Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions

We evaluated 20 patients with spinal lesions with respect to the value of unilateral hemilaminectomy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey. The operative technique of the limited approach for spinal lesions is described. The study is based on 20 pros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spinal cord 2000-02, Vol.38 (2), p.92-96
Hauptverfasser: ÖKTEM, I. S, AKDEMIR, H, KURTSOY, A, KOC, R. K, MENKÜ, A, TUCER, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 2
container_start_page 92
container_title Spinal cord
container_volume 38
creator ÖKTEM, I. S
AKDEMIR, H
KURTSOY, A
KOC, R. K
MENKÜ, A
TUCER, B
description We evaluated 20 patients with spinal lesions with respect to the value of unilateral hemilaminectomy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey. The operative technique of the limited approach for spinal lesions is described. The study is based on 20 prospective consecutive patients with spinal lesions who had unilateral hemilaminectomy. There were 12 women and eight men. Age ranged from 17 to 63 years mean (42 years) with a slight preponderance of women patients (60%). Spinal lesions were cervical in three cases, lumbar in five cases, and thoracic in 12 cases. Hemilaminectomy was performed by using a high speed drill. Postoperative neurological status was unchanged in six cases, improved in 11 cases, and worsened in three cases. We only observed two cases of wound infections that were not related to our surgical approach. At the follow-up evaluation, which occurred approximately 25 months after surgery none of the patients showed spinal deformity or spinal instability. The rationale of attempting unilateral approach is to avoid damage to the dorsal static structures of the vertebral column. With the precise preoperative definition of the relationship of tumor to the surface of the spinal cord by contrast enhanced MRI, unilateral approaches might be more applicable to spinal lesions except invasive extradural lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.sc.3100963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904462576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71035384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-db89b454d9b45c6d130c24b9be8453ef671cbe6dd4360045f843bb0c1078329b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgitPp0asUET115qtpcpShThh40XNo0hRb2mbmbYX992auoHjwkuSFHw9vHoQuCF4QzOQdNAuwC0YwVoIdoBPCc5FmgvLD-GaCppwpNkOnAA2Ohih5jGYE54ISSU5QtnJd3RZd3Ts7-G6bVD4kw7tLguv8Z9EmvvoeYVP3cWod1L6HM3RUFS248-meo7fHh9flKl2_PD0v79epzQgZ0tJIZXjGy91pRUkYtpQbZZzkGXOVyIk1TpQlZwJjnlWSM2OwjetJRpVhc3S7z90E_zE6GHRXg3VtW_TOj6AV5lzQLBdR3vwr81hWxmL-HF39gY0fQ_wbaEoVp3ETFlG6RzZ4gOAqvQl1V4StJljvatfQaLB6qj36yyl0NJ0rf-l9zxFcT6AAW7RVKHpbw4-jUuaEsC9Ucoib</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229423603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>ÖKTEM, I. S ; AKDEMIR, H ; KURTSOY, A ; KOC, R. K ; MENKÜ, A ; TUCER, B</creator><creatorcontrib>ÖKTEM, I. S ; AKDEMIR, H ; KURTSOY, A ; KOC, R. K ; MENKÜ, A ; TUCER, B</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated 20 patients with spinal lesions with respect to the value of unilateral hemilaminectomy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey. The operative technique of the limited approach for spinal lesions is described. The study is based on 20 prospective consecutive patients with spinal lesions who had unilateral hemilaminectomy. There were 12 women and eight men. Age ranged from 17 to 63 years mean (42 years) with a slight preponderance of women patients (60%). Spinal lesions were cervical in three cases, lumbar in five cases, and thoracic in 12 cases. Hemilaminectomy was performed by using a high speed drill. Postoperative neurological status was unchanged in six cases, improved in 11 cases, and worsened in three cases. We only observed two cases of wound infections that were not related to our surgical approach. At the follow-up evaluation, which occurred approximately 25 months after surgery none of the patients showed spinal deformity or spinal instability. The rationale of attempting unilateral approach is to avoid damage to the dorsal static structures of the vertebral column. With the precise preoperative definition of the relationship of tumor to the surface of the spinal cord by contrast enhanced MRI, unilateral approaches might be more applicable to spinal lesions except invasive extradural lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10762181</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPCOFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervical Vertebrae - pathology ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Laminectomy - methods ; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Nervous System - physiopathology ; Neurology ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Spinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Spinal Diseases - pathology ; Spinal Diseases - physiopathology ; Spinal Diseases - surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Spinal Neoplasms - pathology ; Spinal Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology ; Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</subject><ispartof>Spinal cord, 2000-02, Vol.38 (2), p.92-96</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-db89b454d9b45c6d130c24b9be8453ef671cbe6dd4360045f843bb0c1078329b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1288711$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10762181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ÖKTEM, I. