Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence
Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1553 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | JoAnna Nguyen, T Carey, Joseph N Wong, Alex K |
description | Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904010425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S174868151100043X</els_id><sourcerecordid>904010425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks-L1TAQx4so7rr6D3iQXMRT60ybNK2IIMv6AxY86IK3kCZTN882fSbpw_3vTXlPBQ9ekhw-35nMhymKpwgVArYvd9Ww28eqBsQK6goA7xXn2MmuBNH09_Nb8q5sOxRnxaMYdwC8QS4eFmc1Nl3XA54XdBOJLSO7XWftmTY0TeukA7MUZj2xWafgfjLnmZv3k_apZIOOZNkQSMfEApnFxxRWk9ziX7Grg55WnZz_xtItMTo4S97Q4-LBqKdIT073RXHz7urL5Yfy-tP7j5dvr0vDOaSSdCPBCpRtI8ZBG9lz2-fTbONa2UkpJLdoDIqm40PLawvWaDTStroR2FwUL45192H5sVJManZxm0l7WtaoeuCAwGuRyfpImrDEGGhU--BmHe4UgtraqZ3a7KrNroJaZbs59OxUfh1msn8iv3Vm4PkJ0NHoaQzaGxf_cqLmooc6c6-PHGUZB0dBReM2UdZlo0nZxf3_H2_-iZvJeZc7fqc7irtlDT5rVqhiDqjP2x5sa4AI2w58bX4BH4mtWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904010425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</creator><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21388901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acellular dermal matrix ; AlloDerm ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast implant ; Breast Implantation ; Breast Implants ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast reconstruction ; Collagen - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology ; Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention & control ; Mastectomy ; Medical sciences ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Skin, Artificial ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Tissue Expansion Devices ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25245902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21388901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Joseph N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</description><subject>Acellular dermal matrix</subject><subject>AlloDerm</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast implant</subject><subject>Breast Implantation</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Collagen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention & control</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Skin, Artificial</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion Devices</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks-L1TAQx4so7rr6D3iQXMRT60ybNK2IIMv6AxY86IK3kCZTN882fSbpw_3vTXlPBQ9ekhw-35nMhymKpwgVArYvd9Ww28eqBsQK6goA7xXn2MmuBNH09_Nb8q5sOxRnxaMYdwC8QS4eFmc1Nl3XA54XdBOJLSO7XWftmTY0TeukA7MUZj2xWafgfjLnmZv3k_apZIOOZNkQSMfEApnFxxRWk9ziX7Grg55WnZz_xtItMTo4S97Q4-LBqKdIT073RXHz7urL5Yfy-tP7j5dvr0vDOaSSdCPBCpRtI8ZBG9lz2-fTbONa2UkpJLdoDIqm40PLawvWaDTStroR2FwUL45192H5sVJManZxm0l7WtaoeuCAwGuRyfpImrDEGGhU--BmHe4UgtraqZ3a7KrNroJaZbs59OxUfh1msn8iv3Vm4PkJ0NHoaQzaGxf_cqLmooc6c6-PHGUZB0dBReM2UdZlo0nZxf3_H2_-iZvJeZc7fqc7irtlDT5rVqhiDqjP2x5sa4AI2w58bX4BH4mtWg</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creator><creator>Carey, Joseph N</creator><creator>Wong, Alex K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><author>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acellular dermal matrix</topic><topic>AlloDerm</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast implant</topic><topic>Breast Implantation</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Collagen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention & control</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Skin, Artificial</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion Devices</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Joseph N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JoAnna Nguyen, T</au><au>Carey, Joseph N</au><au>Wong, Alex K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1561</epage><pages>1553-1561</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21388901</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904010425 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acellular dermal matrix AlloDerm Biological and medical sciences Breast implant Breast Implantation Breast Implants Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breast reconstruction Collagen - therapeutic use Female Humans Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention & control Mastectomy Medical sciences Plastic Surgery Review Skin, Artificial Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Tissue Expansion Devices Treatment Outcome |
title | Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20human%20acellular%20dermal%20matrix%20in%20implant-%20based%20breast%20reconstruction:%20Evaluating%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=JoAnna%20Nguyen,%20T&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1561&rft.pages=1553-1561&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904010425%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904010425&rft_id=info:pmid/21388901&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S174868151100043X&rfr_iscdi=true |