Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling

Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 2010-09, Vol.115 (F3), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Haviv, I., Enzel, Y., Whipple, K. X., Zilberman, E., Matmon, A., Stone, J., Fifield, K. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue F3
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
container_volume 115
creator Haviv, I.
Enzel, Y.
Whipple, K. X.
Zilberman, E.
Matmon, A.
Stone, J.
Fifield, K. L.
description Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1) face failure mechanisms, (2) flow acceleration and amplified erosion above a knickpoint lip, (3) deposition and removal of coarse debris below the knickpoint, and (4) base level lowering or tectonic uplift rates. Our model demonstrates that knickpoint retreat rate, where the subcaprock is weak or vertically jointed and base level fall rates are steady, is likely to become tied to downstream conditions and equal to the downstream incision rate divided by channel gradient. Mechanically, this coupling occurs where the subcaprock reaches a threshold height for failure in shear or buckling or where the weathering rate of the subcaprock is higher than the downstream incision wave velocity (Vi_ds). The height of the subcaprock face can influence its gravitational stability and the knickpoint lateral erosion rate and lead to a feedback between downstream incision and retreat rate. Retreat rate can be lower than Vi_ds during transients, which could be long (>106 years) and set by the weathering rate of the subcaprock or influenced by lag debris evacuation. Key variables other than discharge can be important in setting retreat rates. These include base level lowering rate, the rock strength of stratigraphic units downstream of the knickpoint, and the size and flux of sediment contributed from above the knickpoint or from the canyon walls. Two types of oversteepened reaches can form in association with a vertical knickpoint: (1) an upstream, free fall‐induced, oversteepened reach whose length is longer than the flow acceleration zone and (2) a downstream coarse debris‐induced oversteepened reach. Although the model was constructed with caprock‐type knickpoints in mind, some of its elements and insights are also relevant to homogenous substrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2008JF001187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907931337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709788774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5413-38d7ae60d21204c76a58f78c2c7d12df1d57f9dd12ad2825a1aac72001c326d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhidGEze1N38AMTG2iaPwwQzgrandbZuqia7xSAgwW7ozsIWZrv33pd2mMR7KBQ7P-4Tve6vqLcGfCAb5GTAW53OMCRH8RTUD0rQ1AIaX1QwTJmoMwF9X-zlf4XJY0zJMZtXq5Cb20-hjQLFDNy6N3ugerYM36030YczoYKtHlzrd9_kQbf14iZLLPo86jMjoTYpm_QWdhexXl4XuUhxQmAaXHkRDtK73YfWmelUM2e0_3nvV7_nJ8vi0vvixODs-uqh1wwitqbBcuxZbIICZ4a1uRMeFAcMtAdsR2_BO2vLWFgQ0mmhteBmdGAqtFXSv-rDzln9dTy6PavDZuL7XwcUpK4m5pIRSXsiDZ0nCseRCcM4K-u4_9CpOKZQ5lCSslQ3Qe-jjDjIp5pxcpzbJDzrdKoLVfUPq34YK_v7RqXNZVJd0MD4_ZYBSyaSEwpEdt_W9u33Wqc4XP-eNpCVT7zKlJff3KaPTWrWc8kb9-b5Qi6-_4HS5_KYYvQP6B60a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>914695234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haviv, I. ; Enzel, Y. ; Whipple, K. X. ; Zilberman, E. ; Matmon, A. ; Stone, J. ; Fifield, K. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haviv, I. ; Enzel, Y. ; Whipple, K. X. ; Zilberman, E. ; Matmon, A. ; Stone, J. ; Fifield, K. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1) face failure mechanisms, (2) flow acceleration and amplified erosion above a knickpoint lip, (3) deposition and removal of coarse debris below the knickpoint, and (4) base level lowering or tectonic uplift rates. Our model demonstrates that knickpoint retreat rate, where the subcaprock is weak or vertically jointed and base level fall rates are steady, is likely to become tied to downstream conditions and equal to the downstream incision rate divided by channel gradient. Mechanically, this coupling occurs where the subcaprock reaches a threshold height for failure in shear or buckling or where the weathering rate of the subcaprock is higher than the downstream incision wave velocity (Vi_ds). The height of the subcaprock face can influence its gravitational stability and the knickpoint lateral erosion rate and lead to a feedback between downstream incision and retreat rate. Retreat rate can be lower than Vi_ds during transients, which could be long (&gt;106 years) and set by the weathering rate of the subcaprock or influenced by lag debris evacuation. Key variables other than discharge can be important in setting retreat rates. These include base level lowering rate, the rock strength of stratigraphic units downstream of the knickpoint, and the size and