Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis
Background Bone staples made of a nickel titanium alloy exert dynamic compression, require little dissection, and may provide an alternative to conventional fixation in mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft. Methods To evaluate its stability relative to conventional methods...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2001-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Head & neck |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Strackee, Simon D. Kroon, Frans H. M. Bos, Kurt E. |
| description | Background
Bone staples made of a nickel titanium alloy exert dynamic compression, require little dissection, and may provide an alternative to conventional fixation in mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft.
Methods
To evaluate its stability relative to conventional methods of fixation with interosseous wires or miniplates, an in vitro model using beech dowels was developed. Torsional stiffness and strength and compression stiffness and strength were examined.
Results
The compression test results showed that maximum strength of interosseous wires is significantly less than memory staples, which in turn are significantly weaker than titanium miniplates. Miniplates are significantly the most rigid form of fixation. Torsional testing showed no significant difference in strength between staples and miniplates and only a marginal difference in elasticity. Interosseous wires show a rapid decrease of strength and rigidity during torsional stress.
Conclusion
When considering interosseous wires the least and miniplates the most stable form of fixation by which bone healing can occur, memory staples can provide enough stability to ensure consolidation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 1–7, 2001. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1<1::AID-HED1>3.0.CO;2-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902330929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859344379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-e49057363d190a5b18312f700c5d6f399765350517704b08fc47c9bdf67945bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYqPwCsgSEoyLlOPYjuuCkKps6yYK5QLEpeUkdmdIk2I7sL4LD4vTlnKDJuQL_zmfP1s6vyShGMYYIHuFQfAUCOVnGQAG_DIjU_wGT6ez6_P06uIcvyVjGBfL11ma3UtOj_j9YU1JSoDTk-SR918BgOQ0e5icYIwZQE5Pk1-X9lYF27VorcNNV3tk41K1tS37RjnkdNW1Pri-2kG9t-0KmV0RrZwywU_RDFXdeqNc9PzQyIe-3kZL6FC40VHQ_Dl3ul2FG9SZWHBao9oao-NhQGG70X4odD7ozm_beNNb_zh5YFTj9ZPDPEo-X158Kq7SxXJ-XcwWaUU5x6mmAhgnOamxAMVKPCE4MxygYnVuiBA8Z4QBw5wDLWFi4rVKlLXJuaCsrMkoebH3blz3vdc-yLX1lW4a1equ91JARgiITETy-Z0kByYYEySCZ3eCeBIpSgkfnIs9WrnOe6eN3Di7Vm4rMcghAnLoqRx6KvcRkBmROA4ZIyCHCEgiQRZLmcXKKHl6eLkv17r-Kzv0PALPDoDylWqMU21l_ZGbEDaJQRkl7_fUT9vo7X9_6R8_2u2jL937bGzx7dGn3DeZc8KZ_PJhLum7efGxyEEy8htUmeRD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859344379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Strackee, Simon D. ; Kroon, Frans H. M. ; Bos, Kurt E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strackee, Simon D. ; Kroon, Frans H. M. ; Bos, Kurt E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Bone staples made of a nickel titanium alloy exert dynamic compression, require little dissection, and may provide an alternative to conventional fixation in mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft.
Methods
To evaluate its stability relative to conventional methods of fixation with interosseous wires or miniplates, an in vitro model using beech dowels was developed. Torsional stiffness and strength and compression stiffness and strength were examined.
Results
The compression test results showed that maximum strength of interosseous wires is significantly less than memory staples, which in turn are significantly weaker than titanium miniplates. Miniplates are significantly the most rigid form of fixation. Torsional testing showed no significant difference in strength between staples and miniplates and only a marginal difference in elasticity. Interosseous wires show a rapid decrease of strength and rigidity during torsional stress.
Conclusion
When considering interosseous wires the least and miniplates the most stable form of fixation by which bone healing can occur, memory staples can provide enough stability to ensure consolidation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 1–7, 2001.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1<1::AID-HED1>3.0.CO;2-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11150064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; interosseous ; mandibular reconstruction ; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Medical sciences ; memory staples ; miniplates ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; surgical flaps</subject><ispartof>Head & neck, 2001-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-e49057363d190a5b18312f700c5d6f399765350517704b08fc47c9bdf67945bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1097-0347%28200101%2923%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-HED1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1097-0347%28200101%2923%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-HED1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=835800$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11150064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strackee, Simon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Frans H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Kurt E.</creatorcontrib><title>Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis</title><title>Head & neck</title><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><description>Background
Bone staples made of a nickel titanium alloy exert dynamic compression, require little dissection, and may provide an alternative to conventional fixation in mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft.
