Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research

The idea that simulation models of agricultural production can serve as tools for farmers remains a compelling idea even after 3 decades of mostly disappointing development efforts. This paper is the first in a series that reports on 17 years of systems research that used models differently from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop and pasture science 2009-01, Vol.60 (11), p.1017-1030
Hauptverfasser: McCown, R.L, Carberry, P.S, Hochman, Z, Dalgliesh, N.P, Foale, M.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1030
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1017
container_title Crop and pasture science
container_volume 60
creator McCown, R.L
Carberry, P.S
Hochman, Z
Dalgliesh, N.P
Foale, M.A
description The idea that simulation models of agricultural production can serve as tools for farmers remains a compelling idea even after 3 decades of mostly disappointing development efforts. This paper is the first in a series that reports on 17 years of systems research that used models differently from the Decision Support System idea that has dominated the field. The starting point of FARMSCAPE (Farmers’, Advisers’, Researchers’, Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) was finding whether farmers could value simulation when conditions for appreciation were improved by ( a ) specifying the simulator for individual paddocks in question and ( b ) delivering customised simulation to decision makers as a supporting service rather than software as a decision support product. The first aim of the program has been to learn how to effectively intervene in farm management practice using complex, abstract models of croplands, specified with local soil, climate, and management data. The second aim has been to learn how a resulting service that farmers value can be delivered cost effectively by a third party. This first paper deals with an aspect of the first aim, i.e. valued decision support intervention. In the terms used by Checkland (1981) , the activities that served this systems practice aim were guided by ‘what we thought we were doing’ in intervening in farmers’ practice, i.e. our systems thinking . This first paper concerns FARMSCAPE systems thinking and how it evolved over 17 years as we learned successively through discovery of a new concept or representation in the literature to overcome limitations of the then-current conceptual framework. Subsequent papers deal with customising scientific monitoring and simulation for farmers, communication as engagement in situations of practice, understanding decision support intervention as facilitation of personal knowledge construction, and piloting commercial delivery of a simulation-based service to farmers and their advisers.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/CP08455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911147592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>911147592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b4e195a8d64ea70dd409b39aa6599b287ca6ab0b0a837c60068544efae646b783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQhyMEEqUgXgAJXxCnLHbiP_GxWlFAqgRq6Tma2JNdo6wdbIeyT8Er422jcuM0o5lP32h-VfWa0Q2jin3YfqMdF-JJdca6VtZCafF07anm6nn1IqUflEoumDyr_lxj7fwv9Nn5HTkEi1M9QEJLLBqXXPAkLfMcYiZ3Lu_JxZJyhMmBJzYeJ_CWjBAPGNOGsA3Z7sHvTibnM8Z7bTGY4A3OORG7xNOSKXJEiImEkYC5RyKmMjH7l9WzEaaEr9Z6Xt1efvy-_Vxfff30ZXtxVZtWqFwPHJkW0FnJERS1llM9tBpACq2HplMGJAx0oNC1ysjybic4xxFQcjmorj2v3j945xh-Lphyf3DJ4FQ-wrCkXjPGuBK6-UeaGFKKOPZzdAeIx57R_pR4vyZeyHerE5KBaYzgS4SPeNMwyVRHC_f2gRsh9LCLhbm9aShrKZOaU9kWgqw3k4vh0bAe6vPvXJA3_0Hav1qjn6E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>911147592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research</title><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><creator>McCown, R.L ; Carberry, P.S ; Hochman, Z ; Dalgliesh, N.P ; Foale, M.A</creator><creatorcontrib>McCown, R.L ; Carberry, P.S ; Hochman, Z ; Dalgliesh, N.P ; Foale, M.A</creatorcontrib><description>The idea that simulation models of agricultural production can serve as tools for farmers remains a compelling idea even after 3 decades of mostly disappointing development efforts. This paper is the first in a series that reports on 17 years of systems research that used models differently from the Decision Support System idea that has dominated the field. The starting point of FARMSCAPE (Farmers’, Advisers’, Researchers’, Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) was finding whether farmers could value simulation when conditions for appreciation were improved by ( a ) specifying the simulator for individual paddocks in question and ( b ) delivering customised simulation to decision makers as a supporting service rather than software as a decision support product. The first aim of the program has been to learn how to effectively intervene in farm management practice using complex, abstract models of croplands, specified with local soil, climate, and management data. The second aim has been to learn how a resulting service that farmers value can be delivered