De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients

Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339
Hauptverfasser: Novoa, P.A, Grinyó, J.M, Ramos, F.J.P, Errasti, P, Franco, A, Aldana, G, Pefaur, J, Marti-Cuadros, A.M, Otero, A.B, Saval, N, Oppenheimer, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3339
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3331
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 43
creator Novoa, P.A
Grinyó, J.M
Ramos, F.J.P
Errasti, P
Franco, A
Aldana, G
Pefaur, J
Marti-Cuadros, A.M
Otero, A.B
Saval, N
Oppenheimer, F
description Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134511014151</els_id><sourcerecordid>905675108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6L0gQxKeu-dU29UGQvfVOOBX0Dh9Dmk4wa7fZS9qF9a936u6h-ORTMpnvfGf4ZAh5wdmSM1693izHZIe8S9EBdEvBOMfEkknxgCy4rmUhKiEfkgVjihdcqvKMPMl5wzAWSj4mZ0KwpqkbviDhAuinuI_0NgONnq73kGIftlOm38L4na7xHgY7hjjQmOjHMGD88xR7ujq4PuZdTGEAGgb6BQbb05vf4_V2GPHBhV2AYcxPySNv-wzPTuc5uX2_vlldFdefLz-s3l0XTlVqLKDx3NtWN2WndANt7cuq8o2ypZZdq2XdQqWVB18LrztfMVGLFqSEUrPZQZ6TV0df5HM3QR7NNmQHPY4DccqmYWVVl5xpVL45Kl2KOSfwZpfC1qaD4czMpM3G_E3azKTnHJLG4uenNlO7xdx96T1aFLw8CWx2tvdo5EL-oyuFaCpVo-7iqAOEsg-QTHYIzEEXErjRdDH83zxv_7FxPX4Wdv4BB8ibOCX8mmy4ycIw83XejXk1OBorXnL5C-RWuV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905675108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P &lt; .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22099791</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cyclosporine - adverse effects ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; Everolimus ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney Transplantation - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Prospective Studies ; Sirolimus - adverse effects ; Sirolimus - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Sirolimus - therapeutic use ; Steroids - therapeutic use ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134511014151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25229647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyó, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, F.J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldana, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pefaur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, A.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saval, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P &lt; .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Everolimus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Graft Rejection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sirolimus - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sirolimus - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Steroids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6L0gQxKeu-dU29UGQvfVOOBX0Dh9Dmk4wa7fZS9qF9a936u6h-ORTMpnvfGf4ZAh5wdmSM1693izHZIe8S9EBdEvBOMfEkknxgCy4rmUhKiEfkgVjihdcqvKMPMl5wzAWSj4mZ0KwpqkbviDhAuinuI_0NgONnq73kGIftlOm38L4na7xHgY7hjjQmOjHMGD88xR7ujq4PuZdTGEAGgb6BQbb05vf4_V2GPHBhV2AYcxPySNv-wzPTuc5uX2_vlldFdefLz-s3l0XTlVqLKDx3NtWN2WndANt7cuq8o2ypZZdq2XdQqWVB18LrztfMVGLFqSEUrPZQZ6TV0df5HM3QR7NNmQHPY4DccqmYWVVl5xpVL45Kl2KOSfwZpfC1qaD4czMpM3G_E3azKTnHJLG4uenNlO7xdx96T1aFLw8CWx2tvdo5EL-oyuFaCpVo-7iqAOEsg-QTHYIzEEXErjRdDH83zxv_7FxPX4Wdv4BB8ibOCX8mmy4ycIw83XejXk1OBorXnL5C-RWuV4</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Novoa, P.A</creator><creator>Grinyó, J.M</creator><creator>Ramos, F.J.P</creator><creator>Errasti, P</creator><creator>Franco, A</creator><creator>Aldana, G</creator><creator>Pefaur, J</creator><creator>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creator><creator>Otero, A.B</creator><creator>Saval, N</creator><creator>Oppenheimer, F</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</title><author>Novoa, P.A ; Grinyó, J.M ; Ramos, F.J.P ; Errasti, P ; Franco, A ; Aldana, G ; Pefaur, J ; Marti-Cuadros, A.M ; Otero, A.B ; Saval, N ; Oppenheimer, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e9f1fab895d489eb7f566f94a583db837be684fef72f8df60272be33e580c4643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Everolimus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Graft Rejection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sirolimus - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sirolimus - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Sirolimus - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Steroids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Novoa, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinyó, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, F.J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldana, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pefaur, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, A.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saval, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Novoa, P.A</au><au>Grinyó, J.M</au><au>Ramos, F.J.P</au><au>Errasti, P</au><au>Franco, A</au><au>Aldana, G</au><au>Pefaur, J</au><au>Marti-Cuadros, A.M</au><au>Otero, A.B</au><au>Saval, N</au><au>Oppenheimer, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3331</spage><epage>3339</epage><pages>3331-3339</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. Methods Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3–8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible ( n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. Results At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization ( P &lt; .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6–8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. Conclusion In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22099791</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2011-11, Vol.43 (9), p.3331-3339
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905675108
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Biological and medical sciences
Cyclosporine - adverse effects
Cyclosporine - therapeutic use
Everolimus
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Graft Rejection
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Kidney - physiopathology
Kidney Transplantation - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Prospective Studies
Sirolimus - adverse effects
Sirolimus - analogs & derivatives
Sirolimus - therapeutic use
Steroids - therapeutic use
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Tissue, organ and graft immunology
Treatment Outcome
title De Novo Use of Everolimus With Elimination or Minimization of Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De%20Novo%20Use%20of%20Everolimus%20With%20Elimination%20or%20Minimization%20of%20Cyclosporine%20in%20Renal%20Transplant%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Novoa,%20P.A&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3331&rft.epage=3339&rft.pages=3331-3339&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E905675108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905675108&rft_id=info:pmid/22099791&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134511014151&rfr_iscdi=true