Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions
► Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and FOG was evaluated. ► KW and FOG enhanced CH4 production at estimated ideal S/I ratios of 1.20 and 0.46. ► Linear and modified Gomertz non-linear regressions combined to describe co-digestion. ► Models indicated that co-substrate addition...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresource technology 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9471-9480 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9480 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 9471 |
container_title | Bioresource technology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Li, Chenxi Champagne, Pascale Anderson, Bruce C. |
description | ► Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and FOG was evaluated. ► KW and FOG enhanced CH4 production at estimated ideal S/I ratios of 1.20 and 0.46. ► Linear and modified Gomertz non-linear regressions combined to describe co-digestion. ► Models indicated that co-substrate addition can shorten lag phase of co-digestion. ► Evaluated S/I ratios and estimated parameters can support large scale operations.
The feasibility of using synthetic kitchen waste (KW) and fat, oil, and grease (FOG) as co-substrates in the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) was investigated using two series of biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests. Ranges of ideal substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio were determined for the FOG (0.25–0.75) and KW (0.80–1.26) as single substrates in the first experiment. The second experiment, which estimated the methane production performances of FOG and KW as co-substrates for WAS co-digestion, was conducted based on the optimal parameters selected from the results of the first experiment. Results indicated that co-digestions with FOG and KW enhanced methane production from 117±2.02mL/gTVS (with only WAS) to 418±13.7mL/gTVS and 324±4.11mL/gTVS, respectively. FOG exhibited more biogas production than KW as co-substrate. Non-linear regression results showed that co-substrate addition shortened the lag phases of organic biodegradation from 81.8 (with only WAS) to 28.3h with FOG and 3.90h with KW. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902373262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852411010546</els_id><sourcerecordid>902373262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-aed28847f047124844078fd4a9690c368e66aab2af7d109a8492f7b2e4a4bb053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEokvhK1S5IDg0i-14becGqsofqRIXOFsTe7LrJbEX2ynqnQ-O093CjZ5sz_zeG9uvqi4oWVNCxbv9unchZjS7NSOUroks9fZJtaJKtg3rpHharUgnSKM2jJ9VL1LaE0JaKtnz6owVinFJVtXv61sYZ8jOb2vwtp6CxXE5FPstpPoQg51NdsHXQwxTPc3eGXeAsR4gX9bBjZf3um1ESHi_TXc-7zA7U_9w2ezQ178gZaydL23AGPrSMqGxbotpcU4vq2cDjAlfndbz6vvH629Xn5ubr5--XH24aQwXLDeAlinF5UC4pIwrzolUg-XQiY6YVigUAqBnMEhLSQeKd2yQPUMOvO_Jpj2v3hx9y6t-zmW4nlwyOI7gMcxJd4S1smWCPUqqjghFW6oK-fa_JJVSUsqFXFBxRE0MKUUc9CG6CeKdpkQvqeq9fkhVL6lqIku9LcKL04y5n9D-lT3EWIDXJwCSgXGI4I1L_zi-2XSq5YV7f-Sw_PKtw6iTcegNWhfRZG2De-wufwDy-8SG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777114678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Li, Chenxi ; Champagne, Pascale ; Anderson, Bruce C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenxi ; Champagne, Pascale ; Anderson, Bruce C.</creatorcontrib><description>► Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and FOG was evaluated. ► KW and FOG enhanced CH4 production at estimated ideal S/I ratios of 1.20 and 0.46. ► Linear and modified Gomertz non-linear regressions combined to describe co-digestion. ► Models indicated that co-substrate addition can shorten lag phase of co-digestion. ► Evaluated S/I ratios and estimated parameters can support large scale operations.
The feasibility of using synthetic kitchen waste (KW) and fat, oil, and grease (FOG) as co-substrates in the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) was investigated using two series of biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests. Ranges of ideal substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio were determined for the FOG (0.25–0.75) and KW (0.80–1.26) as single substrates in the first experiment. The second experiment, which estimated the methane production performances of FOG and KW as co-substrates for WAS co-digestion, was conducted based on the optimal parameters selected from the results of the first experiment. Results indicated that co-digestions with FOG and KW enhanced methane production from 117±2.02mL/gTVS (with only WAS) to 418±13.7mL/gTVS and 324±4.11mL/gTVS, respectively. FOG exhibited more biogas production than KW as co-substrate. Non-linear regression results showed that co-substrate addition shortened the lag phases of organic biodegradation from 81.8 (with only WAS) to 28.3h with FOG and 3.90h with KW.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21872470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobic co-digestion ; Anaerobiosis ; Biochemistry ; Biofuel production ; Biofuels ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of sewage sludges and wastes ; Biotechnology ; Cooking ; Energy ; Environment and pollution ; Fat, oil, and grease ; Fats - metabolism ; Feasibility Studies ; Fog ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Greases ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Kitchens ; Linear and non-linear modeling ; Methane ; Methane production ; Models, Theoretical ; Oils - metabolism ; Phases ; Refuse Disposal ; Regression ; Synthetic kitchen waste ; Use and upgrading of agricultural and food by-products. Biotechnology ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9471-9480</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-aed28847f047124844078fd4a9690c368e66aab2af7d109a8492f7b2e4a4bb053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-aed28847f047124844078fd4a9690c368e66aab2af7d109a8492f7b2e4a4bb053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24559834$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21872470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champagne, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bruce C.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>► Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and FOG was evaluated. ► KW and FOG enhanced CH4 production at estimated ideal S/I ratios of 1.20 and 0.46. ► Linear and modified Gomertz non-linear regressions combined to describe co-digestion. ► Models indicated that co-substrate addition can shorten lag phase of co-digestion. ► Evaluated S/I ratios and estimated parameters can support large scale operations.
