Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites?
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the evaluation of local government Web sites carrying information on infertility by infertile women and by government staff. In particular, the study investigated whether the women and staff differed with respect to the information they rate as important and their...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public health Nursing 2011-09, Vol.28 (5), p.411-420 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 420 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 411 |
| container_title | Public health Nursing |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Takabayashi, Chikako Shimada, Keiko |
| description | ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the evaluation of local government Web sites carrying information on infertility by infertile women and by government staff. In particular, the study investigated whether the women and staff differed with respect to the information they rate as important and their self‐reported satisfaction with the Web sites.
Design and Sample: Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Sixty‐two local government staff members, of whom 46 were public health nurses managing subsidy programs for infertility treatment in the Hokuriku region of Japan, and 84 infertile women attending local clinics.
Measures: We measured the level of satisfaction with the local government Web sites and perceptions about the importance of each type of content. Data were descriptively analyzed, as well as by factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.
Results: Local government Web sites were analyzed with respect to information about the treatment, details of the subsidy program, psychological support, and procedures for making a subsidy application.
Conclusions: The women rated information on the treatment and details of the subsidy programs as important. There was no difference of satisfaction with the Web sites between the infertile women and the staff. Local government staff need to provide reliable data for women who are seeking information on infertility treatment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00917.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905672837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>901878697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-e9ad26ea2127e20f2eeb55b7686b27f854ec75f566ebabfe7b7e93d31e7303793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoNY7Nr6FyQI4tVs8zFJZkCQ0tZtsbTFVhe8CZmZE8w6O1OTTLv775tx1xW8am7y9byHE54ghCmZ0jSOFlMqmMhonsspI-mUkJKq6eoFmuwuXqIJUVxllJFyH70OYUEI4YLJV2ifpTOWs3yCqtMeX3QWfHQt4Hm_hA6brsGz_gF8l3YR30ZjLT51NlHYdTj-BHz2YNrBRNd3uLe7Ai6uMw-tidDgOVT41kUInw7RnjVtgDfb-QB9-3x2d3KeXV7PLk6OL7Na8NQnlKZhEgyjTAEjlgFUQlRKFrJiyhYih1oJK6SEylQWVKWg5A2noDjhquQH6MOm7r3vfw8Qol66UEPbmg76IeiSCKlYwdUzSFqoQpYj-e4_ctEPvkvP0EVJGOGMywQVG6j2fQgerL73bmn8WlOiR196oUctetSiR1_6jy-9StG32_pDtYRmF_wrKAHvt4AJtWmtN13twj8uF0lqLhL3ccM9Jo_rZzegb86v0iLFs03chQirXdz4X1qmTyT0_Gqmy-8_7sjsy43-yp8ANw2-SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>890203236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Takabayashi, Chikako ; Shimada, Keiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Takabayashi, Chikako ; Shimada, Keiko</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the evaluation of local government Web sites carrying information on infertility by infertile women and by government staff. In particular, the study investigated whether the women and staff differed with respect to the information they rate as important and their self‐reported satisfaction with the Web sites.
Design and Sample: Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Sixty‐two local government staff members, of whom 46 were public health nurses managing subsidy programs for infertility treatment in the Hokuriku region of Japan, and 84 infertile women attending local clinics.
Measures: We measured the level of satisfaction with the local government Web sites and perceptions about the importance of each type of content. Data were descriptively analyzed, as well as by factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.
Results: Local government Web sites were analyzed with respect to information about the treatment, details of the subsidy program, psychological support, and procedures for making a subsidy application.
Conclusions: The women rated information on the treatment and details of the subsidy programs as important. There was no difference of satisfaction with the Web sites between the infertile women and the staff. Local government staff need to provide reliable data for women who are seeking information on infertility treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-1209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00917.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22092424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Consumer Behavior ; Consumer Health Information ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Health participants ; health provider support ; Humans ; infertile women ; Infertility ; Infertility, Female - economics ; Infertility, Female - therapy ; Internet ; Internet resources ; Japan ; Local government ; Medical Assistance ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Multivariate Analysis ; Needs Assessment ; Nursing ; Patient Education as Topic ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics ; Social Support ; survey ; Web sites ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Public health Nursing, 2011-09, Vol.28 (5), p.411-420</ispartof><rights>2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Sep/Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-e9ad26ea2127e20f2eeb55b7686b27f854ec75f566ebabfe7b7e93d31e7303793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1525-1446.2010.00917.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1525-1446.2010.00917.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24500345$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22092424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takabayashi, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Keiko</creatorcontrib><title>Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites?</title><title>Public health Nursing</title><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the evaluation of local government Web sites carrying information on infertility by infertile women and by government staff. In particular, the study investigated whether the women and staff differed with respect to the information they rate as important and their self‐reported satisfaction with the Web sites.
Design and Sample: Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Sixty‐two local government staff members, of whom 46 were public health nurses managing subsidy programs for infertility treatment in the Hokuriku region of Japan, and 84 infertile women attending local clinics.
Measures: We measured the level of satisfaction with the local government Web sites and perceptions about the importance of each type of content. Data were descriptively analyzed, as well as by factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.
Results: Local government Web sites were analyzed with respect to information about the treatment, details of the subsidy program, psychological support, and procedures for making a subsidy application.
Conclusions: The women rated information on the treatment and details of the subsidy programs as important. There was no difference of satisfaction with the Web sites between the infertile women and the staff. Local government staff need to provide reliable data for women who are seeking information on infertility treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior</subject><subject>Consumer Health Information</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>health provider support</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertile women</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - economics</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - therapy</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Medical Assistance</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0737-1209</issn><issn>1525-1446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoNY7Nr6FyQI4tVs8zFJZkCQ0tZtsbTFVhe8CZmZE8w6O1OTTLv775tx1xW8am7y9byHE54ghCmZ0jSOFlMqmMhonsspI-mUkJKq6eoFmuwuXqIJUVxllJFyH70OYUEI4YLJV2ifpTOWs3yCqtMeX3QWfHQt4Hm_hA6brsGz_gF8l3YR30ZjLT51NlHYdTj-BHz2YNrBRNd3uLe7Ai6uMw-tidDgOVT41kUInw7RnjVtgDfb-QB9-3x2d3KeXV7PLk6OL7Na8NQnlKZhEgyjTAEjlgFUQlRKFrJiyhYih1oJK6SEylQWVKWg5A2noDjhquQH6MOm7r3vfw8Qol66UEPbmg76IeiSCKlYwdUzSFqoQpYj-e4_ctEPvkvP0EVJGOGMywQVG6j2fQgerL73bmn8WlOiR196oUctetSiR1_6jy-9StG32_pDtYRmF_wrKAHvt4AJtWmtN13twj8uF0lqLhL3ccM9Jo_rZzegb86v0iLFs03chQirXdz4X1qmTyT0_Gqmy-8_7sjsy43-yp8ANw2-SQ</recordid><startdate>201109</startdate><enddate>201109</enddate><creator>Takabayashi, Chikako</creator><creator>Shimada, Keiko</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201109</creationdate><title>Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites?</title><author>Takabayashi, Chikako ; Shimada, Keiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5337-e9ad26ea2127e20f2eeb55b7686b27f854ec75f566ebabfe7b7e93d31e7303793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior</topic><topic>Consumer Health Information</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>health provider support</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertile women</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - economics</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - therapy</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Medical Assistance</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takabayashi, Chikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Keiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takabayashi, Chikako</au><au>Shimada, Keiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites?</atitle><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><date>2011-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>411-420</pages><issn>0737-1209</issn><eissn>1525-1446</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the evaluation of local government Web sites carrying information on infertility by infertile women and by government staff. In particular, the study investigated whether the women and staff differed with respect to the information they rate as important and their self‐reported satisfaction with the Web sites.
Design and Sample: Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Sixty‐two local government staff members, of whom 46 were public health nurses managing subsidy programs for infertility treatment in the Hokuriku region of Japan, and 84 infertile women attending local clinics.
Measures: We measured the level of satisfaction with the local government Web sites and perceptions about the importance of each type of content. Data were descriptively analyzed, as well as by factor analysis and multiple regression analysis.
Results: Local government Web sites were analyzed with respect to information about the treatment, details of the subsidy program, psychological support, and procedures for making a subsidy application.
Conclusions: The women rated information on the treatment and details of the subsidy programs as important. There was no difference of satisfaction with the Web sites between the infertile women and the staff. Local government staff need to provide reliable data for women who are seeking information on infertility treatment.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22092424</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00917.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0737-1209 |
| ispartof | Public health Nursing, 2011-09, Vol.28 (5), p.411-420 |
| issn | 0737-1209 1525-1446 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_905672837 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adult Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Consumer Behavior Consumer Health Information Cross-Sectional Studies Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Health Care Surveys Health participants health provider support Humans infertile women Infertility Infertility, Female - economics Infertility, Female - therapy Internet Internet resources Japan Local government Medical Assistance Medical sciences Medical treatment Middle Aged Miscellaneous Multivariate Analysis Needs Assessment Nursing Patient Education as Topic Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics Social Support survey Web sites Womens health |
| title | Do Infertile Women and Government Staff Differ in the Evaluation of Infertility-related Web Sites? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A50%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Infertile%20Women%20and%20Government%20Staff%20Differ%20in%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Infertility-related%20Web%20Sites?&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20Nursing&rft.au=Takabayashi,%20Chikako&rft.date=2011-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=411-420&rft.issn=0737-1209&rft.eissn=1525-1446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00917.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E901878697%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=890203236&rft_id=info:pmid/22092424&rfr_iscdi=true |