A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size
The mean magnitude of relative error, MMRE, is the de facto standard evaluation criterion to assess the accuracy of software project prediction models. The fundamental metric of MMRE is MRE, a relative residual error. For MMRE to be a meaningful summary statistic, it is a necessary, but not sufficie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Empirical software engineering : an international journal 2003-06, Vol.8 (2), p.139-161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Empirical software engineering : an international journal |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Stensrud, Erik Foss, Tron Kitchenham, Barbara Myrtveit, Ingunn |
description | The mean magnitude of relative error, MMRE, is the de facto standard evaluation criterion to assess the accuracy of software project prediction models. The fundamental metric of MMRE is MRE, a relative residual error. For MMRE to be a meaningful summary statistic, it is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition that MRE and project size are uncorrelated. Except for two previous conference studies done by the same authors, it has never been empirically validated that MRE and project size really are uncorrelated. In this paper, we extend the previous studies using the same data sets as before: Albrecht, Kemerer, Finnish, DMR and Accenture-ERP. Unlike the previous studies, we plot MRE against the predicted effort rather than against the actual effort and, in so doing, we obtain very different results from the previous studies. The results of this study suggest that MRE and project size are uncorrelated, which apparently is contradictory to the previous results where we found a negative correlation. The explanation for these seemingly contradictory results is presented in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1023010612345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907959157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>907959157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-e0c538c013d41427a67159d5b671783b62606f914d8532d37dafb8779cbbfe333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUws1oMMAVsX_zFVqoUKhWBAsyV4zjUVZqUOAGJX48LTAxMz53eR6e7Q-iUkktKGFxNrncglAjKIOV7aES5hEQKKvZjDYolwLg4REchrAkhWqZ8hPIJng1dv3IdzjZb33lrajxv3l3o_avpfdvgtsIxx7mrv_uw8lt84_oP5xp8n2fYNCV-7Nq1sz1-8p_uGB1Upg7u5Jdj9DLLnqd3yeLhdj6dLBLLlO4TRywHZQmFMqUpk0ZIynXJi0ipoBBMEFFpmpaKAytBlqYqlJTaFkXlAGCMLn7mbrv2bYgLLzc-WFfXpnHtEJaaSM317gljdP6vyaRSUmsVxbM_4roduiZesYyCEEyxFL4AY4xq3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>879662824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Stensrud, Erik ; Foss, Tron ; Kitchenham, Barbara ; Myrtveit, Ingunn</creator><creatorcontrib>Stensrud, Erik ; Foss, Tron ; Kitchenham, Barbara ; Myrtveit, Ingunn</creatorcontrib><description>The mean magnitude of relative error, MMRE, is the de facto standard evaluation criterion to assess the accuracy of software project prediction models. The fundamental metric of MMRE is MRE, a relative residual error. For MMRE to be a meaningful summary statistic, it is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition that MRE and project size are uncorrelated. Except for two previous conference studies done by the same authors, it has never been empirically validated that MRE and project size really are uncorrelated. In this paper, we extend the previous studies using the same data sets as before: Albrecht, Kemerer, Finnish, DMR and Accenture-ERP. Unlike the previous studies, we plot MRE against the predicted effort rather than against the actual effort and, in so doing, we obtain very different results from the previous studies. The results of this study suggest that MRE and project size are uncorrelated, which apparently is contradictory to the previous results where we found a negative correlation. The explanation for these seemingly contradictory results is presented in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-3256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1023010612345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Computer programs ; Conferences ; Empirical analysis ; Errors ; Software ; Statistics ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Empirical software engineering : an international journal, 2003-06, Vol.8 (2), p.139-161</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-e0c538c013d41427a67159d5b671783b62606f914d8532d37dafb8779cbbfe333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stensrud, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foss, Tron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchenham, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myrtveit, Ingunn</creatorcontrib><title>A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size</title><title>Empirical software engineering : an international journal</title><description>The mean magnitude of relative error, MMRE, is the de facto standard evaluation criterion to assess the accuracy of software project