Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?

A previously described ( Windschnurer et al., 2009) avoidance distance test was used to assess animals’ fear of humans in order to quantify the human–animal relationship (HAR). This study investigated the influence of the dominant and flightiest animals within a group on the responsiveness of animal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied animal behaviour science 2011-07, Vol.132 (3), p.107-113
Hauptverfasser: Mazurek, Mickael, McGee, Mark, Minchin, William, Crowe, Mark A., Earley, Bernadette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 3
container_start_page 107
container_title Applied animal behaviour science
container_volume 132
creator Mazurek, Mickael
McGee, Mark
Minchin, William
Crowe, Mark A.
Earley, Bernadette
description A previously described ( Windschnurer et al., 2009) avoidance distance test was used to assess animals’ fear of humans in order to quantify the human–animal relationship (HAR). This study investigated the influence of the dominant and flightiest animals within a group on the responsiveness of animals during the avoidance distance test. Eighty-eight pregnant heifers comprised of four different genotypes were used (22 animals per genotype): Limousin × Holstein-Friesian, Limousin × Simmental, Charolais × Limousin, and Charolais × Simmental. Sixty of the 88 heifers were group housed ( n = 5) into 12 pens with 3 pens per breed, while 28 heifers were singly housed (seven heifers per breed). A reactivity test was performed on days 10, 18, 25 and 30 post-housing on the singly housed heifers, and then on the group housed heifers, on the same days, to calculate a reactivity score. On days 33 and 37 flight and dominance tests, respectively, were performed to identify the flightiest and the dominant animal within each group. On day 41, an avoidance test, measuring both the avoidance distance towards a familiar and an unfamiliar human, was performed on all heifers. No difference ( P > 0.05) in reactivity scores was found between the genotypes, between pens for the group housed heifers or between singly housed and group housed heifers ( P = 0.28). The avoidance distance (AD) of singly (S) housed heifers towards a familiar (F) (ADSF) human was shorter ( P < 0.001) than the avoidance distance of group (G) housed heifers towards an unfamiliar human (ADSU). The ADSF and ADGF were correlated with the ADSU and ADGU ( R = 0.87 for singly housed heifers; R = 0.61 for group housed heifers, P < 0.001). For the singly housed heifers, no correlation was observed between reactivity score and ADSF ( R = 0.36, P = 0.18), whereas the reactivity score and ADSU were correlated ( R = 0.68, P = 0.004). For the group housed heifers no significant correlation was detected between the reactivity score and ADGF ( R = 0.18, P = 0.22) or ADGU ( R = −0.11, P = 0.39). No influence of the most dominant animal and the flightiest animals was found on the behaviour of the group in term of avoidance distance and reactivity ( P > 0.05). It is concluded that the assessment of the fear of the animals towards humans using the avoidance test at the feed bunk may be useful for singly and group housed heifers and that the leaders of a group such as the flightiest animal or the dominant animal did not influenc
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_910639969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168159111000815</els_id><sourcerecordid>910639969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a06405d8f65ad7588dded9eacf87cc00085df59bc1cf7908106d3939444638d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb2O1DAUhS0EEsPCK4A7qoTrceLYFaAVPyutRAFbW17_zHiUxME3GWk7XoOCl-NJcCZQU9mSv3POvT6EvGRQM2Dizak209SbMQ71HhirgdcA7BHZMdntKwVN-5jsCigr1ir2lDxDPAFAyxnsyK8bpPPRU3NO0ZnReuoizpfL7HGmIeXtHdEjDn6caQp0DTM9_v7xk2aPUxoxnv1YADonelwGMyKNY-gXX4wcvX-gPhaXzcqlIY5mNco09PFwnOOatHkW2QU65LRMb5-TJ6Hk-Bd_zyty9_HDt-vP1e2XTzfX728ry4WcKwOigdbJIFrjulZK57xT3tggO2vLrrJ1oVX3ltnQKZAMhOOKq6ZpBJeu41fk9eY75fR9KdPoIaL1fflVnxbUqii4UkIVUmykzQkx-6CnXObOD5qBXuvQJ_2vDr3WoYHrUkcRvtqEwSRtDjmivvtagKaMB3sBUIh3G-HLpufos0YbLx8Ys7ezdin-L-QPVL6kwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>910639969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mazurek, Mickael ; McGee, Mark ; Minchin, William ; Crowe, Mark A. ; Earley, Bernadette</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, Mickael ; McGee, Mark ; Minchin, William ; Crowe, Mark A. ; Earley, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><description>A previously described ( Windschnurer et al., 2009) avoidance distance test was used to assess animals’ fear of humans in order to quantify the human–animal relationship (HAR). This study investigated the influence of the dominant and flightiest animals within a group on the responsiveness of animals during the avoidance distance test. Eighty-eight pregnant heifers comprised of four different genotypes were used (22 animals per genotype): Limousin × Holstein-Friesian, Limousin × Simmental, Charolais × Limousin, and Charolais × Simmental. Sixty of the 88 heifers were group housed ( n = 5) into 12 pens with 3 pens per breed, while 28 heifers were singly housed (seven heifers per breed). A reactivity test was performed on days 10, 18, 25 and 30 post-housing on the singly housed heifers, and then on the group housed heifers, on the same days, to calculate a reactivity score. On days 33 and 37 flight and dominance tests, respectively, were performed to identify the flightiest and the dominant animal within each group. On day 41, an avoidance test, measuring both the avoidance distance towards a familiar and an unfamiliar human, was performed on all heifers. No difference ( P &gt; 0.05) in reactivity scores was found between the genotypes, between pens for the group housed heifers or between singly housed and group housed heifers ( P = 0.28). The avoidance distance (AD) of singly (S) housed heifers towards a familiar (F) (ADSF) human was shorter ( P &lt; 0.001) than the avoidance distance of group (G) housed heifers towards an unfamiliar human (ADSU). The ADSF and ADGF were correlated with the ADSU and ADGU ( R = 0.87 for singly housed heifers; R = 0.61 for group housed heifers, P &lt; 0.001). For the singly housed heifers, no correlation was observed between reactivity score and ADSF ( R = 0.36, P = 0.18), whereas the reactivity score and ADSU were correlated ( R = 0.68, P = 0.004). For the group housed heifers no significant correlation was detected between the reactivity score and ADGF ( R = 0.18, P = 0.22) or ADGU ( R = −0.11, P = 0.39). No influence of the most dominant animal and the flightiest animals was found on the behaviour of the group in term of avoidance distance and reactivity ( P &gt; 0.05). It is concluded that the assessment of the fear of the animals towards humans using the avoidance test at the feed bunk may be useful for singly and group housed heifers and that the leaders of a group such as the flightiest animal or the dominant animal did not influence the avoidance distance test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Avoidance distance ; Cattle ; Dominance ; flight ; genotype ; group behavior ; heifers ; humans ; Human–animal relationship (HAR)</subject><ispartof>Applied animal behaviour science, 2011-07, Vol.132 (3), p.107-113</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a06405d8f65ad7588dded9eacf87cc00085df59bc1cf7908106d3939444638d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a06405d8f65ad7588dded9eacf87cc00085df59bc1cf7908106d3939444638d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159111000815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><title>Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?</title><title>Applied animal behaviour science</title><description>A previously described ( Windschnurer et al., 2009) avoidance distance test was used to assess animals’ fear of humans in order to quantify the human–animal relationship (HAR). This study investigated the influence of the dominant and flightiest animals within a group on the responsiveness of animals during the avoidance distance test. Eighty-eight pregnant heifers comprised of four different genotypes were used (22 animals per genotype): Limousin × Holstein-Friesian, Limousin × Simmental, Charolais × Limousin, and Charolais × Simmental. Sixty of the 88 heifers were group housed ( n = 5) into 12 pens with 3 pens per breed, while 28 heifers were singly housed (seven heifers per breed). A reactivity test was performed on days 10, 18, 25 and 30 post-housing on the singly housed heifers, and then on the group housed heifers, on the same days, to calculate a reactivity score. On days 33 and 37 flight and dominance tests, respectively, were performed to identify the flightiest and the dominant animal within each group. On day 41, an avoidance test, measuring both the avoidance distance towards a familiar and an unfamiliar human, was performed on all heifers. No difference ( P &gt; 0.05) in reactivity scores was found between the genotypes, between pens for the group housed heifers or between singly housed and group housed heifers ( P = 0.28). The avoidance distance (AD) of singly (S) housed heifers towards a familiar (F) (ADSF) human was shorter ( P &lt; 0.001) than the avoidance distance of group (G) housed heifers towards an unfamiliar human (ADSU). The ADSF and ADGF were correlated with the ADSU and ADGU ( R = 0.87 for singly housed heifers; R = 0.61 for group housed heifers, P &lt; 0.001). For the singly housed heifers, no correlation was observed between reactivity score and ADSF ( R = 0.36, P = 0.18), whereas the reactivity score and ADSU were correlated ( R = 0.68, P = 0.004). For the group housed heifers no significant correlation was detected between the reactivity score and ADGF ( R = 0.18, P = 0.22) or ADGU ( R = −0.11, P = 0.39). No influence of the most dominant animal and the flightiest animals was found on the behaviour of the group in term of avoidance distance and reactivity ( P &gt; 0.05). It is concluded that the assessment of the fear of the animals towards humans using the avoidance test at the feed bunk may be useful for singly and group housed heifers and that the leaders of a group such as the flightiest animal or the dominant animal did not influence the avoidance distance test.</description><subject>Avoidance distance</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>flight</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>group behavior</subject><subject>heifers</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Human–animal relationship (HAR)</subject><issn>0168-1591</issn><issn>1872-9045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb2O1DAUhS0EEsPCK4A7qoTrceLYFaAVPyutRAFbW17_zHiUxME3GWk7XoOCl-NJcCZQU9mSv3POvT6EvGRQM2Dizak209SbMQ71HhirgdcA7BHZMdntKwVN-5jsCigr1ir2lDxDPAFAyxnsyK8bpPPRU3NO0ZnReuoizpfL7HGmIeXtHdEjDn6caQp0DTM9_v7xk2aPUxoxnv1YADonelwGMyKNY-gXX4wcvX-gPhaXzcqlIY5mNco09PFwnOOatHkW2QU65LRMb5-TJ6Hk-Bd_zyty9_HDt-vP1e2XTzfX728ry4WcKwOigdbJIFrjulZK57xT3tggO2vLrrJ1oVX3ltnQKZAMhOOKq6ZpBJeu41fk9eY75fR9KdPoIaL1fflVnxbUqii4UkIVUmykzQkx-6CnXObOD5qBXuvQJ_2vDr3WoYHrUkcRvtqEwSRtDjmivvtagKaMB3sBUIh3G-HLpufos0YbLx8Ys7ezdin-L-QPVL6kwQ</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Mazurek, Mickael</creator><creator>McGee, Mark</creator><creator>Minchin, William</creator><creator>Crowe, Mark A.</creator><creator>Earley, Bernadette</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?</title><author>Mazurek, Mickael ; McGee, Mark ; Minchin, William ; Crowe, Mark A. ; Earley, Bernadette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a06405d8f65ad7588dded9eacf87cc00085df59bc1cf7908106d3939444638d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Avoidance distance</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>flight</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>group behavior</topic><topic>heifers</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Human–animal relationship (HAR)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazurek, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGee, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazurek, Mickael</au><au>McGee, Mark</au><au>Minchin, William</au><au>Crowe, Mark A.</au><au>Earley, Bernadette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?</atitle><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>107-113</pages><issn>0168-1591</issn><eissn>1872-9045</eissn><abstract>A previously described ( Windschnurer et al., 2009) avoidance distance test was used to assess animals’ fear of humans in order to quantify the human–animal relationship (HAR). This study investigated the influence of the dominant and flightiest animals within a group on the responsiveness of animals during the avoidance distance test. Eighty-eight pregnant heifers comprised of four different genotypes were used (22 animals per genotype): Limousin × Holstein-Friesian, Limousin × Simmental, Charolais × Limousin, and Charolais × Simmental. Sixty of the 88 heifers were group housed ( n = 5) into 12 pens with 3 pens per breed, while 28 heifers were singly housed (seven heifers per breed). A reactivity test was performed on days 10, 18, 25 and 30 post-housing on the singly housed heifers, and then on the group housed heifers, on the same days, to calculate a reactivity score. On days 33 and 37 flight and dominance tests, respectively, were performed to identify the flightiest and the dominant animal within each group. On day 41, an avoidance test, measuring both the avoidance distance towards a familiar and an unfamiliar human, was performed on all heifers. No difference ( P &gt; 0.05) in reactivity scores was found between the genotypes, between pens for the group housed heifers or between singly housed and group housed heifers ( P = 0.28). The avoidance distance (AD) of singly (S) housed heifers towards a familiar (F) (ADSF) human was shorter ( P &lt; 0.001) than the avoidance distance of group (G) housed heifers towards an unfamiliar human (ADSU). The ADSF and ADGF were correlated with the ADSU and ADGU ( R = 0.87 for singly housed heifers; R = 0.61 for group housed heifers, P &lt; 0.001). For the singly housed heifers, no correlation was observed between reactivity score and ADSF ( R = 0.36, P = 0.18), whereas the reactivity score and ADSU were correlated ( R = 0.68, P = 0.004). For the group housed heifers no significant correlation was detected between the reactivity score and ADGF ( R = 0.18, P = 0.22) or ADGU ( R = −0.11, P = 0.39). No influence of the most dominant animal and the flightiest animals was found on the behaviour of the group in term of avoidance distance and reactivity ( P &gt; 0.05). It is concluded that the assessment of the fear of the animals towards humans using the avoidance test at the feed bunk may be useful for singly and group housed heifers and that the leaders of a group such as the flightiest animal or the dominant animal did not influence the avoidance distance test.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1591
ispartof Applied animal behaviour science, 2011-07, Vol.132 (3), p.107-113
issn 0168-1591
1872-9045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_910639969
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Avoidance distance
Cattle
Dominance
flight
genotype
group behavior
heifers
humans
Human–animal relationship (HAR)
title Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A00%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20avoidance%20distance%20test%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20animals%E2%80%99%20responsiveness%20to%20humans%20influenced%20by%20either%20the%20dominant%20or%20flightiest%20animal%20in%20the%20group?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20animal%20behaviour%20science&rft.au=Mazurek,%20Mickael&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=107-113&rft.issn=0168-1591&rft.eissn=1872-9045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E910639969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=910639969&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168159111000815&rfr_iscdi=true