Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence

High-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT) may erroneously demonstrate a superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) where none exists and inaccurately display the size of a dehiscence. CT is an integral component of the diagnosis of SSCD. The prevalence of dehiscence as measured on co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otology & neurotology 2011-12, Vol.32 (9), p.1500-1505
Hauptverfasser: Sequeira, Sunitha M, Whiting, Bruce R, Shimony, Joshua S, Vo, Katie D, Hullar, Timothy E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1505
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1500
container_title Otology & neurotology
container_volume 32
creator Sequeira, Sunitha M
Whiting, Bruce R
Shimony, Joshua S
Vo, Katie D
Hullar, Timothy E
description High-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT) may erroneously demonstrate a superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) where none exists and inaccurately display the size of a dehiscence. CT is an integral component of the diagnosis of SSCD. The prevalence of dehiscence as measured on computed tomographic scan is approximately eightfold higher than that on histologic studies, suggesting that CT may have a relatively low specificity for identifying canal dehiscence. This, in turn, can lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan. We quantified the accuracy of CT in identifying a dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal in a cadaver model using microCT as a gold standard. The superior canals of 11 cadaver heads were blue lined. Twelve of the 22 ears were further drilled to create fenestrations of varying sizes. Heads were imaged using medical CT, followed by microCT scans of the temporal bones at 18-µm resolution. Diagnosis of dehiscence and measurements of dehiscence size were performed on clinical CT and compared with that of microCT. Clinical CT identified 7 of 8 intact canals as dehiscent and tended to overestimate the size of smaller fenestrations, particularly those surrounded by thin bone. These findings confirm that medical CT cannot be used as the exclusive gold standard for SSCD and that, particularly for small dehiscences on CT, clinical symptoms must be clearly indicative of a dehiscence before surgical treatment is undertaken. Preoperative counseling for small dehiscences may need to include the possibility that no dehiscence may be found despite radiologic evidence for it.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318238280c
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905676101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>905676101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c08f635130f231ebdf17e1d237872519ca227e825864699b2125c27b851e352f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKxpTiO9exM1YVBaSiLjBHjnOhQUkc7GTovyelhYHpTrr34_Qwdgt8DjxVD6_L7ZznHAQJ0Cg0am7P2BSkUPFCcnn-s0OsANMJuwrhk3NQQqpLNkHkCjGBKVsvrR28sfvIlZF1TTf0VES9a9yHN91uHxXUk-0r1x4EYejIV85H1rSmHm-7KlhqLV2zi9LUgW5Oc8be149vq-d4s316WS03sRU86WPLdZkICYKXKIDyogRFUKBQWqGE1BpERRqlThZJmuYIKC2qXEsgIbEUM3Z_zO28-xoo9Flz-KCuTUtuCFnKZaISGKnM2OKotN6F4KnMOl81xu8z4NkBYDYCzP4DHG13p4Ihb6j4M_0SE99-1mtv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905676101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sequeira, Sunitha M ; Whiting, Bruce R ; Shimony, Joshua S ; Vo, Katie D ; Hullar, Timothy E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Sunitha M ; Whiting, Bruce R ; Shimony, Joshua S ; Vo, Katie D ; Hullar, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><description>High-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT) may erroneously demonstrate a superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) where none exists and inaccurately display the size of a dehiscence. CT is an integral component of the diagnosis of SSCD. The prevalence of dehiscence as measured on computed tomographic scan is approximately eightfold higher than that on histologic studies, suggesting that CT may have a relatively low specificity for identifying canal dehiscence. This, in turn, can lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan. We quantified the accuracy of CT in identifying a dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal in a cadaver model using microCT as a gold standard. The superior canals of 11 cadaver heads were blue lined. Twelve of the 22 ears were further drilled to create fenestrations of varying sizes. Heads were imaged using medical CT, followed by microCT scans of the temporal bones at 18-µm resolution. Diagnosis of dehiscence and measurements of dehiscence size were performed on clinical CT and compared with that of microCT. Clinical CT identified 7 of 8 intact canals as dehiscent and tended to overestimate the size of smaller fenestrations, particularly those surrounded by thin bone. These findings confirm that medical CT cannot be used as the exclusive gold standard for SSCD and that, particularly for small dehiscences on CT, clinical symptoms must be clearly indicative of a dehiscence before surgical treatment is undertaken. Preoperative counseling for small dehiscences may need to include the possibility that no dehiscence may be found despite radiologic evidence for it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-7129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318238280c</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22072261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Humans ; Labyrinth Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Semicircular Canals - diagnostic imaging ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Otology &amp; neurotology, 2011-12, Vol.32 (9), p.1500-1505</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c08f635130f231ebdf17e1d237872519ca227e825864699b2125c27b851e352f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c08f635130f231ebdf17e1d237872519ca227e825864699b2125c27b851e352f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22072261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Sunitha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Bruce R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Joshua S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, Katie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hullar, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence</title><title>Otology &amp; neurotology</title><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><description>High-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT) may