Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production
Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 6117 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Tuomisto, Hanna L Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost |
description | Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es200130u |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904495838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420405141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1LwzAUBuAgipvTC_-AFEHUi-o5SdsllzLmB0z0QsG7kqYpdLTNTBrBf2_G5gYKenXg8HA-eAk5RrhCoHitHQVABn6HDDGlEKc8xV0yXDZjwbK3ATlwbg4AlAHfJwOKGaeUj4cEp91HbU3X6q6XTfTQLqTqXWSqaOKb3ltdRo9a9tGzNaVXfW26Q7JXycbpo3Udkdfb6cvkPp493T1MbmaxTIH2seYaCgWYCYAKeSEYS4sCoERZIq8wSyQiFVQxLZFjoJTropS0ZJCJUrAROV_NXVjz7rXr87Z2SjeN7LTxLheQJCLljP8r-TgbCxFeDvLiT4ljGixjdLn-9AedG2-78HHOOQbFRRbQ5Qopa5yzusoXtm6l_cwR8mU0-SaaYE_WA33R6nIjv7MI4GwNpFOyqazsVO22LmFMUJFsnVRue9TvhV-3-Z7e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881767896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions</source><creator>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><description>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es200130u</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21682287</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics & numerical data ; Cultured meat ; Cyanobacteria - metabolism ; Environment ; Environmental impact ; Food Handling - standards ; Food industries ; Food Technology - trends ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetically altered foods ; Meat ; Meat and meat product industries ; Meat products ; Protein Hydrolysates ; Spain ; Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry ; Temperature ; Thailand ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Water Supply - analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es200130u$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es200130u$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,2769,27085,27933,27934,56747,56797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24339294$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Cultured meat</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Food Handling - standards</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Technology - trends</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Protein Hydrolysates</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1LwzAUBuAgipvTC_-AFEHUi-o5SdsllzLmB0z0QsG7kqYpdLTNTBrBf2_G5gYKenXg8HA-eAk5RrhCoHitHQVABn6HDDGlEKc8xV0yXDZjwbK3ATlwbg4AlAHfJwOKGaeUj4cEp91HbU3X6q6XTfTQLqTqXWSqaOKb3ltdRo9a9tGzNaVXfW26Q7JXycbpo3Udkdfb6cvkPp493T1MbmaxTIH2seYaCgWYCYAKeSEYS4sCoERZIq8wSyQiFVQxLZFjoJTropS0ZJCJUrAROV_NXVjz7rXr87Z2SjeN7LTxLheQJCLljP8r-TgbCxFeDvLiT4ljGixjdLn-9AedG2-78HHOOQbFRRbQ5Qopa5yzusoXtm6l_cwR8mU0-SaaYE_WA33R6nIjv7MI4GwNpFOyqazsVO22LmFMUJFsnVRue9TvhV-3-Z7e</recordid><startdate>20110715</startdate><enddate>20110715</enddate><creator>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creator><creator>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110715</creationdate><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><author>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Cultured meat</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Food Handling - standards</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Technology - trends</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Protein Hydrolysates</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuomisto, Hanna L</au><au>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2011-07-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6117</spage><epage>6123</epage><pages>6117-6123</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21682287</pmid><doi>10.1021/es200130u</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904495838 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions |
subjects | Bacteria Biological and medical sciences California Carbon Dioxide - analysis Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics & numerical data Cultured meat Cyanobacteria - metabolism Environment Environmental impact Food Handling - standards Food industries Food Technology - trends Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetically altered foods Meat Meat and meat product industries Meat products Protein Hydrolysates Spain Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry Temperature Thailand Tissue Engineering - methods Water Supply - analysis |
title | Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T13%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Impacts%20of%20Cultured%20Meat%20Production&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Tuomisto,%20Hanna%20L&rft.date=2011-07-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6117&rft.epage=6123&rft.pages=6117-6123&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es200130u&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420405141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881767896&rft_id=info:pmid/21682287&rfr_iscdi=true |