The quiet period has something to say
Recent studies suggest that analyst ratings have become less biased following the Global Settlement and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rules implemented in 2002. Assuming analyst ratings are more reliable due to the decline in positive bias, we i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied financial economics 2012-01, Vol.22 (1), p.71-86 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 86 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | Applied financial economics |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Lach, Patrick A. Highfield, Michael J. Treanor, Stephen D. |
| description | Recent studies suggest that analyst ratings have become less biased following the Global Settlement and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rules implemented in 2002. Assuming analyst ratings are more reliable due to the decline in positive bias, we investigate the existence of excess returns for various holding periods based on the strength of ratings issued around the expiration of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) quiet period. We also control for the impact of analyst affiliation and sanctions against investment banks on returns up to 1 year after quiet period expiration. Overall, we find that the strength of analyst coverage can indeed predict future returns, and several factors impact these returns. In addition, we find that only firms which receive positive coverage from a bank sanctioned in the Global Settlement earn positive risk-adjusted returns. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09603107.2011.599785 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_repec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902368504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476240551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-c9f7fdafad948b40523140f4641eed3c1a51a9b3912ca482196a67cf8bbb2c343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9L5TAUxYOM4Bv1G7goA-Kqz9wkTZOVDOI_ENzoOqRp4ou0TU36Rt63N6WjCxfi4uSG8Lvn3hyETgCvAQt8jiXHFHC9JhhgXUlZi2oPrYBxXjKKq19oNSPlzByg3ym9YAxEcFih08eNLV633k7FaKMPbbHRqUiht9PGD8_FFIqkd0do3-ku2eP_9RA9XV89Xt6W9w83d5d_70vDGJlKI13tWu10K5loGK4IBYYd4wysbakBXYGWDZVAjGaCgOSa18aJpmmIoYweorPFd4zhdWvTpHqfjO06PdiwTUpiQrmo8E9ITPNcyjP55wv5ErZxyN9QQnIi84Y0Q2yBTAwpRevUGH2v404BVnPG6iNjNWesloxz2-3SFu1ozWfPlCMYnc8v_xTVhORjN19y6Ln4LMgas2pQgqvN1Geri8XKDy7EXr-F2LXZadeF6KIejE-KfrvMO53xmJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896291403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quiet period has something to say</title><source>RePEc</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lach, Patrick A. ; Highfield, Michael J. ; Treanor, Stephen D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lach, Patrick A. ; Highfield, Michael J. ; Treanor, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies suggest that analyst ratings have become less biased following the Global Settlement and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rules implemented in 2002. Assuming analyst ratings are more reliable due to the decline in positive bias, we investigate the existence of excess returns for various holding periods based on the strength of ratings issued around the expiration of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) quiet period. We also control for the impact of analyst affiliation and sanctions against investment banks on returns up to 1 year after quiet period expiration. Overall, we find that the strength of analyst coverage can indeed predict future returns, and several factors impact these returns. In addition, we find that only firms which receive positive coverage from a bank sanctioned in the Global Settlement earn positive risk-adjusted returns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2011.599785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Abnormal returns ; Analyst ratings ; Analysts ; Bias ; Financial analysis ; Global Settlement ; Initial public offering ; Initial public offerings ; Investment banks ; IPO quiet period ; Ratings & rankings ; Regulatory reform ; Risk management ; Sanctions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Applied financial economics, 2012-01, Vol.22 (1), p.71-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-c9f7fdafad948b40523140f4641eed3c1a51a9b3912ca482196a67cf8bbb2c343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-c9f7fdafad948b40523140f4641eed3c1a51a9b3912ca482196a67cf8bbb2c343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4008,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/tafapfiec/v_3a22_3ay_3a2012_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a71-86.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lach, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highfield, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treanor, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><title>The quiet period has something to say</title><title>Applied financial economics</title><description>Recent studies suggest that analyst ratings have become less biased following the Global Settlement and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rules implemented in 2002. Assuming analyst ratings are more reliable due to the decline in positive bias, we investigate the existence of excess returns for various holding periods based on the strength of ratings issued around the expiration of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) quiet period. We also control for the impact of analyst affiliation and sanctions against investment banks on returns up to 1 year after quiet period expiration. Overall, we find that the strength of analyst coverage can indeed predict future returns, and several factors impact these returns. In addition, we find that only firms which receive positive coverage from a bank sanctioned in the Global Settlement earn positive risk-adjusted returns.