Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists

Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material & Methods Forty dental students in their final ye...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098
Hauptverfasser: Matas, Francesc, Sentís, Joan, Mendieta, Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1098
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1091
container_title Journal of clinical periodontology
container_volume 38
creator Matas, Francesc
Sentís, Joan
Mendieta, Carlos
description Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material & Methods Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley & Hein index. Results The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905871910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>905871910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVAkhDgljOPYjg8gwVIKVQVIFNHbyHEmlZdsUuwN7L49DrssEid88Wj8zT8zvxnLOBQ8neergiuAHCS_LkrgvACujSm2d9ji-HCXLUCAyJXR5oQ9iHEFiRJC3GcnZQmmlFAu2IsrGvId2ZD143DjN1PrB9tnMQW7bOyyG5-yP1ImkKMY_ThkfshaGjY-buJDdq-zfaRHh_uUfXl7drV8l19-PH-_fHWZu0pJkzddJdMYIK3lTtpKtI1UUlWWhG4r43STllCSOlvXTWfqqrGaVGOldV0rHIlT9myvexvG7xPFDa59dNT3dqBximhA1pobDol88g-5GqeQVorIZSWhBlWqRNV7yoUxxkAd3ga_tmGHHHB2GFc4G4mzkTg7jL8dxm0qfXxoMDVrao-FfyxNwNMDYKOzfRfs4Hz8y1W6lqDmGV7uuZ--p91_D4AXy09nc5gE8r1A-gnaHgVs-IZKCy3x64dzfPNZXOjX1xJB_AIn_KWt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545080626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material &amp; Methods Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley &amp; Hein index. Results The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-051X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22092502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; Dental Plaque - prevention &amp; control ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; Disease Progression ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; gingival recession ; Gingival Recession - etiology ; Gingival Recession - prevention &amp; control ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; longitudinal study ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Non tumoral diseases ; Oral Hygiene ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Periodontal Index ; prevalence ; progression/regression ; Single-Blind Method ; tooth brushing ; Toothbrushing - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical periodontology, 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.2011.01799.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-051X.2011.01799.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24785066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22092502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentís, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><title>Journal of clinical periodontology</title><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><description>Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material &amp; Methods Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley &amp; Hein index. Results The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dental Plaque - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gingival recession</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - etiology</subject><subject>Gingival Recession - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>longitudinal study</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>prevalence</subject><subject>progression/regression</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>tooth brushing</subject><subject>Toothbrushing - adverse effects</subject><issn>0303-6979</issn><issn>1600-051X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVAkhDgljOPYjg8gwVIKVQVIFNHbyHEmlZdsUuwN7L49DrssEid88Wj8zT8zvxnLOBQ8neergiuAHCS_LkrgvACujSm2d9ji-HCXLUCAyJXR5oQ9iHEFiRJC3GcnZQmmlFAu2IsrGvId2ZD143DjN1PrB9tnMQW7bOyyG5-yP1ImkKMY_ThkfshaGjY-buJDdq-zfaRHh_uUfXl7drV8l19-PH-_fHWZu0pJkzddJdMYIK3lTtpKtI1UUlWWhG4r43STllCSOlvXTWfqqrGaVGOldV0rHIlT9myvexvG7xPFDa59dNT3dqBximhA1pobDol88g-5GqeQVorIZSWhBlWqRNV7yoUxxkAd3ga_tmGHHHB2GFc4G4mzkTg7jL8dxm0qfXxoMDVrao-FfyxNwNMDYKOzfRfs4Hz8y1W6lqDmGV7uuZ--p91_D4AXy09nc5gE8r1A-gnaHgVs-IZKCy3x64dzfPNZXOjX1xJB_AIn_KWt</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Matas, Francesc</creator><creator>Sentís, Joan</creator><creator>Mendieta, Carlos</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</title><author>Matas, Francesc ; Sentís, Joan ; Mendieta, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4659-bf4569705aa1c5a43db56564ae37d49c7b20165efa88bf984ba7e6ba5acfd3ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dental Plaque - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gingival recession</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - etiology</topic><topic>Gingival Recession - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>longitudinal study</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>prevalence</topic><topic>progression/regression</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>tooth brushing</topic><topic>Toothbrushing - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matas, Francesc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sentís, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendieta, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matas, Francesc</au><au>Sentís, Joan</au><au>Mendieta, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical periodontology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Periodontol</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1098</epage><pages>1091-1098</pages><issn>0303-6979</issn><eissn>1600-051X</eissn><abstract>Aim To assess the prevalence and progression/regression of gingival recession in a population sample with a high standard of oral hygiene and broad knowledge of the role of traumatic tooth brushing in the aetiology of gingival recession. Material &amp; Methods Forty dental students in their final year at Dental School were examined for gingival recession in 1994 and 10 years later by the same examiner. Tooth brushing habits were ascertained in a questionnaire. Clinical parameters recorded for each recession were: recession height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva and bleeding on probing. Full‐mouth plaque index was recorded using the modified Quigley &amp; Hein index. Results The prevalence of gingival recession was 85% and did not change after 10 years. A total of 210 recessions found at the initial examination and 299 at the second were valid for longitudinal evaluation. Statistical differences between recessions at both examinations were found in several clinical parameters. Subjects had a significant increase in the plaque index at the second examination despite very few changes in their oral hygiene habits (p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In dentists, after 10 years, mean number of gingival recession per person and mean recession height increased while plaque control decreased.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22092502</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-6979
ispartof Journal of clinical periodontology, 2011-12, Vol.38 (12), p.1091-1098
issn 0303-6979
1600-051X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905871910
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cohort Studies
Dental Plaque - prevention & control
Dentistry
Dentists
Disease Progression
Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology
Female
gingival recession
Gingival Recession - etiology
Gingival Recession - prevention & control
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
longitudinal study
Male
Medical sciences
Non tumoral diseases
Oral Hygiene
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Periodontal Index
prevalence
progression/regression
Single-Blind Method
tooth brushing
Toothbrushing - adverse effects
title Ten-year longitudinal study of gingival recession in dentists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A52%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten-year%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20gingival%20recession%20in%20dentists&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20periodontology&rft.au=Matas,%20Francesc&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1098&rft.pages=1091-1098&rft.issn=0303-6979&rft.eissn=1600-051X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01799.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905871910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545080626&rft_id=info:pmid/22092502&rfr_iscdi=true