erroneously demonstrate a superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) where none exists and inaccurately display the size of a dehiscence. CT is an integral component of the diagnosis of SSCD. The prevalence of dehiscence as measured on computed tomographic scan is approximately eightfold higher than that on histologic studies, suggesting that CT may have a relatively low specificity for identifying canal dehiscence. This, in turn, can lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan. We quantified the accuracy of CT in identifying a dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal in a cadaver model using microCT as a gold standard. The superior canals of 11 cadaver heads were blue lined. Twelve of the 22 ears were further drilled to create fenestrations of varying sizes. Heads were imaged using medical CT, followed by microCT scans of the temporal bones at 18-µm resolution. Diagnosis of dehiscence and measurements of dehiscence size were performed on clinical CT and compared with that of microCT. Clinical CT identified 7 of 8 intact canals as dehiscent and tended to overestimate the size of smaller fenestrations, particularly those surrounded by thin bone. These findings confirm that medical CT cannot be used as the exclusive gold standard for SSCD and that, particularly for small dehiscences on CT, clinical symptoms must be clearly indicative of a dehiscence before surgical treatment is undertaken. Preoperative counseling for small dehiscences may need to include the possibility that no dehiscence may be found despite radiologic evidence for it.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labyrinth Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Semicircular Canals - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1531-7129</issn><issn>1537-4505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwDxDKxpTiO9exM1YVBaSiLjBHjnOhQUkc7GTovyelhYHpTrr34_Qwdgt8DjxVD6_L7ZznHAQJ0Cg0am7P2BSkUPFCcnn-s0OsANMJuwrhk3NQQqpLNkHkCjGBKVsvrR28sfvIlZF1TTf0VES9a9yHN91uHxXUk-0r1x4EYejIV85H1rSmHm-7KlhqLV2zi9LUgW5Oc8be149vq-d4s316WS03sRU86WPLdZkICYKXKIDyogRFUKBQWqGE1BpERRqlThZJmuYIKC2qXEsgIbEUM3Z_zO28-xoo9Flz-KCuTUtuCFnKZaISGKnM2OKotN6F4KnMOl81xu8z4NkBYDYCzP4DHG13p4Ihb6j4M_0SE99-1mtv</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Sequeira, Sunitha M</creator><creator>Whiting, Bruce R</creator><creator>Shimony, Joshua S</creator><creator>Vo, Katie D</creator><creator>Hullar, Timothy E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence</title><author>Sequeira, Sunitha M ; Whiting, Bruce R ; Shimony, Joshua S ; Vo, Katie D ; Hullar, Timothy E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-c08f635130f231ebdf17e1d237872519ca227e825864699b2125c27b851e352f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labyrinth Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Semicircular Canals - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sequeira, Sunitha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Bruce R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimony, Joshua S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vo, Katie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hullar, Timothy E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sequeira, Sunitha M</au><au>Whiting, Bruce R</au><au>Shimony, Joshua S</au><au>Vo, Katie D</au><au>Hullar, Timothy E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence</atitle><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1500</spage><epage>1505</epage><pages>1500-1505</pages><issn>1531-7129</issn><eissn>1537-4505</eissn><abstract>High-resolution temporal bone computed tomography (CT) may erroneously demonstrate a superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) where none exists and inaccurately display the size of a dehiscence. CT is an integral component of the diagnosis of SSCD. The prevalence of dehiscence as measured on computed tomographic scan is approximately eightfold higher than that on histologic studies, suggesting that CT may have a relatively low specificity for identifying canal dehiscence. This, in turn, can lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan. We quantified the accuracy of CT in identifying a dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal in a cadaver model using microCT as a gold standard. The superior canals of 11 cadaver heads were blue lined. Twelve of the 22 ears were further drilled to create fenestrations of varying sizes. Heads were imaged using medical CT, followed by microCT scans of the temporal bones at 18-µm resolution. Diagnosis of dehiscence and measurements of dehiscence size were performed on clinical CT and compared with that of microCT. Clinical CT identified 7 of 8 intact canals as dehiscent and tended to overestimate the size of smaller fenestrations, particularly those surrounded by thin bone. These findings confirm that medical CT cannot be used as the exclusive gold standard for SSCD and that, particularly for small dehiscences on CT, clinical symptoms must be clearly indicative of a dehiscence before surgical treatment is undertaken. Preoperative counseling for small dehiscences may need to include the possibility that no dehiscence may be found despite radiologic evidence for it.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22072261</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAO.0b013e318238280c</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-7129
ispartof Otology & neurotology, 2011-12, Vol.32 (9), p.1500-1505
issn 1531-7129
1537-4505
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905676101
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Humans
Labyrinth Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Semicircular Canals - diagnostic imaging
Sensitivity and Specificity
Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Accuracy of computed tomography detection of superior canal dehiscence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A03%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20computed%20tomography%20detection%20of%20superior%20canal%20dehiscence&rft.jtitle=Otology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Sequeira,%20Sunitha%20M&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1500&rft.epage=1505&rft.pages=1500-1505&rft.issn=1531-7129&rft.eissn=1537-4505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318238280c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905676101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905676101&rft_id=info:pmid/22072261&rfr_iscdi=true