Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils
Port-Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were submitted to supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 (SCC) and Soxhlet extracted (SE) with hexane. The components in the extracted oils were identified by...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Holzforschung 2011-03, Vol.65 (2), p.277-284 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 284 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 277 |
| container_title | Holzforschung |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Du, Tianchuan Shupe, Todd F. Hse, Chung Y. |
| description | Port-Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were submitted to supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 (SCC) and Soxhlet extracted (SE) with hexane. The components in the extracted oils were identified by GC-MS. The oils were evaluated against two common wood decay fungi, brown-rot fungus (Gloeophyllum trabeum) and white-rot fungus (Trametes versicolor). The SCC extraction yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 3.27%, 3.22%, and 3.29%, respectively. The SE yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 0.80%, 0.71%, and 1.52%, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that SCC extracted cedar oils had higher antifungal activities than SE cedar oils against both fungi. In vitro studies showed that C. nootkatensis oils have the strongest antifungal activity, followed by C. lawsoniana, and J. virginiana oil. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/hf.2011.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907160511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>907160511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b139512a0fdc11638d93f53889776b96a49b73e587276557ea30a2ce24179e2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90MFKAzEQgOEgCtbqyRfIzYNszWySze6xVNsKggoVegtpdmKj225NslLf3i0VT8MMH3P4CbkGNgIJ8m7tRjkDGDEmT8gABFeZ4GJ5SgaMQZnxkrNzchHjR79KxmFAZuNt8q7bvpuGGpv8t08eI20dTeuASGO3w2BDf7W9cE3na4r7FHqLNbVYm0Bb38RLcuZME_Hqbw7J2_RhMZlnT8-zx8n4KbNciJStgFcScsNcbQEKXtYVd5KXZaVUsaoKI6qV4ihLlatCSoWGM5NbzAWoCnPDh-Tm-HcX2q8OY9IbHy02jdli20VdMQUFkwC9vD1KG9oYAzq9C35jwo8Gpg-19NrpQy3d1-p1dtQ-Jtz_UxM-daG4kvp1IfR8CS_TorzXM_4LC8drNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>907160511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils</title><source>De Gruyter数学期刊（与数学科学学院共建）</source><creator>Du, Tianchuan ; Shupe, Todd F. ; Hse, Chung Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Tianchuan ; Shupe, Todd F. ; Hse, Chung Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Port-Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were submitted to supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 (SCC) and Soxhlet extracted (SE) with hexane. The components in the extracted oils were identified by GC-MS. The oils were evaluated against two common wood decay fungi, brown-rot fungus (Gloeophyllum trabeum) and white-rot fungus (Trametes versicolor). The SCC extraction yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 3.27%, 3.22%, and 3.29%, respectively. The SE yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 0.80%, 0.71%, and 1.52%, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that SCC extracted cedar oils had higher antifungal activities than SE cedar oils against both fungi. In vitro studies showed that C. nootkatensis oils have the strongest antifungal activity, followed by C. lawsoniana, and J. virginiana oil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-3830</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-434X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/hf.2011.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>antifungal ; cedar ; Chamaecyparis lawsoniana ; Gloeophyllum trabeum ; Juniperus virginiana ; supercritical fluid extraction ; Trametes versicolor ; wood preservatives ; Xanthocyparis nootkatensis</subject><ispartof>Holzforschung, 2011-03, Vol.65 (2), p.277-284</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b139512a0fdc11638d93f53889776b96a49b73e587276557ea30a2ce24179e2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b139512a0fdc11638d93f53889776b96a49b73e587276557ea30a2ce24179e2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Tianchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupe, Todd F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hse, Chung Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils</title><title>Holzforschung</title><addtitle>Holzforschung</addtitle><description>Port-Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were submitted to supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 (SCC) and Soxhlet extracted (SE) with hexane. The components in the extracted oils were identified by GC-MS. The oils were evaluated against two common wood decay fungi, brown-rot fungus (Gloeophyllum trabeum) and white-rot fungus (Trametes versicolor). The SCC extraction yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 3.27%, 3.22%, and 3.29%, respectively. The SE yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 0.80%, 0.71%, and 1.52%, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that SCC extracted cedar oils had higher antifungal activities than SE cedar oils against both fungi. In vitro studies showed that C. nootkatensis oils have the strongest antifungal activity, followed by C. lawsoniana, and J. virginiana oil.