Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four se...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2010-11, Vol.58 (11), p.2099-2106 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2106 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 2099 |
| container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | McMurdo, Marion E. T. Sugden, Jacqui Argo, Ishbel Boyle, Paul Johnston, Derek W. Sniehotta, Falko F. Donnan, Peter T. |
| description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.
INTERVENTIONS: Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.
MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes: Short Physical Performance Battery, health‐related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy‐nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6‐month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P=.002) and the pedometer plus group (P=.04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.
Trial registration: ISRCTN26786857 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904463792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2182892851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-f9d4a0534c5819585cc95e19b7f7674bea5f0ce9d843bad25e4052059615be143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhi0EYt3gLyALCe0qxZ9xfIFQVbYyqNi0FfXSOM6JcEmTYafQ8utxaCkSN-AbH9nPe-TjByFMyZim9XI1ppKzTAoqx4ykU8IpU-PtAzQ6XjxEI0IIy4qcihN0GuOKEMpIUTxGJ4wSKZgmI_TpTYdvoOrW0EOI-Kp1AWwEfPN5F72zDZ643n_z_Q77Ft9BBW1vww5fNxUEvEyx9jWe4Fvbphb-B1R42rV96JomlYvgbfMEPaptE-HpYT9DHy8vFtO32fx6djWdzDMntFRZrSthieTCyYJqWUjntASqS1WrXIkSrKyJA10Vgpe2YhIEkYxInVNZAhX8DJ3v-96H7usGYm_WPjpoGttCt4lGEyFyrjT7J6lyTvOcap7I53-Rq24T2jRGgpgiQkmdoGIPudDFGKA298Gv0ycZSsxgy6zMIMUMUsxgy_yyZbYp-uzQf1OuoToGf-tJwIsDYGOSUQfbOh__cFxIytgw0qs99903sPvvB5h3s7uhSvlsn_exh-0xb8MXkyuupFl-mJkFo7fLS_7ezPlPR-683g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762704759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McMurdo, Marion E. T. ; Sugden, Jacqui ; Argo, Ishbel ; Boyle, Paul ; Johnston, Derek W. ; Sniehotta, Falko F. ; Donnan, Peter T.</creator><creatorcontrib>McMurdo, Marion E. T. ; Sugden, Jacqui ; Argo, Ishbel ; Boyle, Paul ; Johnston, Derek W. ; Sniehotta, Falko F. ; Donnan, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.
INTERVENTIONS: Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.
MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes: Short Physical Performance Battery, health‐related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy‐nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6‐month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P=.002) and the pedometer plus group (P=.04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.
Trial registration: ISRCTN26786857</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21054290</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical trials ; elderly ; Exercise ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Measuring instruments ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation ; Motivation ; Motor Activity ; Older people ; pedometer ; physical activity ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; randomized controlled trial ; Sedentary Behavior ; Single-Blind Method ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2010-11, Vol.58 (11), p.2099-2106</ispartof><rights>2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-f9d4a0534c5819585cc95e19b7f7674bea5f0ce9d843bad25e4052059615be143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-f9d4a0534c5819585cc95e19b7f7674bea5f0ce9d843bad25e4052059615be143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2010.03127.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-5415.2010.03127.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23451222$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21054290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMurdo, Marion E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugden, Jacqui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argo, Ishbel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Derek W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sniehotta, Falko F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnan, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.
INTERVENTIONS: Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.
MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes: Short Physical Performance Battery, health‐related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy‐nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6‐month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P=.002) and the pedometer plus group (P=.04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.
