Bone marrow mononuclear cells versus G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells for treatment of lower limb ASO: pooled analysis for long-term prognosis

In this study, we report the comparative result of long-term clinical prognoses for patients with no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI) caused by arteriosclerosis obliterans, who are implanted with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC; n =74) or G-CSF-mobilized (M)-PBMNC ( n =111), as no information is available on how the two treatments compare in terms of long-term prognosis, such as survival or amputation. We performed pooled analysis using data from two previous cohort studies. All patients had disease of Fontaine classification III or IV. The endpoints were OS and amputation-free survival (AFS). After adjustment for history of dialysis and Fontaine classification, there was no significant difference between the two treatments with respect to OS (hazard ratio (HR)=1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.74–3.03, P =0.26) or AFS (HR=0.96; 95% CI=0.61–1.51, P =0.87). The negative prognostic factors affecting OS or AFS were the small number of CD34-positive cells collected, history of dialysis, Fontaine classification, male sex and older age. These results suggest that there was no significant difference in long-term prognosis between patients treated with BMMNC and those treated with M-PBMNC. The number of CD34-positive cells collected was an important prognostic factor for amputation and death.