A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities

The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electronic commerce research 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243
Hauptverfasser: Rahim, Md Mahbubur, Shanks, Graeme, Johnston, Robert B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 243
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title Electronic commerce research
container_volume 11
creator Rahim, Md Mahbubur
Shanks, Graeme
Johnston, Robert B.
description The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907932716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311775511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLvixlU0SdukWQ6DfzDgxlmHNE2HDG1Tc1Nh3t7MVBAEVzfcnO-DexC6peSBEiIegRLOCSaUYElEgeUZWtBSMCxzzs7TO68kLkWZX6IrgD0hjAhWLNB2lZngATI3NBPEcMiM70cdHPgh821aRxuwDzs9ONDR-UF3GRwg2j5l-rGzvR3i6SPTJrovF52Fa3TR6g7szc9cou3z08f6FW_eX97Wqw02uagiLmtey7bIW8HKipmqkqWW0pRa103DeC2EoZIb21asEHWrE9gQQ3k6WNua03yJ7ufeMfjPyUJUvQNju04P1k-gkgqZM0F5Iu_-kHs_hXQMqIoTxooikUtEZ-ikJNhWjcH1OhwUJeqoWc2aVdJ87C7UMcPmDCR22NnwW_x_6BvXg4GQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>860224479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><description>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-5753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Automotive components ; Automotive industry ; Business and Management ; Business to business commerce ; Case studies ; Classification ; Comparative analysis ; Computer Communication Networks ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Decision making ; e-Commerce/e-business ; EDI ; Electronic commerce ; Electronic data interchange ; Empirical analysis ; Information systems ; IT in Business ; Lenses ; Manufacturing ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Order processing ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceuticals ; Proprietary ; Similarity ; Studies ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Electronic commerce research, 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><title>Electronic commerce research</title><addtitle>Electron Commer Res</addtitle><description>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</description><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive industry</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business to business commerce</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>e-Commerce/e-business</subject><subject>EDI</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Electronic data interchange</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Order processing</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Proprietary</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1389-5753</issn><issn>1572-9362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAURoMoOI4-gLvixlU0SdukWQ6DfzDgxlmHNE2HDG1Tc1Nh3t7MVBAEVzfcnO-DexC6peSBEiIegRLOCSaUYElEgeUZWtBSMCxzzs7TO68kLkWZX6IrgD0hjAhWLNB2lZngATI3NBPEcMiM70cdHPgh821aRxuwDzs9ONDR-UF3GRwg2j5l-rGzvR3i6SPTJrovF52Fa3TR6g7szc9cou3z08f6FW_eX97Wqw02uagiLmtey7bIW8HKipmqkqWW0pRa103DeC2EoZIb21asEHWrE9gQQ3k6WNua03yJ7ufeMfjPyUJUvQNju04P1k-gkgqZM0F5Iu_-kHs_hXQMqIoTxooikUtEZ-ikJNhWjcH1OhwUJeqoWc2aVdJ87C7UMcPmDCR22NnwW_x_6BvXg4GQ</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creator><creator>Shanks, Graeme</creator><creator>Johnston, Robert B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</title><author>Rahim, Md Mahbubur ; Shanks, Graeme ; Johnston, Robert B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-5b6b9f43f72582c8895a99c5aabdd26b77c196cef8247bfa3f7d0c16007aeb613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive industry</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business to business commerce</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>e-Commerce/e-business</topic><topic>EDI</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Electronic data interchange</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Order processing</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Proprietary</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Graeme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahim, Md Mahbubur</au><au>Shanks, Graeme</au><au>Johnston, Robert B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities</atitle><jtitle>Electronic commerce research</jtitle><stitle>Electron Commer Res</stitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>215-243</pages><issn>1389-5753</issn><eissn>1572-9362</eissn><abstract>The Inter-organisational systems (IOS) Motivation Model (IMM) has recently been proposed as a theory that explains variations in IOS implementation processes initiated by organisations. The IMM classifies IOS adoption projects (regardless of the underlying technology used) into four generic motivation scenarios and explains different implementation processes for each motivation scenario. The theory was tested in the Australian pharmaceutical industry where it received broad support. In order to enhance its generality, in this study we explore the applicability of part of the IMM theory to a different industry context by addressing the research objective that organisations with the same motive for implementing an IOS initiate the same implementation activities regardless of differences in the industry contexts within which they operate. We have used a multiple case study approach and compared the implementation of a proprietary in-house built e-ordering system in a large Australian pharmaceutical manufacturing company with that of a web-based EDI system used by a large automotive manufacturing company using IMM as a theoretical lens. The empirical results indicate a striking similarity in the implementation processes of these two different IOS applications; this can largely be explained using the IMM theory. Furthermore, the differences in industry contexts do not appear to have a direct influence on the activities associated with implementing these systems.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-5753
ispartof Electronic commerce research, 2011-05, Vol.11 (2), p.215-243
issn 1389-5753
1572-9362
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907932716
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Automotive components
Automotive industry
Business and Management
Business to business commerce
Case studies
Classification
Comparative analysis
Computer Communication Networks
Data Structures and Information Theory
Decision making
e-Commerce/e-business
EDI
Electronic commerce
Electronic data interchange
Empirical analysis
Information systems
IT in Business
Lenses
Manufacturing
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Order processing
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmaceuticals
Proprietary
Similarity
Studies
Supply chains
title A cross industry comparison of inter-organisational systems implementation activities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross%20industry%20comparison%20of%20inter-organisational%20systems%20implementation%20activities&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20commerce%20research&rft.au=Rahim,%20Md%20Mahbubur&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=215-243&rft.issn=1389-5753&rft.eissn=1572-9362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10660-010-9074-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311775511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=860224479&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true