The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings
In The Origin of Perspective, Hubert Damisch wrote that 'painting not only shows but thinks'. This paper starts from the question whether a painting can have a 'thought' in addition to showing a narrative, conveying a message, or carrying a meaning behind its realistic appearance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford art journal 2011-03, Vol.34 (1), p.13-30 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Oxford art journal |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Grootenboer, Hanneke |
description | In The Origin of Perspective, Hubert Damisch wrote that 'painting not only shows but thinks'. This paper starts from the question whether a painting can have a 'thought' in addition to showing a narrative, conveying a message, or carrying a meaning behind its realistic appearance. Within the framework of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's What is Philosophy? which offers a theory on thought in painting and Nicolas Poussin's notion of la pensée, it will be argued that paintings can be pensive in that they offer a visual reflection on issues on truth and resemblance, the finite and infinity, or the status of a point versus that of the sign in painting. A comparison between an early eighteenth-century flower still life by the Dutch painter Jan van Huysum and Paul Klee's Equals Infinity (1932) will demonstrate that both early modern and modern art may struggle with quite similar, philosophical problems, which, rather than illustrating, they "think through" visually. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxartj/kcr011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_908490621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41315361</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41315361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-8b8f9d444a300ba0ae2d75d16d3c37c351934ccb32c63b2c9d209e6c407105393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo0dhb_USO5vZ7Ga9SbG2UqhgPYfNZtOm5qNmk2L_vSkRjyrMMJdnhoGXkGsGdwwUjqtPXTfb8bupgbETMmCSM0_6oTwlA2Dc90TA4ZxcOLcFAKGkGJDpamPpiy1dtrd0Xui1vafLkq42VbveNDQr6bMu6b7rWXtwbTFy9LXJ8pwusrRb1FnZZOXaXZKzVOfOXn3PIXmbPq4mM2-xfJpPHhaeQQWNF8ZhqhLOuUaAWIO2fiKDhIkEDUqDAVPIjYnRNwJj36jEB2WF4SAZBKhwSEb93V1dfbTWNVGROWPzXJe2al2kIOQKhM86efurZBKRyVCEwd8UfUDZ1T-uAoqukB9f9Xpq6sq52qbRrs4KXR86FB3zivq8oj6vzt_0fuuaqv7BnCELUDD8AslQkO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036036349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><creator>Grootenboer, Hanneke</creator><creatorcontrib>Grootenboer, Hanneke</creatorcontrib><description>In The Origin of Perspective, Hubert Damisch wrote that 'painting not only shows but thinks'. This paper starts from the question whether a painting can have a 'thought' in addition to showing a narrative, conveying a message, or carrying a meaning behind its realistic appearance. Within the framework of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's What is Philosophy? which offers a theory on thought in painting and Nicolas Poussin's notion of la pensée, it will be argued that paintings can be pensive in that they offer a visual reflection on issues on truth and resemblance, the finite and infinity, or the status of a point versus that of the sign in painting. A comparison between an early eighteenth-century flower still life by the Dutch painter Jan van Huysum and Paul Klee's Equals Infinity (1932) will demonstrate that both early modern and modern art may struggle with quite similar, philosophical problems, which, rather than illustrating, they "think through" visually.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-7287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxartj/kcr011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstract art ; Artistic realism ; Colors ; Infinity ; Modern art ; Paints ; Petals ; Thought</subject><ispartof>Oxford art journal, 2011-03, Vol.34 (1), p.13-30</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-8b8f9d444a300ba0ae2d75d16d3c37c351934ccb32c63b2c9d209e6c407105393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41315361$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41315361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,30971,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grootenboer, Hanneke</creatorcontrib><title>The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings</title><title>Oxford art journal</title><description>In The Origin of Perspective, Hubert Damisch wrote that 'painting not only shows but thinks'. This paper starts from the question whether a painting can have a 'thought' in addition to showing