Trial registration: ISRCTN26786857</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>pedometer</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Sedentary Behavior</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhi0EYt3gLyALCe0qxZ9xfIFQVbYyqNi0FfXSOM6JcEmTYafQ8utxaCkSN-AbH9nPe-TjByFMyZim9XI1ppKzTAoqx4ykU8IpU-PtAzQ6XjxEI0IIy4qcihN0GuOKEMpIUTxGJ4wSKZgmI_TpTYdvoOrW0EOI-Kp1AWwEfPN5F72zDZ643n_z_Q77Ft9BBW1vww5fNxUEvEyx9jWe4Fvbphb-B1R42rV96JomlYvgbfMEPaptE-HpYT9DHy8vFtO32fx6djWdzDMntFRZrSthieTCyYJqWUjntASqS1WrXIkSrKyJA10Vgpe2YhIEkYxInVNZAhX8DJ3v-96H7usGYm_WPjpoGttCt4lGEyFyrjT7J6lyTvOcap7I53-Rq24T2jRGgpgiQkmdoGIPudDFGKA298Gv0ycZSsxgy6zMIMUMUsxgy_yyZbYp-uzQf1OuoToGf-tJwIsDYGOSUQfbOh__cFxIytgw0qs99903sPvvB5h3s7uhSvlsn_exh-0xb8MXkyuupFl-mJkFo7fLS_7ezPlPR-683g</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>McMurdo, Marion E. T.</creator><creator>Sugden, Jacqui</creator><creator>Argo, Ishbel</creator><creator>Boyle, Paul</creator><creator>Johnston, Derek W.</creator><creator>Sniehotta, Falko F.</creator><creator>Donnan, Peter T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>McMurdo, Marion E. T. ; Sugden, Jacqui ; Argo, Ishbel ; Boyle, Paul ; Johnston, Derek W. ; Sniehotta, Falko F. ; Donnan, Peter T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-f9d4a0534c5819585cc95e19b7f7674bea5f0ce9d843bad25e4052059615be143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>pedometer</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Sedentary Behavior</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMurdo, Marion E. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugden, Jacqui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argo, Ishbel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Derek W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sniehotta, Falko F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnan, Peter T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMurdo, Marion E. T.</au><au>Sugden, Jacqui</au><au>Argo, Ishbel</au><au>Boyle, Paul</au><au>Johnston, Derek W.</au><au>Sniehotta, Falko F.</au><au>Donnan, Peter T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2099</spage><epage>2106</epage><pages>2099-2106</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention (BCI) with or without a pedometer in increasing physical activity in sedentary older women.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Primary care, City of Dundee, Scotland.
PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred four sedentary women aged 70 and older.
INTERVENTIONS: Six months of BCI, BCI plus pedometer (pedometer plus), or usual care.
MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: change in daily activity counts measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes: Short Physical Performance Battery, health‐related quality of life, depression and anxiety, falls, and National Health Service resource use.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy‐nine of 204 (88%) women completed the 6‐month trial. Withdrawals were highest from the BCI group (15/68) followed by the pedometer plus group (8/68) and then the control group (2/64). After adjustment for baseline differences, accelerometry counts increased significantly more in the BCI group at 3 months than in the control group (P=.002) and the pedometer plus group (P=.04). By 6 months, accelerometry counts in both intervention groups had fallen to levels that were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline. There were no significant changes in the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The BCI was effective in objectively increasing physical activity in sedentary older women. Provision of a pedometer yielded no additional benefit in physical activity, but may have motivated participants to remain in the trial.
Trial registration: ISRCTN26786857</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21054290</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2010-11, Vol.58 (11), p.2099-2106 |
| issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904463792 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Clinical trials elderly Exercise Female General aspects Humans Measuring instruments Medical sciences Miscellaneous Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation Motivation Motor Activity Older people pedometer physical activity Prospective Studies Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine randomized controlled trial Sedentary Behavior Single-Blind Method Women |
| title | Do Pedometers Increase Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Women? A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Pedometers%20Increase%20Physical%20Activity%20in%20Sedentary%20Older%20Women?%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=McMurdo,%20Marion%20E.%20T.&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2099&rft.epage=2106&rft.pages=2099-2106&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2182892851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762704759&rft_id=info:pmid/21054290&rfr_iscdi=true |