Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village
Domestic cats Felis catus , as companion animals provided with supplemental food, are not limited by the availability of wild prey and locally occur at extraordinary high densities. There is growing concern about the potential impact of large cat numbers on native prey populations. In the present st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of wildlife research 2011-06, Vol.57 (3), p.597-602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 602 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 597 |
container_title | European journal of wildlife research |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Tschanz, Britta Hegglin, Daniel Gloor, Sandra Bontadina, Fabio |
description | Domestic cats
Felis catus
, as companion animals provided with supplemental food, are not limited by the availability of wild prey and locally occur at extraordinary high densities. There is growing concern about the potential impact of large cat numbers on native prey populations. In the present study, we quantified the minimum number of animals killed in a rural village in Switzerland by asking owners (1) to estimate the predation rate in advance and (2) to record prey animals returned home by their pets. The frequency distribution of the numbers of prey items was markedly skewed: 16% of the cats accounted for 75% of prey, irrespective of sex, age or breed. A large fraction of owners considerably overestimated their cat’s predation, indicating that surveying predation rates by means of a questionnaire alone is not sufficient. The observed average rate of predation within 48 days in spring was 2.29 prey items/cat/month (
N
= 32 cats); major prey types were rodents (76.1%) and birds (11.1%). The absolute number of prey items taken per area is striking and indicates that cat predation represents an important factor in ecosystems. Its role may be momentous in intensively fragmented urban habitats, where cat densities are especially high. We thus highlight the need to identify the factors determining predation rates of individual cats. Further extended studies, especially in urbanised areas, are needed to quantify the actual impact of cat predation upon the population dynamics of their prey. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907186386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351479651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-637cd0a53f2effde0ab8150782ad9002ad1af10cf301d69ef8223df26935ffce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLfgi0_RyWU3u75JUSsUBNHnkOZSt26zNdlV-u9NWUEQhIGZgXMOHwehcwpXFEBeJwpcCAIUCAgJhB6gCRW8JlBIcZjvkjIiSsGO0UlKawBWAy8m6Hk-hN7FhHWwOHSBvI3_DU7v7stZvI3O6r7pAo66d3i5w7bbuNQ3BhvdJ9wErHEcom7xZ9O2euVO0ZHXbXJnP3uKXu_vXmZzsnh6eJzdLojhQvak5NJY0AX3zHlvHehlRQuQFdO2znzaUu0pGM-B2rJ2vmKMW8_KmhfeG8en6HLM3cbuY8hIatMk4zJDcN2QVA2SViXPM0UXf5Trboghw6mqlAUUjPIsoqPIxC6l6Lzaxmaj405RUPuO1dixyh2rfceKZg8bPSlrw8rF3-D_Td_UgH6U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867505213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tschanz, Britta ; Hegglin, Daniel ; Gloor, Sandra ; Bontadina, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Tschanz, Britta ; Hegglin, Daniel ; Gloor, Sandra ; Bontadina, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>Domestic cats
Felis catus
, as companion animals provided with supplemental food, are not limited by the availability of wild prey and locally occur at extraordinary high densities. There is growing concern about the potential impact of large cat numbers on native prey populations. In the present study, we quantified the minimum number of animals killed in a rural village in Switzerland by asking owners (1) to estimate the predation rate in advance and (2) to record prey animals returned home by their pets. The frequency distribution of the numbers of prey items was markedly skewed: 16% of the cats accounted for 75% of prey, irrespective of sex, age or breed. A large fraction of owners considerably overestimated their cat’s predation, indicating that surveying predation rates by means of a questionnaire alone is not sufficient. The observed average rate of predation within 48 days in spring was 2.29 prey items/cat/month (
N
= 32 cats); major prey types were rodents (76.1%) and birds (11.1%). The absolute number of prey items taken per area is striking and indicates that cat predation represents an important factor in ecosystems. Its role may be momentous in intensively fragmented urban habitats, where cat densities are especially high. We thus highlight the need to identify the factors determining predation rates of individual cats. Further extended studies, especially in urbanised areas, are needed to quantify the actual impact of cat predation upon the population dynamics of their prey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal populations ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cats ; Domestic animals ; Ecology ; Felis catus ; Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management ; Food ; Frequency distribution ; Habitat ; Habitats ; Inventories ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Pets ; Population dynamics ; Predation ; Prey ; Rural areas ; Sex ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wildlife research, 2011-06, Vol.57 (3), p.597-602</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-637cd0a53f2effde0ab8150782ad9002ad1af10cf301d69ef8223df26935ffce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-637cd0a53f2effde0ab8150782ad9002ad1af10cf301d69ef8223df26935ffce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tschanz, Britta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegglin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gloor, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontadina, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village</title><title>European journal of wildlife research</title><addtitle>Eur J Wildl Res</addtitle><description>Domestic cats
Felis catus
, as companion animals provided with supplemental food, are not limited by the availability of wild prey and locally occur at extraordinary high densities. There is growing concern about the potential impact of large cat numbers on native prey populations. In the present study, we quantified the minimum number of animals killed in a rural village in Switzerland by asking owners (1) to estimate the predation rate in advance and (2) to record prey animals returned home by their pets. The frequency distribution of the numbers of prey items was markedly skewed: 16% of the cats accounted for 75% of prey, irrespective of sex, age or breed. A large fraction of owners considerably overestimated their cat’s predation, indicating that surveying predation rates by means of a questionnaire alone is not sufficient. The observed average rate of predation within 48 days in spring was 2.29 prey items/cat/month (
N
= 32 cats); major prey types were rodents (76.1%) and birds (11.1%). The absolute number of prey items taken per area is striking and indicates that cat predation represents an important factor in ecosystems. Its role may be momentous in intensively fragmented urban habitats, where cat densities are especially high. We thus highlight the need to identify the factors determining predation rates of individual cats. Further extended studies, especially in urbanised areas, are needed to quantify the actual impact of cat predation upon the population dynamics of their prey.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Felis catus</subject><subject>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Frequency distribution</subject><subject>Habitat</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1612-4642</issn><issn>1439-0574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLfgi0_RyWU3u75JUSsUBNHnkOZSt26zNdlV-u9NWUEQhIGZgXMOHwehcwpXFEBeJwpcCAIUCAgJhB6gCRW8JlBIcZjvkjIiSsGO0UlKawBWAy8m6Hk-hN7FhHWwOHSBvI3_DU7v7stZvI3O6r7pAo66d3i5w7bbuNQ3BhvdJ9wErHEcom7xZ9O2euVO0ZHXbXJnP3uKXu_vXmZzsnh6eJzdLojhQvak5NJY0AX3zHlvHehlRQuQFdO2znzaUu0pGM-B2rJ2vmKMW8_KmhfeG8en6HLM3cbuY8hIatMk4zJDcN2QVA2SViXPM0UXf5Trboghw6mqlAUUjPIsoqPIxC6l6Lzaxmaj405RUPuO1dixyh2rfceKZg8bPSlrw8rF3-D_Td_UgH6U</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Tschanz, Britta</creator><creator>Hegglin, Daniel</creator><creator>Gloor, Sandra</creator><creator>Bontadina, Fabio</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village</title><author>Tschanz, Britta ; Hegglin, Daniel ; Gloor, Sandra ; Bontadina, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-637cd0a53f2effde0ab8150782ad9002ad1af10cf301d69ef8223df26935ffce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Felis catus</topic><topic>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Frequency distribution</topic><topic>Habitat</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tschanz, Britta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegglin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gloor, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontadina, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tschanz, Britta</au><au>Hegglin, Daniel</au><au>Gloor, Sandra</au><au>Bontadina, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Wildl Res</stitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>602</epage><pages>597-602</pages><issn>1612-4642</issn><eissn>1439-0574</eissn><abstract>Domestic cats
Felis catus
, as companion animals provided with supplemental food, are not limited by the availability of wild prey and locally occur at extraordinary high densities. There is growing concern about the potential impact of large cat numbers on native prey populations. In the present study, we quantified the minimum number of animals killed in a rural village in Switzerland by asking owners (1) to estimate the predation rate in advance and (2) to record prey animals returned home by their pets. The frequency distribution of the numbers of prey items was markedly skewed: 16% of the cats accounted for 75% of prey, irrespective of sex, age or breed. A large fraction of owners considerably overestimated their cat’s predation, indicating that surveying predation rates by means of a questionnaire alone is not sufficient. The observed average rate of predation within 48 days in spring was 2.29 prey items/cat/month (
N
= 32 cats); major prey types were rodents (76.1%) and birds (11.1%). The absolute number of prey items taken per area is striking and indicates that cat predation represents an important factor in ecosystems. Its role may be momentous in intensively fragmented urban habitats, where cat densities are especially high. We thus highlight the need to identify the factors determining predation rates of individual cats. Further extended studies, especially in urbanised areas, are needed to quantify the actual impact of cat predation upon the population dynamics of their prey.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-4642 |
ispartof | European journal of wildlife research, 2011-06, Vol.57 (3), p.597-602 |
issn | 1612-4642 1439-0574 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907186386 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Age Animal populations Biomedical and Life Sciences Cats Domestic animals Ecology Felis catus Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management Food Frequency distribution Habitat Habitats Inventories Life Sciences Original Paper Pets Population dynamics Predation Prey Rural areas Sex Zoology |
title | Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A27%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hunters%20and%20non-hunters:%20skewed%20predation%20rate%20by%20domestic%20cats%20in%20a%20rural%20village&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wildlife%20research&rft.au=Tschanz,%20Britta&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=602&rft.pages=597-602&rft.issn=1612-4642&rft.eissn=1439-0574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2351479651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867505213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |