Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study

Purpose Achieving primary implant stability in areas with poor bone density is often challenging to the clinician. Previous research has suggested that modified surgical protocols might be beneficial in such situations. The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2011-12, Vol.69 (12), p.e506-e512
Hauptverfasser: Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc, Anand, Pradeep S., MDS, Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e512
container_issue 12
container_start_page e506
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 69
creator Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc
Anand, Pradeep S., MDS
Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD
description Purpose Achieving primary implant stability in areas with poor bone density is often challenging to the clinician. Previous research has suggested that modified surgical protocols might be beneficial in such situations. The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate of implants placed using undersized implant site preparation in areas with poor bone density. Materials and Methods A total of 52 implants were placed in 29 patients. Of the 52 implants, 26 were surgically placed according to the standard drilling protocol (control group) and 26 were placed in low-density bone using an adapted bone drilling method (test group). The maximum insertion torque values and resonance frequency analysis measurements were also recorded. All implants were examined clinically and radiographically at follow-up visits during the study period. Oral hygiene status, bleeding on probing, peri-implant probing depth, and implant survival rate were assessed. Results According to the survival criteria used in the present study, no failure was recorded, and the overall survival rate was 100% for both groups after 12 months. The mean probing depth was 2.75 ± 0.75 mm in the test group and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm in the control group. The mean insertion torque value was 35.19 ± 4.79 Ncm in the test group and 34.62 ± 5.82 Ncm in the control group. The resonance frequency analysis value was 68.58 ± 4.81 implant stability quotient and 66.69 ± 5.41 implant stability quotient in the test and control groups, respectively. The observed differences were not statistically significant ( P > .05). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that placement of implants by an adapted drilling technique in sites with poor bone density is beneficial in enhancing primary implant stability and improving the implant survival rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906558545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0278239111013735</els_id><sourcerecordid>906558545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-350922430d28c029b739d73c25243920dd639b465accd713885409ccc090edda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR8kbz7NeJNsJjMiQl1bLRQs1D6HbHKLGWeSNZkprP75ZthVwQefAodzDjnfJeQlg5oBa970dR_HXHNgrIa2BlCPyIpJwSoJUjwmK-Cqrbjo2Al5lnMPxShV85SccM6YUqBW5NdtcJiy_4mOXo67wYSJ3vgJ6XXCnUlm8jHQKdLz8M0Eu8h-NGn_1zuZrR_8tKc-0OsYE_0QA9KPGHIR39Kzkoh5h3by90g3gw_emqHEZrd_Tp7cmSHji-N7Sm4vzr9uPldXXz5dbs6uKrtWzVQJCR3nawGOtxZ4t1Wic0pYLovYcXCuEd123UhjrVNMtK1cQ2ethQ7QOSNOyetD7y7FHzPmSY8-WxzKAIxz1h00UpaQLE5-cNry6ZzwTu8OezUDvTDXvV6Y64W5hlYX5iX06lg_b0d0fyK_IRfDu4MBy8h7j0ln67HQdD4VMNpF___-9__E7RHjd9xj7uOcQsGnmc5cg75Zrr4cnZVCoYQUD-Rsp68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>906558545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc ; Anand, Pradeep S., MDS ; Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc ; Anand, Pradeep S., MDS ; Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Achieving primary implant stability in areas with poor bone density is often challenging to the clinician. Previous research has suggested that modified surgical protocols might be beneficial in such situations. The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate of implants placed using undersized implant site preparation in areas with poor bone density. Materials and Methods A total of 52 implants were placed in 29 patients. Of the 52 implants, 26 were surgically placed according to the standard drilling protocol (control group) and 26 were placed in low-density bone using an adapted bone drilling method (test group). The maximum insertion torque values and resonance frequency analysis measurements were also recorded. All implants were examined clinically and radiographically at follow-up visits during the study period. Oral hygiene status, bleeding on probing, peri-implant probing depth, and implant survival rate were assessed. Results According to the survival criteria used in the present study, no failure was recorded, and the overall survival rate was 100% for both groups after 12 months. The mean probing depth was 2.75 ± 0.75 mm in the test group and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm in the control group. The mean insertion torque value was 35.19 ± 4.79 Ncm in the test group and 34.62 ± 5.82 Ncm in the control group. The resonance frequency analysis value was 68.58 ± 4.81 implant stability quotient and 66.69 ± 5.41 implant stability quotient in the test and control groups, respectively. The observed differences were not statistically significant ( P &gt; .05). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that placement of implants by an adapted drilling technique in sites with poor bone density is beneficial in enhancing primary implant stability and improving the implant survival rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22117707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Alveolar Bone Loss - rehabilitation ; Bone Density ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osseointegration ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgery ; Torque ; Treatment Outcome ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2011-12, Vol.69 (12), p.e506-e512</ispartof><rights>American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-350922430d28c029b739d73c25243920dd639b465accd713885409ccc090edda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-350922430d28c029b739d73c25243920dd639b465accd713885409ccc090edda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Pradeep S., MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Achieving