Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews
Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental conservation 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 426 |
container_title | Environmental conservation |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | SCULLION, JASON THOMAS, CRAIG W. VOGT, KRISTINA A. PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO LOGSDON, MILES G. |
description | Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S037689291100052X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S037689291100052X</cupid><jstor_id>44519298</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44519298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVggLDaURcD_sZfVqEClVl2USuwix3MzeJTYwXYG5gl4bRymKhIIVpbv-c65vr5V9ZzgtwST5t0NZo1UmmpCMMaCfn5QrQiXuuZMNQ-r1SLXi_64epLSrjBSNGpV_Tjfm2E22fktyl8Agd-7GPwIPpsBuXEyNqPQo8kcllpCfYgIbEiHlGFECeLeWUjIebQOJsMEFp1ewXdnwxs0pyU2whgyFNT_uhq_QcHXyZWa83kJgG_pafWoN0OCZ3fnSXX7_vzT-mN9ef3hYn12WVvBZK45V6AVpqZRDIRpGOWyEyA5xWYjLLeYEdtTaQTtoFOd1XzTGwUd07JnvWIn1etj7hTD1xlSbkeXLAyD8RDm1Jb_I0IJxgt5-l-SNJISKiSWBX31B7oLc_RljlZjoikjuikQOUI2hpQi9O0U3WjioSW4XXbY_rXD4nlx9OxSDvHewLkoqXqZ5uVR701ozTa61N7eUEwkxkQJSZcp2F1XM3bRbbbw-23_7vsT7C6yvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>901923197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S037689291100052X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biodiversity conservation ; Cloud forests ; Coating ; Coniferous forests ; Conservation ; conservation additionality ; Conservation programs ; Deforestation ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental economics ; Environmental impact ; Environmental protection ; Forest conservation ; Forest cover ; Forests ; interviews ; Landowners ; Landsat ; Mexico ; mixed-methods research ; Monitoring ; Municipalities ; Natural resources conservation ; Payments ; payments for ecosystem services ; Remote sensing ; surveys ; upland forests</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44519298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S037689291100052X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><description>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</description><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Cloud forests</subject><subject>Coating</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation additionality</subject><subject>Conservation programs</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>interviews</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>mixed-methods research</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>upland forests</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEkPhAVggLDaURcD_sZfVqEClVl2USuwix3MzeJTYwXYG5gl4bRymKhIIVpbv-c65vr5V9ZzgtwST5t0NZo1UmmpCMMaCfn5QrQiXuuZMNQ-r1SLXi_64epLSrjBSNGpV_Tjfm2E22fktyl8Agd-7GPwIPpsBuXEyNqPQo8kcllpCfYgIbEiHlGFECeLeWUjIebQOJsMEFp1ewXdnwxs0pyU2whgyFNT_uhq_QcHXyZWa83kJgG_pafWoN0OCZ3fnSXX7_vzT-mN9ef3hYn12WVvBZK45V6AVpqZRDIRpGOWyEyA5xWYjLLeYEdtTaQTtoFOd1XzTGwUd07JnvWIn1etj7hTD1xlSbkeXLAyD8RDm1Jb_I0IJxgt5-l-SNJISKiSWBX31B7oLc_RljlZjoikjuikQOUI2hpQi9O0U3WjioSW4XXbY_rXD4nlx9OxSDvHewLkoqXqZ5uVR701ozTa61N7eUEwkxkQJSZcp2F1XM3bRbbbw-23_7vsT7C6yvA</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>SCULLION, JASON</creator><creator>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creator><creator>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creator><creator>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creator><creator>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</title><author>SCULLION, JASON ; THOMAS, CRAIG W. ; VOGT, KRISTINA A. ; PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO ; LOGSDON, MILES G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-448e9802a783e5a73246b5e6420ad5c4c031cf26a52beb8bc94dfa8eb396f3f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Cloud forests</topic><topic>Coating</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation additionality</topic><topic>Conservation programs</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>interviews</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>mixed-methods research</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>upland forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCULLION, JASON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOGSDON, MILES G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCULLION, JASON</au><au>THOMAS, CRAIG W.</au><au>VOGT, KRISTINA A.</au><au>PÉREZ-MAQUEO, OCTAVIO</au><au>LOGSDON, MILES G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>426-434</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Over the last decade, hundreds of payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been initiated around the world, but evidence of their environmental benefits remains limited. In this study, two PES programmes operating in the municipality of Coatepec (Mexico) were evaluated to assess their effectiveness in protecting the region's endangered upland forests. Landsat satellite data were analysed to assess changes in forest cover before and after programme implementation using a difference-in-differences estimator. Additionally, surveys and interviews were conducted with local residents and a subset of PES programme participants to evaluate the programmes’ social and environmental impacts, particularly the effect of the programmes on landowner behaviour. The remote-sensing data show that deforestation was substantially lower on properties receiving PES payments compared to properties not enrolled in the programmes, but the programmes did not prevent the net loss of forests within Coatepec. Moreover, the on-site interviews suggest that the payments may have had little impact on deforestation rates, and that other factors contributed to the conservation of forests in PES properties. These findings suggest that risk-targeted payments, robust monitoring and enforcement programmes, and additional conservation initiatives should be included in all PES schemes to ensure environmental effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S037689291100052X</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8929 |
ispartof | Environmental conservation, 2011-12, Vol.38 (4), p.426-434 |
issn | 0376-8929 1469-4387 1469-4387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158534 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Biodiversity conservation Cloud forests Coating Coniferous forests Conservation conservation additionality Conservation programs Deforestation Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental conservation Environmental economics Environmental impact Environmental protection Forest conservation Forest cover Forests interviews Landowners Landsat Mexico mixed-methods research Monitoring Municipalities Natural resources conservation Payments payments for ecosystem services Remote sensing surveys upland forests |
title | Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20environmental%20impact%20of%20payments%20for%20ecosystem%20services%20in%20Coatepec%20(Mexico)%20using%20remote%20sensing%20and%20on-site%20interviews&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=SCULLION,%20JASON&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=426-434&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S037689291100052X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44519298%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=901923197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S037689291100052X&rft_jstor_id=44519298&rfr_iscdi=true |