Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate

Purpose To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design Retrospective interventional case series. Participants Sixty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2011-11, Vol.118 (11), p.2155-2160
Hauptverfasser: Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED, Price, Marianne O., PhD, Price, Francis W., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2160
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2155
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 118
creator Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED
Price, Marianne O., PhD
Price, Francis W., MD
description Purpose To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design Retrospective interventional case series. Participants Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were ∼1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17–95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2–3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range −0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively ( P =0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae ( P =0.14), neovascularization ( P =0.88), endothelial rejection ( P =0.59), and number of prior PKs ( P =0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902339258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0161642011004192</els_id><sourcerecordid>902339258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-23e1e024ca559d732cbbde291183a927560a3c558721ffd1bd40fe2c2d415c8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhHyDkC-opwWM7XxyQUGkLohKIpVwtx56wXrJOsJ2V9sovx9EuH-LCyQc_74zn8WTZU6AFUKhebItx2sSNKhgFKKgoKGf3shWUos1FDfx-tkoY5JVg9Cx7FMKWUlpVXDzMzhi0tGqgWmU_3mDQuMN4Ecg6ejtN1n0lV86McYODVQN5j17FcRpUiAdy5wx6cq3sgIZ8RIcxXS6Jv6mX5IsNc4p-wo3q7GBjYkZHlDPkxqs-kvXs93a_ECri4-xBr4aAT07neXZ3ffX58m1---Hm3eXr21yXwGLOOAJSJrQqy9bUnOmuM8hagIarltVlRRXXZdnUDPreQGcE7ZFpZgSUutH8PLs41p38-H3GEOXOptmHQTkc5yBbyjhvWdkkUhxJ7ccQPPZy8nan_EEClYt8uZVH-XKRL6mQSX6KPTs1mLsdmt-hX7YT8PwEqKDV0HvltA1_OFGzNn1f4l4dOUw69ha9DNqi02isRx2lGe3_XvJvAT1YZ1PPb3jAsB1n75JqCTIwSeV6WZRlTwAoFdAy_hO-Hbss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902339258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED ; Price, Marianne O., PhD ; Price, Francis W., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED ; Price, Marianne O., PhD ; Price, Francis W., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design Retrospective interventional case series. Participants Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were ∼1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17–95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2–3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range −0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively ( P =0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae ( P =0.14), neovascularization ( P =0.88), endothelial rejection ( P =0.59), and number of prior PKs ( P =0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21906816</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OPHTDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss - diagnosis ; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty ; Female ; Graft Survival - physiology ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Keratoplasty, Penetrating ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Failure ; Vision Disorders - rehabilitation ; Visual Acuity - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2011-11, Vol.118 (11), p.2155-2160</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-23e1e024ca559d732cbbde291183a927560a3c558721ffd1bd40fe2c2d415c8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-23e1e024ca559d732cbbde291183a927560a3c558721ffd1bd40fe2c2d415c8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24729549$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design Retrospective interventional case series. Participants Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were ∼1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17–95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2–3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range −0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively ( P =0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae ( P =0.14), neovascularization ( P =0.88), endothelial rejection ( P =0.59), and number of prior PKs ( P =0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss - diagnosis</subject><subject>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Keratoplasty, Penetrating</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhHyDkC-opwWM7XxyQUGkLohKIpVwtx56wXrJOsJ2V9sovx9EuH-LCyQc_74zn8WTZU6AFUKhebItx2sSNKhgFKKgoKGf3shWUos1FDfx-tkoY5JVg9Cx7FMKWUlpVXDzMzhi0tGqgWmU_3mDQuMN4Ecg6ejtN1n0lV86McYODVQN5j17FcRpUiAdy5wx6cq3sgIZ8RIcxXS6Jv6mX5IsNc4p-wo3q7GBjYkZHlDPkxqs-kvXs93a_ECri4-xBr4aAT07neXZ3ffX58m1---Hm3eXr21yXwGLOOAJSJrQqy9bUnOmuM8hagIarltVlRRXXZdnUDPreQGcE7ZFpZgSUutH8PLs41p38-H3GEOXOptmHQTkc5yBbyjhvWdkkUhxJ7ccQPPZy8nan_EEClYt8uZVH-XKRL6mQSX6KPTs1mLsdmt-hX7YT8PwEqKDV0HvltA1_OFGzNn1f4l4dOUw69ha9DNqi02isRx2lGe3_XvJvAT1YZ1PPb3jAsB1n75JqCTIwSeV6WZRlTwAoFdAy_hO-Hbss</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED</creator><creator>Price, Marianne O., PhD</creator><creator>Price, Francis W., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate</title><author>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED ; Price, Marianne O., PhD ; Price, Francis W., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-23e1e024ca559d732cbbde291183a927560a3c558721ffd1bd40fe2c2d415c8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss - diagnosis</topic><topic>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Keratoplasty, Penetrating</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Marianne O., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Francis W., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anshu, Arundhati, FRCSED</au><au>Price, Marianne O., PhD</au><au>Price, Francis W., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2155</spage><epage>2160</epage><pages>2155-2160</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><coden>OPHTDG</coden><abstract>Purpose To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design Retrospective interventional case series. Participants Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were ∼1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17–95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2–3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range −0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively ( P =0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae ( P =0.14), neovascularization ( P =0.88), endothelial rejection ( P =0.59), and number of prior PKs ( P =0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21906816</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2011-11, Vol.118 (11), p.2155-2160
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902339258
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Corneal Diseases - surgery
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss - diagnosis
Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
Female
Graft Survival - physiology
Humans
Intraoperative Complications
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Keratoplasty, Penetrating
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ophthalmology
Postoperative Complications
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Failure
Vision Disorders - rehabilitation
Visual Acuity - physiology
Young Adult
title Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Descemet's%20Stripping%20Endothelial%20Keratoplasty%20Under%20Failed%20Penetrating%20Keratoplasty:%20Visual%20Rehabilitation%20and%20Graft%20Survival%20Rate&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Anshu,%20Arundhati,%20FRCSED&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2155&rft.epage=2160&rft.pages=2155-2160&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.coden=OPHTDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902339258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902339258&rft_id=info:pmid/21906816&rft_els_id=S0161642011004192&rfr_iscdi=true