Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation
Two hot deboning procedures for producing vacuum packed primal beef joints were compared with conventional side chilling followed by cold deboning. Cold shortening toughness was avoided in the hot procedures either by a delay before chilling or by electrical stimulation of the carcass. Overall evapo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Meat science 1981-02, Vol.5 (2), p.109-123 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 123 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 109 |
| container_title | Meat science |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Taylor, A.A. Shaw, B.G. MacDougall, D.B. |
| description | Two hot deboning procedures for producing vacuum packed primal beef joints were compared with conventional side chilling followed by cold deboning. Cold shortening toughness was avoided in the hot procedures either by a delay before chilling or by electrical stimulation of the carcass. Overall evaporative losses were 0·6% with hot deboning and 1·9% with cold deboning. Hot deboning reduced drip loss but the effect was smaller after electrical stimulation. The colour of large muscles which cool unevenly on the side was more uniform after hot deboning, but again the improvement was smaller after electrical stimulation. There was no difference in bacterial contamination or growth on hot and cold deboned meat, and instrumental and sensory assessments confirmed that eating quality was similar for all three treatments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0309-1740(81)90009-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902675369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0309174081900097</els_id><sourcerecordid>902675369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f0da73fe68374a57ce7467ecccc8d81de5b23a096b4ab96a3e9b15ed9019796b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PxCAQhonRuOvqPzCmN_VQhVIKXEzMRl2TTbzomVCYKqYtWqjGfy_74R7lMjB5Zt7wIHRK8BXBpLrGFMuc8BJfCHIpMU4vvoemRHCal4SKfTTdIRN0FMJ7YggtxCGaFAVmTDI5RXLhY2ah9r3rX7MaoMm-XXzLdG_XFz_GDFowcXBGt1mIrhtbHZ3vj9FBo9sAJ9s6Qy_3d8_zRb58enic3y5zQ5mMeYOt5rSBSlBeasYN8LLiYNIRVhALrC6oxrKqS13LSlOQNWFgJSaSpy6dofPN3o_Bf44QoupcMNC2ugc_BiVxUXFGK5nIckOawYcwQKM-Btfp4UcRrFbO1EqIWglRgqi1M8XT2Nk2YKw7sLuhP0kJuNkAkL755WBQwTjoDVg3JDPKevd_wi-hDXrv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902675369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Taylor, A.A. ; Shaw, B.G. ; MacDougall, D.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, A.A. ; Shaw, B.G. ; MacDougall, D.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Two hot deboning procedures for producing vacuum packed primal beef joints were compared with conventional side chilling followed by cold deboning. Cold shortening toughness was avoided in the hot procedures either by a delay before chilling or by electrical stimulation of the carcass. Overall evaporative losses were 0·6% with hot deboning and 1·9% with cold deboning. Hot deboning reduced drip loss but the effect was smaller after electrical stimulation. The colour of large muscles which cool unevenly on the side was more uniform after hot deboning, but again the improvement was smaller after electrical stimulation. There was no difference in bacterial contamination or growth on hot and cold deboned meat, and instrumental and sensory assessments confirmed that eating quality was similar for all three treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(81)90009-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22055959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Meat science, 1981-02, Vol.5 (2), p.109-123</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><rights>Copyright © 1981. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f0da73fe68374a57ce7467ecccc8d81de5b23a096b4ab96a3e9b15ed9019796b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f0da73fe68374a57ce7467ecccc8d81de5b23a096b4ab96a3e9b15ed9019796b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(81)90009-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22055959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, D.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>Two hot deboning procedures for producing vacuum packed primal beef joints were compared with conventional side chilling followed by cold deboning. Cold shortening toughness was avoided in the hot procedures either by a delay before chilling or by electrical stimulation of the carcass. Overall evaporative losses were 0·6% with hot deboning and 1·9% with cold deboning. Hot deboning reduced drip loss but the effect was smaller after electrical stimulation. The colour of large muscles which cool unevenly on the side was more uniform after hot deboning, but again the improvement was smaller after electrical stimulation. There was no difference in bacterial contamination or growth on hot and cold deboned meat, and instrumental and sensory assessments confirmed that eating quality was similar for all three treatments.</description><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PxCAQhonRuOvqPzCmN_VQhVIKXEzMRl2TTbzomVCYKqYtWqjGfy_74R7lMjB5Zt7wIHRK8BXBpLrGFMuc8BJfCHIpMU4vvoemRHCal4SKfTTdIRN0FMJ7YggtxCGaFAVmTDI5RXLhY2ah9r3rX7MaoMm-XXzLdG_XFz_GDFowcXBGt1mIrhtbHZ3vj9FBo9sAJ9s6Qy_3d8_zRb58enic3y5zQ5mMeYOt5rSBSlBeasYN8LLiYNIRVhALrC6oxrKqS13LSlOQNWFgJSaSpy6dofPN3o_Bf44QoupcMNC2ugc_BiVxUXFGK5nIckOawYcwQKM-Btfp4UcRrFbO1EqIWglRgqi1M8XT2Nk2YKw7sLuhP0kJuNkAkL755WBQwTjoDVg3JDPKevd_wi-hDXrv</recordid><startdate>198102</startdate><enddate>198102</enddate><creator>Taylor, A.A.</creator><creator>Shaw, B.G.</creator><creator>MacDougall, D.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198102</creationdate><title>Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation</title><author>Taylor, A.A. ; Shaw, B.G. ; MacDougall, D.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f0da73fe68374a57ce7467ecccc8d81de5b23a096b4ab96a3e9b15ed9019796b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, B.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, D.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, A.A.</au><au>Shaw, B.G.</au><au>MacDougall, D.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>1981-02</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>109-123</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>Two hot deboning procedures for producing vacuum packed primal beef joints were compared with conventional side chilling followed by cold deboning. Cold shortening toughness was avoided in the hot procedures either by a delay before chilling or by electrical stimulation of the carcass. Overall evaporative losses were 0·6% with hot deboning and 1·9% with cold deboning. Hot deboning reduced drip loss but the effect was smaller after electrical stimulation. The colour of large muscles which cool unevenly on the side was more uniform after hot deboning, but again the improvement was smaller after electrical stimulation. There was no difference in bacterial contamination or growth on hot and cold deboned meat, and instrumental and sensory assessments confirmed that eating quality was similar for all three treatments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22055959</pmid><doi>10.1016/0309-1740(81)90009-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-1740 |
| ispartof | Meat science, 1981-02, Vol.5 (2), p.109-123 |
| issn | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902675369 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| title | Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A08%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hot%20deboning%20beef%20with%20and%20without%20electrical%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Taylor,%20A.A.&rft.date=1981-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=109-123&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0309-1740(81)90009-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902675369%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902675369&rft_id=info:pmid/22055959&rft_els_id=0309174081900097&rfr_iscdi=true |