Field Significance of Regression Patterns
Regression patterns often are used to diagnose the relation between a field and a climate index, but a significance test for the pattern “as a whole” that accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests has not been widely available. This paper argues that field significance can be fr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of climate 2011-10, Vol.24 (19), p.5094-5107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 5094 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | DelSole, Timothy Yang, Xiaosong |
description | Regression patterns often are used to diagnose the relation between a field and a climate index, but a significance test for the pattern “as a whole” that accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests has not been widely available. This paper argues that field significance can be framed as a test of the hypothesis that all regression coefficients vanish in a suitable multivariate regression model. A test for this hypothesis can be derived from the generalized likelihood ratio test. The resulting statistic depends on relevant covariance matrices and accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests. It also depends only on the canonical correlations between the predictors and predictands, thereby revealing a fundamental connection to canonical correlation analysis. Remarkably, the test statistic is invariant to a reversal of the predictors and predictands, allowing the field significance test to be reduced to a standard univariate hypothesis test. In practice, the test cannot be applied when the number of coefficients exceeds the sample size, reflecting the fact that testing more hypotheses than data is ill conceived. To formulate a proper significance test, the data are represented by a small number of principal components, with the number chosen based on cross-validation experiments. However, instead of selecting the model that minimizes the cross-validated mean square error, a confidence interval for the cross-validated error is estimated and the most parsimonious model whose error is within the confidence interval of the minimum error is chosen. This procedure avoids selecting complex models whose error is close to much simpler models. The procedure is applied to diagnose long-term trends in annual average sea surface temperature and boreal winter 300-hPa zonal wind. In both cases a statistically significant 50-yr trend pattern is extracted. The resulting spatial filter can be used to monitor the evolution of the regression pattern without temporal filtering. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/2011JCLI4105.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26191204</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26191204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-91246ba0bef38bf72ee9a4f6e19f6e30645ddb701384e9126d785b8024ca82413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXb8IiiHjYOvnaJEdZrFYKih_nkN1NSsp2tybbg_-9KS0qXmYO85s38x5C5xgmGAt-SwDjp3I-Yxj4BB-gEeYEcmCMHKIRSMVyKTg_RicxLgEwKQBG6Gbqbdtkb37Reedr09U26132ahfBxuj7Lnsxw2BDF0_RkTNttGf7PkYf0_v38jGfPz_Myrt5XlMFQ64wYUVloLKOysoJYq0yzBUWq1QoFIw3TSUAU8lsgotGSF5JIKw2kjBMx-h6p7sO_efGxkGvfKxt25rO9puoVXIkKaNFIi__kct-E7r0nJZKSCU520KTHVSHPsZgnV4HvzLhS2PQ29z039z09v7VXtXE2rQupEx8_NkijCsuBCTuYsct49CH33mBkytg9BvBCHPK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897898546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Significance of Regression Patterns</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>DelSole, Timothy ; Yang, Xiaosong</creator><creatorcontrib>DelSole, Timothy ; Yang, Xiaosong</creatorcontrib><description>Regression patterns often are used to diagnose the relation between a field and a climate index, but a significance test for the pattern “as a whole” that accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests has not been widely available. This paper argues that field significance can be framed as a test of the hypothesis that all regression coefficients vanish in a suitable multivariate regression model. A test for this hypothesis can be derived from the generalized likelihood ratio test. The resulting statistic depends on relevant covariance matrices and accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests. It also depends only on the canonical correlations between the predictors and predictands, thereby revealing a fundamental connection to canonical correlation analysis. Remarkably, the test statistic is invariant to a reversal of the predictors and predictands, allowing the field significance test to be reduced to a standard univariate hypothesis test. In practice, the test cannot be applied when the number of coefficients exceeds the sample size, reflecting the fact that testing more hypotheses than data is ill conceived. To formulate a proper significance test, the data are represented by a small number of principal components, with the number chosen based on cross-validation experiments. However, instead of selecting the model that minimizes the cross-validated mean square error, a confidence interval for the cross-validated error is estimated and the most parsimonious model whose error is within the confidence interval of the minimum error is chosen. This procedure avoids selecting complex models whose error is close to much simpler models. The procedure is applied to diagnose long-term trends in annual average sea surface temperature and boreal winter 300-hPa zonal wind. In both cases a statistically significant 50-yr trend pattern is extracted. The resulting spatial filter can be used to monitor the evolution of the regression pattern without temporal filtering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4105.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Confidence interval ; Confidence intervals ; Correlation analysis ; Correlations ; Covariance matrices ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Hypothesis testing ; Modeling ; Ratio test ; Regression coefficients ; Sea surface temperature ; Statistical variance ; Statistics ; Studies ; Time series ; Trends ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2011-10, Vol.24 (19), p.5094-5107</ispartof><rights>2011 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Oct 1, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-91246ba0bef38bf72ee9a4f6e19f6e30645ddb701384e9126d785b8024ca82413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-91246ba0bef38bf72ee9a4f6e19f6e30645ddb701384e9126d785b8024ca82413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26191204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26191204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24595770$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DelSole, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaosong</creatorcontrib><title>Field Significance of Regression Patterns</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Regression patterns often are used to diagnose