Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual?
This paper looks at the role of statistics-based knowledge in the making of EU policy. We highlight shortcomings in the use of statistical indicators made in the course of the Lisbon strategy, ended in 2010. In our opinion the shortcomings are: (i) The paradox of the coexistence within the same Euro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2011-06, Vol.102 (2), p.197-207 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 207 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 197 |
| container_title | Social indicators research |
| container_volume | 102 |
| creator | Saltelli, Andrea D'Hombres, Beatrice Jesinghaus, Jochen Manca, Anna Rita Mascherini, Massimiliano Nardo, Michela Saisana, Michaela |
| description | This paper looks at the role of statistics-based knowledge in the making of EU policy. We highlight shortcomings in the use of statistical indicators made in the course of the Lisbon strategy, ended in 2010. In our opinion the shortcomings are: (i) The paradox of the coexistence within the same European Commission of two holistic frameworks', the Structural Indicators and the Sustainable Development Indicators. One does not understand which of these two systems is taken to measure the overall policy performance of the European Union, (ii) A communication issue whereby the Lisbon strategy and its offspring EU 2020 are not communicated (Lisbon is to the average citizen the capital of Portugal) and are especially not communicated in relation to existing statistical indicators of good quality, against the opinion of academicians that transparency and accountability based on sound statistics favour democracy and participation. We illustrate the reasons that lead us to see these points as problematic and offer suggestions on how these should be tackled in line with the practices developed in the Open Method of Coordination. The danger is that in the absence of a debate on the issue, these shortcomings be perpetuated in the EU 2020 strategy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-010-9678-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902352047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ919848</ericid><jstor_id>41476477</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41476477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-26e13629997d2be010d7a44ac90beb7546e397d9d7fcdd1128676628b54f4f7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AEGhEcS99JrK_3gRXUZdWdCDcw6ZdFoy9CZjavrgtzezvYzgYT3V4f3qVT0eIc-BXgCl-i0CMCp7CrS3SptePCArkJr31DJ4SFaUU94bTulj8gRxRymVQooVeXeVhxT8oVTsxlK79VzLPvrcbXIquftephRSxIvu44wpR8TOY7fB2U_vn5JHo58wPrubZ2Tzaf3j8kt__e3z1eWH6z5IMIeeqQhcMWutHtg2tg8H7YXwwdJt3GopVORNsoMewzC0GEZppZjZSjGKUQd-Rt4svvtafs0RD-4mYYjT5HMsMzpLGZeMCv1f0iiQxjILjTy_lwTOmGbQvm7oq3_QXZlrbomdaW5cgOINggUKtSDWOLp9TTe-_nZA3bEgtxTkWnx3LMiJtvP6zthj8NNYfQ4JT4tMgND6NtWLhYs1hZO8_mrBGmGazBYZm5R_xvr3v_tuv1yWdtiqP5keT6p2lf8B6X6vSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858934163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Saltelli, Andrea ; D'Hombres, Beatrice ; Jesinghaus, Jochen ; Manca, Anna Rita ; Mascherini, Massimiliano ; Nardo, Michela ; Saisana, Michaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Saltelli, Andrea ; D'Hombres, Beatrice ; Jesinghaus, Jochen ; Manca, Anna Rita ; Mascherini, Massimiliano ; Nardo, Michela ; Saisana, Michaela</creatorcontrib><description>This paper looks at the role of statistics-based knowledge in the making of EU policy. We highlight shortcomings in the use of statistical indicators made in the course of the Lisbon strategy, ended in 2010. In our opinion the shortcomings are: (i) The paradox of the coexistence within the same European Commission of two holistic frameworks', the Structural Indicators and the Sustainable Development Indicators. One does not understand which of these two systems is taken to measure the overall policy performance of the European Union, (ii) A communication issue whereby the Lisbon strategy and its offspring EU 2020 are not communicated (Lisbon is to the average citizen the capital of Portugal) and are especially not communicated in relation to existing statistical indicators of good quality, against the opinion of academicians that transparency and accountability based on sound statistics favour democracy and participation. We illustrate the reasons that lead us to see these points as problematic and offer suggestions on how these should be tackled in line with the practices developed in the Open Method of Coordination. The danger is that in the absence of a debate on the issue, these shortcomings be perpetuated in the EU 2020 strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9678-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SINRDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Benchmarking ; Citizen Participation ; Citizens ; Communication ; Communication Problems ; Competitiveness ; Coordination ; Councils ; Countries ; Democracy ; Ecological sustainability ; Employment ; Environmental policy ; Europe ; European Commission ; European policy ; European Union ; Evaluation Methods ; Evaluation Problems ; Foreign Countries ; Governance ; Guidelines ; History, theory and methodology ; Holistic Approach ; Human Geography ; Indicators ; Knowledge ; Measurement ; Methodology ; Microeconomics ; Offspring ; Opinions ; Policy Analysis ; Policy making ; Political communication ; Political sociology ; Political systems, parties and institutions ; Portugal ; Public Health ; Public Policy ; Quality of Life Research ; Social Indicators ; Social research ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Sociometric Techniques ; Statistical Data ; Statistics ; Studies ; Sustainable Development ; Sustainable economies ; Threat ; Transparency ; Treaties ; World Bank</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2011-06, Vol.102 (2), p.197-207</ispartof><rights>2011 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-26e13629997d2be010d7a44ac90beb7546e397d9d7fcdd1128676628b54f4f7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-26e13629997d2be010d7a44ac90beb7546e397d9d7fcdd1128676628b54f4f7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41476477$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41476477$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27323,27903,27904,33753,33754,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ919848$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24147747$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saltelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hombres, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesinghaus, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manca, Anna Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascherini, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardo, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saisana, Michaela</creatorcontrib><title>Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual?</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>This paper looks at the role of statistics-based knowledge in the making of EU policy. We highlight shortcomings in the use of statistical indicators made in the course of the Lisbon strategy, ended in 2010. In our opinion the shortcomings are: (i) The paradox of the coexistence within the same European Commission of two holistic frameworks', the Structural Indicators and the Sustainable Development Indicators. One does not understand which of these two systems is taken to measure the overall policy performance of the European Union, (ii) A communication issue whereby the Lisbon strategy and its offspring EU 2020 are not communicated (Lisbon is to the average citizen the capital of Portugal) and are especially not communicated in relation to existing statistical indicators of good quality, against the opinion of academicians that transparency and accountability based on sound statistics favour democracy and participation. We illustrate the reasons that lead us to see these points as problematic and offer suggestions on how these should be tackled in line with the practices developed in the Open Method of Coordination. The danger is that in the absence of a debate on the issue, these shortcomings be perpetuated in the EU 2020 strategy.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Problems</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Commission</subject><subject>European policy</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Problems</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Holistic Approach</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political sociology</subject><subject>Political systems, parties and institutions</subject><subject>Portugal</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social Indicators</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociometric Techniques</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Sustainable economies</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>World Bank</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AEGhEcS99JrK_3gRXUZdWdCDcw6ZdFoy9CZjavrgtzezvYzgYT3V4f3qVT0eIc-BXgCl-i0CMCp7CrS3SptePCArkJr31DJ4SFaUU94bTulj8gRxRymVQooVeXeVhxT8oVTsxlK79VzLPvrcbXIquftephRSxIvu44wpR8TOY7fB2U_vn5JHo58wPrubZ2Tzaf3j8kt__e3z1eWH6z5IMIeeqQhcMWutHtg2tg8H7YXwwdJt3GopVORNsoMewzC0GEZppZjZSjGKUQd-Rt4svvtafs0RD-4mYYjT5HMsMzpLGZeMCv1f0iiQxjILjTy_lwTOmGbQvm7oq3_QXZlrbomdaW5cgOINggUKtSDWOLp9TTe-_nZA3bEgtxTkWnx3LMiJtvP6zthj8NNYfQ4JT4tMgND6NtWLhYs1hZO8_mrBGmGazBYZm5R_xvr3v_tuv1yWdtiqP5keT6p2lf8B6X6vSw</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Saltelli, Andrea</creator><creator>D'Hombres, Beatrice</creator><creator>Jesinghaus, Jochen</creator><creator>Manca, Anna Rita</creator><creator>Mascherini, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Nardo, Michela</creator><creator>Saisana, Michaela</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual?</title><author>Saltelli, Andrea ; D'Hombres, Beatrice ; Jesinghaus, Jochen ; Manca, Anna Rita ; Mascherini, Massimiliano ; Nardo, Michela ; Saisana, Michaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-26e13629997d2be010d7a44ac90beb7546e397d9d7fcdd1128676628b54f4f7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Problems</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Commission</topic><topic>European policy</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Problems</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Holistic Approach</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political sociology</topic><topic>Political systems, parties and institutions</topic><topic>Portugal</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social Indicators</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociometric Techniques</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Sustainable economies</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>World Bank</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saltelli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hombres, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesinghaus, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manca, Anna Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascherini, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardo, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saisana, Michaela</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saltelli, Andrea</au><au>D'Hombres, Beatrice</au><au>Jesinghaus, Jochen</au><au>Manca, Anna Rita</au><au>Mascherini, Massimiliano</au><au>Nardo, Michela</au><au>Saisana, Michaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ919848</ericid><atitle>Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual?</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>197-207</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><coden>SINRDZ</coden><abstract>This paper looks at the role of statistics-based knowledge in the making of EU policy. We highlight shortcomings in the use of statistical indicators made in the course of the Lisbon strategy, ended in 2010. In our opinion the shortcomings are: (i) The paradox of the coexistence within the same European Commission of two holistic frameworks', the Structural Indicators and the Sustainable Development Indicators. One does not understand which of these two systems is taken to measure the overall policy performance of the European Union, (ii) A communication issue whereby the Lisbon strategy and its offspring EU 2020 are not communicated (Lisbon is to the average citizen the capital of Portugal) and are especially not communicated in relation to existing statistical indicators of good quality, against the opinion of academicians that transparency and accountability based on sound statistics favour democracy and participation. We illustrate the reasons that lead us to see these points as problematic and offer suggestions on how these should be tackled in line with the practices developed in the Open Method of Coordination. The danger is that in the absence of a debate on the issue, these shortcomings be perpetuated in the EU 2020 strategy.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-010-9678-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
| ispartof | Social indicators research, 2011-06, Vol.102 (2), p.197-207 |
| issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902352047 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Accountability Benchmarking Citizen Participation Citizens Communication Communication Problems Competitiveness Coordination Councils Countries Democracy Ecological sustainability Employment Environmental policy Europe European Commission European policy European Union Evaluation Methods Evaluation Problems Foreign Countries Governance Guidelines History, theory and methodology Holistic Approach Human Geography Indicators Knowledge Measurement Methodology Microeconomics Offspring Opinions Policy Analysis Policy making Political communication Political sociology Political systems, parties and institutions Portugal Public Health Public Policy Quality of Life Research Social Indicators Social research Social Sciences Sociology Sociometric Techniques Statistical Data Statistics Studies Sustainable Development Sustainable economies Threat Transparency Treaties World Bank |
| title | Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A44%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indicators%20for%20European%20Union%20Policies.%20Business%20as%20Usual?&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Saltelli,%20Andrea&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=197-207&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft.coden=SINRDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-010-9678-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41476477%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858934163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ919848&rft_jstor_id=41476477&rfr_iscdi=true |