Methods
To evaluate its stability relative to conventional methods of fixation with interosseous wires or miniplates, an in vitro model using beech dowels was developed. Torsional stiffness and strength and compression stiffness and strength were examined.
Results
The compression test results showed that maximum strength of interosseous wires is significantly less than memory staples, which in turn are significantly weaker than titanium miniplates. Miniplates are significantly the most rigid form of fixation. Torsional testing showed no significant difference in strength between staples and miniplates and only a marginal difference in elasticity. Interosseous wires show a rapid decrease of strength and rigidity during torsional stress.
Conclusion
When considering interosseous wires the least and miniplates the most stable form of fixation by which bone healing can occur, memory staples can provide enough stability to ensure consolidation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 1–7, 2001.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>interosseous</subject><subject>mandibular reconstruction</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>memory staples</subject><subject>miniplates</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>surgical flaps</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkt9u0zAUhyMEYqPwCsgSEoyLlOPYjuuCkKps6yYK5QLEpeUkdmdIk2I7sL4LD4vTlnKDJuQL_zmfP1s6vyShGMYYIHuFQfAUCOVnGQAG_DIjU_wGT6ez6_P06uIcvyVjGBfL11ma3UtOj_j9YU1JSoDTk-SR918BgOQ0e5icYIwZQE5Pk1-X9lYF27VorcNNV3tk41K1tS37RjnkdNW1Pri-2kG9t-0KmV0RrZwywU_RDFXdeqNc9PzQyIe-3kZL6FC40VHQ_Dl3ul2FG9SZWHBao9oao-NhQGG70X4odD7ozm_beNNb_zh5YFTj9ZPDPEo-X158Kq7SxXJ-XcwWaUU5x6mmAhgnOamxAMVKPCE4MxygYnVuiBA8Z4QBw5wDLWFi4rVKlLXJuaCsrMkoebH3blz3vdc-yLX1lW4a1equ91JARgiITETy-Z0kByYYEySCZ3eCeBIpSgkfnIs9WrnOe6eN3Di7Vm4rMcghAnLoqRx6KvcRkBmROA4ZIyCHCEgiQRZLmcXKKHl6eLkv17r-Kzv0PALPDoDylWqMU21l_ZGbEDaJQRkl7_fUT9vo7X9_6R8_2u2jL937bGzx7dGn3DeZc8KZ_PJhLum7efGxyEEy8htUmeRD</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Strackee, Simon D.</creator><creator>Kroon, Frans H. M.</creator><creator>Bos, Kurt E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis</title><author>Strackee, Simon D. ; Kroon, Frans H. M. ; Bos, Kurt E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-e49057363d190a5b18312f700c5d6f399765350517704b08fc47c9bdf67945bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>interosseous</topic><topic>mandibular reconstruction</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>memory staples</topic><topic>miniplates</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>surgical flaps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strackee, Simon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroon, Frans H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Kurt E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strackee, Simon D.</au><au>Kroon, Frans H. M.</au><au>Bos, Kurt E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Background
Bone staples made of a nickel titanium alloy exert dynamic compression, require little dissection, and may provide an alternative to conventional fixation in mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula graft.
Methods
To evaluate its stability relative to conventional methods of fixation with interosseous wires or miniplates, an in vitro model using beech dowels was developed. Torsional stiffness and strength and compression stiffness and strength were examined.
Results
The compression test results showed that maximum strength of interosseous wires is significantly less than memory staples, which in turn are significantly weaker than titanium miniplates. Miniplates are significantly the most rigid form of fixation. Torsional testing showed no significant difference in strength between staples and miniplates and only a marginal difference in elasticity. Interosseous wires show a rapid decrease of strength and rigidity during torsional stress.
Conclusion
When considering interosseous wires the least and miniplates the most stable form of fixation by which bone healing can occur, memory staples can provide enough stability to ensure consolidation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Head Neck 23: 1–7, 2001.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11150064</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1<1::AID-HED1>3.0.CO;2-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1043-3074 |
| ispartof | Head & neck, 2001-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-7 |
| issn | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902330929 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics interosseous mandibular reconstruction Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Medical sciences memory staples miniplates Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases surgical flaps |
| title | Fixation methods in mandibular reconstruction using fibula grafts: A comparative study into the relative strength of three different types of osteosynthesis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A14%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fixation%20methods%20in%20mandibular%20reconstruction%20using%20fibula%20grafts:%20A%20comparative%20study%20into%20the%20relative%20strength%20of%20three%20different%20types%20of%20osteosynthesis&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=Strackee,%20Simon%20D.&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0347(200101)23:1%3C1::AID-HED1%3E3.0.CO;2-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859344379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859344379&rft_id=info:pmid/11150064&rfr_iscdi=true |