De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients
Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3331 |
container_title | Transplantation proceedings |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Novoa, P.A Grinyó, J.M Ramos, F.J.P Errasti, P Franco, A Aldana, G Pefaur, J Marti-Cuadros, A.M Otero, A.B Saval, N Oppenheimer, F |
description | Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134511014151</els_id><sourcerecordid>905675108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6L0gQxKeu-dU29UGQvfVOOBX0Dh9Dmk4wa7fZS9qF9a936u6h-ORTMpnvfGf4ZAh5wdmSM1693izHZIe8S9EBdEvBOMfEkknxgCy4rmUhKiEfkgVjihdcqvKMPMl5wzAWSj4mZ0KwpqkbviDhAuinuI_0NgONnq73kGIftlOm38L4na7xHgY7hjjQmOjHMGD88xR7ujq4PuZdTGEAGgb6BQbb05vf4_V2GPHBhV2AYcxPySNv-wzPTuc5uX2_vlldFdefLz-s3l0XTlVqLKDx3NtWN2WndANt7cuq8o2ypZZdq2XdQqWVB18LrztfMVGLFqSEUrPZQZ6TV0df5HM3QR7NNmQHPY4DccqmYWVVl5xpVL45Kl2KOSfwZpfC1qaD4czMpM3G_E3azKTnHJLG4uenNlO7xdx96T1aFLw8CWx2tvdo5EL-oyuFaCpVo-7iqAOEsg-QTHYIzEEXErjRdDH83zxv_7FxPX4Wdv4BB8ibOCX8mmy4ycIw83XejXk1OBorXnL5C-RWuV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905675108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22099791</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cyclosporine - adverse effects ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; Everolimus ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney Transplantation - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies ; Sirolimus - adverse effects ; Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives ; Sirolimus - therapeutic use ; Steroids - therapeutic use ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134511014151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25229647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyó, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, F.J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldana, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pefaur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, A.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saval, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Everolimus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Graft Rejection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sirolimus - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Steroids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6L0gQxKeu-dU29UGQvfVOOBX0Dh9Dmk4wa7fZS9qF9a936u6h-ORTMpnvfGf4ZAh5wdmSM1693izHZIe8S9EBdEvBOMfEkknxgCy4rmUhKiEfkgVjihdcqvKMPMl5wzAWSj4mZ0KwpqkbviDhAuinuI_0NgONnq73kGIftlOm38L4na7xHgY7hjjQmOjHMGD88xR7ujq4PuZdTGEAGgb6BQbb05vf4_V2GPHBhV2AYcxPySNv-wzPTuc5uX2_vlldFdefLz-s3l0XTlVqLKDx3NtWN2WndANt7cuq8o2ypZZdq2XdQqWVB18LrztfMVGLFqSEUrPZQZ6TV0df5HM3QR7NNmQHPY4DccqmYWVVl5xpVL45Kl2KOSfwZpfC1qaD4czMpM3G_E3azKTnHJLG4uenNlO7xdx96T1aFLw8CWx2tvdo5EL-oyuFaCpVo-7iqAOEsg-QTHYIzEEXErjRdDH83zxv_7FxPX4Wdv4BB8ibOCX8mmy4ycIw83XejXk1OBorXnL5C-RWuV4</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Novoa, P.A</creator><creator>Grinyó, J.M</creator><creator>Ramos, F.J.P</creator><creator>Errasti, P</creator><creator>Franco, A</creator><creator>Aldana, G</creator><creator>Pefaur, J</creator><creator>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creator><creator>Otero, A.B</creator><creator>Saval, N</creator><creator>Oppenheimer, F</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><author>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Everolimus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Graft Rejection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sirolimus - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Steroids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyó, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, F.J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldana, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pefaur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, A.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saval, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novoa, P.A</au><au>Grinyó, J.M</au><au>Ramos, F.J.P</au><au>Errasti, P</au><au>Franco, A</au><au>Aldana, G</au><au>Pefaur, J</au><au>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</au><au>Otero, A.B</au><au>Saval, N</au><au>Oppenheimer, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3331</spage><epage>3339</epage><pages>3331-3339</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22099791</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1345 |
ispartof | Transplantation proceedings, 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339 |
issn | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675108 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Biological and medical sciences Cyclosporine - adverse effects Cyclosporine - therapeutic use Everolimus Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Fundamental immunology Glomerular Filtration Rate Graft Rejection Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use Kidney - physiopathology Kidney Transplantation - methods Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prospective Studies Sirolimus - adverse effects Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives Sirolimus - therapeutic use Steroids - therapeutic use Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Tissue, organ and graft immunology Treatment Outcome |
title | De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De%20Novo%20Use%20of%20Everolimus%20With%20Elimination%20or%20Minimization%20of%20Cyclosporine%20in%20Renal%20Transplant%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Novoa,%20P.A&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3331&rft.epage=3339&rft.pages=3331-3339&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905675108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905675108&rft_id=info:pmid/22099791&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134511014151&rfr_iscdi=true |