The feasibility of using synthetic kitchen waste (KW) and fat, oil, and grease (FOG) as co-substrates in the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) was investigated using two series of biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests. Ranges of ideal substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio were determined for the FOG (0.25–0.75) and KW (0.80–1.26) as single substrates in the first experiment. The second experiment, which estimated the methane production performances of FOG and KW as co-substrates for WAS co-digestion, was conducted based on the optimal parameters selected from the results of the first experiment. Results indicated that co-digestions with FOG and KW enhanced methane production from 117±2.02mL/gTVS (with only WAS) to 418±13.7mL/gTVS and 324±4.11mL/gTVS, respectively. FOG exhibited more biogas production than KW as co-substrate. Non-linear regression results showed that co-substrate addition shortened the lag phases of organic biodegradation from 81.8 (with only WAS) to 28.3h with FOG and 3.90h with KW.</description><subject>Anaerobic co-digestion</subject><subject>Anaerobiosis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biofuel production</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of sewage sludges and wastes</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Fat, oil, and grease</subject><subject>Fats - metabolism</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fog</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Greases</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Kitchens</subject><subject>Linear and non-linear modeling</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane production</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oils - metabolism</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Synthetic kitchen waste</subject><subject>Use and upgrading of agricultural and food by-products. Biotechnology</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxSMEokvhK1S5IDg0i-14becGqsofqRIXOFsTe7LrJbEX2ynqnQ-O093CjZ5sz_zeG9uvqi4oWVNCxbv9unchZjS7NSOUroks9fZJtaJKtg3rpHharUgnSKM2jJ9VL1LaE0JaKtnz6owVinFJVtXv61sYZ8jOb2vwtp6CxXE5FPstpPoQg51NdsHXQwxTPc3eGXeAsR4gX9bBjZf3um1ESHi_TXc-7zA7U_9w2ezQ178gZaydL23AGPrSMqGxbotpcU4vq2cDjAlfndbz6vvH629Xn5ubr5--XH24aQwXLDeAlinF5UC4pIwrzolUg-XQiY6YVigUAqBnMEhLSQeKd2yQPUMOvO_Jpj2v3hx9y6t-zmW4nlwyOI7gMcxJd4S1smWCPUqqjghFW6oK-fa_JJVSUsqFXFBxRE0MKUUc9CG6CeKdpkQvqeq9fkhVL6lqIku9LcKL04y5n9D-lT3EWIDXJwCSgXGI4I1L_zi-2XSq5YV7f-Sw_PKtw6iTcegNWhfRZG2De-wufwDy-8SG</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Li, Chenxi</creator><creator>Champagne, Pascale</creator><creator>Anderson, Bruce C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions</title><author>Li, Chenxi ; Champagne, Pascale ; Anderson, Bruce C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-aed28847f047124844078fd4a9690c368e66aab2af7d109a8492f7b2e4a4bb053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic co-digestion</topic><topic>Anaerobiosis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biofuel production</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of sewage sludges and wastes</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Fat, oil, and grease</topic><topic>Fats - metabolism</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fog</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Greases</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Kitchens</topic><topic>Linear and non-linear modeling</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane production</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oils - metabolism</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Synthetic kitchen waste</topic><topic>Use and upgrading of agricultural and food by-products. Biotechnology</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chenxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champagne, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bruce C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chenxi</au><au>Champagne, Pascale</au><au>Anderson, Bruce C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>9471</spage><epage>9480</epage><pages>9471-9480</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>► Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and FOG was evaluated. ► KW and FOG enhanced CH4 production at estimated ideal S/I ratios of 1.20 and 0.46. ► Linear and modified Gomertz non-linear regressions combined to describe co-digestion. ► Models indicated that co-substrate addition can shorten lag phase of co-digestion. ► Evaluated S/I ratios and estimated parameters can support large scale operations.
The feasibility of using synthetic kitchen waste (KW) and fat, oil, and grease (FOG) as co-substrates in the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) was investigated using two series of biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests. Ranges of ideal substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio were determined for the FOG (0.25–0.75) and KW (0.80–1.26) as single substrates in the first experiment. The second experiment, which estimated the methane production performances of FOG and KW as co-substrates for WAS co-digestion, was conducted based on the optimal parameters selected from the results of the first experiment. Results indicated that co-digestions with FOG and KW enhanced methane production from 117±2.02mL/gTVS (with only WAS) to 418±13.7mL/gTVS and 324±4.11mL/gTVS, respectively. FOG exhibited more biogas production than KW as co-substrate. Non-linear regression results showed that co-substrate addition shortened the lag phases of organic biodegradation from 81.8 (with only WAS) to 28.3h with FOG and 3.90h with KW.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21872470</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.103</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9471-9480 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902373262 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Anaerobic co-digestion Anaerobiosis Biochemistry Biofuel production Biofuels Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of sewage sludges and wastes Biotechnology Cooking Energy Environment and pollution Fat, oil, and grease Fats - metabolism Feasibility Studies Fog Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Greases Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Kitchens Linear and non-linear modeling Methane Methane production Models, Theoretical Oils - metabolism Phases Refuse Disposal Regression Synthetic kitchen waste Use and upgrading of agricultural and food by-products. Biotechnology Wastes |
title | Evaluating and modeling biogas production from municipal fat, oil, and grease and synthetic kitchen waste in anaerobic co-digestions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20and%20modeling%20biogas%20production%20from%20municipal%20fat,%20oil,%20and%20grease%20and%20synthetic%20kitchen%20waste%20in%20anaerobic%20co-digestions&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=Li,%20Chenxi&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=9471&rft.epage=9480&rft.pages=9471-9480&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902373262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777114678&rft_id=info:pmid/21872470&rft_els_id=S0960852411010546&rfr_iscdi=true |