</description><subject>antifungal</subject><subject>cedar</subject><subject>Chamaecyparis lawsoniana</subject><subject>Gloeophyllum trabeum</subject><subject>Juniperus virginiana</subject><subject>supercritical fluid extraction</subject><subject>Trametes versicolor</subject><subject>wood preservatives</subject><subject>Xanthocyparis nootkatensis</subject><issn>0018-3830</issn><issn>1437-434X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90MFKAzEQgOEgCtbqyRfIzYNszWySze6xVNsKggoVegtpdmKj225NslLf3i0VT8MMH3P4CbkGNgIJ8m7tRjkDGDEmT8gABFeZ4GJ5SgaMQZnxkrNzchHjR79KxmFAZuNt8q7bvpuGGpv8t08eI20dTeuASGO3w2BDf7W9cE3na4r7FHqLNbVYm0Bb38RLcuZME_Hqbw7J2_RhMZlnT8-zx8n4KbNciJStgFcScsNcbQEKXtYVd5KXZaVUsaoKI6qV4ihLlatCSoWGM5NbzAWoCnPDh-Tm-HcX2q8OY9IbHy02jdli20VdMQUFkwC9vD1KG9oYAzq9C35jwo8Gpg-19NrpQy3d1-p1dtQ-Jtz_UxM-daG4kvp1IfR8CS_TorzXM_4LC8drNw</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Du, Tianchuan</creator><creator>Shupe, Todd F.</creator><creator>Hse, Chung Y.</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils</title><author>Du, Tianchuan ; Shupe, Todd F. ; Hse, Chung Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-b139512a0fdc11638d93f53889776b96a49b73e587276557ea30a2ce24179e2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>antifungal</topic><topic>cedar</topic><topic>Chamaecyparis lawsoniana</topic><topic>Gloeophyllum trabeum</topic><topic>Juniperus virginiana</topic><topic>supercritical fluid extraction</topic><topic>Trametes versicolor</topic><topic>wood preservatives</topic><topic>Xanthocyparis nootkatensis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Tianchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupe, Todd F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hse, Chung Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Holzforschung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Tianchuan</au><au>Shupe, Todd F.</au><au>Hse, Chung Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils</atitle><jtitle>Holzforschung</jtitle><addtitle>Holzforschung</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>277-284</pages><issn>0018-3830</issn><eissn>1437-434X</eissn><abstract>Port-Orford cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Alaska yellow cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) were submitted to supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 (SCC) and Soxhlet extracted (SE) with hexane. The components in the extracted oils were identified by GC-MS. The oils were evaluated against two common wood decay fungi, brown-rot fungus (Gloeophyllum trabeum) and white-rot fungus (Trametes versicolor). The SCC extraction yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 3.27%, 3.22%, and 3.29%, respectively. The SE yields of J. virginiana, C. nootkatensis, and C. lawsoniana were 0.80%, 0.71%, and 1.52%, respectively. The statistical analysis showed that SCC extracted cedar oils had higher antifungal activities than SE cedar oils against both fungi. In vitro studies showed that C. nootkatensis oils have the strongest antifungal activity, followed by C. lawsoniana, and J. virginiana oil.</abstract><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/hf.2011.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-3830 |
| ispartof | Holzforschung, 2011-03, Vol.65 (2), p.277-284 |
| issn | 0018-3830 1437-434X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_907160511 |
| source | De Gruyter数学期刊（与数学科学学院共建） |
| subjects | antifungal cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Gloeophyllum trabeum Juniperus virginiana supercritical fluid extraction Trametes versicolor wood preservatives Xanthocyparis nootkatensis |
| title | Antifungal activities of three supercritical fluid extracted cedar oils |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T15%3A33%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antifungal%20activities%20of%20three%20supercritical%20fluid%20extracted%20cedar%20oils&rft.jtitle=Holzforschung&rft.au=Du,%20Tianchuan&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=277-284&rft.issn=0018-3830&rft.eissn=1437-434X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/hf.2011.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E907160511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=907160511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |