Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis
Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigator...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | CD008359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | CD008359 |
container_title | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
container_volume | 2011 |
creator | Wilms, Ingrid MHA de Hoog, Dominique ENM de Visser, Dianne C Janzing, Heinrich MJ Janzing, Heinrich MJ |
description | Background
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results.
Objectives
Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year?
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria
Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant.
Main results
Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome.
Authors' conclusions
The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quali |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903660617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>903660617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF6psTClnJ3HsCZXyKVVigdlynIswSppgO6D-exJKEWJhupPu_dA9hMwpLCgAu6Apz6jIxGJ1DSCSTC66vmAHZDoe4vFy-GufkBPvXwESLll-TCaMQU5Fyqfkctl1uCnRhLbZRu_ofO8jvQm2sG2wJgoOdWhwE6KqdZE2fcBIf1msscH6U3JU6drj2feckefbm6fVfbx-vHtYLdexSYVgsUi0BFYYnUkpM5nklJcJr3ihMZVCaIlGc6NNRQEZSMi0YHlRZlCyJIFCJzNyvsvtXPvWow-qsd5gXesNtr1XcviNA6f5oOQ7pXGt9w4r1TnbaLdVFNTITu3ZqT07NbIbjPPvir5osPyx7WENgqud4MPWuFWmNS9uqP8n90_LJ1GwfzE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>903660617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results.
Objectives
Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year?
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria
Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant.
Main results
Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome.
Authors' conclusions
The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22071846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Anti‐Bacterial Agents ; Appendectomy ; Appendectomy - methods ; Appendiceal diseases ; Appendicitis ; Appendicitis - drug therapy ; Appendicitis - surgery ; Gastroenterology & hepatology ; Humans ; Insurance medicine ; Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences ; Other bowel disorders ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Return to Work ; Sick Leave ; Surgery ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Visser, Dianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Background
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results.
Objectives
Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year?
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria
Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant.
Main results
Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome.
Authors' conclusions
The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti‐Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendectomy - methods</subject><subject>Appendiceal diseases</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Appendicitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Appendicitis - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology & hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance medicine</subject><subject>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Other bowel disorders</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RWY</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF6psTClnJ3HsCZXyKVVigdlynIswSppgO6D-exJKEWJhupPu_dA9hMwpLCgAu6Apz6jIxGJ1DSCSTC66vmAHZDoe4vFy-GufkBPvXwESLll-TCaMQU5Fyqfkctl1uCnRhLbZRu_ofO8jvQm2sG2wJgoOdWhwE6KqdZE2fcBIf1msscH6U3JU6drj2feckefbm6fVfbx-vHtYLdexSYVgsUi0BFYYnUkpM5nklJcJr3ihMZVCaIlGc6NNRQEZSMi0YHlRZlCyJIFCJzNyvsvtXPvWow-qsd5gXesNtr1XcviNA6f5oOQ7pXGt9w4r1TnbaLdVFNTITu3ZqT07NbIbjPPvir5osPyx7WENgqud4MPWuFWmNS9uqP8n90_LJ1GwfzE</recordid><startdate>20111109</startdate><enddate>20111109</enddate><creator>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creator><creator>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creator><creator>de Visser, Dianne C</creator><creator>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><creator>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>7PX</scope><scope>RWY</scope><scope>ZYTZH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111109</creationdate><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><author>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti‐Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendectomy - methods</topic><topic>Appendiceal diseases</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Appendicitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Appendicitis - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology & hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance medicine</topic><topic>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Other bowel disorders</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Visser, Dianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library (Open Aceess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</au><au>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</au><au>de Visser, Dianne C</au><au>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</au><au>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2011-11-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>CD008359</spage><epage>CD008359</epage><pages>CD008359-CD008359</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Background
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results.
Objectives
Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year?
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria
Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant.
Main results
Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome.
Authors' conclusions
The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>22071846</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1465-1858 |
ispartof | Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359 |
issn | 1465-1858 1465-1858 1469-493X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903660617 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute Disease Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Anti‐Bacterial Agents Appendectomy Appendectomy - methods Appendiceal diseases Appendicitis Appendicitis - drug therapy Appendicitis - surgery Gastroenterology & hepatology Humans Insurance medicine Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences Other bowel disorders Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Return to Work Sick Leave Surgery Treatment |
title | Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appendectomy%20versus%20antibiotic%20treatment%20for%20acute%20appendicitis&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Wilms,%20Ingrid%20MHA&rft.date=2011-11-09&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=CD008359&rft.epage=CD008359&rft.pages=CD008359-CD008359&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1465-1858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903660617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=903660617&rft_id=info:pmid/22071846&rfr_iscdi=true |