Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning

Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640
Hauptverfasser: Langford, William T., Gordon, Ascelin, Bastin, Lucy, Bekessy, Sarah A., White, Matt D., Newell, Graeme
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 640
container_issue 12
container_start_page 634
container_title Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)
container_volume 26
creator Langford, William T.
Gordon, Ascelin
Bastin, Lucy
Bekessy, Sarah A.
White, Matt D.
Newell, Graeme
description Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911166832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534711002333</els_id><sourcerecordid>911166832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VF3AhsxFXM-Y2mQTcSPEGBUF0HTKZM5oyl5pMC317M7TqTrNJFl8O__kROic4I5iI62U2eICMYkIyLDOMyQGaElnQVDLJDtE0IpXmjBcTdBLCEsejuDpGE0qkUorwKeIvxgXXvSfDBySl8Und-yRswwCtGZxNbN8F8Jv47rtk1Ziui_gUHdWmCXC2v2fo7f7udf6YLp4fnua3i9TmtBhSMDmlynIuibBlzmJApqpS5hXPBSkY1IWSUAKvikgUr4SMglrAuIyMsxm62s1d-f5zDWHQrQsWmhgD-nXQihAihGT0f4l53F3k40y6k9b3IXio9cq71vitJliPteqlHmvVY60aSz2mnqGL_fh12UL18-W7xwgu98AEa5ram8668Ot4IQnnIrqbnYNY28aB18E66CxUzoMddNW7v3J8AQ1GlAk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904009654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><description>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21899914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Models, Biological ; Planning Techniques ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam), 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534711002333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24781446$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21899914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Matt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><title>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Planning Techniques</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VF3AhsxFXM-Y2mQTcSPEGBUF0HTKZM5oyl5pMC317M7TqTrNJFl8O__kROic4I5iI62U2eICMYkIyLDOMyQGaElnQVDLJDtE0IpXmjBcTdBLCEsejuDpGE0qkUorwKeIvxgXXvSfDBySl8Und-yRswwCtGZxNbN8F8Jv47rtk1Ziui_gUHdWmCXC2v2fo7f7udf6YLp4fnua3i9TmtBhSMDmlynIuibBlzmJApqpS5hXPBSkY1IWSUAKvikgUr4SMglrAuIyMsxm62s1d-f5zDWHQrQsWmhgD-nXQihAihGT0f4l53F3k40y6k9b3IXio9cq71vitJliPteqlHmvVY60aSz2mnqGL_fh12UL18-W7xwgu98AEa5ram8668Ot4IQnnIrqbnYNY28aB18E66CxUzoMddNW7v3J8AQ1GlAk</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Langford, William T.</creator><creator>Gordon, Ascelin</creator><creator>Bastin, Lucy</creator><creator>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creator><creator>White, Matt D.</creator><creator>Newell, Graeme</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><author>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Planning Techniques</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Matt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, William T.</au><au>Gordon, Ascelin</au><au>Bastin, Lucy</au><au>Bekessy, Sarah A.</au><au>White, Matt D.</au><au>Newell, Graeme</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology &amp; evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>634-640</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21899914</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-5347
ispartof Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640
issn 0169-5347
1872-8383
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911166832
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation of Natural Resources - economics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Models, Biological
Planning Techniques
Uncertainty
title Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Raising%20the%20bar%20for%20systematic%20conservation%20planning&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Langford,%20William%20T.&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=634-640&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911166832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904009654&rft_id=info:pmid/21899914&rft_els_id=S0169534711002333&rfr_iscdi=true