flux of sediment contributed from above the knickpoint or from the canyon walls. Two types of oversteepened reaches can form in association with a vertical knickpoint: (1) an upstream, free fall‐induced, oversteepened reach whose length is longer than the flow acceleration zone and (2) a downstream coarse debris‐induced oversteepened reach. Although the model was constructed with caprock‐type knickpoints in mind, some of its elements and insights are also relevant to homogenous substrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2008JF001187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accelerated flow ; Acceleration ; Canyons ; Channels ; Coarsening ; Detritus ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Erosion rates ; Evolution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure ; Geomorphology ; Hydrology ; knickpoint ; Mathematical models ; modeling ; Rivers ; Shear ; Soil erosion ; Transition zone ; waterfall ; Waterfalls ; Wave velocity ; Weathering</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2010-09, Vol.115 (F3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5413-38d7ae60d21204c76a58f78c2c7d12df1d57f9dd12ad2825a1aac72001c326d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5413-38d7ae60d21204c76a58f78c2c7d12df1d57f9dd12ad2825a1aac72001c326d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2008JF001187$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2008JF001187$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23394992$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haviv, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enzel, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whipple, K. X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matmon, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fifield, K. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1) face failure mechanisms, (2) flow acceleration and amplified erosion above a knickpoint lip, (3) deposition and removal of coarse debris below the knickpoint, and (4) base level lowering or tectonic uplift rates. Our model demonstrates that knickpoint retreat rate, where the subcaprock is weak or vertically jointed and base level fall rates are steady, is likely to become tied to downstream conditions and equal to the downstream incision rate divided by channel gradient. Mechanically, this coupling occurs where the subcaprock reaches a threshold height for failure in shear or buckling or where the weathering rate of the subcaprock is higher than the downstream incision wave velocity (Vi_ds). The height of the subcaprock face can influence its gravitational stability and the knickpoint lateral erosion rate and lead to a feedback between downstream incision and retreat rate. Retreat rate can be lower than Vi_ds during transients, which could be long (&gt;106 years) and set by the weathering rate of the subcaprock or influenced by lag debris evacuation. Key variables other than discharge can be important in setting retreat rates. These include base level lowering rate, the rock strength of stratigraphic units downstream of the knickpoint, and the size and flux of sediment contributed from above the knickpoint or from the canyon walls. Two types of oversteepened reaches can form in association with a vertical knickpoint: (1) an upstream, free fall‐induced, oversteepened reach whose length is longer than the flow acceleration zone and (2) a downstream coarse debris‐induced oversteepened reach. Although the model was constructed with caprock‐type knickpoints in mind, some of its elements and insights are also relevant to homogenous substrates.</description><subject>Accelerated flow</subject><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Coarsening</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>knickpoint</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Transition zone</subject><subject>waterfall</subject><subject>Waterfalls</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>Weathering</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9003</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEYhidGEze1N38AMTG2iaPwwQzgrandbZuqia7xSAgwW7ozsIWZrv33pd2mMR7KBQ7P-4Tve6vqLcGfCAb5GTAW53OMCRH8RTUD0rQ1AIaX1QwTJmoMwF9X-zlf4XJY0zJMZtXq5Cb20-hjQLFDNy6N3ugerYM36030YczoYKtHlzrd9_kQbf14iZLLPo86jMjoTYpm_QWdhexXl4XuUhxQmAaXHkRDtK73YfWmelUM2e0_3nvV7_nJ8vi0vvixODs-uqh1wwitqbBcuxZbIICZ4a1uRMeFAcMtAdsR2_BO2vLWFgQ0mmhteBmdGAqtFXSv-rDzln9dTy6PavDZuL7XwcUpK4m5pIRSXsiDZ0nCseRCcM4K-u4_9CpOKZQ5lCSslQ3Qe-jjDjIp5pxcpzbJDzrdKoLVfUPq34YK_v7RqXNZVJd0MD4_ZYBSyaSEwpEdt_W9u33Wqc4XP-eNpCVT7zKlJff3KaPTWrWc8kb9-b5Qi6-_4HS5_KYYvQP6B60a</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Haviv, I.</creator><creator>Enzel, Y.</creator><creator>Whipple, K. X.</creator><creator>Zilberman, E.</creator><creator>Matmon, A.</creator><creator>Stone, J.