Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks

Recent research has shown that many mutualistic communities display non-random structures. While our understanding of the structural properties of mutualistic communities continues to improve, we know little of the biological variables resulting in them. Mutualistic communities include those formed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2010-11, Vol.164 (3), p.741-750
Hauptverfasser: Chamberlain, Scott A, Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R, Holland, J. Nathaniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 750
container_issue 3
container_start_page 741
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 164
creator Chamberlain, Scott A
Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R
Holland, J. Nathaniel
description Recent research has shown that many mutualistic communities display non-random structures. While our understanding of the structural properties of mutualistic communities continues to improve, we know little of the biological variables resulting in them. Mutualistic communities include those formed between ants and extrafloral (EF) nectar-bearing plants. In this study, we examined the contributions of plant and ant abundance, plant and ant size, and plant EF nectar resources to the network structures of nestedness and interaction frequency of ant-plant networks across five sites within one geographic locality in the Sonoran Desert. Interactions between ant and plant species were largely symmetric. That is, ant and plant species exerted nearly equivalent quantitative interaction effects on one another, as measured by their frequency of interaction. The mutualistic ant-plant networks also showed nested patterns of structure, in which there was a central core of generalist ant and plant species interacting with one another and few specialist-specialist interactions. Abundance and plant size and ant body size were the best predictors of symmetric interactions between plants and ants, as well as nestedness. Despite interactions in these communities being ultimately mediated by EF nectar resources, the number of EF nectaries had a relatively weak ability to explain variation in symmetric interactions and nestedness. These results suggest that different mechanisms may contribute to structure of bipartite networks. Moreover, our results for ant-plant mutualistic networks support the general importance of species abundances for the structure of species interactions within biological communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-010-1673-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902351217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A355308092</galeid><jstor_id>40926693</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A355308092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-d45fa6e386c95f40107d0a7b1315d3720764539cd7728c25faee05d0d17d197e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4so3nr6AXyhBkVEsOfkqdm8PM6ngwPB816HbJKuXbvNmqTo-c5v7qxd71gRpdCSzG9m-p_5V9V9CkcUQL3MAEKwGijUtFG8bm5UMyo4q6nm-mY1A2C6nkuhD6o7Oa8AqKBS3q4OGEjWqDnMqh-vIgnfSrJtH5PtyRBcsYmkkOOYXMgvSN4E14VM7GIcvB1-3dnBk0X0lyR33zHk4lBStxhLICWS8imQXNLoypgCiS3Spd70-CbrsYy273LpHHYqX2P6nO9Wt1rb53Bv9z2sLt68_njyrj57__b05PisdlLpUnshW9sEPm-clq1AzcqDVQvKqfRcMVCNkFw7rxSbO4ZwCCA9eKo81Srww-rZVHeT4pcx5GLWXXahxx8LccxGA-OSMqr-SyqpsavgDZKP_yBXOLYBZZg5iAagUQKhJxO0tH0w3dBGHLfbljTHXEoOc9AMqaO_UPj4sO5wwKHt8H4v4flewnYJuMmlHXM2p-cf9lk6sS7FnFNozSZ1a5suDQWztZKZrGRge0Yrma22hztt42Id_FXGb-8g8HQH2Oxs3yY0R5evOc6l4pwixyYuY2hYhnQ9pH91fzAlrXKJ6aqoQDVNoznGH03x1kZjlwkbX5wzoBwoLhIk5z8BDrHxWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>804600674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Chamberlain, Scott A ; Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R ; Holland, J. Nathaniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Scott A ; Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R ; Holland, J. Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has shown that many mutualistic communities display non-random structures. While our understanding of the structural properties of mutualistic communities continues to improve, we know little of the biological variables resulting in them. Mutualistic communities include those formed between ants and extrafloral (EF) nectar-bearing plants. In this study, we examined the contributions of plant and ant abundance, plant and ant size, and plant EF nectar resources to the network structures of nestedness and interaction frequency of ant-plant networks across five sites within one geographic locality in the Sonoran Desert. Interactions between ant and plant species were largely symmetric. That is, ant and plant species exerted nearly equivalent quantitative interaction effects on one another, as measured by their frequency of interaction. The mutualistic ant-plant networks also showed nested patterns of structure, in which there was a central core of generalist ant and plant species interacting with one another and few specialist-specialist interactions. Abundance and plant size and ant body size were the best predictors of symmetric interactions between plants and ants, as well as nestedness. Despite interactions in these communities being ultimately mediated by EF nectar resources, the number of EF nectaries had a relatively weak ability to explain variation in symmetric interactions and nestedness. These results suggest that different mechanisms may contribute to structure of bipartite networks. Moreover, our results for ant-plant mutualistic networks support the general importance of species abundances for the structure of species interactions within biological communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1673-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20526780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ant-plant interaction ; Ants ; Ants - anatomy &amp; histology ; Ants - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body Size ; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER ; Community structure ; Correlation coefficients ; Deserts ; Ecological network ; Ecology ; Formicidae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Insect nests ; Interaction frequency ; Life Sciences ; Nectar ; Nectaries ; Nestedness ; Plant communities ; Plant Development ; Plant Nectar ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Plants ; Plants - anatomy &amp; histology ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; Species</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2010-11, Vol.164 (3), p.741-750</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-d45fa6e386c95f40107d0a7b1315d3720764539cd7728c25faee05d0d17d197e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-d45fa6e386c95f40107d0a7b1315d3720764539cd7728c25faee05d0d17d197e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40926693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40926693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23357331$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20526780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, J. Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><title>Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Recent research has shown that many mutualistic communities display non-random structures. While our understanding of the structural properties of mutualistic communities continues to improve, we know little of the biological variables resulting in them. Mutualistic communities include those formed between ants and extrafloral (EF) nectar-bearing plants. In this study, we examined the contributions of plant and ant abundance, plant and ant size, and plant EF nectar resources to the network structures of nestedness and interaction frequency of ant-plant networks across five sites within one geographic locality in the Sonoran Desert. Interactions between ant and plant species were largely symmetric. That is, ant and plant species exerted nearly equivalent quantitative interaction effects on one another, as measured by their frequency of interaction. The mutualistic ant-plant networks also showed nested patterns of structure, in which there was a central core of generalist ant and plant species interacting with one another and few specialist-specialist interactions. Abundance and plant size and ant body size were the best predictors of symmetric interactions between plants and ants, as well as nestedness. Despite interactions in these communities being ultimately mediated by EF nectar resources, the number of EF nectaries had a relatively weak ability to explain variation in symmetric interactions and nestedness. These results suggest that different mechanisms may contribute to structure of bipartite networks. Moreover, our results for ant-plant mutualistic networks support the general importance of species abundances for the structure of species interactions within biological communities.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ant-plant interaction</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Ants - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Ants - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Ecological network</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Insect nests</subject><subject>Interaction frequency</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Nectaries</subject><subject>Nestedness</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Plant Nectar</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkm2L1DAQx4so3nr6AXyhBkVEsOfkqdm8PM6ngwPB816HbJKuXbvNmqTo-c5v7qxd71gRpdCSzG9m-p_5V9V9CkcUQL3MAEKwGijUtFG8bm5UMyo4q6nm-mY1A2C6nkuhD6o7Oa8AqKBS3q4OGEjWqDnMqh-vIgnfSrJtH5PtyRBcsYmkkOOYXMgvSN4E14VM7GIcvB1-3dnBk0X0lyR33zHk4lBStxhLICWS8imQXNLoypgCiS3Spd70-CbrsYy273LpHHYqX2P6nO9Wt1rb53Bv9z2sLt68_njyrj57__b05PisdlLpUnshW9sEPm-clq1AzcqDVQvKqfRcMVCNkFw7rxSbO4ZwCCA9eKo81Srww-rZVHeT4pcx5GLWXXahxx8LccxGA-OSMqr-SyqpsavgDZKP_yBXOLYBZZg5iAagUQKhJxO0tH0w3dBGHLfbljTHXEoOc9AMqaO_UPj4sO5wwKHt8H4v4flewnYJuMmlHXM2p-cf9lk6sS7FnFNozSZ1a5suDQWztZKZrGRge0Yrma22hztt42Id_FXGb-8g8HQH2Oxs3yY0R5evOc6l4pwixyYuY2hYhnQ9pH91fzAlrXKJ6aqoQDVNoznGH03x1kZjlwkbX5wzoBwoLhIk5z8BDrHxWA</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Chamberlain, Scott A</creator><creator>Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Holland, J. Nathaniel</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks</title><author>Chamberlain, Scott A ; Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R ; Holland, J. Nathaniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-d45fa6e386c95f40107d0a7b1315d3720764539cd7728c25faee05d0d17d197e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ant-plant interaction</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Ants - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Ants - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Ecological network</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Insect nests</topic><topic>Interaction frequency</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Nectaries</topic><topic>Nestedness</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Plant Nectar</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, J. Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chamberlain, Scott A</au><au>Kilpatrick, Jeffrey R</au><au>Holland, J. Nathaniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>741-750</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>Recent research has shown that many mutualistic communities display non-random structures. While our understanding of the structural properties of mutualistic communities continues to improve, we know little of the biological variables resulting in them. Mutualistic communities include those formed between ants and extrafloral (EF) nectar-bearing plants. In this study, we examined the contributions of plant and ant abundance, plant and ant size, and plant EF nectar resources to the network structures of nestedness and interaction frequency of ant-plant networks across five sites within one geographic locality in the Sonoran Desert. Interactions between ant and plant species were largely symmetric. That is, ant and plant species exerted nearly equivalent quantitative interaction effects on one another, as measured by their frequency of interaction. The mutualistic ant-plant networks also showed nested patterns of structure, in which there was a central core of generalist ant and plant species interacting with one another and few specialist-specialist interactions. Abundance and plant size and ant body size were the best predictors of symmetric interactions between plants and ants, as well as nestedness. Despite interactions in these communities being ultimately mediated by EF nectar resources, the number of EF nectaries had a relatively weak ability to explain variation in symmetric interactions and nestedness. These results suggest that different mechanisms may contribute to structure of bipartite networks. Moreover, our results for ant-plant mutualistic networks support the general importance of species abundances for the structure of species interactions within biological communities.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20526780</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-010-1673-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2010-11, Vol.164 (3), p.741-750
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902351217
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Abundance
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Ant-plant interaction
Ants
Ants - anatomy & histology
Ants - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body Size
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER
Community structure
Correlation coefficients
Deserts
Ecological network
Ecology
Formicidae
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Hydrology/Water Resources
Insect nests
Interaction frequency
Life Sciences
Nectar
Nectaries
Nestedness
Plant communities
Plant Development
Plant Nectar
Plant Sciences
Plant species
Plants
Plants - anatomy & histology
Population Density
Population Dynamics
Species
title Do extrafloral nectar resources, species abundances, and body sizes contribute to the structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20extrafloral%20nectar%20resources,%20species%20abundances,%20and%20body%20sizes%20contribute%20to%20the%20structure%20of%20ant-plant%20mutualistic%20networks&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Chamberlain,%20Scott%20A&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=741-750&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-010-1673-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA355308092%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=804600674&rft_id=info:pmid/20526780&rft_galeid=A355308092&rft_jstor_id=40926693&rfr_iscdi=true