Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists
Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material & Methods Forty dental students in their final ye...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical periodontology 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1098 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1091 |
container_title | Journal of clinical periodontology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Matas, Francesc Sentís, Joan Mendieta, Carlos |
description | Aim
To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession.
Material & Methods
Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley & Hein index.
Results
The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905871910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>905871910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVAkhDgljOPYjg8gwVIKVQVIFNHbyHEmlZdsUuwN7L49DrssEid88Wj8zT8zvxnLOBQ8neergiuAHCS_LkrgvACujSm2d9ji-HCXLUCAyJXR5oQ9iHEFiRJC3GcnZQmmlFAu2IsrGvId2ZD143DjN1PrB9tnMQW7bOyyG5-yP1ImkKMY_ThkfshaGjY-buJDdq-zfaRHh_uUfXl7drV8l19-PH-_fHWZu0pJkzddJdMYIK3lTtpKtI1UUlWWhG4r43STllCSOlvXTWfqqrGaVGOldV0rHIlT9myvexvG7xPFDa59dNT3dqBximhA1pobDol88g-5GqeQVorIZSWhBlWqRNV7yoUxxkAd3ga_tmGHHHB2GFc4G4mzkTg7jL8dxm0qfXxoMDVrao-FfyxNwNMDYKOzfRfs4Hz8y1W6lqDmGV7uuZ--p91_D4AXy09nc5gE8r1A-gnaHgVs-IZKCy3x64dzfPNZXOjX1xJB_AIn_KWt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545080626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession.
Material & Methods
Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley & Hein index.
Results
The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-051X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22092502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; Dental Plaque - prevention & control ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Disease Progression ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; gingival recession ; Gingival Recession - etiology ; Gingival Recession - prevention & control ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; longitudinal study ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Non tumoral diseases ; Oral Hygiene ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Periodontal Index ; prevalence ; progression/regression ; Single-Blind Method ; tooth brushing ; Toothbrushing - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical periodontology, 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.2011.01799.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.2011.01799.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24785066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22092502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentís, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><title>Journal of clinical periodontology</title><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><description>Aim
To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession.
Material & Methods
Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley & Hein index.
Results
The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gingival recession</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - etiology</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - prevention & control</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>longitudinal study</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>prevalence</subject><subject>progression/regression</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>tooth brushing</subject><subject>Toothbrushing - adverse effects</subject><issn>0303-6979</issn><issn>1600-051X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVAkhDgljOPYjg8gwVIKVQVIFNHbyHEmlZdsUuwN7L49DrssEid88Wj8zT8zvxnLOBQ8neergiuAHCS_LkrgvACujSm2d9ji-HCXLUCAyJXR5oQ9iHEFiRJC3GcnZQmmlFAu2IsrGvId2ZD143DjN1PrB9tnMQW7bOyyG5-yP1ImkKMY_ThkfshaGjY-buJDdq-zfaRHh_uUfXl7drV8l19-PH-_fHWZu0pJkzddJdMYIK3lTtpKtI1UUlWWhG4r43STllCSOlvXTWfqqrGaVGOldV0rHIlT9myvexvG7xPFDa59dNT3dqBximhA1pobDol88g-5GqeQVorIZSWhBlWqRNV7yoUxxkAd3ga_tmGHHHB2GFc4G4mzkTg7jL8dxm0qfXxoMDVrao-FfyxNwNMDYKOzfRfs4Hz8y1W6lqDmGV7uuZ--p91_D4AXy09nc5gE8r1A-gnaHgVs-IZKCy3x64dzfPNZXOjX1xJB_AIn_KWt</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Matas, Francesc</creator><creator>Sentís, Joan</creator><creator>Mendieta, Carlos</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><author>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dental Plaque - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gingival recession</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - etiology</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - prevention & control</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>longitudinal study</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>prevalence</topic><topic>progression/regression</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>tooth brushing</topic><topic>Toothbrushing - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentís, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matas, Francesc</au><au>Sentís, Joan</au><au>Mendieta, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1098</epage><pages>1091-1098</pages><issn>0303-6979</issn><eissn>1600-051X</eissn><abstract>Aim
To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession.
Material & Methods
Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley & Hein index.
Results
The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22092502</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-6979 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical periodontology, 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098 |
issn | 0303-6979 1600-051X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905871910 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cohort Studies Dental Plaque - prevention & control Dentistry Dentists Disease Progression Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology Female gingival recession Gingival Recession - etiology Gingival Recession - prevention & control Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Longitudinal Studies longitudinal study Male Medical sciences Non tumoral diseases Oral Hygiene Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Periodontal Index prevalence progression/regression Single-Blind Method tooth brushing Toothbrushing - adverse effects |
title | Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A52%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten-year%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20gingival%20recession%20in%20dentists&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20periodontology&rft.au=Matas,%20Francesc&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1098&rft.pages=1091-1098&rft.issn=0303-6979&rft.eissn=1600-051X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905871910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545080626&rft_id=info:pmid/22092502&rfr_iscdi=true |