The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits

Perception, attention, retention, comprehension and deduction are critical parameters in probing the adequacy of computer visualizations as means of communicating urban design proposals. This study investigates these parameters in the context of the remodelling of a large urban square in Vienna, Aus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape and urban planning 2009-07, Vol.91 (4), p.171-182
Hauptverfasser: Wergles, Nathalie, Muhar, Andreas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 4
container_start_page 171
container_title Landscape and urban planning
container_volume 91
creator Wergles, Nathalie
Muhar, Andreas
description Perception, attention, retention, comprehension and deduction are critical parameters in probing the adequacy of computer visualizations as means of communicating urban design proposals. This study investigates these parameters in the context of the remodelling of a large urban square in Vienna, Austria. Half of a total of 76 participants experienced the site after remodelling; the other half experienced a series of visualizations of the project proposal. Their responses were gathered by means of a qualitative questionnaire and content analyzed for similarities and differences in their cognitive, affective and evaluative aspects. Significant differences in responses were related to the limitations of the visualization medium in communicating aspects such as texture, movement, interaction and specific sensory qualities related to the design. On the other hand, visualizations were superior in communicating some aspects of the design in virtue of their ability to direct attention to centred or foreground pictorial elements. Visualizations can be successfully employed in design communication, yet more emphasis has to be placed on matching visualizations with the communication needs of the targeted viewers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903649298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169204608002429</els_id><sourcerecordid>34471277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-240800c80719c218d03f9f70238a5be95451aff06a725e21321fb58efc8c2b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhSMEEs0wdzALYJVQdhwnWY5a_EkjsRnWltspD26l7eBKGjErzoA4ISfBTUaI2TCsSvL76j2rXlE841Bx4OrVvhpNGJa0m_KsBEBXcVEBhwfFhnetKBUo8bDYZLYvBUj1uHhCtAcA3ii-Kb5ffUKW4ogsOmbjYVpmTOzoaTGjvzGzj4H5wOZMZfWwBG_Xx4znVBPYgOSvw89vPy5-75vkaZWPHr9kr4Q0xUBIbI53jYkdMdFCLIaS_Iwn1c_0tHjkzEh4fjvPio9vXl9t35WXH96-315cllbKZi6FhA7AdtDy3greDVC73rUg6s40O-wb2XDjHCjTigYFrwV3u6ZDZzsrdqqpz4qXq--U4ucFadYHTxbHfEiMC-keaiV70XeZfPFPspay5aJt7wUFKOCylxnsV9CmSJTQ6Sn5g0lfNQd9Klbv9V_F6lOxmgudi827z29DDFkzumSC9fTHQORia6FOn9muHOYj5jKSJusxWBx8QjvrIfr_SPsFQzjDMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20601494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wergles, Nathalie ; Muhar, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Wergles, Nathalie ; Muhar, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Perception, attention, retention, comprehension and deduction are critical parameters in probing the adequacy of computer visualizations as means of communicating urban design proposals. This study investigates these parameters in the context of the remodelling of a large urban square in Vienna, Austria. Half of a total of 76 participants experienced the site after remodelling; the other half experienced a series of visualizations of the project proposal. Their responses were gathered by means of a qualitative questionnaire and content analyzed for similarities and differences in their cognitive, affective and evaluative aspects. Significant differences in responses were related to the limitations of the visualization medium in communicating aspects such as texture, movement, interaction and specific sensory qualities related to the design. On the other hand, visualizations were superior in communicating some aspects of the design in virtue of their ability to direct attention to centred or foreground pictorial elements. Visualizations can be successfully employed in design communication, yet more emphasis has to be placed on matching visualizations with the communication needs of the targeted viewers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LUPLEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer visualization ; Content analysis ; Design communication ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Spatial perception ; Urban planning ; Visual simulation</subject><ispartof>Landscape and urban planning, 2009-07, Vol.91 (4), p.171-182</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-240800c80719c218d03f9f70238a5be95451aff06a725e21321fb58efc8c2b653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-240800c80719c218d03f9f70238a5be95451aff06a725e21321fb58efc8c2b653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21563267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wergles, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhar, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits</title><title>Landscape and urban planning</title><description>Perception, attention, retention, comprehension and deduction are critical parameters in probing the adequacy of computer visualizations as means of communicating urban design proposals. This study investigates these parameters in the context of the remodelling of a large urban square in Vienna, Austria. Half