prediction models. The fundamental metric of MMRE is MRE, a relative residual error. For MMRE to be a meaningful summary statistic, it is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition that MRE and project size are uncorrelated. Except for two previous conference studies done by the same authors, it has never been empirically validated that MRE and project size really are uncorrelated. In this paper, we extend the previous studies using the same data sets as before: Albrecht, Kemerer, Finnish, DMR and Accenture-ERP. Unlike the previous studies, we plot MRE against the predicted effort rather than against the actual effort and, in so doing, we obtain very different results from the previous studies. The results of this study suggest that MRE and project size are uncorrelated, which apparently is contradictory to the previous results where we found a negative correlation. The explanation for these seemingly contradictory results is presented in this study.</description><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1382-3256</issn><issn>1573-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUws1oMMAVsX_zFVqoUKhWBAsyV4zjUVZqUOAGJX48LTAxMz53eR6e7Q-iUkktKGFxNrncglAjKIOV7aES5hEQKKvZjDYolwLg4REchrAkhWqZ8hPIJng1dv3IdzjZb33lrajxv3l3o_avpfdvgtsIxx7mrv_uw8lt84_oP5xp8n2fYNCV-7Nq1sz1-8p_uGB1Upg7u5Jdj9DLLnqd3yeLhdj6dLBLLlO4TRywHZQmFMqUpk0ZIynXJi0ipoBBMEFFpmpaKAytBlqYqlJTaFkXlAGCMLn7mbrv2bYgLLzc-WFfXpnHtEJaaSM317gljdP6vyaRSUmsVxbM_4roduiZesYyCEEyxFL4AY4xq3Q</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Stensrud, Erik</creator><creator>Foss, Tron</creator><creator>Kitchenham, Barbara</creator><creator>Myrtveit, Ingunn</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>S0W</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size</title><author>Stensrud, Erik ; Foss, Tron ; Kitchenham, Barbara ; Myrtveit, Ingunn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-e0c538c013d41427a67159d5b671783b62606f914d8532d37dafb8779cbbfe333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stensrud, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foss, Tron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchenham, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myrtveit, Ingunn</creatorcontrib><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection</collection><jtitle>Empirical software engineering : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stensrud, Erik</au><au>Foss, Tron</au><au>Kitchenham, Barbara</au><au>Myrtveit, Ingunn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size</atitle><jtitle>Empirical software engineering : an international journal</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>139-161</pages><issn>1382-3256</issn><eissn>1573-7616</eissn><abstract>The mean magnitude of relative error, MMRE, is the de facto standard evaluation criterion to assess the accuracy of software project prediction models. The fundamental metric of MMRE is MRE, a relative residual error. For MMRE to be a meaningful summary statistic, it is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition that MRE and project size are uncorrelated. Except for two previous conference studies done by the same authors, it has never been empirically validated that MRE and project size really are uncorrelated. In this paper, we extend the previous studies using the same data sets as before: Albrecht, Kemerer, Finnish, DMR and Accenture-ERP. Unlike the previous studies, we plot MRE against the predicted effort rather than against the actual effort and, in so doing, we obtain very different results from the previous studies. The results of this study suggest that MRE and project size are uncorrelated, which apparently is contradictory to the previous results where we found a negative correlation. The explanation for these seemingly contradictory results is presented in this study.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1023010612345</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-3256 |
ispartof | Empirical software engineering : an international journal, 2003-06, Vol.8 (2), p.139-161 |
issn | 1382-3256 1573-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907959157 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Computer programs Conferences Empirical analysis Errors Software Statistics Studies |
title | A Further Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between MRE and Project Size |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Further%20Empirical%20Investigation%20of%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20MRE%20and%20Project%20Size&rft.jtitle=Empirical%20software%20engineering%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=Stensrud,%20Erik&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=139-161&rft.issn=1382-3256&rft.eissn=1573-7616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1023010612345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E907959157%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=879662824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |