Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions

► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural water management 2011-07, Vol.98 (9), p.1403-1408
Hauptverfasser: Dogan, E., Copur, O., Kahraman, A., Kirnak, H., Guldur, M.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1408
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1403
container_title Agricultural water management
container_volume 98
creator Dogan, E.
Copur, O.
Kahraman, A.
Kirnak, H.
Guldur, M.E.
description ► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of the study. With the availability of irrigation water, supplemental irrigation in winter-grown crops, such as lentil, wheat, and barley, has been intensely practiced to prevent crop yield losses due to the incidence of intermittent drought stress. In the crop growing seasons of 2006–2007 and 2008–2009, a study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigations on Canola ( Brassica napus L. cv. Elvis F1) under the semiarid climatic conditions of the Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A sprinkler irrigation system was used to irrigate the study plots. The irrigation treatments included 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 (full irrigation) of Class-A pan evaporation amounts. The full irrigation treatment during both years consisted of 250 and 225 mm, respectively. In turn, crop water use values during the same years and treatments were 462 and 449 mm. In general, plant height and 1000 seed weight ranged from 140 to 165 cm and from 2.5 to 3.3 g, respectively, and these variables significantly differed among irrigation treatments ( p < 0.05). Crop yield and above ground biomass measurements were affected by irrigation treatments and varied from 1094 to 3943 kg ha −1 and from 6746 to 18,311 kg ha −1, respectively ( p < 0.05). Similarly, harvest index values were affected ( p < 0.05) and ranged from 0.16 to 0.23 on average. The water use efficiency obtained in the different treatments indicated a strong positive relationship between crop yield and irrigation. Overall, our results indicate that supplemental irrigation substantially increased canola yield; however, for an optimum yield, full irrigation is suggested.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904478964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377411000953</els_id><sourcerecordid>904478964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-cedf34274c248b9653c75e38c24c76b65eef61d78f87b06a37f92438e4c940143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEEkPhF7AgG8Qq4Tp2YmfBAlXlIY3EonSHZHmc68GjxA52pmj-PTdN1SWL6-d3jq6Pi-Itg5oB6z6eanP8a5a6AcZqEDVA96zYMSV51TSKPy92wKWquJTiZfEq5xMACBByV_y6Pc_ziBOGxYylT8kfzeJjKNE5tEtJK2tCHE158TgOpY3THAPRuTyHAVOZcfImeboZ_URSS0gY_OqRXxcvnBkzvnmcr4q7Lzc_r79V-x9fv19_3le2bcRSWRwcF40UthHq0Hctt7JFrmhrZXfoWkTXsUEqp-QBOsOl6xvBFQrbC2CCXxUfNt85xT9nzIuefLY4jiZgPGfdgxBS9d1K8o20Keac0Ok5UdvpohnoNUp90g9R6jVKDUJTlKTab6qEM9onCSKao1_he81Nr2i4UD0oufHrGdVMxQRwTYPSv5eJ7N4_tmuyNaNLJlifn2zpaW3LeE_cu41zJlJXiZi7W3IXAEyqplsb-7QRSOnee0w6W4-BAvWJfk8P0f_3Yf8AqhWugA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904478964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dogan, E. ; Copur, O. ; Kahraman, A. ; Kirnak, H. ; Guldur, M.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogan, E. ; Copur, O. ; Kahraman, A. ; Kirnak, H. ; Guldur, M.E.</creatorcontrib><description>► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of the study. With the availability of irrigation water, supplemental irrigation in winter-grown crops, such as lentil, wheat, and barley, has been intensely practiced to prevent crop yield losses due to the incidence of intermittent drought stress. In the crop growing seasons of 2006–2007 and 2008–2009, a study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigations on Canola ( Brassica napus L. cv. Elvis F1) under the semiarid climatic conditions of the Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A sprinkler irrigation system was used to irrigate the study plots. The irrigation treatments included 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 (full irrigation) of Class-A pan evaporation amounts. The full irrigation treatment during both years consisted of 250 and 225 mm, respectively. In turn, crop water use values during the same years and treatments were 462 and 449 mm. In general, plant height and 1000 seed weight ranged from 140 to 165 cm and from 2.5 to 3.3 g, respectively, and these variables significantly differed among irrigation treatments ( p &lt; 0.05). Crop yield and above ground biomass measurements were affected by irrigation treatments and varied from 1094 to 