Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools

This paper presents an overview of the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging geophysical tools for landform studies. The objectives are to discuss recent technical developments and to provide a review of relevant recent literature, with a focus on propagating field methods with terrestr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam) 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.57-73
1. Verfasser: Van Dam, Remke L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Geomorphology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 137
creator Van Dam, Remke L.
description This paper presents an overview of the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging geophysical tools for landform studies. The objectives are to discuss recent technical developments and to provide a review of relevant recent literature, with a focus on propagating field methods with terrestrial applications. For various methods in this category, including ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity (ER), seismics, and electromagnetic (EM) induction, the technical backgrounds are introduced, followed by section on novel developments relevant to landform characterization. For several decades, GPR has been popular for characterization of the shallow subsurface and in particular sedimentary systems. Novel developments in GPR include the use of multi-offset systems to improve signal-to-noise ratios and data collection efficiency, amongst others, and the increased use of 3D data. Multi-electrode ER systems have become popular in recent years as they allow for relatively fast and detailed mapping. Novel developments include time-lapse monitoring of dynamic processes as well as the use of capacitively-coupled systems for fast, non-invasive surveys. EM induction methods are especially popular for fast mapping of spatial variation, but can also be used to obtain information on the vertical variation in subsurface electrical conductivity. In recent years several examples of the use of plane wave EM for characterization of landforms have been published. Seismic methods for landform characterization include seismic reflection and refraction techniques and the use of surface waves. A recent development is the use of passive sensing approaches. The use of multiple geophysical methods, which can benefit from the sensitivity to different subsurface parameters, is becoming more common. Strategies for coupled and joint inversion of complementary datasets will, once more widely available, benefit the geophysical study of landforms. Three cases studies are presented on the use of electrical and GPR methods for characterization of landforms in the range of meters to 100 s of meters in dimension. In a study of polygonal patterned ground in the Saginaw Lowlands, Michigan, USA, electrical resistivity tomography was used to characterize differences in subsurface texture and water content associated with polygon-swale topography. Also, a sand-filled thermokarst feature was identified using electrical resistivity data. The second example is on the use of constant s
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X10003934</els_id><sourcerecordid>1671512760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-b64dca945177c5eddbc5b56f1a1e8ddf8e5218ffb16d376d99df165c7ad7748a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2O1DAQRiMEEs3AFSAbBAvSuJLYjneMRvxJLSEBI80Kq9oud7uVxMFOjzSsOAQn5CQ49MASVlZZ7_uq9IriMbA1MBAvD-sdhSHEab-uWf5kas0Yv1OsoJN1JRS_ulusMqgqzvnV_eJBSgfGWCsVWxVfNjhaF-JQmj1GNDNF_w1nH8bymPy4K3P3tL9J3qSf3398JEPjXKK9xtFQelHiNPXe_OaXabQlDRR3S3AOoU8Pi3sO-0SPbt-z4vLN688X76rNh7fvL843Fba8nautaK1B1XKQ0nCydmv4lgsHCNRZ6zriNXTObUHYRgqrlHUguJFopWw7bM6KZ6feKYavR0qzHnwy1Pc4UjgmrQCAd41sM_n8nyQICRxqKVhGxQk1MaQUyekp-gHjjQamF_X6oP-o14t6zZTO6nPw6e0OTAZ7F7Mtn_6ma940SonllicnzmHQuIuZufyUizhjNVOsg0y8OhGU5V17ijoZT9m99ZHMrG3w_zvmF7nWqfo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671512760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Van Dam, Remke L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Dam, Remke L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an overview of the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging geophysical tools for landform studies. The objectives are to discuss recent technical developments and to provide a review of relevant recent literature, with a focus on propagating field methods with terrestrial applications. For various methods in this category, including ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity (ER), seismics, and electromagnetic (EM) induction, the technical backgrounds are introduced, followed by section on novel developments relevant to landform characterization. For several decades, GPR has been popular for characterization of the shallow subsurface and in particular sedimentary systems. Novel developments in GPR include the use of multi-offset systems to improve signal-to-noise ratios and data collection efficiency, amongst others, and the increased use of 3D data. Multi-electrode ER systems have become popular in recent years as they allow for relatively fast and detailed mapping. Novel developments include time-lapse monitoring of dynamic processes as well as the use of capacitively-coupled systems for fast, non-invasive surveys. EM induction methods are especially popular for fast mapping of spatial variation, but can also be used to obtain information on the vertical variation in subsurface electrical conductivity. In recent years several examples of the use of plane wave EM for characterization of landforms have been published. Seismic methods for landform characterization include seismic reflection and refraction techniques and the use of surface waves. A recent development is the use of passive sensing approaches. The use of multiple geophysical methods, which can benefit from the sensitivity to different subsurface parameters, is becoming more common. Strategies for coupled and joint inversion of complementary datasets will, once more widely available, benefit the geophysical study of landforms. Three cases studies are presented on the use of electrical and GPR methods for characterization of landforms in the range of meters to 100 s of meters in dimension. In a study of polygonal patterned ground in the