Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers

We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.83-91
Hauptverfasser: Abbes, S., Sellami, H., Sellami, A., Hadrich, I., Amouri, I., Mahfoudh, N., Neji, S., Makni, F., Makni, H., Ayadi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
container_volume 31
creator Abbes, S.
Sellami, H.
Sellami, A.
Hadrich, I.
Amouri, I.
Mahfoudh, N.
Neji, S.
Makni, F.
Makni, H.
Ayadi, A.
description We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0.949 by combining four of them. By applying the new microsatellite markers GLM4, GLM5 and GLM6 we were able to discriminate 29 isolates, originally identified by the more established markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3. When epidemiologically closely related isolates from 36 patients were typed, 25 patients (72%) exhibited identical or highly related multilocus genotypes. We noted a microvariation in 4 of the patients. This minor change of one locus could be explained by a single step mutation. Since one of these patients had not received antifungal treatment; thus, the relationship between genome variation and antifungal therapy remains controversial. We can conclude from our analysis of these new microsatellite markers that they are highly selective and therefore should be considered as a useful typing system for differentiating related and unrelated isolates of C. glabrata, as well as being able to detect microvariation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906154084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519493461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-af2dd28d023ea6c541b757a40997ec813a110a64f2377f0d3220b684e89ad1a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZBNHLaj43ybEUv6DgRc_L7CZbtm63Ndki_fdO2WpB0EsCyTPvzDsvIeeM3jJK9V3E02YpZSxl3NBUHpAhk0KlUmhxSIbUCplazcWAnMQ4p1hjtD4mA86UNVSLIRlPoHW1g2TWQBGggyR2Aeo2Cb6BzrvWx5gUm6T1n8miLsMy4mvT1J1PFhDefYin5KiCJvqz3T0ibw_3r5OndPry-DwZT9NSZlmXQsWd48ZRLjxkpZKs0EqDpNZqXxomgDEKmay40LqiTnBOi8xIbyw4BkyMyHWvuwrLj7WPXb6oY4mzQOuX65hbmjElqZFI3vxLMlwYp6htEL38hc6X69CiD9RTNtMKtzQirIe29mPwVb4KNbrfoFK-DSLvg8hRN98GkW9nuNgJr4uFdz8V35tH4GoHQCyhqQK0ZR33nFJWIYwc77mIX-3Mh_2Ef3f_AjEFnfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905967507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Abbes, S. ; Sellami, H. ; Sellami, A. ; Hadrich, I. ; Amouri, I. ; Mahfoudh, N. ; Neji, S. ; Makni, F. ; Makni, H. ; Ayadi, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbes, S. ; Sellami, H. ; Sellami, A. ; Hadrich, I. ; Amouri, I. ; Mahfoudh, N. ; Neji, S. ; Makni, F. ; Makni, H. ; Ayadi, A.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0.949 by combining four of them. By applying the new microsatellite markers GLM4, GLM5 and GLM6 we were able to discriminate 29 isolates, originally identified by the more established markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3. When epidemiologically closely related isolates from 36 patients were typed, 25 patients (72%) exhibited identical or highly related multilocus genotypes. We noted a microvariation in 4 of the patients. This minor change of one locus could be explained by a single step mutation. Since one of these patients had not received antifungal treatment; thus, the relationship between genome variation and antifungal therapy remains controversial. We can conclude from our analysis of these new microsatellite markers that they are highly selective and therefore should be considered as a useful typing system for differentiating related and unrelated isolates of C. glabrata, as well as being able to detect microvariation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21598073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abscesses ; Antifungal Agents - pharmacology ; Base Sequence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Candida glabrata ; Candida glabrata - classification ; Candida glabrata - drug effects ; Candida glabrata - genetics ; Candida glabrata - isolation &amp; purification ; Candidiasis - drug therapy ; Candidiasis - microbiology ; Chromosomes ; DNA, Fungal - genetics ; Female ; Fluconazole - pharmacology ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic Markers ; Genetic Variation ; Genomes ; Genotype ; Genotypes ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Microbiology ; Medical sciences ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Microsatellites ; Mutation ; Mycological Typing Techniques ; Patients ; Polymorphism ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases, 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.83-91</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-af2dd28d023ea6c541b757a40997ec813a110a64f2377f0d3220b684e89ad1a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-af2dd28d023ea6c541b757a40997ec813a110a64f2377f0d3220b684e89ad1a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25595215$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21598073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellami, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellami, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadrich, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amouri, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoudh, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makni, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makni, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayadi, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0.949 by combining four of them. By applying the new microsatellite markers GLM4, GLM5 and GLM6 we were able to discriminate 29 isolates, originally identified by the more established markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3. When epidemiologically closely related isolates from 36 patients were typed, 25 patients (72%) exhibited identical or highly related multilocus genotypes. We noted a microvariation in 4 of the patients. This minor change of one locus could be explained by a single step mutation. Since one of these patients had not received antifungal treatment; thus, the relationship between genome variation and antifungal therapy remains controversial. We can conclude from our analysis of these new microsatellite markers that they are highly selective and therefore should be considered as a useful typing system for differentiating related and unrelated isolates of C. glabrata, as well as being able to detect microvariation.