Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making
About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5 t ha −1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biosystems engineering 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 382 |
container_title | Biosystems engineering |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi Khademolhosseini, N. Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. Mahdinia, A. Alami-Saied, K. |
description | About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5
t
ha
−1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4
t
ha
−1 was to use a speed 3.5
km
h
−1 and the full platform width. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903643850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1537511009001305</els_id><sourcerecordid>34407363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1poWna31BBaXuyK1nyFz2VkI9CIIckZzGSR7uzta2tZCfdfx-ZDYFeSk8jNM-878tMln0SvBBc1N92hSEfD3HGMeK0KUrOu4KrIpVX2YmoZJNXouxev7wFf5u9i3HHuagaVZ9kf272M43LyJaZBoowk5-Yd2zwj7mFPViaD8z60dCEbAvhAZNZiIwmtqXNNj8QDj1NG_a4RZiZgzBGtsT1Z1yGmXIbKA0QsB4txVV9hF-p_T5742CI-OG5nmb3F-d3Z1f59c3lz7Mf17lVSs15UwJ3vbGil1CZGqUxKbvpu6pWsi4rZ2vXA3BbYtWi67CrpTVWCtVUrTJGnmZfj7r74H8vKb0eKVocBpjQL1F3XCaltuKJ_PJPUirFG1nLBH4_gjb4GAM6vQ80QjhowfV6F73Tf91Fr3fRXOlU0vTnZxuIFgYXYEqLeZEoRa3aVqxxPh45B17DJiTm_rbkQiYDtUZOxPmRwLS_B8KgoyWcLPYU0M669_RfiZ4AJHK4oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34407363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><description>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5
t
ha
−1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4
t
ha
−1 was to use a speed 3.5
km
h
−1 and the full platform width.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEINBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural machinery and engineering ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; combine harvesters ; crop yield ; decision making ; equipment performance ; farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing ; Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage ; optimization ; Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting ; wheat</subject><ispartof>Biosystems engineering, 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537511009001305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21648810$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademolhosseini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdinia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><title>Biosystems engineering</title><description>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5
t
ha
−1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4
t
ha
−1 was to use a speed 3.5
km
h
−1 and the full platform width.</description><subject>Agricultural machinery and engineering</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>combine harvesters</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</subject><subject>Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting</subject><subject>wheat</subject><issn>1537-5110</issn><issn>1537-5129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhk1poWna31BBaXuyK1nyFz2VkI9CIIckZzGSR7uzta2tZCfdfx-ZDYFeSk8jNM-878tMln0SvBBc1N92hSEfD3HGMeK0KUrOu4KrIpVX2YmoZJNXouxev7wFf5u9i3HHuagaVZ9kf272M43LyJaZBoowk5-Yd2zwj7mFPViaD8z60dCEbAvhAZNZiIwmtqXNNj8QDj1NG_a4RZiZgzBGtsT1Z1yGmXIbKA0QsB4txVV9hF-p_T5742CI-OG5nmb3F-d3Z1f59c3lz7Mf17lVSs15UwJ3vbGil1CZGqUxKbvpu6pWsi4rZ2vXA3BbYtWi67CrpTVWCtVUrTJGnmZfj7r74H8vKb0eKVocBpjQL1F3XCaltuKJ_PJPUirFG1nLBH4_gjb4GAM6vQ80QjhowfV6F73Tf91Fr3fRXOlU0vTnZxuIFgYXYEqLeZEoRa3aVqxxPh45B17DJiTm_rbkQiYDtUZOxPmRwLS_B8KgoyWcLPYU0M669_RfiZ4AJHK4oA</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creator><creator>Khademolhosseini, N.</creator><creator>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creator><creator>Mahdinia, A.</creator><creator>Alami-Saied, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</title><author>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi ; Khademolhosseini, N. ; Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. ; Mahdinia, A. ; Alami-Saied, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-72a0fdbc1d3a5b6e3bb001bd95643625fc6fdaa0c2e58ef9e963cbc3147584bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agricultural machinery and engineering</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>combine harvesters</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing</topic><topic>Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting</topic><topic>wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khademolhosseini, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdinia, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami-Saied, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biosystems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nik, M.A. Ebrahimi</au><au>Khademolhosseini, N.</au><au>Abbaspour-Fard, M.H.</au><au>Mahdinia, A.</au><au>Alami-Saied, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making</atitle><jtitle>Biosystems engineering</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>382-388</pages><issn>1537-5110</issn><eissn>1537-5129</eissn><coden>BEINBJ</coden><abstract>About 23% of wheat farms in Iran have yields of more than 5
t
ha
−1, but the technology and the capacity of over 85% of the existing combine harvesters are low and they are not suitable for handling such high yields mainly because of their high harvest losses due to high feed rates. Therefore, it is necessary to match machines with the farms by optimising their feed rate either by changing the effective width or the ground speed. However, simply reducing the effective width, which is the most common method, may also lead to a higher seed breakage (SB). A proper technical framework was developed for harvesting such fields with current combine harvesters, based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique. Several aspects mainly, SB, total harvest losses, fuel consumption, and combine field capacity were considered as harvesting attributes. Nine different combinations of ground speed and effective width were defined as harvesting candidate alternatives. The MCDM technique indicated that simply reducing the effective width is not the most suitable solution for this problem. For example, the optimum solution for a field with the average yield of 7.4
t
ha
−1 was to use a speed 3.5
km
h
−1 and the full platform width.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1537-5110 |
ispartof | Biosystems engineering, 2009-07, Vol.103 (3), p.382-388 |
issn | 1537-5110 1537-5129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903643850 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Agricultural machinery and engineering Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences combine harvesters crop yield decision making equipment performance farms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Biometrics, experimentation. Remote sensing Harvesting. Postharvest. Storage optimization Vegetative propagation. Sowing and planting. Harvesting wheat |
title | Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20utilisation%20of%20low-capacity%20combine%20harvesters%20in%20high-yielding%20wheat%20farms%20using%20multi-criteria%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Biosystems%20engineering&rft.au=Nik,%20M.A.%20Ebrahimi&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=382-388&rft.issn=1537-5110&rft.eissn=1537-5129&rft.coden=BEINBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34407363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34407363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1537511009001305&rfr_iscdi=true |