AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS

In association with international moves to address the impacts of global climate change some governments including those in the EU, US, Canada and Australia have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via ' new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) (e. g. voluntary agreements,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & environment (Essex, England) England), 2004-07, Vol.15 (3), p.437-449
1. Verfasser: Taplin, Roslyn E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 3
container_start_page 437
container_title Energy & environment (Essex, England)
container_volume 15
creator Taplin, Roslyn E.
description In association with international moves to address the impacts of global climate change some governments including those in the EU, US, Canada and Australia have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via ' new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) (e. g. voluntary agreements, emissions trading and ecolabelling). This has been in response to the Framework Convention on Climate Change and in anticipation of the Kyoto Protocol coming into force. This paper focuses on Australian experience with two particular NEPIs: the Greenhouse Challenge and Greenhouse Friendly programs. Empirical evidence on the evolution and effectiveness of these programs is related to theoretical discussion on the role of NEPIs in industrial transformation, social learning and sustainability. The success or effectiveness of these greenhouse NEPIs appears to be dependent on industry motivations and incentives for participation, the implementing agency's procedures and the design of the process for collaboration and information sharing between government and industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1260/0958305041494675
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43735500</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1260_0958305041494675</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43735500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2654a4797744835061c561c8be6bb2a8d14f81860fe834d96fb537c7d1402de63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1P20AQxVeolUih914q7alwMcx6v3uzzBJbMuvIcQqcLMdZV0QBgzc5IP55bKVCVQ_pYTTSvN97h3kIfSNwQUIBl6C5osCBEaaZkPwITUJgKmAg4ROajHIw6HfH6Iv3a4AQNNET9BYt5mURZWlksbmbmSI1Njb4Ni0TfGbNLTb2V1rk9sbYMsrwLM_S-B6ndjAtxtv8Jy4Tg6eFMTbJF3OD4yTKMmOnBkf26m_hesy-yu7xrMinRXQzP0Wf23rj3dc_-wQtrk0ZJ0GWT9M4yoKGMroNQsFZzaSWkjFFOQjS8GHU0onlMqzVirBWESWgdYqylRbtklPZyOEO4coJeoLO9rnPffeyc35bPT74xm029ZPrdr7SEFIhpVYDeX6QJFJKQrRQY-iPw6ggigvQ_weZJCEXfABhDzZ9533v2uq5f3is-9eKQDV2XP3b8WAJ9hZf_3bVutv1T8MjD_Hf9_zab7v-I59RSTkHoO9jOqOz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14712565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Taplin, Roslyn E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Roslyn E.</creatorcontrib><description>In association with international moves to address the impacts of global climate change some governments including those in the EU, US, Canada and Australia have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via ' new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) (e. g. voluntary agreements, emissions trading and ecolabelling). This has been in response to the Framework Convention on Climate Change and in anticipation of the Kyoto Protocol coming into force. This paper focuses on Australian experience with two particular NEPIs: the Greenhouse Challenge and Greenhouse Friendly programs. Empirical evidence on the evolution and effectiveness of these programs is related to theoretical discussion on the role of NEPIs in industrial transformation, social learning and sustainability. The success or effectiveness of these greenhouse NEPIs appears to be dependent on industry motivations and incentives for participation, the implementing agency's procedures and the design of the process for collaboration and information sharing between government and industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-305X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-4070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1260/0958305041494675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Climate change ; Climate change policy ; Ecolabeling ; Ecological sustainability ; Emissions control ; Emissions trading ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental policy ; Extractive industries ; Government ; Governments ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Greenhouses ; International cooperation ; International environmental policy ; Policies</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England), 2004-07, Vol.15 (3), p.437-449</ispartof><rights>2004 MULTI-SCIENCE PUBLISHING CO. LTD.</rights><rights>2004 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2654a4797744835061c561c8be6bb2a8d14f81860fe834d96fb537c7d1402de63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2654a4797744835061c561c8be6bb2a8d14f81860fe834d96fb537c7d1402de63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43735500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43735500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Roslyn E.