</description><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Candida glabrata</subject><subject>Candida glabrata - classification</subject><subject>Candida glabrata - drug effects</subject><subject>Candida glabrata - genetics</subject><subject>Candida glabrata - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Candidiasis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Candidiasis - microbiology</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>DNA, Fungal - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluconazole - pharmacology</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic Markers</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Mycological Typing Techniques</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBdZBNHLaj43ybEUv6DgRc_L7CZbtm63Ndki_fdO2WpB0EsCyTPvzDsvIeeM3jJK9V3E02YpZSxl3NBUHpAhk0KlUmhxSIbUCplazcWAnMQ4p1hjtD4mA86UNVSLIRlPoHW1g2TWQBGggyR2Aeo2Cb6BzrvWx5gUm6T1n8miLsMy4mvT1J1PFhDefYin5KiCJvqz3T0ibw_3r5OndPry-DwZT9NSZlmXQsWd48ZRLjxkpZKs0EqDpNZqXxomgDEKmay40LqiTnBOi8xIbyw4BkyMyHWvuwrLj7WPXb6oY4mzQOuX65hbmjElqZFI3vxLMlwYp6htEL38hc6X69CiD9RTNtMKtzQirIe29mPwVb4KNbrfoFK-DSLvg8hRN98GkW9nuNgJr4uFdz8V35tH4GoHQCyhqQK0ZR33nFJWIYwc77mIX-3Mh_2Ef3f_AjEFnfY</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Abbes, S.</creator><creator>Sellami, H.</creator><creator>Sellami, A.</creator><creator>Hadrich, I.</creator><creator>Amouri, I.</creator><creator>Mahfoudh, N.</creator><creator>Neji, S.</creator><creator>Makni, F.</creator><creator>Makni, H.</creator><creator>Ayadi, A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers</title><author>Abbes, S. ; Sellami, H. ; Sellami, A. ; Hadrich, I. ; Amouri, I. ; Mahfoudh, N. ; Neji, S. ; Makni, F. ; Makni, H. ; Ayadi, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-af2dd28d023ea6c541b757a40997ec813a110a64f2377f0d3220b684e89ad1a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Candida glabrata</topic><topic>Candida glabrata - classification</topic><topic>Candida glabrata - drug effects</topic><topic>Candida glabrata - genetics</topic><topic>Candida glabrata - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Candidiasis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Candidiasis - microbiology</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>DNA, Fungal - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluconazole - pharmacology</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic Markers</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Mycological Typing Techniques</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellami, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellami, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadrich, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amouri, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfoudh, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makni, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makni, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayadi, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbes, S.</au><au>Sellami, H.</au><au>Sellami, A.</au><au>Hadrich, I.</au><au>Amouri, I.</au><au>Mahfoudh, N.</au><au>Neji, S.</au><au>Makni, F.</au><au>Makni, H.</au><au>Ayadi, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>83-91</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0.949 by combining four of them. By applying the new microsatellite markers GLM4, GLM5 and GLM6 we were able to discriminate 29 isolates, originally identified by the more established markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3. When epidemiologically closely related isolates from 36 patients were typed, 25 patients (72%) exhibited identical or highly related multilocus genotypes. We noted a microvariation in 4 of the patients. This minor change of one locus could be explained by a single step mutation. Since one of these patients had not received antifungal treatment; thus, the relationship between genome variation and antifungal therapy remains controversial. We can conclude from our analysis of these new microsatellite markers that they are highly selective and therefore should be considered as a useful typing system for differentiating related and unrelated isolates of C. glabrata, as well as being able to detect microvariation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21598073</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-9723
ispartof European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2012-01, Vol.31 (1), p.83-91
issn 0934-9723
1435-4373
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_906154084
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Abscesses
Antifungal Agents - pharmacology
Base Sequence
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Candida glabrata
Candida glabrata - classification
Candida glabrata - drug effects
Candida glabrata - genetics
Candida glabrata - isolation & purification
Candidiasis - drug therapy
Candidiasis - microbiology
Chromosomes
DNA, Fungal - genetics
Female
Fluconazole - pharmacology
Genetic diversity
Genetic Markers
Genetic Variation
Genomes
Genotype
Genotypes
Humans
Infectious diseases
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical Microbiology
Medical sciences
Microsatellite Repeats
Microsatellites
Mutation
Mycological Typing Techniques
Patients
Polymorphism
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Vagina
title Candida glabrata strain relatedness by new microsatellite markers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Candida%20glabrata%20strain%20relatedness%20by%20new%20microsatellite%20markers&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Abbes,%20S.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=83-91&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10096-011-1280-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519493461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905967507&rft_id=info:pmid/21598073&rfr_iscdi=true