Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He–O 2 ) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox 80 mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intensive care medicine 2011-11, Vol.37 (11), p.1787-1792, Article 1787 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1792 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1787 |
container_title | Intensive care medicine |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Roche-Campo, Ferran Vignaux, Laurence Galia, Fabrice Lyazidi, Aissam Vargas, Frédéric Texereau, Joëlle Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela Jolliet, Philippe Brochard, Laurent |
description | Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He–O
2
) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox
80
mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard high-concentration face mask.
Methods
This prospective randomized crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers in a laboratory setting. Volunteers breathed a mixture of 78% He/22% O
2
through each of the masks under two different breathing conditions (rest and hyperventilation: minute ventilation of 14.9 ± 6.1 and 26.7 ± 8.7 L min
−1
, respectively) and four different He–O
2
flow rates (7, 10, 12, and 15 L min
−1
).
Results
A nasopharyngeal catheter was used to estimate He pharyngeal concentration (Fp [He]) in the airways in order to determine the percentage of contamination with room air (% air cont) at end-expiration. Under all testing conditions, the Hi-Ox
80
mask presented a significantly lower % air cont. During resting breathing pattern, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 54% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox
80
mask compared to 29% for the Heliox21 mask and only 17% for the standard mask. At hyperventilation, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 17% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox mask compared to 4% for the other two masks.
Conclusion
He–O
2
administration via the usual high-concentration reservoir masks results in significant dilution by room air. The Hi-Ox
80
mask minimized room air contamination and much more frequently achieved a pharyngeal He concentration higher than 50%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906557629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724321805</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724321805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-1909d1e0e93302b5034b99c3aafdd7089a101f8460e721051ccac5b3bf1a77b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdigCIRYpfg6cex0V5VfqRIbWFuOczNxSezBTqrOjnfgDXkSHGWgAg3ywtb1d699jg4hT4GeAaXidaQUijKnADkrOM_5PbKBsmA5sELeJxtalCwvq5KdkEcxXidaVBwekhMGtahA8g2Jb3CwNxj2me-yPp3n8ef3H_52v0WXjfZ2mgNm7Rys22Zx592kHfo5Zk1APfWpep7hjR5mPVnvlhlTHxCz3m773Hhn0E1hveu0wWzU8Wt8TB50eoj45LCfki_v3n6-_JBffXr_8fLiKje8lFMONa1bQIp1UVDW8KSmqWtTaN21raCy1kChk2VFUTCgHIzRhjdF04EWoqHFKXm1zt0F_23GOKnRRoPDsGpQNa04FxWrE_n8H_Laz8GlzylZy0pKASJBL1ZoqwdU1nU-STPLSHUhWLIdJOWJyo9QyU0MevAOO5vKf_FnR_i0WhytOdoAa4MJPsaAndoFO-qwV0DVEgu1xkKlWKglFmrpeXbQNzcjtn86fucgAS8PgI5GD13Qzth4x5XJby4Wo9jKxd0SCQx3Rv3_9V9a2M9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898688717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Roche-Campo, Ferran ; Vignaux, Laurence ; Galia, Fabrice ; Lyazidi, Aissam ; Vargas, Frédéric ; Texereau, Joëlle ; Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela ; Jolliet, Philippe ; Brochard, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Roche-Campo, Ferran ; Vignaux, Laurence ; Galia, Fabrice ; Lyazidi, Aissam ; Vargas, Frédéric ; Texereau, Joëlle ; Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela ; Jolliet, Philippe ; Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He–O
2
) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox
80
mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard high-concentration face mask.
Methods
This prospective randomized crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers in a laboratory setting. Volunteers breathed a mixture of 78% He/22% O
2
through each of the masks under two different breathing conditions (rest and hyperventilation: minute ventilation of 14.9 ± 6.1 and 26.7 ± 8.7 L min
−1
, respectively) and four different He–O
2
flow rates (7, 10, 12, and 15 L min
−1
).
