Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem
Nitrogen availability is critically important to litter decomposition, especially in arid and semiarid areas where N is limiting. We studied the relative contributions of litter quality and soil N to litter decomposition of two dominant grassland species, Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, in a s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2010-03, Vol.162 (3), p.771-780 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 771 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Liu, Ping Huang, Jianhui Sun, Osbert Jianxin Han, Xingguo |
description | Nitrogen availability is critically important to litter decomposition, especially in arid and semiarid areas where N is limiting. We studied the relative contributions of litter quality and soil N to litter decomposition of two dominant grassland species, Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, in a semiarid typical steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. The study had four different rates of N addition (0, 8, 32, and 64 g N m⁻² year⁻¹), and litter samples were decomposed under varying site conditions and by litter types. Litter-mixing effects of the two species were also examined. We found that N addition increased litter N concentration and thus enhanced litter decomposition by improving substrate quality. This increase, however, was offset by the negative effect of increased soil N, resulting in a diminished effect of increased soil N availability on in situ litter decomposition. The positive effects of improved litter quality slightly out-performed the negative effects of increased soil N. Our further analysis revealed that the negative effect of increasing soil N on litter decomposition could be partially explained by reduced soil microbial biomass and activity. Decomposition was significantly faster for litters of a two-species mixture than litters of the single species, but the rate of litter decomposition did not differ much between the two species, suggesting that compositional balance, rather than changes in the dominance between Stipa and Artemisia, is more critical for litter decomposition, hence nutrient cycling in this ecosystem. This semiarid steppe ecosystem may become more conservative in nutrient use with switching of dominance from Artemisia to Stipa with increasing soil N, because Stipa has a slower decomposition rate and a higher nutrient retention rate than Artemisia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-009-1506-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902352752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A355467251</galeid><jstor_id>40540215</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A355467251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-6484066b9b73b77ae15624a1be9b60902183c7ca1da86deff0d72ca2fdb5a7c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rj6A7xQiyLiRdd8Ns3lsvixMCC47nU4TU-HDJ1mNknF-Qf-bDPbYXVElF4Ecp73PTmnb1E8peSMEqLeRUKEYBUhuqKS1JW6Vyyo4Kyimuv7xYIQpqtGCn1SPIpxTQgVVMqHxQnVmlFW60XxY-lSwlB2aP1m66NLzo8ljF05Tik4HFMZcECIWEIsoe_RJuzKdldG74ZydCn4FWbFN3ADtG5waXcrH2bfmwlur1xGyogbB8F15SpAjMMey23jLibcPC4e9DBEfHI4T4vrD--_Xnyqlp8_Xl6cLysrlU5VLRpB6rrVreKtUoBU1kwAbVG3NdGE0YZbZYF20NQd9j3pFLPA-q6VoCzlp8Wb2Xcb_M2EMZmNixaH_Br0UzTZgkumJPsvqTinubtWmXz5B7n2UxjzGCZvmgtNFMnQqxlawYDGjb1PAeze0pxzKUWtmNw_7-wvVP66vDvrR-xdvj8SvD0SZCbh97SCKUZzefXlmKUza4OPMWBvtsFtIOwMJWafKDMnyuREmX2izH6254fZpnaD3S_FIUIZeH0AIFoY-gCjdfGOY0zwmvMmc2zmYi6NKwy_Lekf3Z_NonVMPtyZCiJF_tUy11_M9R68gVXIja-vGKGc0IZw2lD-E0ws9RU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199349070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Liu, Ping ; Huang, Jianhui ; Sun, Osbert Jianxin ; Han, Xingguo</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping ; Huang, Jianhui ; Sun, Osbert Jianxin ; Han, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrogen availability is critically important to litter decomposition, especially in arid and semiarid areas where N is limiting. We studied the relative contributions of litter quality and soil N to litter decomposition of two dominant grassland species, Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, in a semiarid typical steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. The study had four different rates of N addition (0, 8, 32, and 64 g N m⁻² year⁻¹), and litter samples were decomposed under varying site conditions and by litter types. Litter-mixing effects of the two species were also examined. We found that N addition increased litter N concentration and thus enhanced litter decomposition by improving substrate quality. This increase, however, was offset by the negative effect of increased soil N, resulting in a diminished effect of increased soil N availability on in situ litter decomposition. The positive effects of improved litter quality slightly out-performed the negative effects of increased soil N. Our further analysis revealed that the negative effect of increasing soil N on litter decomposition could be partially explained by reduced soil microbial biomass and activity. Decomposition was significantly faster for litters of a two-species