Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)
Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of psychophysiology 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 274 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | International journal of psychophysiology |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Terry, Ellen L. France, Christopher R. Bartley, Emily J. DelVentura, Jennifer L. Kerr, Kara L. Vincent, Ashley L. Rhudy, Jamie L. |
description | Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small
Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150
ms vs. 70–150
ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0
Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150
ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0
Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed.
► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2
Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2
Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150
ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876011001954</els_id><sourcerecordid>902367149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEokPhFypvELDIYDtOHLMqGlFAqkCiZW157BfGoyQOfk7F9J_4RzzMtIhVV7bkc6_9fIrijNElo6x5u1367YQ7uwlLThlb0mZJOXtULFgreSkbJR8XiwzKspUNPSmeIW4ppZIp9bQ44Uw2sm6rRfH7KpnRmej8rR9_kCkGC26OgCQFgml2O4Iwok_-1iQfRhI6spkHMxKc_Gh6MgbrLUzJ38AhjQj4jqzCMJn4t9JEM0CCiKQLkSQYphBzEOdhuK9MG_ivqevh1_4own5HXl9flV8uvr15XjzpTI_w4rieFt8vPlyvPpWXXz9-Xr2_LK1QdSprY2opKmX5ul53gjMBqmkrWlHXCWWM4aLumppxYaHilaNOroVqnWXWUcFpdVq8OvTmiX7OgEkPHi30vRkhzKgV5VUjmVAPkq1qW5H_fU82B9LGgJgH01P0g4k7zajeO9VbfedU751q2ujsNAfPjlfM6wHcfexOYgZeHgGD1vRdNKP1-I8Tkleylpk7P3CQv-7GQ9RoPYxZuI9gk3bBP_SWP911x4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898840079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small
Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150
ms vs. 70–150
ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0
Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150
ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0
Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed.
► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2
Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2
Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150
ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21767583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Electric Stimulation ; Electromyogram ; Electromyography ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Nociception ; Nociception - physiology ; Nociceptors - physiology ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain modulation ; Pain Threshold ; Plasticity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reflex - physiology ; RIII reflex ; Skin ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord - physiology ; Spinal Cord - physiopathology ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24723757$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>France, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartley, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Kara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small
Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150
ms vs. 70–150
ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0
Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150
ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0
Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed.
► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2
Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2
Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150
ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</description><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electromyogram</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nociception</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Nociceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain modulation</subject><subject>Pain Threshold</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>RIII reflex</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEokPhFypvELDIYDtOHLMqGlFAqkCiZW157BfGoyQOfk7F9J_4RzzMtIhVV7bkc6_9fIrijNElo6x5u1367YQ7uwlLThlb0mZJOXtULFgreSkbJR8XiwzKspUNPSmeIW4ppZIp9bQ44Uw2sm6rRfH7KpnRmej8rR9_kCkGC26OgCQFgml2O4Iwok_-1iQfRhI6spkHMxKc_Gh6MgbrLUzJ38AhjQj4jqzCMJn4t9JEM0CCiKQLkSQYphBzEOdhuK9MG_ivqevh1_4own5HXl9flV8uvr15XjzpTI_w4rieFt8vPlyvPpWXXz9-Xr2_LK1QdSprY2opKmX5ul53gjMBqmkrWlHXCWWM4aLumppxYaHilaNOroVqnWXWUcFpdVq8OvTmiX7OgEkPHi30vRkhzKgV5VUjmVAPkq1qW5H_fU82B9LGgJgH01P0g4k7zajeO9VbfedU751q2ujsNAfPjlfM6wHcfexOYgZeHgGD1vRdNKP1-I8Tkleylpk7P3CQv-7GQ9RoPYxZuI9gk3bBP_SWP911x4Q</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Terry, Ellen L.</creator><creator>France, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Bartley, Emily J.</creator><creator>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Kerr, Kara L.</creator><creator>Vincent, Ashley L.</creator><creator>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><author>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electromyogram</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nociception</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Nociceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain modulation</topic><topic>Pain Threshold</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>RIII reflex</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>France, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartley, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Kara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terry, Ellen L.</au><au>France, Christopher R.</au><au>Bartley, Emily J.</au><au>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</au><au>Kerr, Kara L.</au><au>Vincent, Ashley L.</au><au>Rhudy, Jamie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>263-274</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small
Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150
ms vs. 70–150
ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0
Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150
ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0
Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed.
► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2
Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2
Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150
ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21767583</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8760 |
ispartof | International journal of psychophysiology, 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274 |
issn | 0167-8760 1872-7697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367149 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Data Interpretation, Statistical Electric Stimulation Electromyogram Electromyography Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Muscle Contraction Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology Nociception Nociception - physiology Nociceptors - physiology Pain Pain - physiopathology Pain - psychology Pain Measurement - methods Pain modulation Pain Threshold Plasticity Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reflex - physiology RIII reflex Skin Spinal cord Spinal Cord - physiology Spinal Cord - physiopathology Time Factors Young Adult |
title | Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20procedures%20to%20study%20sensitization%20of%20human%20spinal%20nociceptive%20processes:%20Comparing%20parameters%20for%20temporal%20summation%20of%20the%20nociceptive%20flexion%20reflex%20(TS-NFR)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Terry,%20Ellen%20L.&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=263-274&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902367149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898840079&rft_id=info:pmid/21767583&rft_els_id=S0167876011001954&rfr_iscdi=true |