Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators

The indirect, behavioral effects of predation and predator-predator interactions can significantly alter the trophic ecology of many communities. In numerous instances, the strength of these effects may be determined by the ability of prey to identify predation risk through predator-specific cues an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2010-04, Vol.162 (4), p.893-902
Hauptverfasser: Martin, Charles W, Fodrie, F. Joel, Heck, Kenneth L. Jr, Mattila, Johanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 902
container_issue 4
container_start_page 893
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 162
creator Martin, Charles W
Fodrie, F. Joel
Heck, Kenneth L. Jr
Mattila, Johanna
description The indirect, behavioral effects of predation and predator-predator interactions can significantly alter the trophic ecology of many communities. In numerous instances, the strength of these effects may be determined by the ability of prey to identify predation risk through predator-specific cues and respond accordingly to avoid capture. We exposed juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus), a common forage fish in many brackish and freshwater environments, to vision and/or olfactory cues from two predators with different hunting methods: northern pike (Esox lucius, an ambush predator) and European perch (Perca fluviatilis, a roving predator). Our results demonstrated that responses of roach to perceived risk (as evidenced by their selection of structured or open-water habitats) were highly dependent on cue type and predator identity. For instance, roach responded to olfactory cues of pike by entering open-water habitat, but entered structured habitat when presented with a vision cue of this predator. Opposite responses were elicited from roach for both olfactory and visual cues of perch. Interestingly, roach defaulted to selection of structured habitat when presented with vision + olfaction cues of either predator. Moreover, when presented individual cues of both predators together, roach responded by choosing open-water habitat. Upon being presented with vision + olfaction cues of both predators, however, roach strongly favored structured habitat. Differences in habitat selection of roach were likely in response to the alternative foraging strategies of the two predators, and suggest that prey species may not always use structured habitats as protection. This appears particularly true when a threat is perceived, but cannot immediately be located. These results provide insight to the complex and variable nature by which prey respond to various cues and predators, and offer a mechanistic guide for how behaviorally mediated and predator-predator interactions act as structuring processes in aquatic systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-010-1564-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902334291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A355467308</galeid><jstor_id>40606620</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A355467308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-43e3efc09e1fca48035ee87bdd66e0f81f5b15bc5294b34a41abeae09e54b9573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFwAEQhBL1LGpyS-rMqpUiWkll5bjne8zSobL3ZSbZ-Bl2aWbAuLEMiyLGu-_x8f_ix7yuCIAVTvEoCUvAAGBVOlLNb3sn0mBS-YFvp-tg_AdVErqfeyRyktAJhkSj3M9jgwXomy2s--v2-9x4j90Nouv7JNO9ghHxPmtp_RHNpVxJkdQswjplXoqRJ8vhivsW87zGOw7ip_ez4ObTemPE7rYT6EPHTeOhLe_LS6btNIHdyIKfcxLPPl2JE5Wdw2SI-zB952CZ9s14Ps8uOHryefi7Mvn05Pjs8Kpyo9FFKgQO9AI_POyhqEQqyrZjYrSwRfM68aphqnuJaNkFYy26BF4pVstKrEQfZm8l3F8I3OM5hlmxx2ne0xjMlo4EJIrtl_yYo44PQVRL78g1yEMfZ0DcO05iUvQRP0aoLmtkPT9j4M0bqNpTkWSsmyElATdfQXisYMl60LPXp6-F3B4Y6AmAHXw9yOKZnTi_Ndlk2siyGliN6sYru08cYwMJtQmSlUBjZ7CpVZk-b59m5js8TZneI2RQS83gI2Odv5aHvXpl8cVwoqJYjjE5eo1M8x_vZI_-j-bBItEoXkzlRCCWXJgeovprq3wdh5pMaXF3Q0AaxmFdmJHzCz9yE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199262609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Martin, Charles W ; Fodrie, F. Joel ; Heck, Kenneth L. Jr ; Mattila, Johanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Martin, Charles W ; Fodrie, F. Joel ; Heck, Kenneth L. Jr ; Mattila, Johanna</creatorcontrib><description>The indirect, behavioral effects of predation and predator-predator interactions can significantly alter the trophic ecology of many communities. In numerous instances, the strength of these effects may be determined by the ability of prey to identify predation risk through predator-specific cues and respond accordingly to avoid capture. We exposed juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus), a common forage fish in many brackish and freshwater environments, to vision and/or olfactory cues from two predators with different hunting methods: northern pike (Esox lucius, an ambush predator) and European perch (Perca fluviatilis, a roving predator). Our results demonstrated that responses of roach to perceived risk (as evidenced by their selection of structured or open-water habitats) were highly dependent on cue type and predator identity. For instance, roach responded to olfactory cues of pike by entering open-water habitat, but entered structured habitat when presented with a vision cue of this predator. Opposite responses were elicited from roach for both olfactory and visual cues of perch. Interestingly, roach defaulted to selection of structured habitat when presented with vision + olfaction cues of either predator. Moreover, when presented individual cues of