</creatorcontrib><title>AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS</title><title>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</title><description>In association with international moves to address the impacts of global climate change some governments including those in the EU, US, Canada and Australia have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via ' new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) (e. g. voluntary agreements, emissions trading and ecolabelling). This has been in response to the Framework Convention on Climate Change and in anticipation of the Kyoto Protocol coming into force. This paper focuses on Australian experience with two particular NEPIs: the Greenhouse Challenge and Greenhouse Friendly programs. Empirical evidence on the evolution and effectiveness of these programs is related to theoretical discussion on the role of NEPIs in industrial transformation, social learning and sustainability. The success or effectiveness of these greenhouse NEPIs appears to be dependent on industry motivations and incentives for participation, the implementing agency's procedures and the design of the process for collaboration and information sharing between government and industry.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change policy</subject><subject>Ecolabeling</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Extractive industries</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Governments</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International environmental policy</subject><subject>Policies</subject><issn>0958-305X</issn><issn>2048-4070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1P20AQxVeolUih914q7alwMcx6v3uzzBJbMuvIcQqcLMdZV0QBgzc5IP55bKVCVQ_pYTTSvN97h3kIfSNwQUIBl6C5osCBEaaZkPwITUJgKmAg4ROajHIw6HfH6Iv3a4AQNNET9BYt5mURZWlksbmbmSI1Njb4Ni0TfGbNLTb2V1rk9sbYMsrwLM_S-B6ndjAtxtv8Jy4Tg6eFMTbJF3OD4yTKMmOnBkf26m_hesy-yu7xrMinRXQzP0Wf23rj3dc_-wQtrk0ZJ0GWT9M4yoKGMroNQsFZzaSWkjFFOQjS8GHU0onlMqzVirBWESWgdYqylRbtklPZyOEO4coJeoLO9rnPffeyc35bPT74xm029ZPrdr7SEFIhpVYDeX6QJFJKQrRQY-iPw6ggigvQ_weZJCEXfABhDzZ9533v2uq5f3is-9eKQDV2XP3b8WAJ9hZf_3bVutv1T8MjD_Hf9_zab7v-I59RSTkHoO9jOqOz</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Taplin, Roslyn E.</creator><general>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS</title><author>Taplin, Roslyn E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-2654a4797744835061c561c8be6bb2a8d14f81860fe834d96fb537c7d1402de63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change policy</topic><topic>Ecolabeling</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Extractive industries</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Governments</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International environmental policy</topic><topic>Policies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Roslyn E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taplin, Roslyn E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</jtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>437-449</pages><issn>0958-305X</issn><eissn>2048-4070</eissn><abstract>In association with international moves to address the impacts of global climate change some governments including those in the EU, US, Canada and Australia have taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions via ' new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) (e. g. voluntary agreements, emissions trading and ecolabelling). This has been in response to the Framework Convention on Climate Change and in anticipation of the Kyoto Protocol coming into force. This paper focuses on Australian experience with two particular NEPIs: the Greenhouse Challenge and Greenhouse Friendly programs. Empirical evidence on the evolution and effectiveness of these programs is related to theoretical discussion on the role of NEPIs in industrial transformation, social learning and sustainability. The success or effectiveness of these greenhouse NEPIs appears to be dependent on industry motivations and incentives for participation, the implementing agency's procedures and the design of the process for collaboration and information sharing between government and industry.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd</pub><doi>10.1260/0958305041494675</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-305X
ispartof Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2004-07, Vol.15 (3), p.437-449
issn 0958-305X
2048-4070
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367798
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Air pollution
Climate change
Climate change policy
Ecolabeling
Ecological sustainability
Emissions control
Emissions trading
Environmental conservation
Environmental policy
Extractive industries
Government
Governments
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Greenhouses
International cooperation
International environmental policy
Policies
title AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE WITH 'NEW ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: THE GREENHOUSE CHALLENGE AND GREENHOUSE FRIENDLY PROGRAMS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A56%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AUSTRALIAN%20EXPERIENCE%20WITH%20'NEW%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20POLICY%20INSTRUMENTS:%20THE%20GREENHOUSE%20CHALLENGE%20AND%20GREENHOUSE%20FRIENDLY%20PROGRAMS&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environment%20(Essex,%20England)&rft.au=Taplin,%20Roslyn%20E.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=437-449&rft.issn=0958-305X&rft.eissn=2048-4070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1260/0958305041494675&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43735500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14712565&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43735500&rft_sage_id=10.1260_0958305041494675&rfr_iscdi=true