Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning
Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 640 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 634 |
container_title | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Langford, William T. Gordon, Ascelin Bastin, Lucy Bekessy, Sarah A. White, Matt D. Newell, Graeme |
description | Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911166832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534711002333</els_id><sourcerecordid>911166832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VF3AhsxFXM-Y2mQTcSPEGBUF0HTKZM5oyl5pMC317M7TqTrNJFl8O__kROic4I5iI62U2eICMYkIyLDOMyQGaElnQVDLJDtE0IpXmjBcTdBLCEsejuDpGE0qkUorwKeIvxgXXvSfDBySl8Und-yRswwCtGZxNbN8F8Jv47rtk1Ziui_gUHdWmCXC2v2fo7f7udf6YLp4fnua3i9TmtBhSMDmlynIuibBlzmJApqpS5hXPBSkY1IWSUAKvikgUr4SMglrAuIyMsxm62s1d-f5zDWHQrQsWmhgD-nXQihAihGT0f4l53F3k40y6k9b3IXio9cq71vitJliPteqlHmvVY60aSz2mnqGL_fh12UL18-W7xwgu98AEa5ram8668Ot4IQnnIrqbnYNY28aB18E66CxUzoMddNW7v3J8AQ1GlAk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904009654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><description>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21899914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Models, Biological ; Planning Techniques ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534711002333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24781446$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21899914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Matt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><title>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Planning Techniques</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VF3AhsxFXM-Y2mQTcSPEGBUF0HTKZM5oyl5pMC317M7TqTrNJFl8O__kROic4I5iI62U2eICMYkIyLDOMyQGaElnQVDLJDtE0IpXmjBcTdBLCEsejuDpGE0qkUorwKeIvxgXXvSfDBySl8Und-yRswwCtGZxNbN8F8Jv47rtk1Ziui_gUHdWmCXC2v2fo7f7udf6YLp4fnua3i9TmtBhSMDmlynIuibBlzmJApqpS5hXPBSkY1IWSUAKvikgUr4SMglrAuIyMsxm62s1d-f5zDWHQrQsWmhgD-nXQihAihGT0f4l53F3k40y6k9b3IXio9cq71vitJliPteqlHmvVY60aSz2mnqGL_fh12UL18-W7xwgu98AEa5ram8668Ot4IQnnIrqbnYNY28aB18E66CxUzoMddNW7v3J8AQ1GlAk</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Langford, William T.</creator><creator>Gordon, Ascelin</creator><creator>Bastin, Lucy</creator><creator>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creator><creator>White, Matt D.</creator><creator>Newell, Graeme</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</title><author>Langford, William T. ; Gordon, Ascelin ; Bastin, Lucy ; Bekessy, Sarah A. ; White, Matt D. ; Newell, Graeme</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-ea5229c44816cb5300139db85d456173ef798ebe4d748194d680132ce00bdb843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Planning Techniques</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ascelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bekessy, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Matt D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Graeme</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, William T.</au><au>Gordon, Ascelin</au><au>Bastin, Lucy</au><au>Bekessy, Sarah A.</au><au>White, Matt D.</au><au>Newell, Graeme</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>634</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>634-640</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21899914</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-5347 |
ispartof | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2011-12, Vol.26 (12), p.634-640 |
issn | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911166832 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Conservation of Natural Resources - economics Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Models, Biological Planning Techniques Uncertainty |
title | Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A29%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Raising%20the%20bar%20for%20systematic%20conservation%20planning&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Langford,%20William%20T.&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=634&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=634-640&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E911166832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904009654&rft_id=info:pmid/21899914&rft_els_id=S0169534711002333&rfr_iscdi=true |