both predators together, roach responded by choosing open-water habitat. Upon being presented with vision + olfaction cues of both predators, however, roach strongly favored structured habitat. Differences in habitat selection of roach were likely in response to the alternative foraging strategies of the two predators, and suggest that prey species may not always use structured habitats as protection. This appears particularly true when a threat is perceived, but cannot immediately be located. These results provide insight to the complex and variable nature by which prey respond to various cues and predators, and offer a mechanistic guide for how behaviorally mediated and predator-predator interactions act as structuring processes in aquatic systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1564-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20127367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aquatic environment ; Aquatic habitats ; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cues ; Cyprinidae - physiology ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Esox lucius ; Experimentation ; Finland ; Fish ; Food Chain ; Foraging ; Fresh Water ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater environments ; Freshwater fish ; Freshwater fishes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Habitat preferences ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Odorants - analysis ; Olfaction ; Olfactory perception ; Perca fluviatilis ; Photic Stimulation ; Plant Sciences ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior - physiology ; Prey ; Rutilus rutilus ; Synecology ; Time Factors ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2010-04, Vol.162 (4), p.893-902</ispartof><rights>2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-43e3efc09e1fca48035ee87bdd66e0f81f5b15bc5294b34a41abeae09e54b9573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-43e3efc09e1fca48035ee87bdd66e0f81f5b15bc5294b34a41abeae09e54b9573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40606620$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40606620$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22550753$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20127367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martin, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fodrie, F. Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Kenneth L. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Johanna</creatorcontrib><title>Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>The indirect, behavioral effects of predation and predator-predator interactions can significantly alter the trophic ecology of many communities. In numerous instances, the strength of these effects may be determined by the ability of prey to identify predation risk through predator-specific cues and respond accordingly to avoid capture. We exposed juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus), a common forage fish in many brackish and freshwater environments, to vision and/or olfactory cues from two predators with different hunting methods: northern pike (Esox lucius, an ambush predator) and European perch (Perca fluviatilis, a roving predator). Our results demonstrated that responses of roach to perceived risk (as evidenced by their selection of structured or open-water habitats) were highly dependent on cue type and predator identity. For instance, roach responded to olfactory cues of pike by entering open-water habitat, but entered structured habitat when presented with a vision cue of this predator. Opposite responses were elicited from roach for both olfactory and visual cues of perch. Interestingly, roach defaulted to selection of structured habitat when presented with vision + olfaction cues of either predator. Moreover, when presented individual cues of both predators together, roach responded by choosing open-water habitat. Upon being presented with vision + olfaction cues of both predators, however, roach strongly favored structured habitat. Differences in habitat selection of roach were likely in response to the alternative foraging strategies of the two predators, and suggest that prey species may not always use structured habitats as protection. This appears particularly true when a threat is perceived, but cannot immediately be located. These results provide insight to the complex and variable nature by which prey respond to various cues and predators, and offer a mechanistic guide for how behaviorally mediated and predator-predator interactions act as structuring processes in aquatic systems.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Cyprinidae - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Esox lucius</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater environments</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Odorants - analysis</subject><subject>Olfaction</subject><subject>Olfactory perception</subject><subject>Perca fluviatilis</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Rutilus rutilus</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFwAEQhBL1LGpyS-rMqpUiWkll5bjne8zSobL3ZSbZ-Bl2aWbAuLEMiyLGu-_x8f_ix7yuCIAVTvEoCUvAAGBVOlLNb3sn0mBS-YFvp-tg_AdVErqfeyRyktAJhkSj3M9jgwXomy2s--v2-9x4j90Nouv7JNO9ghHxPmtp_RHNpVxJkdQswjplXoqRJ8vhivsW87zGOw7ip_ez4ObTemPE7rYT6EPHTeOhLe_LS6btNIHdyIKfcxLPPl2JE5Wdw2SI-zB952CZ9s14Ps8uOHryefi7Mvn05Pjs8Kpyo9FFKgQO9AI_POyhqEQqyrZjYrSwRfM68aphqnuJaNkFYy26BF4pVstKrEQfZm8l3F8I3OM5hlmxx2ne0xjMlo4EJIrtl_yYo44PQVRL78g1yEMfZ0DcO05iUvQRP0aoLmtkPT9j4M0bqNpTkWSsmyElATdfQXisYMl60LPXp6-F3B4Y6AmAHXw9yOKZnTi_Ndlk2siyGliN6sYru08cYwMJtQmSlUBjZ7CpVZk-b59m5js8TZneI2RQS83gI2Odv5aHvXpl8cVwoqJYjjE5eo1M8x_vZI_-j-bBItEoXkzlRCCWXJgeovprq3wdh5pMaXF3Q0AaxmFdmJHzCz9yE</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Martin, Charles