Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)

Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274
Hauptverfasser: Terry, Ellen L., France, Christopher R., Bartley, Emily J., DelVentura, Jennifer L., Kerr, Kara L., Vincent, Ashley L., Rhudy, Jamie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue 3
container_start_page 263
container_title International journal of psychophysiology
container_volume 81
creator Terry, Ellen L.
France, Christopher R.
Bartley, Emily J.
DelVentura, Jennifer L.
Kerr, Kara L.
Vincent, Ashley L.
Rhudy, Jamie L.
description Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150 ms vs. 70–150 ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0 Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150 ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0 Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed. ► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2 Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2 Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150 ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876011001954</els_id><sourcerecordid>902367149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEokPhFypvELDIYDtOHLMqGlFAqkCiZW157BfGoyQOfk7F9J_4RzzMtIhVV7bkc6_9fIrijNElo6x5u1367YQ7uwlLThlb0mZJOXtULFgreSkbJR8XiwzKspUNPSmeIW4ppZIp9bQ44Uw2sm6rRfH7KpnRmej8rR9_kCkGC26OgCQFgml2O4Iwok_-1iQfRhI6spkHMxKc_Gh6MgbrLUzJ38AhjQj4jqzCMJn4t9JEM0CCiKQLkSQYphBzEOdhuK9MG_ivqevh1_4own5HXl9flV8uvr15XjzpTI_w4rieFt8vPlyvPpWXXz9-Xr2_LK1QdSprY2opKmX5ul53gjMBqmkrWlHXCWWM4aLumppxYaHilaNOroVqnWXWUcFpdVq8OvTmiX7OgEkPHi30vRkhzKgV5VUjmVAPkq1qW5H_fU82B9LGgJgH01P0g4k7zajeO9VbfedU751q2ujsNAfPjlfM6wHcfexOYgZeHgGD1vRdNKP1-I8Tkleylpk7P3CQv-7GQ9RoPYxZuI9gk3bBP_SWP911x4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898840079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150 ms vs. 70–150 ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0 Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150 ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0 Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed. ► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2 Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2 Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150 ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21767583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPSEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Electric Stimulation ; Electromyogram ; Electromyography ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Nociception ; Nociception - physiology ; Nociceptors - physiology ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain modulation ; Pain Threshold ; Plasticity ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reflex - physiology ; RIII reflex ; Skin ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord - physiology ; Spinal Cord - physiopathology ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24723757$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>France, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartley, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Kara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150 ms vs. 70–150 ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0 Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150 ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0 Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed. ► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2 Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2 Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150 ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</description><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electromyogram</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nociception</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Nociceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain modulation</subject><subject>Pain Threshold</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>RIII reflex</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAURSMEokPhFypvELDIYDtOHLMqGlFAqkCiZW157BfGoyQOfk7F9J_4RzzMtIhVV7bkc6_9fIrijNElo6x5u1367YQ7uwlLThlb0mZJOXtULFgreSkbJR8XiwzKspUNPSmeIW4ppZIp9bQ44Uw2sm6rRfH7KpnRmej8rR9_kCkGC26OgCQFgml2O4Iwok_-1iQfRhI6spkHMxKc_Gh6MgbrLUzJ38AhjQj4jqzCMJn4t9JEM0CCiKQLkSQYphBzEOdhuK9MG_ivqevh1_4own5HXl9flV8uvr15XjzpTI_w4rieFt8vPlyvPpWXXz9-Xr2_LK1QdSprY2opKmX5ul53gjMBqmkrWlHXCWWM4aLumppxYaHilaNOroVqnWXWUcFpdVq8OvTmiX7OgEkPHi30vRkhzKgV5VUjmVAPkq1qW5H_fU82B9LGgJgH01P0g4k7zajeO9VbfedU751q2ujsNAfPjlfM6wHcfexOYgZeHgGD1vRdNKP1-I8Tkleylpk7P3CQv-7GQ9RoPYxZuI9gk3bBP_SWP911x4Q</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Terry, Ellen L.</creator><creator>France, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Bartley, Emily J.</creator><creator>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Kerr, Kara L.</creator><creator>Vincent, Ashley L.