of a total of 76 participants experienced the site after remodelling; the other half experienced a series of visualizations of the project proposal. Their responses were gathered by means of a qualitative questionnaire and content analyzed for similarities and differences in their cognitive, affective and evaluative aspects. Significant differences in responses were related to the limitations of the visualization medium in communicating aspects such as texture, movement, interaction and specific sensory qualities related to the design. On the other hand, visualizations were superior in communicating some aspects of the design in virtue of their ability to direct attention to centred or foreground pictorial elements. Visualizations can be successfully employed in design communication, yet more emphasis has to be placed on matching visualizations with the communication needs of the targeted viewers.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer visualization</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Design communication</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Spatial perception</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Visual simulation</subject><issn>0169-2046</issn><issn>1872-6062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhSMEEs0wdzALYJVQdhwnWY5a_EkjsRnWltspD26l7eBKGjErzoA4ISfBTUaI2TCsSvL76j2rXlE841Bx4OrVvhpNGJa0m_KsBEBXcVEBhwfFhnetKBUo8bDYZLYvBUj1uHhCtAcA3ii-Kb5ffUKW4ogsOmbjYVpmTOzoaTGjvzGzj4H5wOZMZfWwBG_Xx4znVBPYgOSvw89vPy5-75vkaZWPHr9kr4Q0xUBIbI53jYkdMdFCLIaS_Iwn1c_0tHjkzEh4fjvPio9vXl9t35WXH96-315cllbKZi6FhA7AdtDy3greDVC73rUg6s40O-wb2XDjHCjTigYFrwV3u6ZDZzsrdqqpz4qXq--U4ucFadYHTxbHfEiMC-keaiV70XeZfPFPspay5aJt7wUFKOCylxnsV9CmSJTQ6Sn5g0lfNQd9Klbv9V_F6lOxmgudi827z29DDFkzumSC9fTHQORia6FOn9muHOYj5jKSJusxWBx8QjvrIfr_SPsFQzjDMQ</recordid><startdate>20090730</startdate><enddate>20090730</enddate><creator>Wergles, Nathalie</creator><creator>Muhar, Andreas</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090730</creationdate><title>The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits</title><author>Wergles, Nathalie ; Muhar, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-240800c80719c218d03f9f70238a5be95451aff06a725e21321fb58efc8c2b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer visualization</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Design communication</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Spatial perception</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Visual simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wergles, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhar, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wergles, Nathalie</au><au>Muhar, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits</atitle><jtitle>Landscape and urban planning</jtitle><date>2009-07-30</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>171-182</pages><issn>0169-2046</issn><eissn>1872-6062</eissn><coden>LUPLEZ</coden><abstract>Perception, attention, retention, comprehension and deduction are critical parameters in probing the adequacy of computer visualizations as means of communicating urban design proposals. This study investigates these parameters in the context of the remodelling of a large urban square in Vienna, Austria. Half of a total of 76 participants experienced the site after remodelling; the other half experienced a series of visualizations of the project proposal. Their responses were gathered by means of a qualitative questionnaire and content analyzed for similarities and differences in their cognitive, affective and evaluative aspects. Significant differences in responses were related to the limitations of the visualization medium in communicating aspects such as texture, movement, interaction and specific sensory qualities related to the design. On the other hand, visualizations were superior in communicating some aspects of the design in virtue of their ability to direct attention to centred or foreground pictorial elements. Visualizations can be successfully employed in design communication, yet more emphasis has to be placed on matching visualizations with the communication needs of the targeted viewers.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-2046
ispartof Landscape and urban planning, 2009-07, Vol.91 (4), p.171-182
issn 0169-2046
1872-6062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903649298
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Computer visualization
Content analysis
Design communication
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Spatial perception
Urban planning
Visual simulation
title The role of computer visualization in the communication of urban design—A comparison of viewer responses to visualizations versus on-site visits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20computer%20visualization%20in%20the%20communication%20of%20urban%20design%E2%80%94A%20comparison%20of%20viewer%20responses%20to%20visualizations%20versus%20on-site%20visits&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20and%20urban%20planning&rft.au=Wergles,%20Nathalie&rft.date=2009-07-30&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=171-182&rft.issn=0169-2046&rft.eissn=1872-6062&rft.coden=LUPLEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34471277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20601494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169204608002429&rfr_iscdi=true