Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation
Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B–related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Liver transplantation 2007-03, Vol.13 (3), p.367-373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Liver transplantation |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Rosenau, Jens Hooman, Nazanin Hadem, Johannes Rifai, Kinan Bahr, Matthias J. Philipp, Gunnar Tillmann, Hans L. Klempnauer, Juergen Strassburg, Christian P. Manns, Michael P. |
description | Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B–related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty‐four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 μg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti‐HBs‐antigen (anti‐HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti‐HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti‐HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti‐HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow‐up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates. Liver Transpl 13: 367–373, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lt.21003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902340230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70236367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3853-4317be883eb3dd2582da599d74676fd95750714f675af73710ac609b5a70f8e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9OwyAUxonROJ0mPoHhSr3phFJKe7kt7k-yxJt53bAWHIbRWujmnsGXlq3NvNILDufk_Pj4kg-AO4wGGKHwWbtB6BtyBq4wDVkQR4ycn_qY9sC1tR8IYUxTdAl6mBGcJDS9At8TrnRTC1hKuBYVd8opC0dwy_NcGT-WBu6UW8O8NFthDjPXcDayw_eOEVAZeHjot_bEOmWasrGenE9hVZfVeq_5l5fm0okaarX11dXc2Epz444f3YALybUVt93dB2-Tl-V4Fixep_PxcBHkJKEkiAhmK5EkRKxIUYQ0CQtO07RgUcxiWaSUUcRwJGNGuWSEYcTzGKUryhmSiQhJHzy2ut7XZyOsyzbK5kJ7I8J7zlIUksgf5MmHf0nmqZjEzINPLZjXpbW1kFlVqw2v9xlG2SGiTLvsGJFH7zvNZrURxS_YZeKBoAV2Sov9n0LZYtkK_gDpkptz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70236367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rosenau, Jens ; Hooman, Nazanin ; Hadem, Johannes ; Rifai, Kinan ; Bahr, Matthias J. ; Philipp, Gunnar ; Tillmann, Hans L. ; Klempnauer, Juergen ; Strassburg, Christian P. ; Manns, Michael P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosenau, Jens ; Hooman, Nazanin ; Hadem, Johannes ; Rifai, Kinan ; Bahr, Matthias J. ; Philipp, Gunnar ; Tillmann, Hans L. ; Klempnauer, Juergen ; Strassburg, Christian P. ; Manns, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B–related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty‐four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 μg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti‐HBs‐antigen (anti‐HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti‐HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti‐HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti‐HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow‐up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates. Liver Transpl 13: 367–373, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-6465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-6473</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lt.21003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17318859</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adjuvants ; Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antigen-Antibody Complex - metabolism ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Hepatitis B - drug therapy ; Hepatitis B - prevention & control ; Hepatitis B surface antigen ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - therapeutic use ; Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immune response (humoral) ; Immunization, Secondary - methods ; Immunoglobulins ; Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use ; Intravenous administration ; Liver ; Liver diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prophylaxis ; Treatment Outcome ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Liver transplantation, 2007-03, Vol.13 (3), p.367-373</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</rights><rights>(c) 2007 AASLD.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3853-4317be883eb3dd2582da599d74676fd95750714f675af73710ac609b5a70f8e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3853-4317be883eb3dd2582da599d74676fd95750714f675af73710ac609b5a70f8e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flt.21003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flt.21003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17318859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosenau, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooman, Nazanin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadem, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifai, Kinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahr, Matthias J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillmann, Hans L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strassburg, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><title>Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation</title><title>Liver transplantation</title><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><description>Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B–related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty‐four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 μg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti‐HBs‐antigen (anti‐HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti‐HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti‐HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti‐HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow‐up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates. Liver Transpl 13: 367–373, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.