the relation between a field and a climate index, but a significance test for the pattern “as a whole” that accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests has not been widely available. This paper argues that field significance can be framed as a test of the hypothesis that all regression coefficients vanish in a suitable multivariate regression model. A test for this hypothesis can be derived from the generalized likelihood ratio test. The resulting statistic depends on relevant covariance matrices and accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests. It also depends only on the canonical correlations between the predictors and predictands, thereby revealing a fundamental connection to canonical correlation analysis. Remarkably, the test statistic is invariant to a reversal of the predictors and predictands, allowing the field significance test to be reduced to a standard univariate hypothesis test. In practice, the test cannot be applied when the number of coefficients exceeds the sample size, reflecting the fact that testing more hypotheses than data is ill conceived. To formulate a proper significance test, the data are represented by a small number of principal components, with the number chosen based on cross-validation experiments. However, instead of selecting the model that minimizes the cross-validated mean square error, a confidence interval for the cross-validated error is estimated and the most parsimonious model whose error is within the confidence interval of the minimum error is chosen. This procedure avoids selecting complex models whose error is close to much simpler models. The procedure is applied to diagnose long-term trends in annual average sea surface temperature and boreal winter 300-hPa zonal wind. In both cases a statistically significant 50-yr trend pattern is extracted. The resulting spatial filter can be used to monitor the evolution of the regression pattern without temporal filtering.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Confidence interval</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlations</subject><subject>Covariance matrices</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Ratio test</subject><subject>Regression coefficients</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXb8IiiHjYOvnaJEdZrFYKih_nkN1NSsp2tybbg_-9KS0qXmYO85s38x5C5xgmGAt-SwDjp3I-Yxj4BB-gEeYEcmCMHKIRSMVyKTg_RicxLgEwKQBG6Gbqbdtkb37Reedr09U26132ahfBxuj7Lnsxw2BDF0_RkTNttGf7PkYf0_v38jGfPz_Myrt5XlMFQ64wYUVloLKOysoJYq0yzBUWq1QoFIw3TSUAU8lsgotGSF5JIKw2kjBMx-h6p7sO_efGxkGvfKxt25rO9puoVXIkKaNFIi__kct-E7r0nJZKSCU520KTHVSHPsZgnV4HvzLhS2PQ29z039z09v7VXtXE2rQupEx8_NkijCsuBCTuYsct49CH33mBkytg9BvBCHPK</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>DelSole, Timothy</creator><creator>Yang, Xiaosong</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Field Significance of Regression Patterns</title><author>DelSole, Timothy ; Yang, Xiaosong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-91246ba0bef38bf72ee9a4f6e19f6e30645ddb701384e9126d785b8024ca82413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Confidence interval</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlations</topic><topic>Covariance matrices</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Ratio test</topic><topic>Regression coefficients</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DelSole, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaosong</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DelSole, Timothy</au><au>Yang, Xiaosong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Significance of Regression Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>5094</spage><epage>5107</epage><pages>5094-5107</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Regression patterns often are used to diagnose the relation between a field and a climate index, but a significance test for the pattern “as a whole” that accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests has not been widely available. This paper argues that field significance can be framed as a test of the hypothesis that all regression coefficients vanish in a suitable multivariate regression model. A test for this hypothesis can be derived from the generalized likelihood ratio test. The resulting statistic depends on relevant covariance matrices and accounts for the multiplicity and interdependence of the tests. It also depends only on the canonical correlations between the predictors and predictands, thereby revealing a fundamental connection to canonical correlation analysis. Remarkably, the test statistic is invariant to a reversal of the predictors and predictands, allowing the field significance test to be reduced to a standard univariate hypothesis test. In practice, the test cannot be applied when the number of coefficients exceeds the sample size, reflecting the fact that testing more hypotheses than data is ill conceived. To formulate a proper significance test, the data are represented by a small number of principal components, with the number chosen based on cross-validation experiments. However, instead of selecting the model that minimizes the cross-validated mean square error, a confidence interval for the cross-validated error is estimated and the most parsimonious model whose error is within the confidence interval of the minimum error is chosen. This procedure avoids selecting complex models whose error is close to much simpler models. The procedure is applied to diagnose long-term trends in annual average sea surface temperature and boreal winter 300-hPa zonal wind. In both cases a statistically significant 50-yr trend pattern is extracted. The resulting spatial filter can be used to monitor the evolution of the regression pattern without temporal filtering.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/2011JCLI4105.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 2011-10, Vol.24 (19), p.5094-5107 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904483436 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Climate change Confidence interval Confidence intervals Correlation analysis Correlations Covariance matrices Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Hypothesis testing Modeling Ratio test Regression coefficients Sea surface temperature Statistical variance Statistics Studies Time series Trends Variables |
title | Field Significance of Regression Patterns |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A52%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Significance%20of%20Regression%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=DelSole,%20Timothy&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=5094&rft.epage=5107&rft.pages=5094-5107&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/2011JCLI4105.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26191204%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897898546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26191204&rfr_iscdi=true |