3943 kg ha −1 and from 6746 to 18,311 kg ha −1, respectively ( p &lt; 0.05). Similarly, harvest index values were affected ( p &lt; 0.05) and ranged from 0.16 to 0.23 on average. The water use efficiency obtained in the different treatments indicated a strong positive relationship between crop yield and irrigation. Overall, our results indicate that supplemental irrigation substantially increased canola yield; however, for an optimum yield, full irrigation is suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>aboveground biomass ; Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Brassica napus ; Canola ; Canola Sprinkler irrigation Water stress Semiarid climatic conditions ; climatic factors ; Crops ; Droughts ; Evaporation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Grounds ; harvest index ; Irrigation ; irrigation rates ; Irrigation systems ; irrigation water ; Seasons ; Semiarid climatic conditions ; Sprinkler irrigation ; Water stress ; water use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2011-07, Vol.98 (9), p.1403-1408</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-cedf34274c248b9653c75e38c24c76b65eef61d78f87b06a37f92438e4c940143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-cedf34274c248b9653c75e38c24c76b65eef61d78f87b06a37f92438e4c940143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24355139$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a98_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a9_3ap_3a1403-1408.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copur, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirnak, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guldur, M.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of the study. With the availability of irrigation water, supplemental irrigation in winter-grown crops, such as lentil, wheat, and barley, has been intensely practiced to prevent crop yield losses due to the incidence of intermittent drought stress. In the crop growing seasons of 2006–2007 and 2008–2009, a study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigations on Canola ( Brassica napus L. cv. Elvis F1) under the semiarid climatic conditions of the Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A sprinkler irrigation system was used to irrigate the study plots. The irrigation treatments included 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 (full irrigation) of Class-A pan evaporation amounts. The full irrigation treatment during both years consisted of 250 and 225 mm, respectively. In turn, crop water use values during the same years and treatments were 462 and 449 mm. In general, plant height and 1000 seed weight ranged from 140 to 165 cm and from 2.5 to 3.3 g, respectively, and these variables significantly differed among irrigation treatments ( p &lt; 0.05). Crop yield and above ground biomass measurements were affected by irrigation treatments and varied from 1094 to 3943 kg ha −1 and from 6746 to 18,311 kg ha −1, respectively ( p &lt; 0.05). Similarly, harvest index values were affected ( p &lt; 0.05) and ranged from 0.16 to 0.23 on average. The water use efficiency obtained in the different treatments indicated a strong positive relationship between crop yield and irrigation. Overall, our results indicate that supplemental irrigation substantially increased canola yield; however, for an optimum yield, full irrigation is suggested.</description><subject>aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Canola</subject><subject>Canola Sprinkler irrigation Water stress Semiarid climatic conditions</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>harvest index</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>irrigation rates</subject><subject>Irrigation systems</subject><subject>irrigation water</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Semiarid climatic conditions</subject><subject>Sprinkler irrigation</subject><subject>Water stress</subject><subject>water use efficiency</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEEkPhF7AgG8Qq4Tp2YmfBAlXlIY3EonSHZHmc68GjxA52pmj-PTdN1SWL6-d3jq6Pi-Itg5oB6z6eanP8a5a6AcZqEDVA96zYMSV51TSKPy92wKWquJTiZfEq5xMACBByV_y6Pc_ziBOGxYylT8kfzeJjKNE5tEtJK2tCHE158TgOpY3THAPRuTyHAVOZcfImeboZ_URSS0gY_OqRXxcvnBkzvnmcr4q7Lzc_r79V-x9fv19_3le2bcRSWRwcF40UthHq0Hctt7JFrmhrZXfoWkTXsUEqp-QBOsOl6xvBFQrbC2CCXxUfNt85xT9nzIuefLY4jiZgPGfdgxBS9d1K8o20Keac0Ok5UdvpohnoNUp90g9R6jVKDUJTlKTab6qEM9onCSKao1_he81Nr2i4UD0oufHrGdVMxQRwTYPSv5eJ7N4_tmuyNaNLJlifn2zpaW3LeE_cu41zJlJXiZi7W3IXAEyqplsb-7QRSOnee0w6W4-BAvWJfk8P0f_3Yf8AqhWugA</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Dogan, E.</creator><creator>Copur, O.</creator><creator>Kahraman, A.