DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid
Less than 1% of known monilophytes and lycophytes have a genome size estimate, and substantially less is known about the presence and prevalence of endopolyploid nuclei in these groups. Thirty-one monilophyte species (including three horsetails) and six lycophyte species were collected in Ontario, C...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chromosome research 2011-08, Vol.19 (6), p.763-775 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 775 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 763 |
| container_title | Chromosome research |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Bainard, Jillian D Henry, Thomas A Bainard, Luke D Newmaster, Steven G |
| description | Less than 1% of known monilophytes and lycophytes have a genome size estimate, and substantially less is known about the presence and prevalence of endopolyploid nuclei in these groups. Thirty-one monilophyte species (including three horsetails) and six lycophyte species were collected in Ontario, Canada. Using flow cytometry, genome size and degree of endopolyploidy were estimated for 37 species. Across the five orders covered, 1Cx-values averaged 4.2 pg in the Lycopodiales, 18.1 pg for the Equisetales, 5.06 pg for a single representative of the Ophioglossales, 14.3 pg for the Osmundales, and 7.06 pg for the Polypodiales. There was no indication of endoreduplication in any of the leaf, stem, or root tissue analyzed. This information is essential to our understanding of DNA content evolution in land plants. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907185951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>907185951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-98fb00ad95f0ad12307c039cef98a8372cfbe466998ccbe80d5db1e91b0820af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P1SAUhonRONfRH-BGiRtX1XMoLeBuMn4mE13obCWU0judtFCBa3L_vdReNXGhG-DkPOc9IQ8hjxFeIIB4mRAaISpArBRjssI7ZIeNqKtWcnWX7EC1oqrL-4w8SOkWAGTN8T45Yyi5aBXuyNfXHy-oDT47n-l3E0eTx-Dp6Okc_DiF5eaYXaLG93Q62lP5ik4m7h3dOx_m0s03JlMTHfUhU-f7sITpuExh7B-Se4OZknt0us_J9ds3Xy7fV1ef3n24vLiqLGdtrpQcOgDTq2YoJ7IahIVaWTcoaWQtmB06x9tWKWlt5yT0Td-hU9iBZGCG-pw833KXGL4dXMp6HpN102S8C4ekFQiUjWrwv6RUbVP2c1HIZ3-Rt-EQffnGCjEu-c843CAbQ0rRDXqJ42ziUSPoVZLeJOkiSa-S9Drz5BR86GbX_574ZaUAbANSafm9i382_yv16TY0mKDNPo5JX39mgHzVrhhA_QPrKaYf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896248451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Bainard, Jillian D ; Henry, Thomas A ; Bainard, Luke D ; Newmaster, Steven G</creator><creatorcontrib>Bainard, Jillian D ; Henry, Thomas A ; Bainard, Luke D ; Newmaster, Steven G</creatorcontrib><description>Less than 1% of known monilophytes and lycophytes have a genome size estimate, and substantially less is known about the presence and prevalence of endopolyploid nuclei in these groups. Thirty-one monilophyte species (including three horsetails) and six lycophyte species were collected in Ontario, Canada. Using flow cytometry, genome size and degree of endopolyploidy were estimated for 37 species. Across the five orders covered, 1Cx-values averaged 4.2 pg in the Lycopodiales, 18.1 pg for the Equisetales, 5.06 pg for a single representative of the Ophioglossales, 14.3 pg for the Osmundales, and 7.06 pg for the Polypodiales. There was no indication of endoreduplication in any of the leaf, stem, or root tissue analyzed. This information is essential to our understanding of DNA content evolution in land plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21847691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Biology ; Chromosomes ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA, Plant - genetics ; embryophytes ; endopolyploidy ; Endoreduplication ; Equisetales ; Equisetum ; Equisetum - genetics ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; Ferns - genetics ; Flow Cytometry ; Flowers & plants ; genome ; Genome Size ; Genome, Plant ; Genomes ; Genomics ; Human Genetics ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Lycopodiales ; Lycopodium - genetics ; Nuclei ; Ophioglossales ; Osmundales ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Ploidies ; Polypodiales ; Roots</subject><ispartof>Chromosome research, 2011-08, Vol.19 (6), p.763-775</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-98fb00ad95f0ad12307c039cef98a8372cfbe466998ccbe80d5db1e91b0820af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-98fb00ad95f0ad12307c039cef98a8372cfbe466998ccbe80d5db1e91b0820af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bainard, Jillian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainard, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newmaster, Steven G</creatorcontrib><title>DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid</title><title>Chromosome research</title><addtitle>Chromosome Res</addtitle><addtitle>Chromosome Res</addtitle><description>Less than 1% of known monilophytes and lycophytes have a genome size estimate, and substantially less is known about the presence and prevalence of endopolyploid nuclei in these groups. Thirty-one monilophyte species (including three horsetails) and six lycophyte species were collected in Ontario, Canada. Using flow cytometry, genome size and degree of endopolyploidy were estimated for 37 species. Across the five orders covered, 1Cx-values averaged 4.2 pg in the Lycopodiales, 18.1 pg for the Equisetales, 5.06 pg for a single representative of the Ophioglossales, 14.3 pg for the Osmundales, and 7.06 pg for the Polypodiales. There was no indication of endoreduplication in any of the leaf, stem, or root tissue analyzed. This information is essential to our understanding of DNA content evolution in land plants.</description><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>embryophytes</subject><subject>endopolyploidy</subject><subject>Endoreduplication</subject><subject>Equisetales</subject><subject>Equisetum</subject><subject>Equisetum - genetics</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Ferns - genetics</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>genome</subject><subject>Genome Size</subject><subject>Genome, Plant</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lycopodiales</subject><subject>Lycopodium - genetics</subject><subject>Nuclei</subject><subject>Ophioglossales</subject><subject>Osmundales</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>Polypodiales</subject><subject>Roots</subject><issn>0967-3849</issn><issn>1573-6849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2P1SAUhonRONfRH-BGiRtX1XMoLeBuMn4mE13obCWU0judtFCBa3L_vdReNXGhG-DkPOc9IQ8hjxFeIIB4mRAaISpArBRjssI7ZIeNqKtWcnWX7EC1oqrL-4w8SOkWAGTN8T45Yyi5aBXuyNfXHy-oDT47n-l3E0eTx-Dp6Okc_DiF5eaYXaLG93Q62lP5ik4m7h3dOx_m0s03JlMTHfUhU-f7sITpuExh7B-Se4OZknt0us_J9ds3Xy7fV1ef3n24vLiqLGdtrpQcOgDTq2YoJ7IahIVaWTcoaWQtmB06x9tWKWlt5yT0Td-hU9iBZGCG-pw833KXGL4dXMp6HpN102S8C4ekFQiUjWrwv6RUbVP2c1HIZ3-Rt-EQffnGCjEu-c843CAbQ0rRDXqJ42ziUSPoVZLeJOkiSa-S9Drz5BR86GbX_574ZaUAbANSafm9i382_yv16TY0mKDNPo5JX39mgHzVrhhA_QPrKaYf</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Bainard, Jillian D</creator><creator>Henry, Thomas A</creator><creator>Bainard, Luke D</creator><creator>Newmaster, Steven G</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid</title><author>Bainard, Jillian D ; Henry, Thomas A ; Bainard, Luke D ; Newmaster, Steven G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-98fb00ad95f0ad12307c039cef98a8372cfbe466998ccbe80d5db1e91b0820af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>embryophytes</topic><topic>endopolyploidy</topic><topic>Endoreduplication</topic><topic>Equisetales</topic><topic>Equisetum</topic><topic>Equisetum - genetics</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Ferns - genetics</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>genome</topic><topic>Genome Size</topic><topic>Genome, Plant</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lycopodiales</topic><topic>Lycopodium - genetics</topic><topic>Nuclei</topic><topic>Ophioglossales</topic><topic>Osmundales</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>Polypodiales</topic><topic>Roots</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bainard, Jillian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainard, Luke D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newmaster, Steven G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chromosome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bainard, Jillian D</au><au>Henry, Thomas A</au><au>Bainard, Luke D</au><au>Newmaster, Steven G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid</atitle><jtitle>Chromosome research</jtitle><stitle>Chromosome Res</stitle><addtitle>Chromosome Res</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>775</epage><pages>763-775</pages><issn>0967-3849</issn><eissn>1573-6849</eissn><abstract>Less than 1% of known monilophytes and lycophytes have a genome size estimate, and substantially less is known about the presence and prevalence of endopolyploid nuclei in these groups. Thirty-one monilophyte species (including three horsetails) and six lycophyte species were collected in Ontario, Canada. Using flow cytometry, genome size and degree of endopolyploidy were estimated for 37 species. Across the five orders covered, 1Cx-values averaged 4.2 pg in the Lycopodiales, 18.1 pg for the Equisetales, 5.06 pg for a single representative of the Ophioglossales, 14.3 pg for the Osmundales, and 7.06 pg for the Polypodiales. There was no indication of endoreduplication in any of the leaf, stem, or root tissue analyzed. This information is essential to our understanding of DNA content evolution in land plants.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21847691</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0967-3849 |
| ispartof | Chromosome research, 2011-08, Vol.19 (6), p.763-775 |
| issn | 0967-3849 1573-6849 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907185951 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Animal Genetics and Genomics Biomedical and Life Sciences Cell Biology Chromosomes Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA, Plant - genetics embryophytes endopolyploidy Endoreduplication Equisetales Equisetum Equisetum - genetics Evolution Evolution, Molecular Ferns - genetics Flow Cytometry Flowers & plants genome Genome Size Genome, Plant Genomes Genomics Human Genetics Leaves Life Sciences Lycopodiales Lycopodium - genetics Nuclei Ophioglossales Osmundales Plant Genetics and Genomics Ploidies Polypodiales Roots |
| title | DNA content variation in monilophytes and lycophytes: large genomes that are not endopolyploid |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20content%20variation%20in%20monilophytes%20and%20lycophytes:%20large%20genomes%20that%20are%20not%20endopolyploid&rft.jtitle=Chromosome%20research&rft.au=Bainard,%20Jillian%20D&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=775&rft.pages=763-775&rft.issn=0967-3849&rft.eissn=1573-6849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10577-011-9228-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E907185951%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896248451&rft_id=info:pmid/21847691&rfr_iscdi=true |