Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis
The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Meth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geomorphology (Amsterdam) 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Geomorphology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | James, L. Allan Hodgson, Michael E. Ghoshal, Subhajit Latiolais, Mary Megison |
description | The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of
geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct
DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90
years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X11002923</els_id><sourcerecordid>1762132211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLV0C-ILhksePEfziBSimVirgUqTfLtce7XiVx8GSR-u3r7S4c4WTpze-9seYR8oazNWdcftitN5DHXObtumVP4poJ84ysuFZtI01_95ysKmiavu_vXpJXiDvGWKcMWxG8OnmTp37rpg3QAAv4JeWJ7jFNG7pNuORS56Obkbop0C-X32lIMUKByVfkI73dAl1gnHNxQx2NMOEhIEda_4azW1LV3eSGB0x4Tl5ENyC8Pr1n5OfXy9uLb83Nj6vri883jeuMXBre9YF77qS5l_deB-g6CFoproPqnOhZ1FIzAYyLyEQrICrlZGCacS_aVooz8u6YO5f8aw-42DGhh2FwE-Q9WsM573XX6kq-_yfJlWx5zeS8ovKI-pIRC0Q7lzS68mA5s4c-7M7-6cMe-jjotY9qfHva4dC7IRZXb4d_3W0vhDGqq9ynIwf1NL8TFIs-1TtDSKX2YkNO_1v1CNYwpUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762132211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</creator><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of
geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct
DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90
years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Calibration ; Cartometry ; Change detection ; Construction ; DEMs ; Discrete element method ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Elevation ; Error analysis ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geomorphology ; Geomorphology, landform evolution ; Geomorphometry ; Historic maps ; Internal geophysics ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Surficial geology ; Temporal logic</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25339974$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</title><description>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of
geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct
DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90
years.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Cartometry</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>DEMs</subject><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Geomorphology, landform evolution</subject><subject>Geomorphometry</subject><subject>Historic maps</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Temporal logic</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLV0C-ILhksePEfziBSimVirgUqTfLtce7XiVx8GSR-u3r7S4c4WTpze-9seYR8oazNWdcftitN5DHXObtumVP4poJ84ysuFZtI01_95ysKmiavu_vXpJXiDvGWKcMWxG8OnmTp37rpg3QAAv4JeWJ7jFNG7pNuORS56Obkbop0C-X32lIMUKByVfkI73dAl1gnHNxQx2NMOEhIEda_4azW1LV3eSGB0x4Tl5ENyC8Pr1n5OfXy9uLb83Nj6vri883jeuMXBre9YF77qS5l_deB-g6CFoproPqnOhZ1FIzAYyLyEQrICrlZGCacS_aVooz8u6YO5f8aw-42DGhh2FwE-Q9WsM573XX6kq-_yfJlWx5zeS8ovKI-pIRC0Q7lzS68mA5s4c-7M7-6cMe-jjotY9qfHva4dC7IRZXb4d_3W0vhDGqq9ynIwf1NL8TFIs-1TtDSKX2YkNO_1v1CNYwpUU</recordid><startdate>20120115</startdate><enddate>20120115</enddate><creator>James, L. Allan</creator><creator>Hodgson, Michael E.</creator><creator>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creator><creator>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120115</creationdate><title>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</title><author>James, L. Allan ; Hodgson, Michael E. ; Ghoshal, Subhajit ; Latiolais, Mary Megison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a496t-145d1c1a69b6bc8de44ed87718d74a350f86803e013f0323ef77a6d0801c32263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Cartometry</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>DEMs</topic><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Geomorphology, landform evolution</topic><topic>Geomorphometry</topic><topic>Historic maps</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Temporal logic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, L. Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghoshal, Subhajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latiolais, Mary Megison</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, L. Allan</au><au>Hodgson, Michael E.</au><au>Ghoshal, Subhajit</au><au>Latiolais, Mary Megison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2012-01-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>181-198</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>The ability to develop spatially distributed models of topographic change is presenting new capabilities in geomorphic research. High resolution maps of elevation change indicate locations, processes, and rates of geomorphic change, and provide a means of calibrating temporal simulation models. Methods of
geomorphic change detection (GCD), based on gridded models, may be applied to a wide range of time periods by utilizing cartometric, remote sensing, or ground-based topographic survey data to measure volumetric change. Advantages and limitations of historical DEM reconstruction methods are reviewed with a focus on coupling them with subsequent DEMs to construct
DEMs of difference (DoD), which can be created by subtracting one elevation model from another, to map erosion, deposition, and volumetric change. The period of DoD analysis can be extended to several decades if accurate historical DEMs can be generated by extracting topographic data from historical data and selecting areas where geomorphic change has been substantial. The challenge is to recognize and minimize uncertainties in data that are particularly elusive with early topographic data. This paper reviews potential sources of error in digitized topographic maps and DEMs. Although the paper is primarily a review of methods, three brief examples are presented at the end to demonstrate GCD using DoDs constructed from data extending over periods ranging from 70 to 90
years.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-555X |
ispartof | Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.181-198 |
issn | 0169-555X 1872-695X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158428 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied geophysics Calibration Cartometry Change detection Construction DEMs Discrete element method Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Elevation Error analysis Exact sciences and technology Geomorphology Geomorphology, landform evolution Geomorphometry Historic maps Internal geophysics Marine and continental quaternary Surficial geology Temporal logic |
title | Geomorphic change detection using historic maps and DEM differencing: The temporal dimension of geospatial analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A11%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geomorphic%20change%20detection%20using%20historic%20maps%20and%20DEM%20differencing:%20The%20temporal%20dimension%20of%20geospatial%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=James,%20L.%20Allan&rft.date=2012-01-15&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=181-198&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762132211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762132211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X11002923&rfr_iscdi=true |