Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews

Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental conservation 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434
Hauptverfasser: SCULLION, JASON, THOMAS, CRAIG W., VOGT, KRISTINA A., PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO, LOGSDON, MILES G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 4
container_start_page 426
container_title Environmental conservation
container_volume 38
creator SCULLION, JASON
THOMAS, CRAIG W.
VOGT, KRISTINA A.
PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO
LOGSDON, MILES G.
description Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S037689291100052X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S037689291100052X</cupid><jstor_id>44519298</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44519298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVggLDaURcD_sZfVqEClVl2USuwix3MzeJTYwXYG5gl4bRymKhIIVpbv-c65vr5V9ZzgtwST5t0NZo1UmmpCMMaCfn5QrQiXuuZMNQ-r1SLXi_64epLSrjBSNGpV_Tjfm2E22fktyl8Agd-7GPwIPpsBuXEyNqPQo8kcllpCfYgIbEiHlGFECeLeWUjIebQOJsMEFp1ewXdnwxs0pyU2whgyFNT_uhq_QcHXyZWa83kJgG_pafWoN0OCZ3fnSXX7_vzT-mN9ef3hYn12WVvBZK45V6AVpqZRDIRpGOWyEyA5xWYjLLeYEdtTaQTtoFOd1XzTGwUd07JnvWIn1etj7hTD1xlSbkeXLAyD8RDm1Jb_I0IJxgt5-l-SNJISKiSWBX31B7oLc_RljlZjoikjuikQOUI2hpQi9O0U3WjioSW4XXbY_rXD4nlx9OxSDvHewLkoqXqZ5uVR701ozTa61N7eUEwkxkQJSZcp2F1XM3bRbbbw-23_7vsT7C6yvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>901923197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S037689291100052X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biodiversity conservation ; Cloud forests ; Coating ; Coniferous forests ; Conservation ; conservation additionality ; Conservation programs ; Deforestation ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental economics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental protection ; Forest conservation ; Forest cover ; Forests ; interviews ; Landowners ; Landsat ; Mexico ; mixed-methods research ; Monitoring ; Municipalities ; Natural resources conservation ; Payments ; payments for ecosystem services ; Remote sensing ; surveys ; upland forests</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44519298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S037689291100052X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><description>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</description><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Cloud forests</subject><subject>Coating</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation additionality</subject><subject>Conservation programs</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>interviews</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>mixed-methods research</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>upland forests</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVggLDaURcD_sZfVqEClVl2USuwix3MzeJTYwXYG5gl4bRymKhIIVpbv-c65vr5V9ZzgtwST5t0NZo1UmmpCMMaCfn5QrQiXuuZMNQ-r1SLXi_64epLSrjBSNGpV_Tjfm2E22fktyl8Agd-7GPwIPpsBuXEyNqPQo8kcllpCfYgIbEiHlGFECeLeWUjIebQOJsMEFp1ewXdnwxs0pyU2whgyFNT_uhq_QcHXyZWa83kJgG_pafWoN0OCZ3fnSXX7_vzT-mN9ef3hYn12WVvBZK45V6AVpqZRDIRpGOWyEyA5xWYjLLeYEdtTaQTtoFOd1XzTGwUd07JnvWIn1etj7hTD1xlSbkeXLAyD8RDm1Jb_I0IJxgt5-l-SNJISKiSWBX31B7oLc_RljlZjoikjuikQOUI2hpQi9O0U3WjioSW4XXbY_rXD4nlx9OxSDvHewLkoqXqZ5uVR701ozTa61N7eUEwkxkQJSZcp2F1XM3bRbbbw-23_7vsT7C6yvA</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>SCULLION, JASON</creator><creator>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creator><creator>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creator><creator>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creator><creator>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><author>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Cloud forests</topic><topic>Coating</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation additionality</topic><topic>Conservation programs</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>interviews</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>mixed-methods research</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>upland forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCULLION, JASON</au><au>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</au><au>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</au><au>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</au><au>LOGSDON, MILES G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>426-434</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S037689291100052X</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-8929
ispartof Environmental conservation, 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434
issn 0376-8929
1469-4387
1469-4387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158534
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Biodiversity conservation
Cloud forests
Coating
Coniferous forests
Conservation
conservation additionality
Conservation programs
Deforestation
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental conservation
Environmental economics
Environmental impact
Environmental protection
Forest conservation
Forest cover
Forests
interviews
Landowners
Landsat
Mexico
mixed-methods research
Monitoring
Municipalities
Natural resources conservation
Payments
payments for ecosystem services
Remote sensing
surveys
upland forests
title Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20environmental%20impact%20of%20payments%20for%20ecosystem%20services%20in%20Coatepec%20(Mexico)%20using%20remote%20sensing%20and%20on-site%20interviews&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=SCULLION,%20JASON&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=426-434&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S037689291100052X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44519298%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=901923197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S037689291100052X&rft_jstor_id=44519298&rfr_iscdi=true