</description><subject>Adjuvants</subject><subject>Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antigen-Antibody Complex - metabolism</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - prevention & control</subject><subject>Hepatitis B surface antigen</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune response (humoral)</subject><subject>Immunization, Secondary - methods</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1527-6465</issn><issn>1527-6473</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9OwyAUxonROJ0mPoHhSr3phFJKe7kt7k-yxJt53bAWHIbRWujmnsGXlq3NvNILDufk_Pj4kg-AO4wGGKHwWbtB6BtyBq4wDVkQR4ycn_qY9sC1tR8IYUxTdAl6mBGcJDS9At8TrnRTC1hKuBYVd8opC0dwy_NcGT-WBu6UW8O8NFthDjPXcDayw_eOEVAZeHjot_bEOmWasrGenE9hVZfVeq_5l5fm0okaarX11dXc2Epz444f3YALybUVt93dB2-Tl-V4Fixep_PxcBHkJKEkiAhmK5EkRKxIUYQ0CQtO07RgUcxiWaSUUcRwJGNGuWSEYcTzGKUryhmSiQhJHzy2ut7XZyOsyzbK5kJ7I8J7zlIUksgf5MmHf0nmqZjEzINPLZjXpbW1kFlVqw2v9xlG2SGiTLvsGJFH7zvNZrURxS_YZeKBoAV2Sov9n0LZYtkK_gDpkptz</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Rosenau, Jens</creator><creator>Hooman, Nazanin</creator><creator>Hadem, Johannes</creator><creator>Rifai, Kinan</creator><creator>Bahr, Matthias J.</creator><creator>Philipp, Gunnar</creator><creator>Tillmann, Hans L.</creator><creator>Klempnauer, Juergen</creator><creator>Strassburg, Christian P.</creator><creator>Manns, Michael P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation</title><author>Rosenau, Jens ; Hooman, Nazanin ; Hadem, Johannes ; Rifai, Kinan ; Bahr, Matthias J. ; Philipp, Gunnar ; Tillmann, Hans L. ; Klempnauer, Juergen ; Strassburg, Christian P. ; Manns, Michael P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3853-4317be883eb3dd2582da599d74676fd95750714f675af73710ac609b5a70f8e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adjuvants</topic><topic>Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antigen-Antibody Complex - metabolism</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - prevention & control</topic><topic>Hepatitis B surface antigen</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune response (humoral)</topic><topic>Immunization, Secondary - methods</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosenau, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooman, Nazanin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadem, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifai, Kinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahr, Matthias J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillmann, Hans L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klempnauer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strassburg, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manns, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosenau, Jens</au><au>Hooman, Nazanin</au><au>Hadem, Johannes</au><au>Rifai, Kinan</au><au>Bahr, Matthias J.</au><au>Philipp, Gunnar</au><au>Tillmann, Hans L.</au><au>Klempnauer, Juergen</au><au>Strassburg, Christian P.</au><au>Manns, Michael P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>367-373</pages><issn>1527-6465</issn><eissn>1527-6473</eissn><abstract>Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B–related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty‐four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 μg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti‐HBs‐antigen (anti‐HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti‐HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti‐HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti‐HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow‐up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates. Liver Transpl 13: 367–373, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>17318859</pmid><doi>10.1002/lt.21003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-6465 |
ispartof | Liver transplantation, 2007-03, Vol.13 (3), p.367-373 |
issn | 1527-6465 1527-6473 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902340230 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adjuvants Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use Adolescent Adult Aged Antigen-Antibody Complex - metabolism Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug Therapy, Combination Female Hepatitis B - drug therapy Hepatitis B - prevention & control Hepatitis B surface antigen Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - therapeutic use Hepatitis B Vaccines - therapeutic use Humans Immune response (humoral) Immunization, Secondary - methods Immunoglobulins Immunoglobulins - therapeutic use Intravenous administration Liver Liver diseases Liver transplantation Liver Transplantation - adverse effects Male Middle Aged Prophylaxis Treatment Outcome Vaccination Vaccines |
title | Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A18%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20of%20hepatitis%20B%20vaccination%20with%20conventional%20HBsAg%20vaccine%20in%20patients%20with%20continuous%20HBIG%20prophylaxis%20after%20liver%20transplantation&rft.jtitle=Liver%20transplantation&rft.au=Rosenau,%20Jens&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=367-373&rft.issn=1527-6465&rft.eissn=1527-6473&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lt.21003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70236367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70236367&rft_id=info:pmid/17318859&rfr_iscdi=true |