</creator><creator>Kirnak, H.</creator><creator>Guldur, M.E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions</title><author>Dogan, E. ; Copur, O. ; Kahraman, A. ; Kirnak, H. ; Guldur, M.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c524t-cedf34274c248b9653c75e38c24c76b65eef61d78f87b06a37f92438e4c940143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Canola</topic><topic>Canola Sprinkler irrigation Water stress Semiarid climatic conditions</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>harvest index</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>irrigation rates</topic><topic>Irrigation systems</topic><topic>irrigation water</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Semiarid climatic conditions</topic><topic>Sprinkler irrigation</topic><topic>Water stress</topic><topic>water use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogan, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copur, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirnak, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guldur, M.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogan, E.</au><au>Copur, O.</au><au>Kahraman, A.</au><au>Kirnak, H.</au><au>Guldur, M.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1403</spage><epage>1408</epage><pages>1403-1408</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>► A study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigation on canola yield components. ► Results indicated that there was a significant crop growth and yield increase. ► Therefore, even though canola is thought to be dry land crop, irrigation is necessary under climatic conditions of the study. With the availability of irrigation water, supplemental irrigation in winter-grown crops, such as lentil, wheat, and barley, has been intensely practiced to prevent crop yield losses due to the incidence of intermittent drought stress. In the crop growing seasons of 2006–2007 and 2008–2009, a study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental irrigations on Canola ( Brassica napus L. cv. Elvis F1) under the semiarid climatic conditions of the Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. A sprinkler irrigation system was used to irrigate the study plots. The irrigation treatments included 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 (full irrigation) of Class-A pan evaporation amounts. The full irrigation treatment during both years consisted of 250 and 225 mm, respectively. In turn, crop water use values during the same years and treatments were 462 and 449 mm. In general, plant height and 1000 seed weight ranged from 140 to 165 cm and from 2.5 to 3.3 g, respectively, and these variables significantly differed among irrigation treatments ( p &lt; 0.05). Crop yield and above ground biomass measurements were affected by irrigation treatments and varied from 1094 to 3943 kg ha −1 and from 6746 to 18,311 kg ha −1, respectively ( p &lt; 0.05). Similarly, harvest index values were affected ( p &lt; 0.05) and ranged from 0.16 to 0.23 on average. The water use efficiency obtained in the different treatments indicated a strong positive relationship between crop yield and irrigation. Overall, our results indicate that supplemental irrigation substantially increased canola yield; however, for an optimum yield, full irrigation is suggested.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-3774
ispartof Agricultural water management, 2011-07, Vol.98 (9), p.1403-1408
issn 0378-3774
1873-2283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904478964
source RePEc; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects aboveground biomass
Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Brassica napus
Canola
Canola Sprinkler irrigation Water stress Semiarid climatic conditions
climatic factors
Crops
Droughts
Evaporation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Grounds
harvest index
Irrigation
irrigation rates
Irrigation systems
irrigation water
Seasons
Semiarid climatic conditions
Sprinkler irrigation
Water stress
water use efficiency
title Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A17%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplemental%20irrigation%20effect%20on%20canola%20yield%20components%20under%20semiarid%20climatic%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Dogan,%20E.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1403&rft.epage=1408&rft.pages=1403-1408&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904478964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904478964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378377411000953&rfr_iscdi=true