The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes
Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measure...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Meat science 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Meat science |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kempster, A.J. Chadwick, J.P. Cue, R.I. Grantley-Smith, M. |
description | Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary.
Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF
e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6).
Fat thickness measurements taken over the
M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An
M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision.
Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF
e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902673371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0309174086900707</els_id><sourcerecordid>902673371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DgG-WQMraztnOphCqgSJV6oD1bzmTMmm7ixU6Q-u_xdkuPPc1hnnc-HsbeCTgTIPRnUNA1wrRwavWnDsBAY16wlbBGNa1Q9iVbPSFH7LiU3wAglLSv2ZGUsG6tEisWbjbEqcxx9HNME0-Blw3RjqPP6EvhmMZdKvGhGXIaefAz99PAx6Xglvi8iXg3USVH8mXJNNI0Fz77O5p4f893OfVU3rBXwW8LvX2sJ-z229ebi8vm6vr7j4svVw0qq-ZmQEFDJ8MauyDRqA4NkPcefWugV1rqdrAeoPNoeoQQNFqjbY-qU6LvtDphHw9z69o_S_3LjbEgbbd-orQU14HURikjKtkeSMyplEzB7XKVkO-dALcX7Pb23N6es9o9CHamxt4_Llj6kYan0H-jFfhwAIJPzv_Ksbjbn7KKB9GupWn3xPmBoCrib6TsCkaakIaYCWc3pPj8Df8AZV2VEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902673371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary.
Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF
e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6).
Fat thickness measurements taken over the
M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An
M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision.
Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF
e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22054831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>carcass yield ; estimation ; fat thickness ; lambs ; lean percentage ; muscle weight ; probes (equipment) ; standard deviation</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cue, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary.
Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF
e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6).
Fat thickness measurements taken over the
M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An
M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision.
Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF
e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</description><subject>carcass yield</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>fat thickness</subject><subject>lambs</subject><subject>lean percentage</subject><subject>muscle weight</subject><subject>probes (equipment)</subject><subject>standard deviation</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DgG-WQMraztnOphCqgSJV6oD1bzmTMmm7ixU6Q-u_xdkuPPc1hnnc-HsbeCTgTIPRnUNA1wrRwavWnDsBAY16wlbBGNa1Q9iVbPSFH7LiU3wAglLSv2ZGUsG6tEisWbjbEqcxx9HNME0-Blw3RjqPP6EvhmMZdKvGhGXIaefAz99PAx6Xglvi8iXg3USVH8mXJNNI0Fz77O5p4f893OfVU3rBXwW8LvX2sJ-z229ebi8vm6vr7j4svVw0qq-ZmQEFDJ8MauyDRqA4NkPcefWugV1rqdrAeoPNoeoQQNFqjbY-qU6LvtDphHw9z69o_S_3LjbEgbbd-orQU14HURikjKtkeSMyplEzB7XKVkO-dALcX7Pb23N6es9o9CHamxt4_Llj6kYan0H-jFfhwAIJPzv_Ksbjbn7KKB9GupWn3xPmBoCrib6TsCkaakIaYCWc3pPj8Df8AZV2VEA</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Kempster, A.J.</creator><creator>Chadwick, J.P.</creator><creator>Cue, R.I.</creator><creator>Grantley-Smith, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><author>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>carcass yield</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>fat thickness</topic><topic>lambs</topic><topic>lean percentage</topic><topic>muscle weight</topic><topic>probes (equipment)</topic><topic>standard deviation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cue, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kempster, A.J.</au><au>Chadwick, J.P.</au><au>Cue, R.I.</au><au>Grantley-Smith, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>113-126</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary.
Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF
e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6).
Fat thickness measurements taken over the
M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An
M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision.
Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF
e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22054831</pmid><doi>10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1740 |
ispartof | Meat science, 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126 |
issn | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902673371 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | carcass yield estimation fat thickness lambs lean percentage muscle weight probes (equipment) standard deviation |
title | The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A47%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20estimation%20of%20sheep%20carcass%20composition%20from%20fat%20and%20muscle%20thickness%20measurements%20taken%20by%20probes&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Kempster,%20A.J.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=113-126&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902673371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902673371&rft_id=info:pmid/22054831&rft_els_id=0309174086900707&rfr_iscdi=true |