Results
A nasopharyngeal catheter was used to estimate He pharyngeal concentration (Fp [He]) in the airways in order to determine the percentage of contamination with room air (% air cont) at end-expiration. Under all testing conditions, the Hi-Ox
80
mask presented a significantly lower % air cont. During resting breathing pattern, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 54% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox
80
mask compared to 29% for the Heliox21 mask and only 17% for the standard mask. At hyperventilation, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 17% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox mask compared to 4% for the other two masks.
Conclusion
He–O
2
administration via the usual high-concentration reservoir masks results in significant dilution by room air. The Hi-Ox
80
mask minimized room air contamination and much more frequently achieved a pharyngeal He concentration higher than 50%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21976185</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICMED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheters ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diseases of the respiratory system ; Emergency Medicine ; Female ; France ; Helium ; Helium - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Hyperventilation ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Masks - standards ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Oxygen - administration & dosage ; Pain Medicine ; Pediatrics ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Respiration ; Valves ; Ventilators ; Volunteers</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2011-11, Vol.37 (11), p.1787-1792, Article 1787</ispartof><rights>Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-1909d1e0e93302b5034b99c3aafdd7089a101f8460e721051ccac5b3bf1a77b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-1909d1e0e93302b5034b99c3aafdd7089a101f8460e721051ccac5b3bf1a77b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24708579$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roche-Campo, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vignaux, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galia, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyazidi, Aissam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texereau, Joëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolliet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><title>Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He–O
2
) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox
80
mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard high-concentration face mask.
Methods
This prospective randomized crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers in a laboratory setting. Volunteers breathed a mixture of 78% He/22% O
2
through each of the masks under two different breathing conditions (rest and hyperventilation: minute ventilation of 14.9 ± 6.1 and 26.7 ± 8.7 L min
−1
, respectively) and four different He–O
2
flow rates (7, 10, 12, and 15 L min
−1
).
Results
A nasopharyngeal catheter was used to estimate He pharyngeal concentration (Fp [He]) in the airways in order to determine the percentage of contamination with room air (% air cont) at end-expiration. Under all testing conditions, the Hi-Ox
80
mask presented a significantly lower % air cont. During resting breathing pattern, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 54% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox
80
mask compared to 29% for the Heliox21 mask and only 17% for the standard mask. At hyperventilation, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 17% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox mask compared to 4% for the other two masks.
Conclusion
He–O
2
administration via the usual high-concentration reservoir masks results in significant dilution by room air. The Hi-Ox
80
mask minimized room air contamination and much more frequently achieved a pharyngeal He concentration higher than 50%.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diseases of the respiratory system</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Helium - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperventilation</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masks - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Oxygen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Valves</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1u1DAUhS0EokPhAdigCIRYpfg6cex0V5VfqRIbWFuOczNxSezBTqrOjnfgDXkSHGWgAg3ywtb1d699jg4hT4GeAaXidaQUijKnADkrOM_5PbKBsmA5sELeJxtalCwvq5KdkEcxXidaVBwekhMGtahA8g2Jb3CwNxj2me-yPp3n8ef3H_52v0WXjfZ2mgNm7Rys22Zx592kHfo5Zk1APfWpep7hjR5mPVnvlhlTHxCz3m773Hhn0E1hveu0wWzU8Wt8TB50eoj45LCfki_v3n6-_JBffXr_8fLiKje8lFMONa1bQIp1UVDW8KSmqWtTaN21raCy1kChk2VFUTCgHIzRhjdF04EWoqHFKXm1zt0F_23GOKnRRoPDsGpQNa04FxWrE_n8H_Laz8GlzylZy0pKASJBL1ZoqwdU1nU-STPLSHUhWLIdJOWJyo9QyU0MevAOO5vKf_FnR_i0WhytOdoAa4MJPsaAndoFO-qwV0DVEgu1xkKlWKglFmrpeXbQNzcjtn86fucgAS8PgI5GD13Qzth4x5XJby4Wo9jKxd0SCQx3Rv3_9V9a2M9s</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Roche-Campo, Ferran</creator><creator>Vignaux, Laurence</creator><creator>Galia, Fabrice</creator><creator>Lyazidi, Aissam</creator><creator>Vargas, Frédéric</creator><creator>Texereau, Joëlle</creator><creator>Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela</creator><creator>Jolliet, Philippe</creator><creator>Brochard, Laurent</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks</title><author>Roche-Campo, Ferran ; Vignaux, Laurence ; Galia, Fabrice ; Lyazidi, Aissam ; Vargas, Frédéric ; Texereau, Joëlle ; Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela ; Jolliet, Philippe ; Brochard, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-1909d1e0e93302b5034b99c3aafdd7089a101f8460e721051ccac5b3bf1a77b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diseases of the respiratory system</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Helium - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperventilation</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masks - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Oxygen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Valves</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roche-Campo, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vignaux, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galia, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyazidi, Aissam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texereau, Joëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolliet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roche-Campo, Ferran</au><au>Vignaux, Laurence</au><au>Galia, Fabrice</au><au>Lyazidi, Aissam</au><au>Vargas, Frédéric</au><au>Texereau, Joëlle</au><au>Apiou-Sbirlea, Gabriela</au><au>Jolliet, Philippe</au><au>Brochard, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intensive Care Med</stitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1787</spage><epage>1792</epage><pages>1787-1792</pages><artnum>1787</artnum><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><coden>ICMED9</coden><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He–O
2
) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox
80
mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard high-concentration face mask.
Methods
This prospective randomized crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers in a laboratory setting. Volunteers breathed a mixture of 78% He/22% O
2
through each of the masks under two different breathing conditions (rest and hyperventilation: minute ventilation of 14.9 ± 6.1 and 26.7 ± 8.7 L min
−1
, respectively) and four different He–O
2
flow rates (7, 10, 12, and 15 L min
−1
).
Results
A nasopharyngeal catheter was used to estimate He pharyngeal concentration (Fp [He]) in the airways in order to determine the percentage of contamination with room air (% air cont) at end-expiration. Under all testing conditions, the Hi-Ox
80
mask presented a significantly lower % air cont. During resting breathing pattern, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 54% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox
80
mask compared to 29% for the Heliox21 mask and only 17% for the standard mask. At hyperventilation, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 17% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox mask compared to 4% for the other two masks.
Conclusion
He–O
2
administration via the usual high-concentration reservoir masks results in significant dilution by room air. The Hi-Ox
80
mask minimized room air contamination and much more frequently achieved a pharyngeal He concentration higher than 50%.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21976185</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-4642 |
ispartof | Intensive care medicine, 2011-11, Vol.37 (11), p.1787-1792, Article 1787 |
issn | 0342-4642 1432-1238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906557629 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesiology Biological and medical sciences Catheters Critical Care Medicine Cross-Over Studies Diseases of the respiratory system Emergency Medicine Female France Helium Helium - administration & dosage Humans Hyperventilation Intensive Intensive care Intensive care medicine Male Masks - standards Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Oxygen - administration & dosage Pain Medicine Pediatrics Pneumology/Respiratory System Prospective Studies Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Respiration Valves Ventilators Volunteers |
title | Delivery of helium–oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T01%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivery%20of%20helium%E2%80%93oxygen%20mixture%20during%20spontaneous%20breathing:%20evaluation%20of%20three%20high-concentration%20face%20masks&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Roche-Campo,%20Ferran&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1787&rft.epage=1792&rft.pages=1787-1792&rft.artnum=1787&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft.coden=ICMED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-011-2355-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724321805%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898688717&rft_id=info:pmid/21976185&rft_galeid=A724321805&rfr_iscdi=true |