W</creator><creator>Fodrie, F. Joel</creator><creator>Heck, Kenneth L. Jr</creator><creator>Mattila, Johanna</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators</title><author>Martin, Charles W ; Fodrie, F. Joel ; Heck, Kenneth L. Jr ; Mattila, Johanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-43e3efc09e1fca48035ee87bdd66e0f81f5b15bc5294b34a41abeae09e54b9573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Cyprinidae - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Esox lucius</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater environments</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Odorants - analysis</topic><topic>Olfaction</topic><topic>Olfactory perception</topic><topic>Perca fluviatilis</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Rutilus rutilus</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martin, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fodrie, F. Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heck, Kenneth L. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Johanna</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martin, Charles W</au><au>Fodrie, F. Joel</au><au>Heck, Kenneth L. Jr</au><au>Mattila, Johanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>893</spage><epage>902</epage><pages>893-902</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>The indirect, behavioral effects of predation and predator-predator interactions can significantly alter the trophic ecology of many communities. In numerous instances, the strength of these effects may be determined by the ability of prey to identify predation risk through predator-specific cues and respond accordingly to avoid capture. We exposed juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus), a common forage fish in many brackish and freshwater environments, to vision and/or olfactory cues from two predators with different hunting methods: northern pike (Esox lucius, an ambush predator) and European perch (Perca fluviatilis, a roving predator). Our results demonstrated that responses of roach to perceived risk (as evidenced by their selection of structured or open-water habitats) were highly dependent on cue type and predator identity. For instance, roach responded to olfactory cues of pike by entering open-water habitat, but entered structured habitat when presented with a vision cue of this predator. Opposite responses were elicited from roach for both olfactory and visual cues of perch. Interestingly, roach defaulted to selection of structured habitat when presented with vision + olfaction cues of either predator. Moreover, when presented individual cues of both predators together, roach responded by choosing open-water habitat. Upon being presented with vision + olfaction cues of both predators, however, roach strongly favored structured habitat. Differences in habitat selection of roach were likely in response to the alternative foraging strategies of the two predators, and suggest that prey species may not always use structured habitats as protection. This appears particularly true when a threat is perceived, but cannot immediately be located. These results provide insight to the complex and variable nature by which prey respond to various cues and predators, and offer a mechanistic guide for how behaviorally mediated and predator-predator interactions act as structuring processes in aquatic systems.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20127367</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-010-1564-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2010-04, Vol.162 (4), p.893-902
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902334291
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aquatic environment
Aquatic habitats
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cues
Cyprinidae - physiology
Ecology
Ecosystem
Esox lucius
Experimentation
Finland
Fish
Food Chain
Foraging
Fresh Water
Fresh water ecosystems
Freshwater environments
Freshwater fish
Freshwater fishes
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Habitat preferences
Habitat selection
Habitat utilization
Habitats
Hydrology/Water Resources
Life Sciences
Odorants - analysis
Olfaction
Olfactory perception
Perca fluviatilis
Photic Stimulation
Plant Sciences
Predators
Predatory Behavior - physiology
Prey
Rutilus rutilus
Synecology
Time Factors
Wildlife habitats
title Differential habitat use and antipredator response of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) to olfactory and visual cues from multiple predators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T23%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20habitat%20use%20and%20antipredator%20response%20of%20juvenile%20roach%20(Rutilus%20rutilus)%20to%20olfactory%20and%20visual%20cues%20from%20multiple%20predators&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Martin,%20Charles%20W&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=893&rft.epage=902&rft.pages=893-902&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-010-1564-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA355467308%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199262609&rft_id=info:pmid/20127367&rft_galeid=A355467308&rft_jstor_id=40606620&rfr_iscdi=true