Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity
The artistic representation of British antiquity brings in its wake a problem of methodology: how are the working assumptions of artists and archaeologists to be reconciled? This paper looks at two examples of artists responding to the deep past, both concerned with sites in Wiltshire. Thomas Guest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tate papers 2005-03 (3), p.np-np |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | np |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | np |
container_title | Tate papers |
container_volume | |
creator | Smiles, Sam |
description | The artistic representation of British antiquity brings in its wake a problem of methodology: how are the working assumptions of artists and archaeologists to be reconciled? This paper looks at two examples of artists responding to the deep past, both concerned with sites in Wiltshire. Thomas Guest (1754-1818) painted the grave goods from two barrows at Winterslow excavated in the 1810s. His paintings survived and were rediscovered in the mid-1930s. In that same decade the British artist Paul Nash encountered Avebury for the first time and responded to the prehistoric site in his own terms. The paper considers the two approaches and what they may tell us about the relationship between art and archaeology. (Author abstract) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911909347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1320271468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1317-86bf0f08ae1493fedfbc2c61dbb925924cbb8d2cb21e23bb238b3ffeb6a0d5683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKA0EQRQdRMEb_oXe6Gej3w50GjUJQFxGXoZ9My2RmMt2D-Pd21IUrs6qi6nDr3jqqZkgwUivJ6PGf_rQ6S-kdQi4JQbPKrpt-qxNYTj5loDsHXvTUgiedGhA78BbbnJo4-muQP3rgh5h659N-lRsP9JhjytECPQxjr20Dcg9ux1imTRHLcTfF_HlenQTdJn_xW-fV6_3devFQr56Xj4ubVT0ggkQtuQkwQKk9oooE74Kx2HLkjFGYKUytMdJhazDymBiDiTQkBG-4ho6VPPPq8ke3eNnt82y2MVnftrrz_ZQ2CiEFFaGikFf_kkiU5wiGOTuMEgyxQPT7_gEUEiY5RVyRL1NIfvk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035864169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smiles, Sam</creator><creatorcontrib>Smiles, Sam</creatorcontrib><description>The artistic representation of British antiquity brings in its wake a problem of methodology: how are the working assumptions of artists and archaeologists to be reconciled? This paper looks at two examples of artists responding to the deep past, both concerned with sites in Wiltshire. Thomas Guest (1754-1818) painted the grave goods from two barrows at Winterslow excavated in the 1810s. His paintings survived and were rediscovered in the mid-1930s. In that same decade the British artist Paul Nash encountered Avebury for the first time and responded to the prehistoric site in his own terms. The paper considers the two approaches and what they may tell us about the relationship between art and archaeology. (Author abstract)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-9854</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-9854</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Tate papers, 2005-03 (3), p.np-np</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,30994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smiles, Sam</creatorcontrib><title>Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity</title><title>Tate papers</title><description>The artistic representation of British antiquity brings in its wake a problem of methodology: how are the working assumptions of artists and archaeologists to be reconciled? This paper looks at two examples of artists responding to the deep past, both concerned with sites in Wiltshire. Thomas Guest (1754-1818) painted the grave goods from two barrows at Winterslow excavated in the 1810s. His paintings survived and were rediscovered in the mid-1930s. In that same decade the British artist Paul Nash encountered Avebury for the first time and responded to the prehistoric site in his own terms. The paper considers the two approaches and what they may tell us about the relationship between art and archaeology. (Author abstract)</description><issn>1753-9854</issn><issn>1753-9854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKA0EQRQdRMEb_oXe6Gej3w50GjUJQFxGXoZ9My2RmMt2D-Pd21IUrs6qi6nDr3jqqZkgwUivJ6PGf_rQ6S-kdQi4JQbPKrpt-qxNYTj5loDsHXvTUgiedGhA78BbbnJo4-muQP3rgh5h659N-lRsP9JhjytECPQxjr20Dcg9ux1imTRHLcTfF_HlenQTdJn_xW-fV6_3devFQr56Xj4ubVT0ggkQtuQkwQKk9oooE74Kx2HLkjFGYKUytMdJhazDymBiDiTQkBG-4ho6VPPPq8ke3eNnt82y2MVnftrrz_ZQ2CiEFFaGikFf_kkiU5wiGOTuMEgyxQPT7_gEUEiY5RVyRL1NIfvk</recordid><startdate>20050301</startdate><enddate>20050301</enddate><creator>Smiles, Sam</creator><scope>C18</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050301</creationdate><title>Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity</title><author>Smiles, Sam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1317-86bf0f08ae1493fedfbc2c61dbb925924cbb8d2cb21e23bb238b3ffeb6a0d5683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smiles, Sam</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>Tate papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smiles, Sam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity</atitle><jtitle>Tate papers</jtitle><date>2005-03-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><issue>3</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>np</epage><pages>np-np</pages><issn>1753-9854</issn><eissn>1753-9854</eissn><abstract>The artistic representation of British antiquity brings in its wake a problem of methodology: how are the working assumptions of artists and archaeologists to be reconciled? This paper looks at two examples of artists responding to the deep past, both concerned with sites in Wiltshire. Thomas Guest (1754-1818) painted the grave goods from two barrows at Winterslow excavated in the 1810s. His paintings survived and were rediscovered in the mid-1930s. In that same decade the British artist Paul Nash encountered Avebury for the first time and responded to the prehistoric site in his own terms. The paper considers the two approaches and what they may tell us about the relationship between art and archaeology. (Author abstract)</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-9854 |
ispartof | Tate papers, 2005-03 (3), p.np-np |
issn | 1753-9854 1753-9854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911909347 |
source | ARTbibliographies Modern; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Thomas Guest and Paul Nash in Wiltshire: two episodes in the artistic approach to British antiquity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A49%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thomas%20Guest%20and%20Paul%20Nash%20in%20Wiltshire:%20two%20episodes%20in%20the%20artistic%20approach%20to%20British%20antiquity&rft.jtitle=Tate%20papers&rft.au=Smiles,%20Sam&rft.date=2005-03-01&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=np&rft.pages=np-np&rft.issn=1753-9854&rft.eissn=1753-9854&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1320271468%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035864169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |