Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis
Objective. This article presents an updated meta-analysis of field and laboratory studies that examine the influence of age on a number of evaluative workplace outcomes (advancement, selection, general evaluations, interpersonal skills, and reliability). Method. A random effects meta-analytic proced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2011-11, Vol.66B (6), p.687-698 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 698 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 687 |
container_title | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences |
container_volume | 66B |
creator | Bal, Anne C. Reiss, Abigail E. B. Rudolph, Cort W. Baltes, Boris B. |
description | Objective.
This article presents an updated meta-analysis of field and laboratory studies that examine the influence of age on a number of evaluative workplace outcomes (advancement, selection, general evaluations, interpersonal skills, and reliability).
Method.
A random effects meta-analytic procedure was used.
Results.
In line with the perspective that perceptions of older workers are multidimensional, the observed meta-analytic correlations indicate that age has medium-sized negative effects on majority of the outcomes investigated (r
advancement = −.21, r
selection = −.30, r
general evaluations = −.24, and r
interpersonal skills = −.23, and a medium-sized positive effect on perceptions of reliability (r
reliability = .31). Additionally, evidence of moderation by study design for the selection outcome is presented, such that within-subjects designs elicit stronger effects of age than between-subjects designs.
Discussion.
The present study demonstrates that it is likely that older workers are not viewed entirely negatively or entirely positively in the workplace; rather, the perceptions of older workers are more are varied, and even positive in some cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geronb/gbr056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_908020513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/geronb/gbr056</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2521338111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-3d8583226651e25d39219ae9c046bfa7d3dbfeed745fbf56a69e4e190d25b41b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0Utv1DAQAOAIgWgpHLmiCAnRS1q_H72tqhYQLe0BxNFy4sniksTBTqruv8fbLEXqBSyNx7Y-jcaaoniN0RFGmh6vIYahPl7XEXHxpNjHkquKU6Ge5jOSuuIIs73iRUo3KC8s2fNij2CJtaBsv7g8u7O9H_ywLq9D8pO_hdIOrvwCa3t_uYbYwDj5MKQytOVV5yCW30P8CTGdlKvyEiZbrQbbbZJPL4tnre0SvNrlg-Lb-dnX04_VxdWHT6eri6rhBE8VdYorSogQHAPhjmqCtQXdICbq1kpHXd0COMl4W7dcWKGBAdbIEV4zXNOD4v1Sd4zh1wxpMr1PDXSdHSDMyWikEEEc0_-QSBDJkMjy7SN5E-aYP7ZFAivEEcmoWlATQ0oRWjNG39u4MRiZ7TzMMg-zzCP7z4uPMELzgMM87tytoVaIOu-bHARhnJPfPuYYt1lJI7QyP6Y-V3uza3Gue3AP5f6MM4N3O2BTY7s22qHx6a9jUglEeXaHi8uN_OMHvwERRrrZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>906180502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bal, Anne C. ; Reiss, Abigail E. B. ; Rudolph, Cort W. ; Baltes, Boris B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bal, Anne C. ; Reiss, Abigail E. B. ; Rudolph, Cort W. ; Baltes, Boris B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective.
This article presents an updated meta-analysis of field and laboratory studies that examine the influence of age on a number of evaluative workplace outcomes (advancement, selection, general evaluations, interpersonal skills, and reliability).
Method.
A random effects meta-analytic procedure was used.
Results.
In line with the perspective that perceptions of older workers are multidimensional, the observed meta-analytic correlations indicate that age has medium-sized negative effects on majority of the outcomes investigated (r
advancement = −.21, r
selection = −.30, r
general evaluations = −.24, and r
interpersonal skills = −.23, and a medium-sized positive effect on perceptions of reliability (r
reliability = .31). Additionally, evidence of moderation by study design for the selection outcome is presented, such that within-subjects designs elicit stronger effects of age than between-subjects designs.
Discussion.
The present study demonstrates that it is likely that older workers are not viewed entirely negatively or entirely positively in the workplace; rather, the perceptions of older workers are more are varied, and even positive in some cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbr056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21719634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGBSF3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult. Elderly ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Developmental psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interprofessional Relations ; Job Satisfaction ; Labour force ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Middle Aged ; Moderation ; Occupational Diseases ; Occupational psychology ; Older people ; Older workers ; Perceptions ; Personal Satisfaction ; Prejudice ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reliability ; Social Perception ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Work condition. Job performance. Stress ; Workplace - statistics & numerical data ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2011-11, Vol.66B (6), p.687-698</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-3d8583226651e25d39219ae9c046bfa7d3dbfeed745fbf56a69e4e190d25b41b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-3d8583226651e25d39219ae9c046bfa7d3dbfeed745fbf56a69e4e190d25b41b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,3993,27903,27904,30978,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24786035$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21719634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/oupgeronb/v_3a66b_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a687-698.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bal, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Abigail E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Cort W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltes, Boris B.</creatorcontrib><title>Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><description>Objective.
This article presents an updated meta-analysis of field and laboratory studies that examine the influence of age on a number of evaluative workplace outcomes (advancement, selection, general evaluations, interpersonal skills, and reliability).
Method.
A random effects meta-analytic procedure was used.
Results.
In line with the perspective that perceptions of older workers are multidimensional, the observed meta-analytic correlations indicate that age has medium-sized negative effects on majority of the outcomes investigated (r
advancement = −.21, r
selection = −.30, r
general evaluations = −.24, and r
interpersonal skills = −.23, and a medium-sized positive effect on perceptions of reliability (r
reliability = .31). Additionally, evidence of moderation by study design for the selection outcome is presented, such that within-subjects designs elicit stronger effects of age than between-subjects designs.
Discussion.
The present study demonstrates that it is likely that older workers are not viewed entirely negatively or entirely positively in the workplace; rather, the perceptions of older workers are more are varied, and even positive in some cases.</description><subject>Adult. Elderly</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Labour force</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Moderation</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Older workers</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</subject><subject>Workplace - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0Utv1DAQAOAIgWgpHLmiCAnRS1q_H72tqhYQLe0BxNFy4sniksTBTqruv8fbLEXqBSyNx7Y-jcaaoniN0RFGmh6vIYahPl7XEXHxpNjHkquKU6Ge5jOSuuIIs73iRUo3KC8s2fNij2CJtaBsv7g8u7O9H_ywLq9D8pO_hdIOrvwCa3t_uYbYwDj5MKQytOVV5yCW30P8CTGdlKvyEiZbrQbbbZJPL4tnre0SvNrlg-Lb-dnX04_VxdWHT6eri6rhBE8VdYorSogQHAPhjmqCtQXdICbq1kpHXd0COMl4W7dcWKGBAdbIEV4zXNOD4v1Sd4zh1wxpMr1PDXSdHSDMyWikEEEc0_-QSBDJkMjy7SN5E-aYP7ZFAivEEcmoWlATQ0oRWjNG39u4MRiZ7TzMMg-zzCP7z4uPMELzgMM87tytoVaIOu-bHARhnJPfPuYYt1lJI7QyP6Y-V3uza3Gue3AP5f6MM4N3O2BTY7s22qHx6a9jUglEeXaHi8uN_OMHvwERRrrZ</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Bal, Anne C.</creator><creator>Reiss, Abigail E. B.</creator><creator>Rudolph, Cort W.</creator><creator>Baltes, Boris B.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press for Gerontological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Bal, Anne C. ; Reiss, Abigail E. B. ; Rudolph, Cort W. ; Baltes, Boris B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-3d8583226651e25d39219ae9c046bfa7d3dbfeed745fbf56a69e4e190d25b41b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult. Elderly</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Labour force</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Moderation</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Older workers</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</topic><topic>Workplace - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bal, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Abigail E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Cort W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltes, Boris B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bal, Anne C.</au><au>Reiss, Abigail E. B.</au><au>Rudolph, Cort W.</au><au>Baltes, Boris B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>66B</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>687</spage><epage>698</epage><pages>687-698</pages><issn>1079-5014</issn><eissn>1758-5368</eissn><coden>JGBSF3</coden><abstract>Objective.
This article presents an updated meta-analysis of field and laboratory studies that examine the influence of age on a number of evaluative workplace outcomes (advancement, selection, general evaluations, interpersonal skills, and reliability).
Method.
A random effects meta-analytic procedure was used.
Results.
In line with the perspective that perceptions of older workers are multidimensional, the observed meta-analytic correlations indicate that age has medium-sized negative effects on majority of the outcomes investigated (r
advancement = −.21, r
selection = −.30, r
general evaluations = −.24, and r
interpersonal skills = −.23, and a medium-sized positive effect on perceptions of reliability (r
reliability = .31). Additionally, evidence of moderation by study design for the selection outcome is presented, such that within-subjects designs elicit stronger effects of age than between-subjects designs.
Discussion.
The present study demonstrates that it is likely that older workers are not viewed entirely negatively or entirely positively in the workplace; rather, the perceptions of older workers are more are varied, and even positive in some cases.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21719634</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronb/gbr056</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-5014 |
ispartof | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2011-11, Vol.66B (6), p.687-698 |
issn | 1079-5014 1758-5368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_908020513 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; RePEc; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult. Elderly Age Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Developmental psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gerontology Humans Interpersonal Relations Interprofessional Relations Job Satisfaction Labour force Male Meta-analysis Middle Aged Moderation Occupational Diseases Occupational psychology Older people Older workers Perceptions Personal Satisfaction Prejudice Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reliability Social Perception Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Work condition. Job performance. Stress Workplace - statistics & numerical data Workplaces |
title | Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A59%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Perceptions%20of%20Older%20Workers:%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20B,%20Psychological%20sciences%20and%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Bal,%20Anne%20C.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=66B&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=687&rft.epage=698&rft.pages=687-698&rft.issn=1079-5014&rft.eissn=1758-5368&rft.coden=JGBSF3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbr056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2521338111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=906180502&rft_id=info:pmid/21719634&rft_oup_id=10.1093/geronb/gbr056&rfr_iscdi=true |