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKDEMIR, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURTSOY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOC, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENKÜ, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TUCER, B</creatorcontrib><title>Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions</title><title>Spinal cord</title><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><description>We evaluated 20 patients with spinal lesions with respect to the value of unilateral hemilaminectomy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey. The operative technique of the limited approach for spinal lesions is described. The study is based on 20 prospective consecutive patients with spinal lesions who had unilateral hemilaminectomy. There were 12 women and eight men. Age ranged from 17 to 63 years mean (42 years) with a slight preponderance of women patients (60%). Spinal lesions were cervical in three cases, lumbar in five cases, and thoracic in 12 cases. Hemilaminectomy was performed by using a high speed drill. Postoperative neurological status was unchanged in six cases, improved in 11 cases, and worsened in three cases. We only observed two cases of wound infections that were not related to our surgical approach. At the follow-up evaluation, which occurred approximately 25 months after surgery none of the patients showed spinal deformity or spinal instability. The rationale of attempting unilateral approach is to avoid damage to the dorsal static structures of the vertebral column. With the precise preoperative definition of the relationship of tumor to the surface of the spinal cord by contrast enhanced MRI, unilateral approaches might be more applicable to spinal lesions except invasive extradural lesions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy - methods</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</subject><issn>1362-4393</issn><issn>1476-5624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgitPp0asUET115qtpcpShThh40XNo0hRb2mbmbYX992auoHjwkuSFHw9vHoQuCF4QzOQdNAuwC0YwVoIdoBPCc5FmgvLD-GaCppwpNkOnAA2Ohih5jGYE54ISSU5QtnJd3RZd3Ts7-G6bVD4kw7tLguv8Z9EmvvoeYVP3cWod1L6HM3RUFS248-meo7fHh9flKl2_PD0v79epzQgZ0tJIZXjGy91pRUkYtpQbZZzkGXOVyIk1TpQlZwJjnlWSM2OwjetJRpVhc3S7z90E_zE6GHRXg3VtW_TOj6AV5lzQLBdR3vwr81hWxmL-HF39gY0fQ_wbaEoVp3ETFlG6RzZ4gOAqvQl1V4StJljvatfQaLB6qj36yyl0NJ0rf-l9zxFcT6AAW7RVKHpbw4-jUuaEsC9Ucoib</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>ÖKTEM, I. S</creator><creator>AKDEMIR, H</creator><creator>KURTSOY, A</creator><creator>KOC, R. K</creator><creator>MENKÜ, A</creator><creator>TUCER, B</creator><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions</title><author>ÖKTEM, I. S ; AKDEMIR, H ; KURTSOY, A ; KOC, R. K ; MENKÜ, A ; TUCER, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-db89b454d9b45c6d130c24b9be8453ef671cbe6dd4360045f843bb0c1078329b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy - methods</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ÖKTEM, I. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKDEMIR, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KURTSOY, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOC, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENKÜ, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TUCER, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ÖKTEM, I. S</au><au>AKDEMIR, H</au><au>KURTSOY, A</au><au>KOC, R. K</au><au>MENKÜ, A</au><au>TUCER, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions</atitle><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>92-96</pages><issn>1362-4393</issn><eissn>1476-5624</eissn><coden>SPCOFM</coden><abstract>We evaluated 20 patients with spinal lesions with respect to the value of unilateral hemilaminectomy at the Department of Neurosurgery, Erciyes University, Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey. The operative technique of the limited approach for spinal lesions is described. The study is based on 20 prospective consecutive patients with spinal lesions who had unilateral hemilaminectomy. There were 12 women and eight men. Age ranged from 17 to 63 years mean (42 years) with a slight preponderance of women patients (60%). Spinal lesions were cervical in three cases, lumbar in five cases, and thoracic in 12 cases. Hemilaminectomy was performed by using a high speed drill. Postoperative neurological status was unchanged in six cases, improved in 11 cases, and worsened in three cases. We only observed two cases of wound infections that were not related to our surgical approach. At the follow-up evaluation, which occurred approximately 25 months after surgery none of the patients showed spinal deformity or spinal instability. The rationale of attempting unilateral approach is to avoid damage to the dorsal static structures of the vertebral column. With the precise preoperative definition of the relationship of tumor to the surface of the spinal cord by contrast enhanced MRI, unilateral approaches might be more applicable to spinal lesions except invasive extradural lesions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing</pub><pmid>10762181</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.sc.3100963</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1362-4393
ispartof Spinal cord, 2000-02, Vol.38 (2), p.92-96
issn 1362-4393
1476-5624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904462576
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cervical Vertebrae - pathology
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Female
Humans
Laminectomy - methods
Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Nervous System - physiopathology
Neurology
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Spinal Diseases - diagnosis
Spinal Diseases - pathology
Spinal Diseases - physiopathology
Spinal Diseases - surgery
Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Spinal Neoplasms - pathology
Spinal Neoplasms - physiopathology
Spinal Neoplasms - surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae - pathology
Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses
title Hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A26%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hemilaminectomy%20for%20the%20removal%20of%20the%20spinal%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Spinal%20cord&rft.au=%C3%96KTEM,%20I.%20S&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=92-96&rft.issn=1362-4393&rft.eissn=1476-5624&rft.coden=SPCOFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.sc.3100963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71035384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229423603&rft_id=info:pmid/10762181&rfr_iscdi=true