</creator><creator>Fifield, K. L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling</title><author>Haviv, I. ; Enzel, Y. ; Whipple, K. X. ; Zilberman, E. ; Matmon, A. ; Stone, J. ; Fifield, K. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5413-38d7ae60d21204c76a58f78c2c7d12df1d57f9dd12ad2825a1aac72001c326d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accelerated flow</topic><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Coarsening</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>knickpoint</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Transition zone</topic><topic>waterfall</topic><topic>Waterfalls</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>Weathering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haviv, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enzel, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whipple, K. X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilberman, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matmon, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fifield, K. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haviv, I.</au><au>Enzel, Y.</au><au>Whipple, K. X.</au><au>Zilberman, E.</au><au>Matmon, A.</au><au>Stone, J.</au><au>Fifield, K. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>F3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9003</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9011</eissn><abstract>Vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) mark a prominent process transition zone whose governing mechanics is not represented by conventional stream power incision models. We examine the evolution of vertical knickpoints with resistant caprock utilizing numerical simulations that explicitly represent (1) face failure mechanisms, (2) flow acceleration and amplified erosion above a knickpoint lip, (3) deposition and removal of coarse debris below the knickpoint, and (4) base level lowering or tectonic uplift rates. Our model demonstrates that knickpoint retreat rate, where the subcaprock is weak or vertically jointed and base level fall rates are steady, is likely to become tied to downstream conditions and equal to the downstream incision rate divided by channel gradient. Mechanically, this coupling occurs where the subcaprock reaches a threshold height for failure in shear or buckling or where the weathering rate of the subcaprock is higher than the downstream incision wave velocity (Vi_ds). The height of the subcaprock face can influence its gravitational stability and the knickpoint lateral erosion rate and lead to a feedback between downstream incision and retreat rate. Retreat rate can be lower than Vi_ds during transients, which could be long (&gt;106 years) and set by the weathering rate of the subcaprock or influenced by lag debris evacuation. Key variables other than discharge can be important in setting retreat rates. These include base level lowering rate, the rock strength of stratigraphic units downstream of the knickpoint, and the size and flux of sediment contributed from above the knickpoint or from the canyon walls. Two types of oversteepened reaches can form in association with a vertical knickpoint: (1) an upstream, free fall‐induced, oversteepened reach whose length is longer than the flow acceleration zone and (2) a downstream coarse debris‐induced oversteepened reach. Although the model was constructed with caprock‐type knickpoints in mind, some of its elements and insights are also relevant to homogenous substrates.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2008JF001187</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2010-09, Vol.115 (F3), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-9003
2156-2202
2169-9011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907931337
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accelerated flow
Acceleration
Canyons
Channels
Coarsening
Detritus
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Erosion rates
Evolution
Exact sciences and technology
Failure
Geomorphology
Hydrology
knickpoint
Mathematical models
modeling
Rivers
Shear
Soil erosion
Transition zone
waterfall
Waterfalls
Wave velocity
Weathering
title Evolution of vertical knickpoints (waterfalls) with resistant caprock: Insights from numerical modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A59%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20vertical%20knickpoints%20(waterfalls)%20with%20resistant%20caprock:%20Insights%20from%20numerical%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Earth%20Surface&rft.au=Haviv,%20I.&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=F3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2008JF001187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709788774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=914695234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true