a narrative, conveying a message, or carrying a meaning behind its realistic appearance. Within the framework of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's What is Philosophy? which offers a theory on thought in painting and Nicolas Poussin's notion of la pensée, it will be argued that paintings can be pensive in that they offer a visual reflection on issues on truth and resemblance, the finite and infinity, or the status of a point versus that of the sign in painting. A comparison between an early eighteenth-century flower still life by the Dutch painter Jan van Huysum and Paul Klee's Equals Infinity (1932) will demonstrate that both early modern and modern art may struggle with quite similar, philosophical problems, which, rather than illustrating, they "think through" visually.</description><subject>Abstract art</subject><subject>Artistic realism</subject><subject>Colors</subject><subject>Infinity</subject><subject>Modern art</subject><subject>Paints</subject><subject>Petals</subject><subject>Thought</subject><issn>0142-6540</issn><issn>1741-7287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo0dhb_USO5vZ7Ga9SbG2UqhgPYfNZtOm5qNmk2L_vSkRjyrMMJdnhoGXkGsGdwwUjqtPXTfb8bupgbETMmCSM0_6oTwlA2Dc90TA4ZxcOLcFAKGkGJDpamPpiy1dtrd0Xui1vafLkq42VbveNDQr6bMu6b7rWXtwbTFy9LXJ8pwusrRb1FnZZOXaXZKzVOfOXn3PIXmbPq4mM2-xfJpPHhaeQQWNF8ZhqhLOuUaAWIO2fiKDhIkEDUqDAVPIjYnRNwJj36jEB2WF4SAZBKhwSEb93V1dfbTWNVGROWPzXJe2al2kIOQKhM86efurZBKRyVCEwd8UfUDZ1T-uAoqukB9f9Xpq6sq52qbRrs4KXR86FB3zivq8oj6vzt_0fuuaqv7BnCELUDD8AslQkO8</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Grootenboer, Hanneke</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings</title><author>Grootenboer, Hanneke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-8b8f9d444a300ba0ae2d75d16d3c37c351934ccb32c63b2c9d209e6c407105393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Abstract art</topic><topic>Artistic realism</topic><topic>Colors</topic><topic>Infinity</topic><topic>Modern art</topic><topic>Paints</topic><topic>Petals</topic><topic>Thought</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grootenboer, Hanneke</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>Oxford art journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grootenboer, Hanneke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings</atitle><jtitle>Oxford art journal</jtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>13-30</pages><issn>0142-6540</issn><eissn>1741-7287</eissn><abstract>In The Origin of Perspective, Hubert Damisch wrote that 'painting not only shows but thinks'. This paper starts from the question whether a painting can have a 'thought' in addition to showing a narrative, conveying a message, or carrying a meaning behind its realistic appearance. Within the framework of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's What is Philosophy? which offers a theory on thought in painting and Nicolas Poussin's notion of la pensée, it will be argued that paintings can be pensive in that they offer a visual reflection on issues on truth and resemblance, the finite and infinity, or the status of a point versus that of the sign in painting. A comparison between an early eighteenth-century flower still life by the Dutch painter Jan van Huysum and Paul Klee's Equals Infinity (1932) will demonstrate that both early modern and modern art may struggle with quite similar, philosophical problems, which, rather than illustrating, they "think through" visually.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxartj/kcr011</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-6540 |
ispartof | Oxford art journal, 2011-03, Vol.34 (1), p.13-30 |
issn | 0142-6540 1741-7287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_908490621 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); ARTbibliographies Modern |
subjects | Abstract art Artistic realism Colors Infinity Modern art Paints Petals Thought |
title | The Pensive Image: On Thought in Jan van Huysum's Still Life Paintings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A14%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Pensive%20Image:%20On%20Thought%20in%20Jan%20van%20Huysum's%20Still%20Life%20Paintings&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20art%20journal&rft.au=Grootenboer,%20Hanneke&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=13-30&rft.issn=0142-6540&rft.eissn=1741-7287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxartj/kcr011&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41315361%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036036349&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41315361&rfr_iscdi=true |