mixture than litters of the single species, but the rate of litter decomposition did not differ much between the two species, suggesting that compositional balance, rather than changes in the dominance between Stipa and Artemisia, is more critical for litter decomposition, hence nutrient cycling in this ecosystem. This semiarid steppe ecosystem may become more conservative in nutrient use with switching of dominance from Artemisia to Stipa with increasing soil N, because Stipa has a slower decomposition rate and a higher nutrient retention rate than Artemisia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1506-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19921269</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Artemisia ; Artemisia frigida ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Decomposition ; Dominance ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem Ecology – Original Paper ; Ecosystems ; Forest soils ; Forest steppe soils ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Grassland soils ; Grasslands ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Litter ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - chemistry ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrient release ; Nutrient retention ; Nutrients ; Plant litter ; Plant Sciences ; Poaceae ; Soil ; Soil - analysis ; Soil ecology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil nutrients ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Steppes ; Stipa ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2010-03, Vol.162 (3), p.771-780</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-6484066b9b73b77ae15624a1be9b60902183c7ca1da86deff0d72ca2fdb5a7c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-6484066b9b73b77ae15624a1be9b60902183c7ca1da86deff0d72ca2fdb5a7c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40540215$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40540215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22436338$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19921269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Osbert Jianxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><title>Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Nitrogen availability is critically important to litter decomposition, especially in arid and semiarid areas where N is limiting. We studied the relative contributions of litter quality and soil N to litter decomposition of two dominant grassland species, Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, in a semiarid typical steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. The study had four different rates of N addition (0, 8, 32, and 64 g N m⁻² year⁻¹), and litter samples were decomposed under varying site conditions and by litter types. Litter-mixing effects of the two species were also examined. We found that N addition increased litter N concentration and thus enhanced litter decomposition by improving substrate quality. This increase, however, was offset by the negative effect of increased soil N, resulting in a diminished effect of increased soil N availability on in situ litter decomposition. The positive effects of improved litter quality slightly out-performed the negative effects of increased soil N. Our further analysis revealed that the negative effect of increasing soil N on litter decomposition could be partially explained by reduced soil microbial biomass and activity. Decomposition was significantly faster for litters of a two-species mixture than litters of the single species, but the rate of litter decomposition did not differ much between the two species, suggesting that compositional balance, rather than changes in the dominance between Stipa and Artemisia, is more critical for litter decomposition, hence nutrient cycling in this ecosystem. This semiarid steppe ecosystem may become more conservative in nutrient use with switching of dominance from Artemisia to Stipa with increasing soil N, because Stipa has a slower decomposition rate and a higher nutrient retention rate than Artemisia.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Artemisia</subject><subject>Artemisia frigida</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem Ecology – Original Paper</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forest steppe soils</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Grassland soils</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - chemistry</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrient release</subject><subject>Nutrient retention</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Plant litter</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Steppes</subject><subject>Stipa</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rj6A7xQiyLiRdd8Ns3lsvixMCC47nU4TU-HDJ1mNknF-Qf-bDPbYXVElF4Ecp73PTmnb1E8peSMEqLeRUKEYBUhuqKS1JW6Vyyo4Kyimuv7xYIQpqtGCn1SPIpxTQgVVMqHxQnVmlFW60XxY-lSwlB2aP1m66NLzo8ljF05Tik4HFMZcECIWEIsoe_RJuzKdldG74ZydCn4FWbFN3ADtG5waXcrH2bfmwlur1xGyogbB8F15SpAjMMey23jLibcPC4e9DBEfHI4T4vrD--_Xnyqlp8_Xl6cLysrlU5VLRpB6rrVreKtUoBU1kwAbVG3NdGE0YZbZYF20NQd9j3pFLPA-q6VoCzlp8Wb2Xcb_M2EMZmNixaH_Br0UzTZgkumJPsvqTinubtWmXz5B7n2UxjzGCZvmgtNFMnQqxlawYDGjb1PAeze0pxzKUWtmNw_7-wvVP66vDvrR-xdvj8SvD0SZCbh97SCKUZzefXlmKUza4OPMWBvtsFtIOwMJWafKDMnyuREmX2izH6254fZpnaD3S_FIUIZeH0AIFoY-gCjdfGOY0zwmvMmc2zmYi6NKwy_Lekf3Z_NonVMPtyZCiJF_tUy11_M9R68gVXIja-vGKGc0IZw2lD-E0ws9RU</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Liu, Ping</creator><creator>Huang, Jianhui</creator><creator>Sun, Osbert