Saginaw Lowlands, Michigan, USA, electrical resistivity tomography was used to characterize differences in subsurface texture and water content associated with polygon-swale topography. Also, a sand-filled thermokarst feature was identified using electrical resistivity data. The second example is on the use of constant spread traversing (CST) for characterization of large-scale glaciotectonic deformation in the Ludington Ridge, Michigan. Multiple CST surveys parallel to an ~ 60 m high cliff, where broad (~ 100 m) synclines and narrow clay-rich anticlines are visible, illustrated that at least one of the narrow structures extended inland. A third case study discusses internal structures of an eolian dune on a coastal spit in New Zealand. Both 35 and 200 MHz GPR data, which clearly identified a paleosol and internal sedimentary structures of the dune, were used to improve understanding of the development of the dune, which may shed light on paleo-wind directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; case studies ; data collection ; deformation ; Dunes ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; electrical conductivity ; electrical resistance ; Electrical resistivity ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geomorphology, landform evolution ; Geophysics ; Ground-penetrating radar ; Internal geophysics ; Landforms ; lowlands ; Marine and continental quaternary ; monitoring ; paleosolic soil types ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic phenomena ; Subsurface characterization ; surface waves ; Surficial geology ; surveys ; Texture ; tomography ; topography ; water content</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.57-73</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-b64dca945177c5eddbc5b56f1a1e8ddf8e5218ffb16d376d99df165c7ad7748a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-b64dca945177c5eddbc5b56f1a1e8ddf8e5218ffb16d376d99df165c7ad7748a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25339964$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Dam, Remke L.</creatorcontrib><title>Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</title><description>This paper presents an overview of the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging geophysical tools for landform studies. The objectives are to discuss recent technical developments and to provide a review of relevant recent literature, with a focus on propagating field methods with terrestrial applications. For various methods in this category, including ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity (ER), seismics, and electromagnetic (EM) induction, the technical backgrounds are introduced, followed by section on novel developments relevant to landform characterization. For several decades, GPR has been popular for characterization of the shallow subsurface and in particular sedimentary systems. Novel developments in GPR include the use of multi-offset systems to improve signal-to-noise ratios and data collection efficiency, amongst others, and the increased use of 3D data. Multi-electrode ER systems have become popular in recent years as they allow for relatively fast and detailed mapping. Novel developments include time-lapse monitoring of dynamic processes as well as the use of capacitively-coupled systems for fast, non-invasive surveys. EM induction methods are especially popular for fast mapping of spatial variation, but can also be used to obtain information on the vertical variation in subsurface electrical conductivity. In recent years several examples of the use of plane wave EM for characterization of landforms have been published. Seismic methods for landform characterization include seismic reflection and refraction techniques and the use of surface waves. A recent development is the use of passive sensing approaches. The use of multiple geophysical methods, which can benefit from the sensitivity to different subsurface parameters, is becoming more common. Strategies for coupled and joint inversion of complementary datasets will, once more widely available, benefit the geophysical study of landforms. Three cases studies are presented on the use of electrical and GPR methods for characterization of landforms in the range of meters to 100 s of meters in dimension. In a study of polygonal patterned ground in the Saginaw Lowlands, Michigan, USA, electrical resistivity tomography was used to characterize differences in subsurface texture and water content associated with polygon-swale topography. Also, a sand-filled thermokarst feature was identified using electrical resistivity data. The second example is on the use of constant spread traversing (CST) for characterization of large-scale glaciotectonic deformation in the Ludington Ridge, Michigan. Multiple CST surveys parallel to an ~ 60 m high cliff, where broad (~ 100 m) synclines and narrow clay-rich anticlines are visible, illustrated that at least one of the narrow structures extended inland. A third case study discusses internal structures of an eolian dune on a coastal spit in New Zealand. Both 35 and 200 MHz GPR data, which clearly identified a paleosol and internal sedimentary structures of the dune, were used to improve understanding of the development of the dune, which may shed light on paleo-wind directions.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>deformation</subject><subject>Dunes</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>electrical conductivity</subject><subject>electrical resistance</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geomorphology, landform evolution</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Ground-penetrating radar</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>lowlands</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>paleosolic soil types</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Subsurface characterization</subject><subject>surface waves</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>tomography</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>water