</description><subject>Abnormal returns</subject><subject>Analyst ratings</subject><subject>Analysts</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Global Settlement</subject><subject>Initial public offering</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Investment banks</subject><subject>IPO quiet period</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Regulatory reform</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0960-3107</issn><issn>1466-4305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9L5TAUxYOM4Bv1G7goA-Kqz9wkTZOVDOI_ENzoOqRp4ou0TU36Rt63N6WjCxfi4uSG8Lvn3hyETgCvAQt8jiXHFHC9JhhgXUlZi2oPrYBxXjKKq19oNSPlzByg3ym9YAxEcFih08eNLV633k7FaKMPbbHRqUiht9PGD8_FFIqkd0do3-ku2eP_9RA9XV89Xt6W9w83d5d_70vDGJlKI13tWu10K5loGK4IBYYd4wysbakBXYGWDZVAjGaCgOSa18aJpmmIoYweorPFd4zhdWvTpHqfjO06PdiwTUpiQrmo8E9ITPNcyjP55wv5ErZxyN9QQnIi84Y0Q2yBTAwpRevUGH2v404BVnPG6iNjNWesloxz2-3SFu1ozWfPlCMYnc8v_xTVhORjN19y6Ln4LMgas2pQgqvN1Geri8XKDy7EXr-F2LXZadeF6KIejE-KfrvMO53xmJM</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Lach, Patrick A.</creator><creator>Highfield, Michael J.</creator><creator>Treanor, Stephen D.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor and Francis Journals</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>The quiet period has something to say</title><author>Lach, Patrick A. ; Highfield, Michael J. ; Treanor, Stephen D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-c9f7fdafad948b40523140f4641eed3c1a51a9b3912ca482196a67cf8bbb2c343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abnormal returns</topic><topic>Analyst ratings</topic><topic>Analysts</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Global Settlement</topic><topic>Initial public offering</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Investment banks</topic><topic>IPO quiet period</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Regulatory reform</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lach, Patrick A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highfield, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treanor, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Applied financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lach, Patrick A.</au><au>Highfield, Michael J.</au><au>Treanor, Stephen D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quiet period has something to say</atitle><jtitle>Applied financial economics</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>71-86</pages><issn>0960-3107</issn><eissn>1466-4305</eissn><abstract>Recent studies suggest that analyst ratings have become less biased following the Global Settlement and National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Rules implemented in 2002. Assuming analyst ratings are more reliable due to the decline in positive bias, we investigate the existence of excess returns for various holding periods based on the strength of ratings issued around the expiration of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) quiet period. We also control for the impact of analyst affiliation and sanctions against investment banks on returns up to 1 year after quiet period expiration. Overall, we find that the strength of analyst coverage can indeed predict future returns, and several factors impact these returns. In addition, we find that only firms which receive positive coverage from a bank sanctioned in the Global Settlement earn positive risk-adjusted returns.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09603107.2011.599785</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-3107 |
| ispartof | Applied financial economics, 2012-01, Vol.22 (1), p.71-86 |
| issn | 0960-3107 1466-4305 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902368504 |
| source | RePEc; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Abnormal returns Analyst ratings Analysts Bias Financial analysis Global Settlement Initial public offering Initial public offerings Investment banks IPO quiet period Ratings & rankings Regulatory reform Risk management Sanctions Studies |
| title | The quiet period has something to say |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A10%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_repec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quiet%20period%20has%20something%20to%20say&rft.jtitle=Applied%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Lach,%20Patrick%20A.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=71-86&rft.issn=0960-3107&rft.eissn=1466-4305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09603107.2011.599785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_repec%3E2476240551%3C/proquest_repec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896291403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |