Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence

Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561
Hauptverfasser: JoAnna Nguyen, T, Carey, Joseph N, Wong, Alex K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1561
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1553
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 64
creator JoAnna Nguyen, T
Carey, Joseph N
Wong, Alex K
description Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904010425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S174868151100043X</els_id><sourcerecordid>904010425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks-L1TAQx4so7rr6D3iQXMRT60ybNK2IIMv6AxY86IK3kCZTN882fSbpw_3vTXlPBQ9ekhw-35nMhymKpwgVArYvd9Ww28eqBsQK6goA7xXn2MmuBNH09_Nb8q5sOxRnxaMYdwC8QS4eFmc1Nl3XA54XdBOJLSO7XWftmTY0TeukA7MUZj2xWafgfjLnmZv3k_apZIOOZNkQSMfEApnFxxRWk9ziX7Grg55WnZz_xtItMTo4S97Q4-LBqKdIT073RXHz7urL5Yfy-tP7j5dvr0vDOaSSdCPBCpRtI8ZBG9lz2-fTbONa2UkpJLdoDIqm40PLawvWaDTStroR2FwUL45192H5sVJManZxm0l7WtaoeuCAwGuRyfpImrDEGGhU--BmHe4UgtraqZ3a7KrNroJaZbs59OxUfh1msn8iv3Vm4PkJ0NHoaQzaGxf_cqLmooc6c6-PHGUZB0dBReM2UdZlo0nZxf3_H2_-iZvJeZc7fqc7irtlDT5rVqhiDqjP2x5sa4AI2w58bX4BH4mtWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904010425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</creator><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21388901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acellular dermal matrix ; AlloDerm ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast implant ; Breast Implantation ; Breast Implants ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast reconstruction ; Collagen - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology ; Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention &amp; control ; Mastectomy ; Medical sciences ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Skin, Artificial ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Tissue Expansion Devices ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25245902$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21388901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Joseph N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</description><subject>Acellular dermal matrix</subject><subject>AlloDerm</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast implant</subject><subject>Breast Implantation</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Collagen - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Skin, Artificial</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Tissue Expansion Devices</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks-L1TAQx4so7rr6D3iQXMRT60ybNK2IIMv6AxY86IK3kCZTN882fSbpw_3vTXlPBQ9ekhw-35nMhymKpwgVArYvd9Ww28eqBsQK6goA7xXn2MmuBNH09_Nb8q5sOxRnxaMYdwC8QS4eFmc1Nl3XA54XdBOJLSO7XWftmTY0TeukA7MUZj2xWafgfjLnmZv3k_apZIOOZNkQSMfEApnFxxRWk9ziX7Grg55WnZz_xtItMTo4S97Q4-LBqKdIT073RXHz7urL5Yfy-tP7j5dvr0vDOaSSdCPBCpRtI8ZBG9lz2-fTbONa2UkpJLdoDIqm40PLawvWaDTStroR2FwUL45192H5sVJManZxm0l7WtaoeuCAwGuRyfpImrDEGGhU--BmHe4UgtraqZ3a7KrNroJaZbs59OxUfh1msn8iv3Vm4PkJ0NHoaQzaGxf_cqLmooc6c6-PHGUZB0dBReM2UdZlo0nZxf3_H2_-iZvJeZc7fqc7irtlDT5rVqhiDqjP2x5sa4AI2w58bX4BH4mtWg</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creator><creator>Carey, Joseph N</creator><creator>Wong, Alex K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</title><author>JoAnna Nguyen, T ; Carey, Joseph N ; Wong, Alex K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-ea370d517635fbac794d9c79c1016d7877574d1cc15384b642d0dca1c7d6a3513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acellular dermal matrix</topic><topic>AlloDerm</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast implant</topic><topic>Breast Implantation</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Collagen - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Skin, Artificial</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Tissue Expansion Devices</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JoAnna Nguyen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Joseph N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alex K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JoAnna Nguyen, T</au><au>Carey, Joseph N</au><au>Wong, Alex K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1561</epage><pages>1553-1561</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular to the point that a subset of surgeons use ADM for virtually every tissue expander/implant based reconstruction. While there may be a number of perceived and anecdotal advantages such as decreased post-operative pain, increased initial expander fill volume, and improved aesthetic outcome, it remains unclear as to whether there is sufficient evidence to support these as well as other claims or its routine use. In this review, we identified all papers in the PubMed and Medline databases that addressed outcomes of the use of ADM in single and multiple staged implant based breast reconstruction. Papers were evaluated for any claim of benefit in using ADM in breast reconstruction. The following perceived advantages were supported solely by anecdotal reports and opinions: reduction in post-op pain, decreased operative time, precise control of the lateral and IMF, maximal use of mastectomy skin flaps, and improved lower pole expansion. There was inconsistent data for commonly perceived advantages, such as: eliminating the need for expanders, increased initial fill volumes, fewer expansions, faster time to reconstruction completion, decreased rate of revision, and improved aesthetic outcome. We found consistent support for a decreased incidence of capsular contracture; however the existing reports have limited long term follow-up. Despite the many heralded benefits of ADM in breast reconstruction, the data supporting these claims is mostly anecdotal. Both long term outcomes and randomized controlled prospective studies are needed in order to definitively evaluate the perceived advantages of ADM in breast reconstruction.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21388901</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2011-12, Vol.64 (12), p.1553-1561
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904010425
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acellular dermal matrix
AlloDerm
Biological and medical sciences
Breast implant
Breast Implantation
Breast Implants
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast reconstruction
Collagen - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology
Implant Capsular Contracture - prevention & control
Mastectomy
Medical sciences
Plastic Surgery
Review
Skin, Artificial
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland
Tissue Expansion Devices
Treatment Outcome
title Use of human acellular dermal matrix in implant- based breast reconstruction: Evaluating the evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20human%20acellular%20dermal%20matrix%20in%20implant-%20based%20breast%20reconstruction:%20Evaluating%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=JoAnna%20Nguyen,%20T&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1561&rft.pages=1553-1561&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E904010425%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904010425&rft_id=info:pmid/21388901&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S174868151100043X&rfr_iscdi=true