cost effectively by a third party. This first paper deals with an aspect of the first aim, i.e. valued decision support intervention. In the terms used by Checkland (1981) , the activities that served this systems practice aim were guided by ‘what we thought we were doing’ in intervening in farmers’ practice, i.e. our systems thinking . This first paper concerns FARMSCAPE systems thinking and how it evolved over 17 years as we learned successively through discovery of a new concept or representation in the literature to overcome limitations of the then-current conceptual framework. Subsequent papers deal with customising scientific monitoring and simulation for farmers, communication as engagement in situations of practice, understanding decision support intervention as facilitation of personal knowledge construction, and piloting commercial delivery of a simulation-based service to farmers and their advisers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1836-0947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1836-5795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/CP08455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Collingwood: Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; APSIM ; Biological and medical sciences ; FARMSCAPE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; implementation ; participatory research ; simulation ; soft systems ; Yield Prophet</subject><ispartof>Crop and pasture science, 2009-01, Vol.60 (11), p.1017-1030</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b4e195a8d64ea70dd409b39aa6599b287ca6ab0b0a837c60068544efae646b783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b4e195a8d64ea70dd409b39aa6599b287ca6ab0b0a837c60068544efae646b783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3337,3338,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22161780$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCown, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carberry, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochman, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalgliesh, N.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foale, M.A</creatorcontrib><title>Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research</title><title>Crop and pasture science</title><description>The idea that simulation models of agricultural production can serve as tools for farmers remains a compelling idea even after 3 decades of mostly disappointing development efforts. This paper is the first in a series that reports on 17 years of systems research that used models differently from the Decision Support System idea that has dominated the field. The starting point of FARMSCAPE (Farmers’, Advisers’, Researchers’, Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) was finding whether farmers could value simulation when conditions for appreciation were improved by ( a ) specifying the simulator for individual paddocks in question and ( b ) delivering customised simulation to decision makers as a supporting service rather than software as a decision support product. The first aim of the program has been to learn how to effectively intervene in farm management practice using complex, abstract models of croplands, specified with local soil, climate, and management data. The second aim has been to learn how a resulting service that farmers value can be delivered cost effectively by a third party. This first paper deals with an aspect of the first aim, i.e. valued decision support intervention. In the terms used by Checkland (1981) , the activities that served this systems practice aim were guided by ‘what we thought we were doing’ in intervening in farmers’ practice, i.e. our systems thinking . This first paper concerns FARMSCAPE systems thinking and how it evolved over 17 years as we learned successively through discovery of a new concept or representation in the literature to overcome limitations of the then-current conceptual framework. Subsequent papers deal with customising scientific monitoring and simulation for farmers, communication as engagement in situations of practice, understanding decision support intervention as facilitation of personal knowledge construction, and piloting commercial delivery of a simulation-based service to farmers and their advisers.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>APSIM</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>FARMSCAPE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>implementation</subject><subject>participatory research</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>soft systems</subject><subject>Yield Prophet</subject><issn>1836-0947</issn><issn>1836-5795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQhyMEEqUgXgAJXxCnLHbiP_GxWlFAqgRq6Tma2JNdo6wdbIeyT8Er422jcuM0o5lP32h-VfWa0Q2jin3YfqMdF-JJdca6VtZCafF07anm6nn1IqUflEoumDyr_lxj7fwv9Nn5HTkEi1M9QEJLLBqXXPAkLfMcYiZ3Lu_JxZJyhMmBJzYeJ_CWjBAPGNOGsA3Z7sHvTibnM8Z7bTGY4A3OORG7xNOSKXJEiImEkYC5RyKmMjH7l9WzEaaEr9Z6Xt1efvy-_Vxfff30ZXtxVZtWqFwPHJkW0FnJERS1llM9tBpACq2HplMGJAx0oNC1ysjybic4xxFQcjmorj2v3j945xh-Lphyf3DJ4FQ-wrCkXjPGuBK6-UeaGFKKOPZzdAeIx57R_pR4vyZeyHerE5KBaYzgS4SPeNMwyVRHC_f2gRsh9LCLhbm9aShrKZOaU9kWgqw3k4vh0bAe6vPvXJA3_0Hav1qjn6E</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>McCown, R.L</creator><creator>Carberry, P.S</creator><creator>Hochman, Z</creator><creator>Dalgliesh, N.P</creator><creator>Foale, M.A</creator><general>Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing</general><general>CSIRO Publishing</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research</title><author>McCown, R.L ; Carberry, P.S ; Hochman, Z ; Dalgliesh, N.P ; Foale, M.