Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making

About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biosystems engineering 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388
Hauptverfasser: Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi, Khademolhosseini, N., Abbaspour-Fard, M.H., Mahdinia, A., Alami-Saied, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 382
container_title Biosystems engineering
container_volume 103
creator Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi
Khademolhosseini, N.
Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.
Mahdinia, A.
Alami-Saied, K.
description About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4 t ha −1 was to use a speed 3.5 km h −1 and the full platform width.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903643850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1537511009001305</els_id><sourcerecordid>34407363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1poWna31BBaXuyK1nyFz2VkI9CIIckZzGSR7uzta2tZCfdfx-ZDYFeSk8jNM-878tMln0SvBBc1N92hSEfD3HGMeK0KUrOu4KrIpVX2YmoZJNXouxev7wFf5u9i3HHuagaVZ9kf272M43LyJaZBoowk5-Yd2zwj7mFPViaD8z60dCEbAvhAZNZiIwmtqXNNj8QDj1NG_a4RZiZgzBGtsT1Z1yGmXIbKA0QsB4txVV9hF-p_T5742CI-OG5nmb3F-d3Z1f59c3lz7Mf17lVSs15UwJ3vbGil1CZGqUxKbvpu6pWsi4rZ2vXA3BbYtWi67CrpTVWCtVUrTJGnmZfj7r74H8vKb0eKVocBpjQL1F3XCaltuKJ_PJPUirFG1nLBH4_gjb4GAM6vQ80QjhowfV6F73Tf91Fr3fRXOlU0vTnZxuIFgYXYEqLeZEoRa3aVqxxPh45B17DJiTm_rbkQiYDtUZOxPmRwLS_B8KgoyWcLPYU0M669_RfiZ4AJHK4oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34407363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><description>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4 t ha −1 was to use a speed 3.5 km h −1 and the full platform width.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEINBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural machinery and engineering ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; combine harvesters ; crop yield ; decision making ; equipment performance ; farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing ; Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage ; optimization ; Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting ; wheat</subject><ispartof>Biosystems engineering, 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537511009001305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21648810$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademolhosseini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdinia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><title>Biosystems engineering</title><description>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4 t ha −1 was to use a speed 3.5 km h −1 and the full platform width.</description><subject>Agricultural machinery and engineering</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>combine harvesters</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</subject><subject>Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting</subject><subject>wheat</subject><issn>1537-5110</issn><issn>1537-5129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1poWna31BBaXuyK1nyFz2VkI9CIIckZzGSR7uzta2tZCfdfx-ZDYFeSk8jNM-878tMln0SvBBc1N92hSEfD3HGMeK0KUrOu4KrIpVX2YmoZJNXouxev7wFf5u9i3HHuagaVZ9kf272M43LyJaZBoowk5-Yd2zwj7mFPViaD8z60dCEbAvhAZNZiIwmtqXNNj8QDj1NG_a4RZiZgzBGtsT1Z1yGmXIbKA0QsB4txVV9hF-p_T5742CI-OG5nmb3F-d3Z1f59c3lz7Mf17lVSs15UwJ3vbGil1CZGqUxKbvpu6pWsi4rZ2vXA3BbYtWi67CrpTVWCtVUrTJGnmZfj7r74H8vKb0eKVocBpjQL1F3XCaltuKJ_PJPUirFG1nLBH4_gjb4GAM6vQ80QjhowfV6F73Tf91Fr3fRXOlU0vTnZxuIFgYXYEqLeZEoRa3aVqxxPh45B17DJiTm_rbkQiYDtUZOxPmRwLS_B8KgoyWcLPYU0M669_RfiZ4AJHK4oA</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creator><creator>Khademolhosseini, N.</creator><creator>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creator><creator>Mahdinia, A.</creator><creator>Alami-Saied, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><author>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agricultural machinery and engineering</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>combine harvesters</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</topic><topic>Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting</topic><topic>wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademolhosseini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdinia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biosystems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</au><au>Khademolhosseini, N.</au><au>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</au><au>Mahdinia, A.</au><au>Alami-Saied, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</atitle><jtitle>Biosystems engineering</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>382-388</pages><issn>1537-5110</issn><eissn>1537-5129</eissn><coden>BEINBJ</coden><abstract>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4 t ha −1 was to use a speed 3.5 km h −1 and the full platform width.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5110
ispartof Biosystems engineering, 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388
issn 1537-5110
1537-5129
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903643850
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural machinery and engineering
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
combine harvesters
crop yield
decision making
equipment performance
farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing
Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage
optimization
Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting
wheat
title Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20utilisation%20of%20low-capacity%20combine%20harvesters%20in%20high-yielding%20wheat%20farms%20using%20multi-criteria%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Biosystems%20engineering&rft.au=Nik,%20M.A.%20Ebrahimi&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=382-388&rft.issn=1537-5110&rft.eissn=1537-5129&rft.coden=BEINBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34407363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34407363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1537511009001305&rfr_iscdi=true