Jianxin</creator><creator>Han, Xingguo</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem</title><author>Liu, Ping ; Huang, Jianhui ; Sun, Osbert Jianxin ; Han, Xingguo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-6484066b9b73b77ae15624a1be9b60902183c7ca1da86deff0d72ca2fdb5a7c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Artemisia</topic><topic>Artemisia frigida</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem Ecology – Original Paper</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forest steppe soils</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Grassland soils</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - chemistry</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrient release</topic><topic>Nutrient retention</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Plant litter</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Steppes</topic><topic>Stipa</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Osbert Jianxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xingguo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ping</au><au>Huang, Jianhui</au><au>Sun, Osbert Jianxin</au><au>Han, Xingguo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>771-780</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Nitrogen availability is critically important to litter decomposition, especially in arid and semiarid areas where N is limiting. We studied the relative contributions of litter quality and soil N to litter decomposition of two dominant grassland species, Stipa krylovii and Artemisia frigida, in a semiarid typical steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. The study had four different rates of N addition (0, 8, 32, and 64 g N m⁻² year⁻¹), and litter samples were decomposed under varying site conditions and by litter types. Litter-mixing effects of the two species were also examined. We found that N addition increased litter N concentration and thus enhanced litter decomposition by improving substrate quality. This increase, however, was offset by the negative effect of increased soil N, resulting in a diminished effect of increased soil N availability on in situ litter decomposition. The positive effects of improved litter quality slightly out-performed the negative effects of increased soil N. Our further analysis revealed that the negative effect of increasing soil N on litter decomposition could be partially explained by reduced soil microbial biomass and activity. Decomposition was significantly faster for litters of a two-species mixture than litters of the single species, but the rate of litter decomposition did not differ much between the two species, suggesting that compositional balance, rather than changes in the dominance between Stipa and Artemisia, is more critical for litter decomposition, hence nutrient cycling in this ecosystem. This semiarid steppe ecosystem may become more conservative in nutrient use with switching of dominance from Artemisia to Stipa with increasing soil N, because Stipa has a slower decomposition rate and a higher nutrient retention rate than Artemisia.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19921269</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-009-1506-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2010-03, Vol.162 (3), p.771-780 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902352752 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Artemisia Artemisia frigida Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Decomposition Dominance Ecology Ecosystem Ecosystem Ecology – Original Paper Ecosystems Forest soils Forest steppe soils Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Grassland soils Grasslands Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Litter Nitrogen Nitrogen - chemistry Nutrient cycles Nutrient release Nutrient retention Nutrients Plant litter Plant Sciences Poaceae Soil Soil - analysis Soil ecology Soil microorganisms Soil nutrients Soil quality Soils Steppes Stipa Synecology |
title | Litter decomposition and nutrient release as affected by soil nitrogen availability and litter quality in a semiarid grassland ecosystem |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Litter%20decomposition%20and%20nutrient%20release%20as%20affected%20by%20soil%20nitrogen%20availability%20and%20litter%20quality%20in%20a%20semiarid%20grassland%20ecosystem&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Liu,%20Ping&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=771-780&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-009-1506-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA355467251%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199349070&rft_id=info:pmid/19921269&rft_galeid=A355467251&rft_jstor_id=40540215&rfr_iscdi=true |