Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis

The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam) 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198
Hauptverfasser: James, L. Allan, Hodgson, Michael E., Ghoshal, Subhajit, Latiolais, Mary Megison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue 1
container_start_page 181
container_title Geomorphology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 137
creator James, L. Allan
Hodgson, Michael E.
Ghoshal, Subhajit
Latiolais, Mary Megison
description The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X11002923</els_id><sourcerecordid>1762132211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLV0C-ILhksePEfziBSimVirgUqTfLtce7XiVx8GSR-u3r7S4c4WTpze-9seYR8oazNWdcftitN5DHXObtumVP4poJ84ysuFZtI01_95ysKmiavu_vXpJXiDvGWKcMWxG8OnmTp37rpg3QAAv4JeWJ7jFNG7pNuORS56Obkbop0C-X32lIMUKByVfkI73dAl1gnHNxQx2NMOEhIEda_4azW1LV3eSGB0x4Tl5ENyC8Pr1n5OfXy9uLb83Nj6vri883jeuMXBre9YF77qS5l_deB-g6CFoproPqnOhZ1FIzAYyLyEQrICrlZGCacS_aVooz8u6YO5f8aw-42DGhh2FwE-Q9WsM573XX6kq-_yfJlWx5zeS8ovKI-pIRC0Q7lzS68mA5s4c-7M7-6cMe-jjotY9qfHva4dC7IRZXb4d_3W0vhDGqq9ynIwf1NL8TFIs-1TtDSKX2YkNO_1v1CNYwpUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762132211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</creator><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Calibration ; Cartometry ; Change detection ; Construction ; DEMs ; Discrete element method ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Error analysis ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geomorphology ; Geomorphology, landform evolution ; Geomorphometry ; Historic maps ; Internal geophysics ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Surficial geology ; Temporal logic</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25339974$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</title><description>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90 years.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cartometry</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>DEMs</subject><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Geomorphology, landform evolution</subject><subject>Geomorphometry</subject><subject>Historic maps</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Temporal logic</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLV0C-ILhksePEfziBSimVirgUqTfLtce7XiVx8GSR-u3r7S4c4WTpze-9seYR8oazNWdcftitN5DHXObtumVP4poJ84ysuFZtI01_95ysKmiavu_vXpJXiDvGWKcMWxG8OnmTp37rpg3QAAv4JeWJ7jFNG7pNuORS56Obkbop0C-X32lIMUKByVfkI73dAl1gnHNxQx2NMOEhIEda_4azW1LV3eSGB0x4Tl5ENyC8Pr1n5OfXy9uLb83Nj6vri883jeuMXBre9YF77qS5l_deB-g6CFoproPqnOhZ1FIzAYyLyEQrICrlZGCacS_aVooz8u6YO5f8aw-42DGhh2FwE-Q9WsM573XX6kq-_yfJlWx5zeS8ovKI-pIRC0Q7lzS68mA5s4c-7M7-6cMe-jjotY9qfHva4dC7IRZXb4d_3W0vhDGqq9ynIwf1NL8TFIs-1TtDSKX2YkNO_1v1CNYwpUU</recordid><startdate>20120115</startdate><enddate>20120115</enddate><creator>James, L. Allan</creator><creator>Hodgson, Michael E.</creator><creator>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creator><creator>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120115</creationdate><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><author>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cartometry</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>DEMs</topic><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Geomorphology, landform evolution</topic><topic>Geomorphometry</topic><topic>Historic maps</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Temporal logic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, L. Allan</au><au>Hodgson, Michael E.</au><au>Ghoshal, Subhajit</au><au>Latiolais, Mary Megison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2012-01-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>181-198</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90 years.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-555X
ispartof Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198
issn 0169-555X
1872-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158428
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Applied geophysics
Calibration
Cartometry
Change detection
Construction
DEMs
Discrete element method
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Elevation
Error analysis
Exact sciences and technology
Geomorphology
Geomorphology, landform evolution
Geomorphometry
Historic maps
Internal geophysics
Marine and continental quaternary
Surficial geology
Temporal logic
title Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geomorphic%20change%20detection%20using%20historic%20maps%20and%20DEM%20differencing:%20The%20temporal%20dimension%20of%20geospatial%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=James,%20L.%20Allan&rft.date=2012-01-15&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=181-198&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762132211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762132211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X11002923&rfr_iscdi=true