content</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2O1DAQRiMEEs3AFSAbBAvSuJLYjneMRvxJLSEBI80Kq9oud7uVxMFOjzSsOAQn5CQ49MASVlZZ7_uq9IriMbA1MBAvD-sdhSHEab-uWf5kas0Yv1OsoJN1JRS_ulusMqgqzvnV_eJBSgfGWCsVWxVfNjhaF-JQmj1GNDNF_w1nH8bymPy4K3P3tL9J3qSf3398JEPjXKK9xtFQelHiNPXe_OaXabQlDRR3S3AOoU8Pi3sO-0SPbt-z4vLN688X76rNh7fvL843Fba8nautaK1B1XKQ0nCydmv4lgsHCNRZ6zriNXTObUHYRgqrlHUguJFopWw7bM6KZ6feKYavR0qzHnwy1Pc4UjgmrQCAd41sM_n8nyQICRxqKVhGxQk1MaQUyekp-gHjjQamF_X6oP-o14t6zZTO6nPw6e0OTAZ7F7Mtn_6ma940SonllicnzmHQuIuZufyUizhjNVOsg0y8OhGU5V17ijoZT9m99ZHMrG3w_zvmF7nWqfo</recordid><startdate>20120115</startdate><enddate>20120115</enddate><creator>Van Dam, Remke L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120115</creationdate><title>Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools</title><author>Van Dam, Remke L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-b64dca945177c5eddbc5b56f1a1e8ddf8e5218ffb16d376d99df165c7ad7748a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>deformation</topic><topic>Dunes</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>electrical conductivity</topic><topic>electrical resistance</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geomorphology, landform evolution</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Ground-penetrating radar</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>lowlands</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>paleosolic soil types</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Subsurface characterization</topic><topic>surface waves</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>tomography</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Dam, Remke L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Dam, Remke L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2012-01-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>57-73</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an overview of the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging geophysical tools for landform studies. The objectives are to discuss recent technical developments and to provide a review of relevant recent literature, with a focus on propagating field methods with terrestrial applications. For various methods in this category, including ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity (ER), seismics, and electromagnetic (EM) induction, the technical backgrounds are introduced, followed by section on novel developments relevant to landform characterization. For several decades, GPR has been popular for characterization of the shallow subsurface and in particular sedimentary systems. Novel developments in GPR include the use of multi-offset systems to improve signal-to-noise ratios and data collection efficiency, amongst others, and the increased use of 3D data. Multi-electrode ER systems have become popular in recent years as they allow for relatively fast and detailed mapping. Novel developments include time-lapse monitoring of dynamic processes as well as the use of capacitively-coupled systems for fast, non-invasive surveys. EM induction methods are especially popular for fast mapping of spatial variation, but can also be used to obtain information on the vertical variation in subsurface electrical conductivity. In recent years several examples of the use of plane wave EM for characterization of landforms have been published. Seismic methods for landform characterization include seismic reflection and refraction techniques and the use of surface waves. A recent development is the use of passive sensing approaches. The use of multiple geophysical methods, which can benefit from the sensitivity to different subsurface parameters, is becoming more common. Strategies for coupled and joint inversion of complementary datasets will, once more widely available, benefit the geophysical study of landforms. Three cases studies are presented on the use of electrical and GPR methods for characterization of landforms in the range of meters to 100 s of meters in dimension. In a study of polygonal patterned ground in the Saginaw Lowlands, Michigan, USA, electrical resistivity tomography was used to characterize differences in subsurface texture and water content associated with polygon-swale topography. Also, a sand-filled thermokarst feature was identified using electrical resistivity data. The second example is on the use of constant spread traversing (CST) for characterization of large-scale glaciotectonic deformation in the Ludington Ridge, Michigan. Multiple CST surveys parallel to an ~ 60 m high cliff, where broad (~ 100 m) synclines and narrow clay-rich anticlines are visible, illustrated that at least one of the narrow structures extended inland. A third case study discusses internal structures of an eolian dune on a coastal spit in New Zealand. Both 35 and 200 MHz GPR data, which clearly identified a paleosol and internal sedimentary structures of the dune, were used to improve understanding of the development of the dune, which may shed light on paleo-wind directions.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.005</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-555X
ispartof Geomorphology (Amsterdam), 2012-01, Vol.137 (1), p.57-73
issn 0169-555X
1872-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911158374
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Applied geophysics
case studies
data collection
deformation
Dunes
Dynamical systems
Dynamics
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
electrical conductivity
electrical resistance
Electrical resistivity
Exact sciences and technology
Geomorphology, landform evolution
Geophysics
Ground-penetrating radar
Internal geophysics
Landforms
lowlands
Marine and continental quaternary
monitoring
paleosolic soil types
Seismic engineering
Seismic phenomena
Subsurface characterization
surface waves
Surficial geology
surveys
Texture
tomography
topography
water content
title Landform characterization using geophysics—Recent advances, applications, and emerging tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A25%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landform%20characterization%20using%20geophysics%E2%80%94Recent%20advances,%20applications,%20and%20emerging%20tools&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Van%20Dam,%20Remke%20L.&rft.date=2012-01-15&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=57-73&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1671512760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671512760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X10003934&rfr_iscdi=true