Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production

Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123
Hauptverfasser: Tuomisto, Hanna L, Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6123
container_issue 14
container_start_page 6117
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 45
creator Tuomisto, Hanna L
Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost
description Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es200130u
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904495838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420405141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1LwzAUBuAgipvTC_-AFEHUi-o5SdsllzLmB0z0QsG7kqYpdLTNTBrBf2_G5gYKenXg8HA-eAk5RrhCoHitHQVABn6HDDGlEKc8xV0yXDZjwbK3ATlwbg4AlAHfJwOKGaeUj4cEp91HbU3X6q6XTfTQLqTqXWSqaOKb3ltdRo9a9tGzNaVXfW26Q7JXycbpo3Udkdfb6cvkPp493T1MbmaxTIH2seYaCgWYCYAKeSEYS4sCoERZIq8wSyQiFVQxLZFjoJTropS0ZJCJUrAROV_NXVjz7rXr87Z2SjeN7LTxLheQJCLljP8r-TgbCxFeDvLiT4ljGixjdLn-9AedG2-78HHOOQbFRRbQ5Qopa5yzusoXtm6l_cwR8mU0-SaaYE_WA33R6nIjv7MI4GwNpFOyqazsVO22LmFMUJFsnVRue9TvhV-3-Z7e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881767896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions</source><creator>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><description>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es200130u</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21682287</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cultured meat ; Cyanobacteria - metabolism ; Environment ; Environmental impact ; Food Handling - standards ; Food industries ; Food Technology - trends ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetically altered foods ; Meat ; Meat and meat product industries ; Meat products ; Protein Hydrolysates ; Spain ; Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry ; Temperature ; Thailand ; Tissue Engineering - methods ; Water Supply - analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es200130u$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es200130u$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,2769,27085,27933,27934,56747,56797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24339294$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cultured meat</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria - metabolism</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Food Handling - standards</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Technology - trends</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Protein Hydrolysates</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1LwzAUBuAgipvTC_-AFEHUi-o5SdsllzLmB0z0QsG7kqYpdLTNTBrBf2_G5gYKenXg8HA-eAk5RrhCoHitHQVABn6HDDGlEKc8xV0yXDZjwbK3ATlwbg4AlAHfJwOKGaeUj4cEp91HbU3X6q6XTfTQLqTqXWSqaOKb3ltdRo9a9tGzNaVXfW26Q7JXycbpo3Udkdfb6cvkPp493T1MbmaxTIH2seYaCgWYCYAKeSEYS4sCoERZIq8wSyQiFVQxLZFjoJTropS0ZJCJUrAROV_NXVjz7rXr87Z2SjeN7LTxLheQJCLljP8r-TgbCxFeDvLiT4ljGixjdLn-9AedG2-78HHOOQbFRRbQ5Qopa5yzusoXtm6l_cwR8mU0-SaaYE_WA33R6nIjv7MI4GwNpFOyqazsVO22LmFMUJFsnVRue9TvhV-3-Z7e</recordid><startdate>20110715</startdate><enddate>20110715</enddate><creator>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creator><creator>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110715</creationdate><title>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</title><author>Tuomisto, Hanna L ; Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-e8e0bc016900f18b9335bb00d1ad18f164a11292c3ea181bc028ebda2d3069d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cultured meat</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria - metabolism</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Food Handling - standards</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Technology - trends</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Protein Hydrolysates</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Hanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuomisto, Hanna L</au><au>Teixeira de Mattos, M. Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2011-07-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6117</spage><epage>6123</epage><pages>6117-6123</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Cultured meat (i.e., meat produced in vitro using tissue engineering techniques) is being developed as a potentially healthier and more efficient alternative to conventional meat. Life cycle assessment (LCA) research method was used for assessing environmental impacts of large-scale cultured meat production. Cyanobacteria hydrolysate was assumed to be used as the nutrient and energy source for muscle cell growth. The results showed that production of 1000 kg cultured meat requires 26–33 GJ energy, 367–521 m3 water, 190–230 m2 land, and emits 1900–2240 kg CO2-eq GHG emissions. In comparison to conventionally produced European meat, cultured meat involves approximately 7–45% lower energy use (only poultry has lower energy use), 78–96% lower GHG emissions, 99% lower land use, and 82–96% lower water use depending on the product compared. Despite high uncertainty, it is concluded that the overall environmental impacts of cultured meat production are substantially lower than those of conventionally produced meat.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>21682287</pmid><doi>10.1021/es200130u</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2011-07, Vol.45 (14), p.6117-6123
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904495838
source MEDLINE; ACS Journals: American Chemical Society Web Editions
subjects Bacteria
Biological and medical sciences
California
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
Conservation of Energy Resources - statistics & numerical data
Cultured meat
Cyanobacteria - metabolism
Environment
Environmental impact
Food Handling - standards
Food industries
Food Technology - trends
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetically altered foods
Meat
Meat and meat product industries
Meat products
Protein Hydrolysates
Spain
Sustainability Engineering and Green Chemistry
Temperature
Thailand
Tissue Engineering - methods
Water Supply - analysis
title Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T13%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Impacts%20of%20Cultured%20Meat%20Production&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Tuomisto,%20Hanna%20L&rft.date=2011-07-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6117&rft.epage=6123&rft.pages=6117-6123&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es200130u&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420405141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881767896&rft_id=info:pmid/21682287&rfr_iscdi=true