Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Growth of calves during their first few weeks of life is one of the most important factors affecting their performance during subsequent rearing, and it can be modified by disease, especially gastrointestinal infections. Use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a tool which may maintain the intestinal m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal feed science and technology 2011-11, Vol.169 (3-4), p.147-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Animal feed science and technology |
container_volume | 169 |
creator | Frizzo, L.S. Zbrun, M.V. Soto, L.P. Signorini, M.L. |
description | Growth of calves during their first few weeks of life is one of the most important factors affecting their performance during subsequent rearing, and it can be modified by disease, especially gastrointestinal infections. Use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a tool which may maintain the intestinal microbial balance, prevent diarrhea and improve growth. However, a consensus has not been reached as to whether probiotics are effective in improving growth of calves. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess effects of probiotics on the growth of calves (i.e., body weight gain (BWG), feed efficiency). PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 1980 to 2010, unrestricted by language. The inclusion criteria were: randomized and controlled experiments using calves less than 5d of age without apparent disease and with passive immunity, and published in peer reviewed journals. Twenty-one and 14 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on BWG and feed efficiency, respectively. LAB supplementation increased BWG (standardized mean differences (SMD)=0.22822, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1006–0.4638) and improve feed efficiency (SMD=−0.8141, 95% CI −1.2222 to −0.4059), considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. Growth of calves was not affected when the LAB was added to whole milk, but beneficial effects occurred when LAB was added to milk replacer. The probiotic effect was not related to the number of LAB strains in the inoculum. The number of calves in the experiments had an impact on the results and conclusions. Probiotics may be an alternative to the antibiotics commonly used as growth promoters in calves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904482313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840111002860</els_id><sourcerecordid>904482313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-9eefed6fc8cd45f668147bb4a22d70719acf534ab35aea1c1b2d8842f432d8943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2qlbql_Q--VJwSPLY3cbgBogUJiQucLcceU68Se7GzVMuvx3QRPXKaGem9N3ofIRRYCwy6k01rYvCIrtjQcgbQsq5lbPhEVqB60XAO3WeyYqLvGyUZfCXfStkwBlwJviLTpfdol0KTp9ucxpCWYOsV6UNOf5c_dIvZpzybaJGGSPdpFx-oNdMTllN6RmdcTGOimfYl_AvJJro0h2d01Ka45DRNdV1yMFP5Tr74OvDH2zwi978u7y6umpvb39cXZzeNlUO3NAOiR9d5q6yTa991CmQ_jtJw7nrWw2CsXwtpRrE2aMDCyJ1Sknsp6jJIcUSOD7m10eMOy6LnUCxOk4mYdkUPTErFBYiqVAelzamUjF5vc5hN3mtg-pWv3uj_fPUrX806XflW68-3J6ZUHr4Wt6G8-7lcD8AkVN35QYe18VPArGsSVpwu5EpeuxQ-fvYCNH-YKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904482313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Frizzo, L.S. ; Zbrun, M.V. ; Soto, L.P. ; Signorini, M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frizzo, L.S. ; Zbrun, M.V. ; Soto, L.P. ; Signorini, M.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Growth of calves during their first few weeks of life is one of the most important factors affecting their performance during subsequent rearing, and it can be modified by disease, especially gastrointestinal infections. Use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a tool which may maintain the intestinal microbial balance, prevent diarrhea and improve growth. However, a consensus has not been reached as to whether probiotics are effective in improving growth of calves. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess effects of probiotics on the growth of calves (i.e., body weight gain (BWG), feed efficiency). PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 1980 to 2010, unrestricted by language. The inclusion criteria were: randomized and controlled experiments using calves less than 5d of age without apparent disease and with passive immunity, and published in peer reviewed journals. Twenty-one and 14 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on BWG and feed efficiency, respectively. LAB supplementation increased BWG (standardized mean differences (SMD)=0.22822, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1006–0.4638) and improve feed efficiency (SMD=−0.8141, 95% CI −1.2222 to −0.4059), considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. Growth of calves was not affected when the LAB was added to whole milk, but beneficial effects occurred when LAB was added to milk replacer. The probiotic effect was not related to the number of LAB strains in the inoculum. The number of calves in the experiments had an impact on the results and conclusions. Probiotics may be an alternative to the antibiotics commonly used as growth promoters in calves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSTDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calves ; Feed and pet food industries ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth performance ; Lactic acid bacteria ; Meta-analysis ; Probiotic ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2011-11, Vol.169 (3-4), p.147-156</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-9eefed6fc8cd45f668147bb4a22d70719acf534ab35aea1c1b2d8842f432d8943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-9eefed6fc8cd45f668147bb4a22d70719acf534ab35aea1c1b2d8842f432d8943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840111002860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24591041$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frizzo, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zbrun, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorini, M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>Growth of calves during their first few weeks of life is one of the most important factors affecting their performance during subsequent rearing, and it can be modified by disease, especially gastrointestinal infections. Use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a tool which may maintain the intestinal microbial balance, prevent diarrhea and improve growth. However, a consensus has not been reached as to whether probiotics are effective in improving growth of calves. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess effects of probiotics on the growth of calves (i.e., body weight gain (BWG), feed efficiency). PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 1980 to 2010, unrestricted by language. The inclusion criteria were: randomized and controlled experiments using calves less than 5d of age without apparent disease and with passive immunity, and published in peer reviewed journals. Twenty-one and 14 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on BWG and feed efficiency, respectively. LAB supplementation increased BWG (standardized mean differences (SMD)=0.22822, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1006–0.4638) and improve feed efficiency (SMD=−0.8141, 95% CI −1.2222 to −0.4059), considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. Growth of calves was not affected when the LAB was added to whole milk, but beneficial effects occurred when LAB was added to milk replacer. The probiotic effect was not related to the number of LAB strains in the inoculum. The number of calves in the experiments had an impact on the results and conclusions. Probiotics may be an alternative to the antibiotics commonly used as growth promoters in calves.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth performance</subject><subject>Lactic acid bacteria</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Probiotic</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2qlbql_Q--VJwSPLY3cbgBogUJiQucLcceU68Se7GzVMuvx3QRPXKaGem9N3ofIRRYCwy6k01rYvCIrtjQcgbQsq5lbPhEVqB60XAO3WeyYqLvGyUZfCXfStkwBlwJviLTpfdol0KTp9ucxpCWYOsV6UNOf5c_dIvZpzybaJGGSPdpFx-oNdMTllN6RmdcTGOimfYl_AvJJro0h2d01Ka45DRNdV1yMFP5Tr74OvDH2zwi978u7y6umpvb39cXZzeNlUO3NAOiR9d5q6yTa991CmQ_jtJw7nrWw2CsXwtpRrE2aMDCyJ1Sknsp6jJIcUSOD7m10eMOy6LnUCxOk4mYdkUPTErFBYiqVAelzamUjF5vc5hN3mtg-pWv3uj_fPUrX806XflW68-3J6ZUHr4Wt6G8-7lcD8AkVN35QYe18VPArGsSVpwu5EpeuxQ-fvYCNH-YKg</recordid><startdate>20111103</startdate><enddate>20111103</enddate><creator>Frizzo, L.S.</creator><creator>Zbrun, M.V.</creator><creator>Soto, L.P.</creator><creator>Signorini, M.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111103</creationdate><title>Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Frizzo, L.S. ; Zbrun, M.V. ; Soto, L.P. ; Signorini, M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-9eefed6fc8cd45f668147bb4a22d70719acf534ab35aea1c1b2d8842f432d8943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth performance</topic><topic>Lactic acid bacteria</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Probiotic</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frizzo, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zbrun, M.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soto, L.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorini, M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frizzo, L.S.</au><au>Zbrun, M.V.</au><au>Soto, L.P.</au><au>Signorini, M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2011-11-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>147-156</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><coden>AFSTDH</coden><abstract>Growth of calves during their first few weeks of life is one of the most important factors affecting their performance during subsequent rearing, and it can be modified by disease, especially gastrointestinal infections. Use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a tool which may maintain the intestinal microbial balance, prevent diarrhea and improve growth. However, a consensus has not been reached as to whether probiotics are effective in improving growth of calves. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess effects of probiotics on the growth of calves (i.e., body weight gain (BWG), feed efficiency). PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 1980 to 2010, unrestricted by language. The inclusion criteria were: randomized and controlled experiments using calves less than 5d of age without apparent disease and with passive immunity, and published in peer reviewed journals. Twenty-one and 14 studies were included to assess probiotic effects on BWG and feed efficiency, respectively. LAB supplementation increased BWG (standardized mean differences (SMD)=0.22822, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1006–0.4638) and improve feed efficiency (SMD=−0.8141, 95% CI −1.2222 to −0.4059), considering the source of heterogeneity and publication biases. Growth of calves was not affected when the LAB was added to whole milk, but beneficial effects occurred when LAB was added to milk replacer. The probiotic effect was not related to the number of LAB strains in the inoculum. The number of calves in the experiments had an impact on the results and conclusions. Probiotics may be an alternative to the antibiotics commonly used as growth promoters in calves.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-8401 |
ispartof | Animal feed science and technology, 2011-11, Vol.169 (3-4), p.147-156 |
issn | 0377-8401 1873-2216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904482313 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Age Animal productions Biological and medical sciences Calves Feed and pet food industries Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Growth performance Lactic acid bacteria Meta-analysis Probiotic Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
title | Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20probiotics%20on%20growth%20performance%20in%20young%20calves:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Frizzo,%20L.S.&rft.date=2011-11-03&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=147-156&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft.coden=AFSTDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904482313%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904482313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840111002860&rfr_iscdi=true |