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b4e195a8d64ea70dd409b39aa6599b287ca6ab0b0a837c60068544efae646b783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>APSIM</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>FARMSCAPE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>implementation</topic><topic>participatory research</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>soft systems</topic><topic>Yield Prophet</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCown, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carberry, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochman, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalgliesh, N.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foale, M.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop and pasture science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCown, R.L</au><au>Carberry, P.S</au><au>Hochman, Z</au><au>Dalgliesh, N.P</au><au>Foale, M.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research</atitle><jtitle>Crop and pasture science</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1017</spage><epage>1030</epage><pages>1017-1030</pages><issn>1836-0947</issn><eissn>1836-5795</eissn><abstract>The idea that simulation models of agricultural production can serve as tools for farmers remains a compelling idea even after 3 decades of mostly disappointing development efforts. This paper is the first in a series that reports on 17 years of systems research that used models differently from the Decision Support System idea that has dominated the field. The starting point of FARMSCAPE (Farmers’, Advisers’, Researchers’, Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) was finding whether farmers could value simulation when conditions for appreciation were improved by ( a ) specifying the simulator for individual paddocks in question and ( b ) delivering customised simulation to decision makers as a supporting service rather than software as a decision support product. The first aim of the program has been to learn how to effectively intervene in farm management practice using complex, abstract models of croplands, specified with local soil, climate, and management data. The second aim has been to learn how a resulting service that farmers value can be delivered cost effectively by a third party. This first paper deals with an aspect of the first aim, i.e. valued decision support intervention. In the terms used by Checkland (1981) , the activities that served this systems practice aim were guided by ‘what we thought we were doing’ in intervening in farmers’ practice, i.e. our systems thinking . This first paper concerns FARMSCAPE systems thinking and how it evolved over 17 years as we learned successively through discovery of a new concept or representation in the literature to overcome limitations of the then-current conceptual framework. Subsequent papers deal with customising scientific monitoring and simulation for farmers, communication as engagement in situations of practice, understanding decision support intervention as facilitation of personal knowledge construction, and piloting commercial delivery of a simulation-based service to farmers and their advisers.</abstract><cop>Collingwood</cop><pub>Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing</pub><doi>10.1071/CP08455</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1836-0947
ispartof Crop and pasture science, 2009-01, Vol.60 (11), p.1017-1030
issn 1836-0947
1836-5795
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_911147592
source CSIRO Publishing Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
APSIM
Biological and medical sciences
FARMSCAPE
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
implementation
participatory research
simulation
soft systems
Yield Prophet
title Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T02%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-inventing%20model-based%20decision%20support%20with%20Australian%20dryland%20farmers.%201.%20Changing%20intervention%20concepts%20during%2017%20years%20of%20action%20research&rft.jtitle=Crop%20and%20pasture%20science&rft.au=McCown,%20R.L&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1017&rft.epage=1030&rft.pages=1017-1030&rft.issn=1836-0947&rft.eissn=1836-5795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/CP08455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E911147592%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=911147592&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true