A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities
The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electronic commerce research 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Electronic commerce research |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Rahim, Md Mahbubur Shanks, Graeme Johnston, Robert B. |
description | The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907932716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311775511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLvixlU0SdukWQ6DfzDgxlmHNE2HDG1Tc1Nh3t7MVBAEVzfcnO-DexC6peSBEiIegRLOCSaUYElEgeUZWtBSMCxzzs7TO68kLkWZX6IrgD0hjAhWLNB2lZngATI3NBPEcMiM70cdHPgh821aRxuwDzs9ONDR-UF3GRwg2j5l-rGzvR3i6SPTJrovF52Fa3TR6g7szc9cou3z08f6FW_eX97Wqw02uagiLmtey7bIW8HKipmqkqWW0pRa103DeC2EoZIb21asEHWrE9gQQ3k6WNua03yJ7ufeMfjPyUJUvQNju04P1k-gkgqZM0F5Iu_-kHs_hXQMqIoTxooikUtEZ-ikJNhWjcH1OhwUJeqoWc2aVdJ87C7UMcPmDCR22NnwW_x_6BvXg4GQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>860224479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><description>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-5753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Automotive components ; Automotive industry ; Business and Management ; Business to business commerce ; Case studies ; Classification ; Comparative analysis ; Computer Communication Networks ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Decision making ; e-Commerce/e-business ; EDI ; Electronic commerce ; Electronic data interchange ; Empirical analysis ; Information systems ; IT in Business ; Lenses ; Manufacturing ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Order processing ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Proprietary ; Similarity ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Electronic commerce research, 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><title>Electronic commerce research</title><addtitle>Electron Commer Res</addtitle><description>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</description><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive industry</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business to business commerce</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>e-Commerce/e-business</subject><subject>EDI</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Electronic data interchange</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Order processing</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Proprietary</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1389-5753</issn><issn>1572-9362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLvixlU0SdukWQ6DfzDgxlmHNE2HDG1Tc1Nh3t7MVBAEVzfcnO-DexC6peSBEiIegRLOCSaUYElEgeUZWtBSMCxzzs7TO68kLkWZX6IrgD0hjAhWLNB2lZngATI3NBPEcMiM70cdHPgh821aRxuwDzs9ONDR-UF3GRwg2j5l-rGzvR3i6SPTJrovF52Fa3TR6g7szc9cou3z08f6FW_eX97Wqw02uagiLmtey7bIW8HKipmqkqWW0pRa103DeC2EoZIb21asEHWrE9gQQ3k6WNua03yJ7ufeMfjPyUJUvQNju04P1k-gkgqZM0F5Iu_-kHs_hXQMqIoTxooikUtEZ-ikJNhWjcH1OhwUJeqoWc2aVdJ87C7UMcPmDCR22NnwW_x_6BvXg4GQ</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creator><creator>Shanks, Graeme</creator><creator>Johnston, Robert B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><author>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive industry</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business to business commerce</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>e-Commerce/e-business</topic><topic>EDI</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Electronic data interchange</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Order processing</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Proprietary</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</au><au>Shanks, Graeme</au><au>Johnston, Robert B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</atitle><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle><stitle>Electron Commer Res</stitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>215-243</pages><issn>1389-5753</issn><eissn>1572-9362</eissn><abstract>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-5753 |
ispartof | Electronic commerce research, 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243 |
issn | 1389-5753 1572-9362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907932716 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Automotive components Automotive industry Business and Management Business to business commerce Case studies Classification Comparative analysis Computer Communication Networks Data Structures and Information Theory Decision making e-Commerce/e-business EDI Electronic commerce Electronic data interchange Empirical analysis Information systems IT in Business Lenses Manufacturing Operations Research/Decision Theory Order processing Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceuticals Proprietary Similarity Studies Supply chains |
title | A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross%20industry%20comparison%20of%20inter-organisational%20systems%20implementation%20activities&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20commerce%20research&rft.au=Rahim,%20Md%20Mahbubur&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=215-243&rft.issn=1389-5753&rft.eissn=1572-9362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311775511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=860224479&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |