Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis

Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigator...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359
Hauptverfasser: Wilms, Ingrid MHA, de Hoog, Dominique ENM, de Visser, Dianne C, Janzing, Heinrich MJ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page CD008359
container_issue 11
container_start_page CD008359
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume 2011
creator Wilms, Ingrid MHA
de Hoog, Dominique ENM
de Visser, Dianne C
Janzing, Heinrich MJ
Janzing, Heinrich MJ
description Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results. Objectives Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year? Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant. Main results Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome. Authors' conclusions The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quali
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903660617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>903660617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF6psTClnJ3HsCZXyKVVigdlynIswSppgO6D-exJKEWJhupPu_dA9hMwpLCgAu6Apz6jIxGJ1DSCSTC66vmAHZDoe4vFy-GufkBPvXwESLll-TCaMQU5Fyqfkctl1uCnRhLbZRu_ofO8jvQm2sG2wJgoOdWhwE6KqdZE2fcBIf1msscH6U3JU6drj2feckefbm6fVfbx-vHtYLdexSYVgsUi0BFYYnUkpM5nklJcJr3ihMZVCaIlGc6NNRQEZSMi0YHlRZlCyJIFCJzNyvsvtXPvWow-qsd5gXesNtr1XcviNA6f5oOQ7pXGt9w4r1TnbaLdVFNTITu3ZqT07NbIbjPPvir5osPyx7WENgqud4MPWuFWmNS9uqP8n90_LJ1GwfzE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>903660617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><description>Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results. Objectives Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year? Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant. Main results Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome. Authors' conclusions The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22071846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Anti‐Bacterial Agents ; Appendectomy ; Appendectomy - methods ; Appendiceal diseases ; Appendicitis ; Appendicitis - drug therapy ; Appendicitis - surgery ; Gastroenterology &amp; hepatology ; Humans ; Insurance medicine ; Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences ; Other bowel disorders ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Return to Work ; Sick Leave ; Surgery ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Visser, Dianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results. Objectives Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year? Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant. Main results Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome. Authors' conclusions The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti‐Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Appendectomy - methods</subject><subject>Appendiceal diseases</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Appendicitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Appendicitis - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology &amp; hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance medicine</subject><subject>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Other bowel disorders</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RWY</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF6psTClnJ3HsCZXyKVVigdlynIswSppgO6D-exJKEWJhupPu_dA9hMwpLCgAu6Apz6jIxGJ1DSCSTC66vmAHZDoe4vFy-GufkBPvXwESLll-TCaMQU5Fyqfkctl1uCnRhLbZRu_ofO8jvQm2sG2wJgoOdWhwE6KqdZE2fcBIf1msscH6U3JU6drj2feckefbm6fVfbx-vHtYLdexSYVgsUi0BFYYnUkpM5nklJcJr3ihMZVCaIlGc6NNRQEZSMi0YHlRZlCyJIFCJzNyvsvtXPvWow-qsd5gXesNtr1XcviNA6f5oOQ7pXGt9w4r1TnbaLdVFNTITu3ZqT07NbIbjPPvir5osPyx7WENgqud4MPWuFWmNS9uqP8n90_LJ1GwfzE</recordid><startdate>20111109</startdate><enddate>20111109</enddate><creator>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creator><creator>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creator><creator>de Visser, Dianne C</creator><creator>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><creator>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>7PX</scope><scope>RWY</scope><scope>ZYTZH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111109</creationdate><title>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</title><author>Wilms, Ingrid MHA ; de Hoog, Dominique ENM ; de Visser, Dianne C ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ ; Janzing, Heinrich MJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4882-83a902bca5999593716d36f6bae4988a9eca6cacf10e20905a827bd50d2330ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti‐Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Appendectomy - methods</topic><topic>Appendiceal diseases</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Appendicitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Appendicitis - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology &amp; hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance medicine</topic><topic>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Other bowel disorders</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Visser, Dianne C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library (Open Aceess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilms, Ingrid MHA</au><au>de Hoog, Dominique ENM</au><au>de Visser, Dianne C</au><au>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</au><au>Janzing, Heinrich MJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2011-11-09</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>CD008359</spage><epage>CD008359</epage><pages>CD008359-CD008359</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results. Objectives Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year? Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant. Main results Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome. Authors' conclusions The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>22071846</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-1858
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-11, Vol.2011 (11), p.CD008359-CD008359
issn 1465-1858
1465-1858
1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903660617
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Anti‐Bacterial Agents
Appendectomy
Appendectomy - methods
Appendiceal diseases
Appendicitis
Appendicitis - drug therapy
Appendicitis - surgery
Gastroenterology & hepatology
Humans
Insurance medicine
Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences
Other bowel disorders
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Return to Work
Sick Leave
Surgery
Treatment
title Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appendectomy%20versus%20antibiotic%20treatment%20for%20acute%20appendicitis&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Wilms,%20Ingrid%20MHA&rft.date=2011-11-09&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=CD008359&rft.epage=CD008359&rft.pages=CD008359-CD008359&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1465-1858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903660617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=903660617&rft_id=info:pmid/22071846&rfr_iscdi=true