Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release
Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the outp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2011-05, Vol.129 (5), p.3181-3193 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3193 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 3181 |
| container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
| container_volume | 129 |
| creator | Goldman, Simon A. Baer, Thomas Moore, Brian C. J. |
| description | Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the output of an auditory filter centered at the signal frequency, using a method described by
Richards
[(
1988
)
Hear. Res.
35
,
47-58
]
, here called "on-frequency band (OFB) reversal." This removed regular beats for a pair of proximal FBs centered symmetrically about the OFB on a linear frequency scale (but not for a single FB that had the same center frequency as either of the constituent FBs in a pair) while maintaining the comodulation of individual noise bands that provides the basis for across-channel processes. OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs-but not for a single FB or distal FB pair or when the FBs were presented in the opposite ear to the signal plus OFB-across a range of signal frequencies and for continuous and gated noise presentation. Simulations indicated that OFB reversal reduces the availability of within-channel cues based upon temporal fine structure and changes in envelope statistics. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.3560122 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907161298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>867321193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-40213286a384ee17be9af51ccd0c841912d172b757e0a20a1b70c34c4cf53f7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgiruuHvwC0ouIh2omjya9LMj6hAUveg5pmrrRPtakRfz2dm11T-JpGPgxM_wHoWPAFwAELuGC8gQDITtoCpzgWHLCdtEUYwwxS5Nkgg5CeO1bLmm6jyYEeCIZwVM0v3bBd-vW1S_Rh2tXro7NSte1LSPT2RC1TWSaqsm7UreuqaNKh7eN9ba0OthDtFfoMtijsc7Q8-3N0-I-Xj7ePSyulrFhGNqYYQKUyERTyawFkdlUFxyMybGRDFIgOQiSCS4s1gRryAQ2lBlmCk4LUdAZOhvmrn3z3t_VqsoFY8tS17bpgkqxgARIKv-VMhGUAKS0l-eDNL4JwdtCrb2rtP9UgNUmVwVqzLW3J-PULqts_it_guzB6Qh0MLosvK6NC1vHQIIQm_PmgwvGtd-R_r11-xo1vEaZFf0CZBOTYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867321193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Goldman, Simon A. ; Baer, Thomas ; Moore, Brian C. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Simon A. ; Baer, Thomas ; Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the output of an auditory filter centered at the signal frequency, using a method described by
Richards
[(
1988
)
Hear. Res.
35
,
47-58
]
, here called "on-frequency band (OFB) reversal." This removed regular beats for a pair of proximal FBs centered symmetrically about the OFB on a linear frequency scale (but not for a single FB that had the same center frequency as either of the constituent FBs in a pair) while maintaining the comodulation of individual noise bands that provides the basis for across-channel processes. OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs-but not for a single FB or distal FB pair or when the FBs were presented in the opposite ear to the signal plus OFB-across a range of signal frequencies and for continuous and gated noise presentation. Simulations indicated that OFB reversal reduces the availability of within-channel cues based upon temporal fine structure and changes in envelope statistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.3560122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21568420</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Audition ; Auditory Threshold ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Cues ; Dichotic Listening Tests ; Differential Threshold ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Neurological ; Noise ; Perception ; Perceptual Masking - physiology ; Pitch Perception - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011-05, Vol.129 (5), p.3181-3193</ispartof><rights>2011 Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-40213286a384ee17be9af51ccd0c841912d172b757e0a20a1b70c34c4cf53f7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-40213286a384ee17be9af51ccd0c841912d172b757e0a20a1b70c34c4cf53f7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.3560122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,790,1559,4498,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24181778$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Simon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the output of an auditory filter centered at the signal frequency, using a method described by
Richards
[(
1988
)
Hear. Res.
35
,
47-58
]
, here called "on-frequency band (OFB) reversal." This removed regular beats for a pair of proximal FBs centered symmetrically about the OFB on a linear frequency scale (but not for a single FB that had the same center frequency as either of the constituent FBs in a pair) while maintaining the comodulation of individual noise bands that provides the basis for across-channel processes. OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs-but not for a single FB or distal FB pair or when the FBs were presented in the opposite ear to the signal plus OFB-across a range of signal frequencies and for continuous and gated noise presentation. Simulations indicated that OFB reversal reduces the availability of within-channel cues based upon temporal fine structure and changes in envelope statistics.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dichotic Listening Tests</subject><subject>Differential Threshold</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking - physiology</subject><subject>Pitch Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgiruuHvwC0ouIh2omjya9LMj6hAUveg5pmrrRPtakRfz2dm11T-JpGPgxM_wHoWPAFwAELuGC8gQDITtoCpzgWHLCdtEUYwwxS5Nkgg5CeO1bLmm6jyYEeCIZwVM0v3bBd-vW1S_Rh2tXro7NSte1LSPT2RC1TWSaqsm7UreuqaNKh7eN9ba0OthDtFfoMtijsc7Q8-3N0-I-Xj7ePSyulrFhGNqYYQKUyERTyawFkdlUFxyMybGRDFIgOQiSCS4s1gRryAQ2lBlmCk4LUdAZOhvmrn3z3t_VqsoFY8tS17bpgkqxgARIKv-VMhGUAKS0l-eDNL4JwdtCrb2rtP9UgNUmVwVqzLW3J-PULqts_it_guzB6Qh0MLosvK6NC1vHQIIQm_PmgwvGtd-R_r11-xo1vEaZFf0CZBOTYw</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Goldman, Simon A.</creator><creator>Baer, Thomas</creator><creator>Moore, Brian C. J.</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release</title><author>Goldman, Simon A. ; Baer, Thomas ; Moore, Brian C. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-40213286a384ee17be9af51ccd0c841912d172b757e0a20a1b70c34c4cf53f7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dichotic Listening Tests</topic><topic>Differential Threshold</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking - physiology</topic><topic>Pitch Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Simon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Brian C. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldman, Simon A.</au><au>Baer, Thomas</au><au>Moore, Brian C. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3181</spage><epage>3193</epage><pages>3181-3193</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Comodulation masking release (CMR), assessed using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm, may reflect the contribution of both across- and within-channel cues when FBs are proximal to the signal frequency. This study examined the effect of disrupting within-channel cues based upon envelope beats at the output of an auditory filter centered at the signal frequency, using a method described by
Richards
[(
1988
)
Hear. Res.
35
,
47-58
]
, here called "on-frequency band (OFB) reversal." This removed regular beats for a pair of proximal FBs centered symmetrically about the OFB on a linear frequency scale (but not for a single FB that had the same center frequency as either of the constituent FBs in a pair) while maintaining the comodulation of individual noise bands that provides the basis for across-channel processes. OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs-but not for a single FB or distal FB pair or when the FBs were presented in the opposite ear to the signal plus OFB-across a range of signal frequencies and for continuous and gated noise presentation. Simulations indicated that OFB reversal reduces the availability of within-channel cues based upon temporal fine structure and changes in envelope statistics.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>21568420</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.3560122</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
| ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011-05, Vol.129 (5), p.3181-3193 |
| issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907161298 |
| source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adolescent Adult Audition Auditory Threshold Biological and medical sciences Computer Simulation Cues Dichotic Listening Tests Differential Threshold Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Models, Neurological Noise Perception Perceptual Masking - physiology Pitch Perception - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology Young Adult |
| title | Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A24%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disrupting%20within-channel%20cues%20to%20comodulation%20masking%20release&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Goldman,%20Simon%20A.&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3181&rft.epage=3193&rft.pages=3181-3193&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.3560122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867321193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867321193&rft_id=info:pmid/21568420&rfr_iscdi=true |