primary implant stability in areas with poor bone density is often challenging to the clinician. Previous research has suggested that modified surgical protocols might be beneficial in such situations. The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate of implants placed using undersized implant site preparation in areas with poor bone density. Materials and Methods A total of 52 implants were placed in 29 patients. Of the 52 implants, 26 were surgically placed according to the standard drilling protocol (control group) and 26 were placed in low-density bone using an adapted bone drilling method (test group). The maximum insertion torque values and resonance frequency analysis measurements were also recorded. All implants were examined clinically and radiographically at follow-up visits during the study period. Oral hygiene status, bleeding on probing, peri-implant probing depth, and implant survival rate were assessed. Results According to the survival criteria used in the present study, no failure was recorded, and the overall survival rate was 100% for both groups after 12 months. The mean probing depth was 2.75 ± 0.75 mm in the test group and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm in the control group. The mean insertion torque value was 35.19 ± 4.79 Ncm in the test group and 34.62 ± 5.82 Ncm in the control group. The resonance frequency analysis value was 68.58 ± 4.81 implant stability quotient and 66.69 ± 5.41 implant stability quotient in the test and control groups, respectively. The observed differences were not statistically significant ( P &gt; .05). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that placement of implants by an adapted drilling technique in sites with poor bone density is beneficial in enhancing primary implant stability and improving the implant survival rate.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFrFDEUhYModq3-AR8kbz7NeJNsJjMiQl1bLRQs1D6HbHKLGWeSNZkprP75ZthVwQefAodzDjnfJeQlg5oBa970dR_HXHNgrIa2BlCPyIpJwSoJUjwmK-Cqrbjo2Al5lnMPxShV85SccM6YUqBW5NdtcJiy_4mOXo67wYSJ3vgJ6XXCnUlm8jHQKdLz8M0Eu8h-NGn_1zuZrR_8tKc-0OsYE_0QA9KPGHIR39Kzkoh5h3by90g3gw_emqHEZrd_Tp7cmSHji-N7Sm4vzr9uPldXXz5dbs6uKrtWzVQJCR3nawGOtxZ4t1Wic0pYLovYcXCuEd123UhjrVNMtK1cQ2ethQ7QOSNOyetD7y7FHzPmSY8-WxzKAIxz1h00UpaQLE5-cNry6ZzwTu8OezUDvTDXvV6Y64W5hlYX5iX06lg_b0d0fyK_IRfDu4MBy8h7j0ln67HQdD4VMNpF___-9__E7RHjd9xj7uOcQsGnmc5cg75Zrr4cnZVCoYQUD-Rsp68</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc</creator><creator>Anand, Pradeep S., MDS</creator><creator>Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study</title><author>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc ; Anand, Pradeep S., MDS ; Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-350922430d28c029b739d73c25243920dd639b465accd713885409ccc090edda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Pradeep S., MDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alghamdi, Hamdan, BDS, MSc</au><au>Anand, Pradeep S., MDS</au><au>Anil, Sukumaran, BDS, MDS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e506</spage><epage>e512</epage><pages>e506-e512</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><abstract>Purpose Achieving primary implant stability in areas with poor bone density is often challenging to the clinician. Previous research has suggested that modified surgical protocols might be beneficial in such situations. The objective of the present clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate of implants placed using undersized implant site preparation in areas with poor bone density. Materials and Methods A total of 52 implants were placed in 29 patients. Of the 52 implants, 26 were surgically placed according to the standard drilling protocol (control group) and 26 were placed in low-density bone using an adapted bone drilling method (test group). The maximum insertion torque values and resonance frequency analysis measurements were also recorded. All implants were examined clinically and radiographically at follow-up visits during the study period. Oral hygiene status, bleeding on probing, peri-implant probing depth, and implant survival rate were assessed. Results According to the survival criteria used in the present study, no failure was recorded, and the overall survival rate was 100% for both groups after 12 months. The mean probing depth was 2.75 ± 0.75 mm in the test group and 2.87 ± 0.79 mm in the control group. The mean insertion torque value was 35.19 ± 4.79 Ncm in the test group and 34.62 ± 5.82 Ncm in the control group. The resonance frequency analysis value was 68.58 ± 4.81 implant stability quotient and 66.69 ± 5.41 implant stability quotient in the test and control groups, respectively. The observed differences were not statistically significant ( P &gt; .05). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that placement of implants by an adapted drilling technique in sites with poor bone density is beneficial in enhancing primary implant stability and improving the implant survival rate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22117707</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2011-12, Vol.69 (12), p.e506-e512
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906558545
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Alveolar Bone Loss - rehabilitation
Bone Density
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Prosthesis Retention
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osseointegration
Prospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surgery
Torque
Treatment Outcome
Vibration
title Undersized Implant Site Preparation to Enhance Primary Implant Stability in Poor Bone Density: A Prospective Clinical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T18%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Undersized%20Implant%20Site%20Preparation%20to%20Enhance%20Primary%20Implant%20Stability%20in%20Poor%20Bone%20Density:%20A%20Prospective%20Clinical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Alghamdi,%20Hamdan,%20BDS,%20MSc&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e506&rft.epage=e512&rft.pages=e506-e512&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E906558545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=906558545&rft_id=info:pmid/22117707&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0278239111013735&rfr_iscdi=true