BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY
This article investigates the cultural dynamics and tensions of efforts to reform African tax bureaucracies according to contemporary global standards of independence, transparency, and efficiency. Focusing on the controversial establishment of a semi-independent tax authority in Mauritius, the arti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African affairs (London) 2011-07, Vol.110 (440), p.417-437 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 440 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | African affairs (London) |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Hirschmann, David |
description | This article investigates the cultural dynamics and tensions of efforts to reform African tax bureaucracies according to contemporary global standards of independence, transparency, and efficiency. Focusing on the controversial establishment of a semi-independent tax authority in Mauritius, the article perceives tax reform as an uneasy and unstable meeting of different organizational cultures and epistemic communities. Unlike much existing literature -which understands public sector reform within the dichotomy of the modern and the traditional, and a resulting hybridity of bureaucratic culture -the article suggests that the notion of ' tribidity' better describes the reformed Mauritian tax authority. Here, three bureaucratic cultures interact: a global semi-private sector, centred on the performance-based culture of New Public Administration (NPA); a communal culture, emphasizing loyalty, ethnic identity, and union solidarity; and a Weberian culture, where process, hierarchy, and security are fundamental. The unsettled interplay of these overlapping bureaucratic cultures determined the fate of Mauritius's tax reforms, showing how such reform cannot be approached as entirely technical and apolitical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/afraf/adr026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911912177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A263157022</galeid><jstor_id>41240213</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/afraf/adr026</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A263157022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b7e83a36a96ea50a5f79e7131e6eebd1a6ddf41654c6007a6a964ffe764401993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFr2zAUB3BROlja7bbrwPTSy7y-J8mS1VvqurNHlkBmF3ISqiOXBDfOJAe2b19lHhv00p3E-_Pj8fQeIR8QPiModmVaZ9ors3ZAxQmZIBdpTAXFUzIBAIyVAvWWnHm_DSVjKp2Qrzf5ajG_jYrVzbK8LavVdZTVs6pe5tE0xHlVzMssxFE5j6oij75N62VZlfX3aJnf5_M6sLoqFiFbvSNvWtN5-_7Pe07qu7zKini2-FJm01nc8ASG-EHalBkmjBLWJGCSViorkaEV1j6s0Yj1uuUoEt4IAGmOkLetlYJzQKXYObkc--5d_-Ng_aCfNr6xXWd2tj94rRAVUpTydQkUUs7E_0mpmKJBXryQ2_7gduHDOk0xAQz7Dige0aPprN7smn432J9D03edfbQ6rCNb6CkVDBMJ9Nj00-gb13vvbKv3bvNk3C-NoI-n1b9Pq8fT_pu2P-xfkx9HufVD7_5ajpRDmJM9A84CpZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881501621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hirschmann, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirschmann, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article investigates the cultural dynamics and tensions of efforts to reform African tax bureaucracies according to contemporary global standards of independence, transparency, and efficiency. Focusing on the controversial establishment of a semi-independent tax authority in Mauritius, the article perceives tax reform as an uneasy and unstable meeting of different organizational cultures and epistemic communities. Unlike much existing literature -which understands public sector reform within the dichotomy of the modern and the traditional, and a resulting hybridity of bureaucratic culture -the article suggests that the notion of ' tribidity' better describes the reformed Mauritian tax authority. Here, three bureaucratic cultures interact: a global semi-private sector, centred on the performance-based culture of New Public Administration (NPA); a communal culture, emphasizing loyalty, ethnic identity, and union solidarity; and a Weberian culture, where process, hierarchy, and security are fundamental. The unsettled interplay of these overlapping bureaucratic cultures determined the fate of Mauritius's tax reforms, showing how such reform cannot be approached as entirely technical and apolitical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/afraf/adr026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFAFAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>African culture ; Bureaucracy ; Civil service ; Cultural Identity ; Efficiency ; Ethnic Identity ; Ethnicity ; Government bureaucracy ; Hindus ; Loyalty ; Mauritius ; Methods ; Prime ministers ; Private sector ; Public Administration ; Public Sector ; Public-private sector cooperation ; Reform ; Revenue ; Security ; Tax reform ; Tax revenues ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Unionism ; Unions ; Weber, Max</subject><ispartof>African affairs (London), 2011-07, Vol.110 (440), p.417-437</ispartof><rights>Royal African Society 2011</rights><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal African Society. All rights reserved 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jul 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b7e83a36a96ea50a5f79e7131e6eebd1a6ddf41654c6007a6a964ffe764401993</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41240213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41240213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1578,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirschmann, David</creatorcontrib><title>BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY</title><title>African affairs (London)</title><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><description>This article investigates the cultural dynamics and tensions of efforts to reform African tax bureaucracies according to contemporary global standards of independence, transparency, and efficiency. Focusing on the controversial establishment of a semi-independent tax authority in Mauritius, the article perceives tax reform as an uneasy and unstable meeting of different organizational cultures and epistemic communities. Unlike much existing literature -which understands public sector reform within the dichotomy of the modern and the traditional, and a resulting hybridity of bureaucratic culture -the article suggests that the notion of ' tribidity' better describes the reformed Mauritian tax authority. Here, three bureaucratic cultures interact: a global semi-private sector, centred on the performance-based culture of New Public Administration (NPA); a communal culture, emphasizing loyalty, ethnic identity, and union solidarity; and a Weberian culture, where process, hierarchy, and security are fundamental. The unsettled interplay of these overlapping bureaucratic cultures determined the fate of Mauritius's tax reforms, showing how such reform cannot be approached as entirely technical and apolitical.</description><subject>African culture</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Cultural Identity</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ethnic Identity</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Government bureaucracy</subject><subject>Hindus</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Mauritius</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><subject>Public-private sector cooperation</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Tax revenues</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Unionism</subject><subject>Unions</subject><subject>Weber, Max</subject><issn>0001-9909</issn><issn>1468-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UFr2zAUB3BROlja7bbrwPTSy7y-J8mS1VvqurNHlkBmF3ISqiOXBDfOJAe2b19lHhv00p3E-_Pj8fQeIR8QPiModmVaZ9ors3ZAxQmZIBdpTAXFUzIBAIyVAvWWnHm_DSVjKp2Qrzf5ajG_jYrVzbK8LavVdZTVs6pe5tE0xHlVzMssxFE5j6oij75N62VZlfX3aJnf5_M6sLoqFiFbvSNvWtN5-_7Pe07qu7zKini2-FJm01nc8ASG-EHalBkmjBLWJGCSViorkaEV1j6s0Yj1uuUoEt4IAGmOkLetlYJzQKXYObkc--5d_-Ng_aCfNr6xXWd2tj94rRAVUpTydQkUUs7E_0mpmKJBXryQ2_7gduHDOk0xAQz7Dige0aPprN7smn432J9D03edfbQ6rCNb6CkVDBMJ9Nj00-gb13vvbKv3bvNk3C-NoI-n1b9Pq8fT_pu2P-xfkx9HufVD7_5ajpRDmJM9A84CpZI</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Hirschmann, David</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY</title><author>Hirschmann, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-b7e83a36a96ea50a5f79e7131e6eebd1a6ddf41654c6007a6a964ffe764401993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>African culture</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Cultural Identity</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ethnic Identity</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Government bureaucracy</topic><topic>Hindus</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Mauritius</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><topic>Public-private sector cooperation</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Tax revenues</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Unionism</topic><topic>Unions</topic><topic>Weber, Max</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirschmann, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirschmann, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY</atitle><jtitle>African affairs (London)</jtitle><addtitle>African Affairs</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>440</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>417-437</pages><issn>0001-9909</issn><eissn>1468-2621</eissn><coden>AFAFAI</coden><abstract>This article investigates the cultural dynamics and tensions of efforts to reform African tax bureaucracies according to contemporary global standards of independence, transparency, and efficiency. Focusing on the controversial establishment of a semi-independent tax authority in Mauritius, the article perceives tax reform as an uneasy and unstable meeting of different organizational cultures and epistemic communities. Unlike much existing literature -which understands public sector reform within the dichotomy of the modern and the traditional, and a resulting hybridity of bureaucratic culture -the article suggests that the notion of ' tribidity' better describes the reformed Mauritian tax authority. Here, three bureaucratic cultures interact: a global semi-private sector, centred on the performance-based culture of New Public Administration (NPA); a communal culture, emphasizing loyalty, ethnic identity, and union solidarity; and a Weberian culture, where process, hierarchy, and security are fundamental. The unsettled interplay of these overlapping bureaucratic cultures determined the fate of Mauritius's tax reforms, showing how such reform cannot be approached as entirely technical and apolitical.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/afraf/adr026</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-9909 |
ispartof | African affairs (London), 2011-07, Vol.110 (440), p.417-437 |
issn | 0001-9909 1468-2621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911912177 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | African culture Bureaucracy Civil service Cultural Identity Efficiency Ethnic Identity Ethnicity Government bureaucracy Hindus Loyalty Mauritius Methods Prime ministers Private sector Public Administration Public Sector Public-private sector cooperation Reform Revenue Security Tax reform Tax revenues Taxation Taxes Unionism Unions Weber, Max |
title | BEYOND HYBRIDITY: CULTURE AND ETHNICITY IN THE MAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=BEYOND%20HYBRIDITY:%20CULTURE%20AND%20ETHNICITY%20IN%20THE%20MAURITIUS%20REVENUE%20AUTHORITY&rft.jtitle=African%20affairs%20(London)&rft.au=Hirschmann,%20David&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=440&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=417-437&rft.issn=0001-9909&rft.eissn=1468-2621&rft.coden=AFAFAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/afraf/adr026&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA263157022%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881501621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A263157022&rft_jstor_id=41240213&rft_oup_id=10.1093/afraf/adr026&rfr_iscdi=true |