</creator><creator>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</title><author>Terry, Ellen L. ; France, Christopher R. ; Bartley, Emily J. ; DelVentura, Jennifer L. ; Kerr, Kara L. ; Vincent, Ashley L. ; Rhudy, Jamie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-5aa57439c2b5bf4214e9683030df49aaa245f65124ce323d0d7b498dc1cd04203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electromyogram</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nociception</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Nociceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain modulation</topic><topic>Pain Threshold</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>RIII reflex</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terry, Ellen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>France, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartley, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Kara L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhudy, Jamie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terry, Ellen L.</au><au>France, Christopher R.</au><au>Bartley, Emily J.</au><au>DelVentura, Jennifer L.</au><au>Kerr, Kara L.</au><au>Vincent, Ashley L.</au><au>Rhudy, Jamie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>263-274</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><coden>IJPSEE</coden><abstract>Temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) is the progressive increase in pain ratings during a series of noxious stimulations. TS-pain has been used to make inferences about sensitization of spinal nociceptive processes; however, pain report can be biased thereby leading to problems with this inference. Temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception) can potentially overcome report bias, but there have been few attempts (generally with small Ns) to standardize TS-NFR procedures. In this study, 50 healthy participants received 25 series of noxious electric stimulations to evoke TS-NFR and TS-pain. Goals were to: 1) determine the stimulation frequency that best elicits TS-NFR and reduces electromyogram (EMG) contamination from muscle tension, 2) determine the minimum number of stimulations per series before NFR summation asymptotes, 3) compare NFR definition intervals (90–150 ms vs. 70–150 ms post-stimulation), and 4) compare TS-pain and TS-NFR when different stimulation frequencies are used. Results indicated TS-NFR should be elicited by a series of three stimuli delivered at 2.0 Hz and TS-NFR should be defined from a 70–150 ms post-stimulation scoring interval. Unfortunately, EMG contamination from muscle tension was greatest during 2.0 Hz series. Discrepancies were noted between TS-NFR and TS-pain which raise concerns about using pain ratings to infer changes in spinal nociceptive processes. And finally, some individuals did not have reliable NFRs when the stimulation intensity was set at NFR threshold during TS-NFR testing; therefore, a higher intensity is needed. Implications of findings are discussed. ► Procedures for studying spinal sensitization (via NFR) were tested and compared. ► Spinal sensitization can be elicited from 3 noxious stimulations at 2 Hz. ► However, muscle tension during 2 Hz series may contaminate NFR-related EMG. ► NFRs in this procedure should be assessed 70–150 ms post-stimulation. ► Using pain ratings to infer spinal sensitization can be problematic.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21767583</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8760
ispartof International journal of psychophysiology, 2011-09, Vol.81 (3), p.263-274
issn 0167-8760
1872-7697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902367149
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Electric Stimulation
Electromyogram
Electromyography
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Muscle Contraction
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Nociception
Nociception - physiology
Nociceptors - physiology
Pain
Pain - physiopathology
Pain - psychology
Pain Measurement - methods
Pain modulation
Pain Threshold
Plasticity
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reflex - physiology
RIII reflex
Skin
Spinal cord
Spinal Cord - physiology
Spinal Cord - physiopathology
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Standardizing procedures to study sensitization of human spinal nociceptive processes: Comparing parameters for temporal summation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20procedures%20to%20study%20sensitization%20of%20human%20spinal%20nociceptive%20processes:%20Comparing%20parameters%20for%20temporal%20summation%20of%20the%20nociceptive%20flexion%20reflex%20(TS-NFR)&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Terry,%20Ellen%20L.&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=263-274&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft.coden=IJPSEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902367149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898840079&rft_id=info:pmid/21767583&rft_els_id=S0167876011001954&rfr_iscdi=true