Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells
A comparative study on the stability and potential of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium in repeated batch fermentation was conducted. The bead cores, made of three types of materials, i.e., ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 2011-03, Vol.111 (3), p.294-299 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 299 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 294 |
| container_title | Journal of bioscience and bioengineering |
| container_volume | 111 |
| creator | Voo, Wan-Ping Ravindra, Pogaku Tey, Beng-Ti Chan, Eng-Seng |
| description | A comparative study on the stability and potential of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium in repeated batch fermentation was conducted. The bead cores, made of three types of materials, i.e., ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The effect of single and double layer coatings using chitosan and core material, respectively, on the bead stability and cell production were also studied. The pectin based beads were found to be more stable than that of the alginate beads and their stability was further improved by coating with chitosan. The cell concentration in pectin based beads was comparable to that in the alginate beads. On the other hand, pectin based beads gave significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles when compared to the alginate beads. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability and favourable microenvironment for cell growth. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904467785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389172310003725</els_id><sourcerecordid>904467785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-1bf1a4f3562213bf0fa0d4f1e3a8e41caf28cb9b3124a2915061ce7a15664f1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERUvhHyDwBrHKxeNXkg1SdcWjUqUuSsXSmjh25avcONgJUv89DrnADlZjzXzjc3SGkFfAdsBAvz_sDl2I2e44W1uwK-UJuQAh60pKDk_Xd9NWUHNxTp7nfGAMalbDM3LOgYOGll-Qb_t4nDCFHEcaPcXhIYw4O4pjTydn5zDSDrPraeewz9THRKcU-6VMto0pLsOcHtdusTMHS60bhvyCnHkcsnt5qpfk_tPHr_sv1c3t5-v91U1lVaPmCjoPKL1QmnMQnWceWS89OIGNk2DR88Z2bSeAS-QtKKbBuhpBaf0LuyTvtn-L_vfF5dkcQ14d4Ojikk3LpNR13aj_kgVpW6WULqTcSJtizsl5M6VwxPRogJk1e3MwW_Zmzd4AmFLK2uuTwNIdXf9n6XfYBXh7AjBbHHzC0Yb8lxOtbpRc9d9snMdo8KEcx9zfFSXBoJWNFivxYSNcifZHcMlkG9xoXR9SOZrpY_i315-kH60G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>853995556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Voo, Wan-Ping ; Ravindra, Pogaku ; Tey, Beng-Ti ; Chan, Eng-Seng</creator><creatorcontrib>Voo, Wan-Ping ; Ravindra, Pogaku ; Tey, Beng-Ti ; Chan, Eng-Seng</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative study on the stability and potential of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium in repeated batch fermentation was conducted. The bead cores, made of three types of materials, i.e., ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The effect of single and double layer coatings using chitosan and core material, respectively, on the bead stability and cell production were also studied. The pectin based beads were found to be more stable than that of the alginate beads and their stability was further improved by coating with chitosan. The cell concentration in pectin based beads was comparable to that in the alginate beads. On the other hand, pectin based beads gave significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles when compared to the alginate beads. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability and favourable microenvironment for cell growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-1723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-4421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21216192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alginate ; Alginates - chemistry ; Animals ; Bead ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cells, Immobilized ; Chitosan - metabolism ; Culture Media ; Encapsulation ; Fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Glucuronic Acid - chemistry ; Hexuronic Acids - chemistry ; Lactobacillus - growth & development ; Microspheres ; Pectin ; Pectins - chemistry ; Poultry ; Probiotic ; Probiotics ; Stability</subject><ispartof>Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2011-03, Vol.111 (3), p.294-299</ispartof><rights>2010 The Society for Biotechnology, Japan</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-1bf1a4f3562213bf0fa0d4f1e3a8e41caf28cb9b3124a2915061ce7a15664f1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-1bf1a4f3562213bf0fa0d4f1e3a8e41caf28cb9b3124a2915061ce7a15664f1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23968546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21216192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voo, Wan-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindra, Pogaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tey, Beng-Ti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eng-Seng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells</title><title>Journal of bioscience and bioengineering</title><addtitle>J Biosci Bioeng</addtitle><description>A comparative study on the stability and potential of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium in repeated batch fermentation was conducted. The bead cores, made of three types of materials, i.e., ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The effect of single and double layer coatings using chitosan and core material, respectively, on the bead stability and cell production were also studied. The pectin based beads were found to be more stable than that of the alginate beads and their stability was further improved by coating with chitosan. The cell concentration in pectin based beads was comparable to that in the alginate beads. On the other hand, pectin based beads gave significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles when compared to the alginate beads. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability and favourable microenvironment for cell growth.</description><subject>Alginate</subject><subject>Alginates - chemistry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bead</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cells, Immobilized</subject><subject>Chitosan - metabolism</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Encapsulation</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Glucuronic Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Hexuronic Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - growth & development</subject><subject>Microspheres</subject><subject>Pectin</subject><subject>Pectins - chemistry</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Probiotic</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Stability</subject><issn>1389-1723</issn><issn>1347-4421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERUvhHyDwBrHKxeNXkg1SdcWjUqUuSsXSmjh25avcONgJUv89DrnADlZjzXzjc3SGkFfAdsBAvz_sDl2I2e44W1uwK-UJuQAh60pKDk_Xd9NWUHNxTp7nfGAMalbDM3LOgYOGll-Qb_t4nDCFHEcaPcXhIYw4O4pjTydn5zDSDrPraeewz9THRKcU-6VMto0pLsOcHtdusTMHS60bhvyCnHkcsnt5qpfk_tPHr_sv1c3t5-v91U1lVaPmCjoPKL1QmnMQnWceWS89OIGNk2DR88Z2bSeAS-QtKKbBuhpBaf0LuyTvtn-L_vfF5dkcQ14d4Ojikk3LpNR13aj_kgVpW6WULqTcSJtizsl5M6VwxPRogJk1e3MwW_Zmzd4AmFLK2uuTwNIdXf9n6XfYBXh7AjBbHHzC0Yb8lxOtbpRc9d9snMdo8KEcx9zfFSXBoJWNFivxYSNcifZHcMlkG9xoXR9SOZrpY_i315-kH60G</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Voo, Wan-Ping</creator><creator>Ravindra, Pogaku</creator><creator>Tey, Beng-Ti</creator><creator>Chan, Eng-Seng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Osaka, Japan: Society for Bioscience and Bioengineering, Japan; Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Distributed outside Japan by Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells</title><author>Voo, Wan-Ping ; Ravindra, Pogaku ; Tey, Beng-Ti ; Chan, Eng-Seng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-1bf1a4f3562213bf0fa0d4f1e3a8e41caf28cb9b3124a2915061ce7a15664f1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alginate</topic><topic>Alginates - chemistry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bead</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cells, Immobilized</topic><topic>Chitosan - metabolism</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Encapsulation</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Glucuronic Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Hexuronic Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - growth & development</topic><topic>Microspheres</topic><topic>Pectin</topic><topic>Pectins - chemistry</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Probiotic</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voo, Wan-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravindra, Pogaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tey, Beng-Ti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eng-Seng</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of bioscience and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voo, Wan-Ping</au><au>Ravindra, Pogaku</au><au>Tey, Beng-Ti</au><au>Chan, Eng-Seng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bioscience and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>J Biosci Bioeng</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>294</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>294-299</pages><issn>1389-1723</issn><eissn>1347-4421</eissn><abstract>A comparative study on the stability and potential of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium in repeated batch fermentation was conducted. The bead cores, made of three types of materials, i.e., ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The effect of single and double layer coatings using chitosan and core material, respectively, on the bead stability and cell production were also studied. The pectin based beads were found to be more stable than that of the alginate beads and their stability was further improved by coating with chitosan. The cell concentration in pectin based beads was comparable to that in the alginate beads. On the other hand, pectin based beads gave significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles when compared to the alginate beads. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability and favourable microenvironment for cell growth.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21216192</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1389-1723 |
| ispartof | Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2011-03, Vol.111 (3), p.294-299 |
| issn | 1389-1723 1347-4421 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904467785 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Alginate Alginates - chemistry Animals Bead Biological and medical sciences Biotechnology Cells, Immobilized Chitosan - metabolism Culture Media Encapsulation Fermentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Glucuronic Acid - chemistry Hexuronic Acids - chemistry Lactobacillus - growth & development Microspheres Pectin Pectins - chemistry Poultry Probiotic Probiotics Stability |
| title | Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T23%3A50%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20alginate%20and%20pectin%20based%20beads%20for%20production%20of%20poultry%20probiotic%20cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bioscience%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Voo,%20Wan-Ping&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=294-299&rft.issn=1389-1723&rft.eissn=1347-4421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904467785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=853995556&rft_id=info:pmid/21216192&rft_els_id=S1389172310003725&rfr_iscdi=true |