The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes

Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meat science 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126
Hauptverfasser: Kempster, A.J., Chadwick, J.P., Cue, R.I., Grantley-Smith, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 113
container_title Meat science
container_volume 16
creator Kempster, A.J.
Chadwick, J.P.
Cue, R.I.
Grantley-Smith, M.
description Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary. Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6). Fat thickness measurements taken over the M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision. Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902673371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0309174086900707</els_id><sourcerecordid>902673371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DgG-WQMraztnOphCqgSJV6oD1bzmTMmm7ixU6Q-u_xdkuPPc1hnnc-HsbeCTgTIPRnUNA1wrRwavWnDsBAY16wlbBGNa1Q9iVbPSFH7LiU3wAglLSv2ZGUsG6tEisWbjbEqcxx9HNME0-Blw3RjqPP6EvhmMZdKvGhGXIaefAz99PAx6Xglvi8iXg3USVH8mXJNNI0Fz77O5p4f893OfVU3rBXwW8LvX2sJ-z229ebi8vm6vr7j4svVw0qq-ZmQEFDJ8MauyDRqA4NkPcefWugV1rqdrAeoPNoeoQQNFqjbY-qU6LvtDphHw9z69o_S_3LjbEgbbd-orQU14HURikjKtkeSMyplEzB7XKVkO-dALcX7Pb23N6es9o9CHamxt4_Llj6kYan0H-jFfhwAIJPzv_Ksbjbn7KKB9GupWn3xPmBoCrib6TsCkaakIaYCWc3pPj8Df8AZV2VEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902673371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary. Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6). Fat thickness measurements taken over the M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision. Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22054831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>carcass yield ; estimation ; fat thickness ; lambs ; lean percentage ; muscle weight ; probes (equipment) ; standard deviation</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126</ispartof><rights>1986</rights><rights>Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22054831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cue, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary. Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6). Fat thickness measurements taken over the M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision. Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</description><subject>carcass yield</subject><subject>estimation</subject><subject>fat thickness</subject><subject>lambs</subject><subject>lean percentage</subject><subject>muscle weight</subject><subject>probes (equipment)</subject><subject>standard deviation</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCP0DgG-WQMraztnOphCqgSJV6oD1bzmTMmm7ixU6Q-u_xdkuPPc1hnnc-HsbeCTgTIPRnUNA1wrRwavWnDsBAY16wlbBGNa1Q9iVbPSFH7LiU3wAglLSv2ZGUsG6tEisWbjbEqcxx9HNME0-Blw3RjqPP6EvhmMZdKvGhGXIaefAz99PAx6Xglvi8iXg3USVH8mXJNNI0Fz77O5p4f893OfVU3rBXwW8LvX2sJ-z229ebi8vm6vr7j4svVw0qq-ZmQEFDJ8MauyDRqA4NkPcefWugV1rqdrAeoPNoeoQQNFqjbY-qU6LvtDphHw9z69o_S_3LjbEgbbd-orQU14HURikjKtkeSMyplEzB7XKVkO-dALcX7Pb23N6es9o9CHamxt4_Llj6kYan0H-jFfhwAIJPzv_Ksbjbn7KKB9GupWn3xPmBoCrib6TsCkaakIaYCWc3pPj8Df8AZV2VEA</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Kempster, A.J.</creator><creator>Chadwick, J.P.</creator><creator>Cue, R.I.</creator><creator>Grantley-Smith, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</title><author>Kempster, A.J. ; Chadwick, J.P. ; Cue, R.I. ; Grantley-Smith, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-dc1ed92f5c9f2c739c70eaaaca470b36264d8a009ac7bc0ff6c8768bc3931b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>carcass yield</topic><topic>estimation</topic><topic>fat thickness</topic><topic>lambs</topic><topic>lean percentage</topic><topic>muscle weight</topic><topic>probes (equipment)</topic><topic>standard deviation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kempster, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cue, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantley-Smith, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kempster, A.J.</au><au>Chadwick, J.P.</au><au>Cue, R.I.</au><au>Grantley-Smith, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>113-126</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>Three trials, involving a total of 290 lambs, were carried out to examine the precision of probed fat and muscle measurements for estimating carcass composition in classification and grading schemes. The measurement positions and probes were not always the same in different trials but common measurements provided the basis for comparison between trials. Residual standard deviations (sd) for the prediction of carcass lean percentage averaged over trials are referred to in this Summary. Residual standard deviation for prediction from carcass weight was 3·5. The visual fat assessment currently used in the national Sheep Carcase Classification Scheme, operated by MLC, contributed significantly to the prediction (residual standard deviation = 3·0) but was less precise than a visual assessment of carcass subcutaneous fat content to the nearest percentage unit (SF e) (residual standard deviation = 2·6). Fat thickness measurements taken over the M. longissimus at the 12th rib with the Danish optical probe, a simple steel rule or the pig version of the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP), showed similar precision to the classification fat class. An M. longissimus thickness measurement taken by the HGP did not add significantly to the precision. Probe fat measurements added significantly to the precision achieved with visual fat assessments (residual standard deviation with classification fat class = 2·8; residual standard deviation with SF e = 2·5). There would be advantages, therefore, in using both a visual fatness assessment and fat measurements in classification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22054831</pmid><doi>10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 1986, Vol.16 (2), p.113-126
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902673371
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects carcass yield
estimation
fat thickness
lambs
lean percentage
muscle weight
probes (equipment)
standard deviation
title The estimation of sheep carcass composition from fat and muscle thickness measurements taken by probes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A47%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20estimation%20of%20sheep%20carcass%20composition%20from%20fat%20and%20muscle%20thickness%20measurements%20taken%20by%20probes&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Kempster,%20A.J.&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=113-126&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90070-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902673371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902673371&rft_id=info:pmid/22054831&rft_els_id=0309174086900707&rfr_iscdi=true