COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY
It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N e ) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Evolution 2011-10, Vol.65 (10), p.2927-2945 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2945 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2927 |
| container_title | Evolution |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Phillipsen, Ivan C. Funk, W. Chris Hoffman, Eric A. Monsen, Kirsten J. Blouin, Michael S. |
| description | It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N e ) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species (20-26 populations per species, mean n per population = 29). Our objectives were to determine typical values of N e for populations of each species, compare N e estimates among the species, and test for correlations between several geographic variables and N e within species. We used single-sample linkage disequilibrium (LD), approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), and sibship assignment (SA) methods to estimate contemporary N e for each population. Three of the species—Rana pretiosa. R. luteiventris, and R. cascadae—have consistently small effective population sizes ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01356.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902676390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41240878</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41240878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-a166be3f7c4b1e44a21a5b62f7ec4322ec7d399346065030a810d447423615643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwEUAWLzwlu_4TO0biIUqdLlKWdE27MV6sNHVRs3YdSSu6bz9nHX3AsmTrnt-58vVBCBPwiVsXjU-CIPQCwYVPgRAfCAuEf3iDBifhLRoAEO6xkMIZ-tB1DQCogKj36IwSJSRnbIB-x8XVOJpE0_RG4yiPsrtSl7hIsE4SHb9Ux8V4ljmgyHGZ_tL4Np1eprmDhzi6KvIRLsc6TnX5HU-iPB3iZFKMShy5jeOo1LiczoZ3H9G7ZbXu7KfX8xzNEj2NL72sGKVxlHk1ByG8iggxt2wpaz4nlvOKkiqYC7qUtuaMUlvLBVOKcQEiAAZVSGDBueSUCeKmZufo27HvY7v9s7fdzmxWXW3X6-rBbvedUUCFFEyBI7_-RzbbffvgHmdCJV1LBcJBX16h_XxjF-axXW2q9sn8-0AH_DgCf1dr-3TSCZg-KNOYPg_T52H6oMxLUOZg9E3R35z_89HfdLtte_JzQjmEMnS6d9RX3c4eTnrV3hshmQzMbT4yWZIPy5_X1yZjz2DCk1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897474906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Phillipsen, Ivan C. ; Funk, W. Chris ; Hoffman, Eric A. ; Monsen, Kirsten J. ; Blouin, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillipsen, Ivan C. ; Funk, W. Chris ; Hoffman, Eric A. ; Monsen, Kirsten J. ; Blouin, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N e ) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species (20-26 populations per species, mean n per population = 29). Our objectives were to determine typical values of N e for populations of each species, compare N e estimates among the species, and test for correlations between several geographic variables and N e within species. We used single-sample linkage disequilibrium (LD), approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), and sibship assignment (SA) methods to estimate contemporary N e for each population. Three of the species—Rana pretiosa. R. luteiventris, and R. cascadae—have consistently small effective population sizes (<50). N e in Lithobates pipiens spans a wider range, with some values in the hundreds or thousands. There is a strong east-to-west trend of decreasing N e in L. pipiens. The smaller effective sizes of western populations of this species may be related to habitat fragmentation and population bottlenecking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01356.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21967433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Comparative analysis ; conservation genetics ; Estimation methods ; Evolution ; Frogs ; Genetic diversity ; Genetics ; Geography ; Habitats ; Linkage Disequilibrium ; North America ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; Population estimates ; Population genetics ; Population size ; Ranidae ; Ranidae - physiology ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Species ; Species populations ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 2011-10, Vol.65 (10), p.2927-2945</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>2011 The Author(s). © 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Study of Evolution Oct 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-a166be3f7c4b1e44a21a5b62f7ec4322ec7d399346065030a810d447423615643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41240878$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41240878$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21967433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillipsen, Ivan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funk, W. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Kirsten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blouin, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N e ) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species (20-26 populations per species, mean n per population = 29). Our objectives were to determine typical values of N e for populations of each species, compare N e estimates among the species, and test for correlations between several geographic variables and N e within species. We used single-sample linkage disequilibrium (LD), approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), and sibship assignment (SA) methods to estimate contemporary N e for each population. Three of the species—Rana pretiosa. R. luteiventris, and R. cascadae—have consistently small effective population sizes (<50). N e in Lithobates pipiens spans a wider range, with some values in the hundreds or thousands. There is a strong east-to-west trend of decreasing N e in L. pipiens. The smaller effective sizes of western populations of this species may be related to habitat fragmentation and population bottlenecking.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>conservation genetics</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Linkage Disequilibrium</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>Ranidae</subject><subject>Ranidae - physiology</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species populations</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwEUAWLzwlu_4TO0biIUqdLlKWdE27MV6sNHVRs3YdSSu6bz9nHX3AsmTrnt-58vVBCBPwiVsXjU-CIPQCwYVPgRAfCAuEf3iDBifhLRoAEO6xkMIZ-tB1DQCogKj36IwSJSRnbIB-x8XVOJpE0_RG4yiPsrtSl7hIsE4SHb9Ux8V4ljmgyHGZ_tL4Np1eprmDhzi6KvIRLsc6TnX5HU-iPB3iZFKMShy5jeOo1LiczoZ3H9G7ZbXu7KfX8xzNEj2NL72sGKVxlHk1ByG8iggxt2wpaz4nlvOKkiqYC7qUtuaMUlvLBVOKcQEiAAZVSGDBueSUCeKmZufo27HvY7v9s7fdzmxWXW3X6-rBbvedUUCFFEyBI7_-RzbbffvgHmdCJV1LBcJBX16h_XxjF-axXW2q9sn8-0AH_DgCf1dr-3TSCZg-KNOYPg_T52H6oMxLUOZg9E3R35z_89HfdLtte_JzQjmEMnS6d9RX3c4eTnrV3hshmQzMbT4yWZIPy5_X1yZjz2DCk1o</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Phillipsen, Ivan C.</creator><creator>Funk, W. Chris</creator><creator>Hoffman, Eric A.</creator><creator>Monsen, Kirsten J.</creator><creator>Blouin, Michael S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY</title><author>Phillipsen, Ivan C. ; Funk, W. Chris ; Hoffman, Eric A. ; Monsen, Kirsten J. ; Blouin, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-a166be3f7c4b1e44a21a5b62f7ec4322ec7d399346065030a810d447423615643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>conservation genetics</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Linkage Disequilibrium</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>Ranidae</topic><topic>Ranidae - physiology</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species populations</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillipsen, Ivan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funk, W. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsen, Kirsten J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blouin, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillipsen, Ivan C.</au><au>Funk, W. Chris</au><au>Hoffman, Eric A.</au><au>Monsen, Kirsten J.</au><au>Blouin, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2927</spage><epage>2945</epage><pages>2927-2945</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>It has recently become practicable to estimate the effective sizes (N e ) of multiple populations within species. Such efforts are valuable for estimating N e in evolutionary modeling and conservation planning. We used microsatellite loci to estimate N e of 90 populations of four ranid frog species (20-26 populations per species, mean n per population = 29). Our objectives were to determine typical values of N e for populations of each species, compare N e estimates among the species, and test for correlations between several geographic variables and N e within species. We used single-sample linkage disequilibrium (LD), approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), and sibship assignment (SA) methods to estimate contemporary N e for each population. Three of the species—Rana pretiosa. R. luteiventris, and R. cascadae—have consistently small effective population sizes (<50). N e in Lithobates pipiens spans a wider range, with some values in the hundreds or thousands. There is a strong east-to-west trend of decreasing N e in L. pipiens. The smaller effective sizes of western populations of this species may be related to habitat fragmentation and population bottlenecking.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>21967433</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01356.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-3820 |
| ispartof | Evolution, 2011-10, Vol.65 (10), p.2927-2945 |
| issn | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902676390 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Amphibians Animal populations Animals Bayes Theorem Comparative analysis conservation genetics Estimation methods Evolution Frogs Genetic diversity Genetics Geography Habitats Linkage Disequilibrium North America Population Density Population Dynamics Population estimates Population genetics Population size Ranidae Ranidae - physiology Reptiles & amphibians Species Species populations Species Specificity |
| title | COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE WITHIN AND AMONG SPECIES: RANID FROGS AS A CASE STUDY |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARATIVE%20ANALYSES%20OF%20EFFECTIVE%20POPULATION%20SIZE%20WITHIN%20AND%20AMONG%20SPECIES:%20RANID%20FROGS%20AS%20A%20CASE%20STUDY&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Phillipsen,%20Ivan%20C.&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2927&rft.epage=2945&rft.pages=2927-2945&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01356.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41240878%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897474906&rft_id=info:pmid/21967433&rft_jstor_id=41240878&rfr_iscdi=true |